Erosive toe-web intertrigo: Clinical features and management.

BACKGROUND: Toe-web (TW) intertrigo is a common disease of fungal or bacterial origin. Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) TW intertrigo consists of weeping, erosive, painful lesions that may be recurrent, leading to functional disability. Eczema is often associated with this condition. The management of intertrigo is poorly codified. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a standardized treatment plan using topical steroids in relation to the course and the frequency of recurrence of GNB-TW intertrigo. METHODS: We conducted a prospective open interventional multicentre study from June 2020 to June 2021. Standardised treatment using TCS together with follow-up via phone calls were performed over a 6-month period. In addition, a retrospective historical monocentric study was performed for patients with suspected TW-GNB intertrigo treated without standardized management. The primary endpoint was disease duration. We performed a Wilcoxon test to compare the median duration of GNB-TW intertrigo in both series. RESULTS: We included 13 patients in the prospective cohort and 14 in the retrospective cohort. In both cohorts, most patients were male with a median age of 59 years. The most frequent signs were fissures and exudates. Eczema was often associated (51.8%). Identified risk factors were psoriasis, local humidity, fungal intertrigo, vascular disease (arterial or venous insufficiency), and a history of multiple local treatments prior to diagnosis. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the predominant pathogen (48.1%). Median durations of TW-GNB intertrigo were 56 days and 61 days. There was no significant difference in the median duration of the disease between the prospective and the retrospective cohorts (respectively61 days and 56 days; p > 0.58). Relapses were more frequent in the retrospective cohort (respectively 7.7% and 21.4%). CONCLUSION: GNB-TW intertrigo is a difficult-to-treat disease often associated with eczema. While topical corticosteroids (TCS) seem to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment they do not appear to reduce disease duration compared to other treatments.

Real-world multicentre cohort of first-line pembrolizumab alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer PD-L1 ≥ 50.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab alone (IO-mono) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT-IO) is first-line standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%. This retrospective multicentre study assessed real-world use and efficacy of both strategies. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50% from eight hospitals who had received at least one cycle of IO-mono or CT-IO were included. Overall survival (OS) and real-word progression-free-survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and a Cox model with inverse propensity treatment weighting was carried out. RESULTS: Among the 243 patients included, 141 (58%) received IO-mono and 102 (42%) CT-IO. Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (95% CI 10.4-13.3), median OS was not reached, but no difference was observed between groups (p = 0.51). Early deaths at 12 weeks were 11% (95% CI 4.6-16.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 9.0-20.9) in CT-IO and IO groups (p = 0.32). After adjustment for age, gender, performance status, histology, brain metastases, liver metastases and tobacco status, no statistically significant difference was found for OS between groups, neither in the multivariate adjusted model [HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.61-1.86), p = 0.8] nor in propensity adjusted analysis [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.60-1.65), p = 0.99]. Male gender (HR 2.01, p = 0.01) and PS ≥ 2 (HR 3.28, p < 0.001) were found to be negative independent predictive factors for OS. CONCLUSION: Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. However, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line does not appear to impact survival outcomes, even regarding early deaths.