Prophylactic gastrostomy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: results of a national survey among radiation oncologists.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional complications in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC) treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) often lead to placement of a prophylactic gastrostomy (PG) tube, while indication lacks harmonization. Our aim was to explore the current PG tube utilization among Belgian radiation oncology centers. METHODS: A survey was distributed to all 24 Belgian Radiation oncology departments, with questions about the number of patient treated per year, whether the PG indication is discussed at the multidisciplinary board, placement technique, time of starting nutrition and removal, its impact on swallowing function and importance of clinical factors. For the latter Relative Importance and Discordance Indexes were calculated to describe the ranking and agreement. RESULTS: All 24 centers submitted the questionnaire. Twenty three treat more than 20 head and neck (HNC) patients per year, while four (1 in 21-50; 3 in 51-100) are not discussing the gastrostomy tube indication at the multidisciplinary board. For the latter, endoscopic placement (68%) is the dominant technique, followed by the radiologic (16%) and laparoscopic (16%) methods. Seventy-five percent start the enteral nutrition when clinically indicated, 17% immediately and 8% from the start of radiotherapy. Majority of specialists (19/24) keep the gastrostomy tube until the patient assume an adequate oral feeding. Fifteen centres are considering PG decrease swallowing function. Regarding factors and their importance in the decision for the PG, foreseen irradiated volume reached highest importance, followed by 'anatomical site', 'patients' choice' and 'postoperative versus definitive' and 'local expertise', with decreasing importance respectively. Disagreement indexes showed moderate variation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a PG tube for LAHNC patients treated by CCRT shows disparity at national level. Prospective studies are needed to ensure proper indication of this supportive measure.

Stereotactic robotic body radiotherapy for patients with oligorecurrent pulmonary metastases.

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to report treatment efficacy and toxicity of patients treated by robotic (Cyberknife®) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligorecurrent lung metastases (ORLM). Additionally we wanted to evaluate influence of tumor, patient and treatment related parameters on local control (LC), lung and distant progression free- (lung PFS/Di-PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Consecutive patients with up to 5 ORLM (confirmed by FDG PET/CT) were included in this study. Intended dose was 60Gy in 3 fractions (prescribed to the 80% isodose volume). Patients were followed at regular intervals and tumor control and toxicity was prospectively scored. Tumor, patient and treatment data were analysed using competing risk- and Cox regression. RESULTS: Between May 2010 and March 2016, 104 patients with 132 lesions were irradiated from primary lung carcinoma (47%), gastro-intestinal (34%) and mixed primary histologies (19%). The mean tumor volume was 7.9 cc. After a median follow up of 22 months, the 1, 2 and 3 year LC rate (per lesion) was 89.3, 80.0 and 77.8% respectively. The corresponding (per patient) 1, 2 and 3 years lung PFS were 66.3, 50.0, 42.6%, Di-PFS were 80.5, 64.4, 60.6% and OS rates were 92.2, 80.9 and 72.0% respectively. On univariable analysis, gastro-intestinal (GI) as primary tumor site showed a significant superior local control versus the other primary tumor sites. For OS, significant variables were primary histology and primary tumor site with a superior OS for patients with metastases of primary GI origin. LC was significantly affected by the tumor volume, physical and biologically effective dose coverage. Significant variables in multivariable analysis were BED prescription dose for LC and GI as primary site for OS. The vast majority of patients developed no toxicity or grade 1 acute and late toxicity. Acute and late grade 3 radiation pneumonitis (RP) was observed in 1 and 2 patients respectively. One patient with a centrally located lesion developed grade 4 RP and died due to possible RT-induced pulmonary hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is a highly effective local therapy for oligorecurrent lung metastases and could achieve long term survival in patients with favourable prognostic features.

Clinical Outcomes of 130 Patients with Primary and Secondary Lung Tumors treated with Cyberknife Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Authors report clinical outcomes of patients treated with robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary, recurrent and metastatic lung lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 130 patients with 160 lesions were treated with Cyberknife SBRT, including T1-3 primary lung cancers (54%), recurrent tumors (22%) and pulmonary metastases (24%). The mean biologically equivalent dose (BED10Gy) was 151 Gy (72-180 Gy). Median prescribed dose for peripheral and central lesions was 3×20 Gy and 3×15 Gy, respectively. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and cause-specific survival (CSS) rates, early and late toxicities are reported. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing local tumor control. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 21 months. In univariate analysis, higher dose was associated with better LC and a cut-off value was detected at BED10Gy ≤ 112.5 Gy, resulting in 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial LC rates of 93%, vs 73%, 80% vs 61%, and 63% vs 54%, for the high and low dose groups, respectively (p = 0.0061, HR = 0.384). In multivariate analysis, metastatic origin, histological confirmation and larger Planning Target Volume (PTV) were associated with higher risk of local failure. Actuarial OS and CSS rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 85%, 74% and 62%, and 93%, 89% and 80%, respectively. Acute and late toxicities ≥ Gr 3 were observed in 3 (2%) and 6 patients (5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our favorable LC and survival rates after robotic SBRT, with low rates of severe toxicities, are coherent with the literature data in this mixed, non-selected study population.

Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based setup accuracy and margins for prone and supine whole breast irradiation (WBI). METHODS: Setup accuracy was evaluated on 3559 CBCT scans of 242 patients treated with WBI and uncertainty margins were calculated using the van Herk formula. Uni- and multivariate analysis on individual margins was performed for age, body mass index (BMI) and cup size. RESULTS: The population-based margin in vertical (VE), lateral (LA) and longitudinal (LO) directions was 10.4/9.4/9.4 mm for the 103 supine and 10.5/22.4/13.7 mm for the 139 prone treated patients, being significantly (p < 0.01) different for the LA and LO directions. Multivariate analysis identified a significant (p < 0.05) correlation between BMI and the LO margin in supine position and the VE/LA margin in prone position. CONCLUSION: In this series, setup accuracy is significantly worse in prone compared to supine position for the LA and LO directions. However, without proper image-guidance, uncertainty margins of about 1 cm are also necessary for supine WBI. For patients with a higher BMI, larger margins are required.

Clinical efficacy and toxicity of radio-chemotherapy and magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer patients: A mono-institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of radio-chemotherapy (RCT) and MR-guided pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2014 85 patients with FIGO stage 1B1 N+ or ≥ 1B2 cervical cancer were treated with RCT+ IGABT. The treatment consisted of a pelvic± paraaortic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (45-50.4 Gy ± 10 Gy boost to primary tumor and/or to pathologic lymph nodes) with concurrent cisplatin followed by 25-35 Gy of PDR IGABT in 30-50 pulses. The ratio of 3D-CFRT/IMRT was 61/24 patients. Dose-volume parameters of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV) and D2cm(3) organs at risk (OARs) were reported. Local control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CCS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed actuarially and morbidity crude rates were scored using CTCAEv4.0. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 36 months (range 6-94). The mean D90 and D98 for HR-CTV was 84.4 ± 9 Gy and 77 ± 8.1 Gy, while for IR-CTV was 69.1 ± 4.3 Gy and 64.8 ± 4.3 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cm(3) for OARs was the following: bladder: 77.3 ± 10.5 Gy, rectum: 65 ± 6.8 Gy, sigmoid: 63 ± 7.9 Gy and intestine: 64.0 ± 9.1 Gy. Three year LC, CSS and OS were: 94%, 85% and 81%. The three-year regional- and distant control rates were 95% and 74%. Node negative patients had significantly higher three-year CSS (100 vs. 72%, p = 0.016) and OS (92 vs. 72%, p = 0.001) compared to node positive ones. Three-year actuarial late Grade ≥ 3 morbidity was the following: GI: 8%, GU: 5%, Vaginal: 8%. The frequency of Grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities including anemia/leukopenia/neutropenia/thrombocytopenia were 8.6%/34.7%/24.3%/24.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This large mono-institutional experience builds up further evidences that IGABT in conjunction with RCT should be the standard of care for patients suffering LACC.

Adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, can we predict when and for whom?

BACKGROUND: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) could be a tool to reduce toxicity and to facilitate dose escalation in stage III NSCLC. Our aim was to identify the most appropriate time and potential benefit of ART. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed volume reduction and dosimetric consequences of 41 patients who were treated with concurrent (cCRT) (n = 21) or sequential (sCRT) chemoradiotherapy to a median dose of 70 Gy, 2 Gy/F. At every treatment fraction a cone-beam CT (CBCT) was performed. The gross tumor volume (GTV-T) was adapted (exclusion of lymph nodes) to create the GTV-T-F1. Every fifth fraction (F5-F30), the GTV-T-F1 was adapted on the CBCT to create a GTV-T-Fx. Dose volume histograms were recalculated for every GTV-T-Fx, enabling to create lookup tables to predict the theoretical dosimetric advantage on common lung dose constraints. RESULTS: The average GTV reduction was 42.1% (range 4.0-69.3%); 50.1% and 33.7% for the cCRT and sCRT patients, respectively. A linear relationship between GTV-T-F1 volume and absolute volume decrease was found for both groups. The mean V5, V20, V30 and mean lung dose increased by 0.8, 3.1, 5.2 and 3.4%, respectively. A larger increase (p < 0.05) was observed for peripheral tumors and cCRT. Lookup tables were generated. CONCLUSION: ART offers the most beneficial dosimetric effects when performed around fraction 15, especially for patients with a large initial GTV-T treated by cCRT.

Impact of consensus guidelines on delineation of primary tumor clinical target volume (CTVp) for head and neck cancer: Results of a national review project.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A significant interobserver variability (IOV) for clinical target volume of the primary tumor (CTVp) delineation was shown in a previous national review project. Since then, international expert consensus guidelines (CG) for the delineation of CTVp were published. The aim of this follow-up study was to 1) objectify the extent of implementation of the CG, 2) assess its impact on delineation quality and consistency, 3) identify any remaining ambiguities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All Belgian RT departments were invited to complete an online survey and submit CTVp for 5 reference cases. Organs at risk and GTV of the primary tumor were predefined. Margins, volumes, IOV between all participating centers (IOVall) and IOV compared to a reference consensus delineation (IOVref) were calculated and compared to the previous analysis. A qualitative analysis was performed assessing the correct interpretation of the CG for each case. RESULTS: 17 RT centers completed both survey and delineations, of which 88% had implemented CG. Median DSCref for CTVp_total was 0.80-0.92. IOVall and IOVref improved significantly for the centers following CG (p = 0.005). IOVref for CTVp_high was small with a DSC higher than 0.90 for all cases. A significant volume decrease for the CTVp receiving 70 Gy was observed. Interpretation of CG was more accurate for (supra)glottic carcinoma. 60% of the radiation oncologists thinks clarification of CG is indicated. CONCLUSION: Implementation of consensus guidelines for CTVp delineation is already fairly advanced on a national level, resulting in significantly increased delineation uniformity. The accompanying substantial decrease of CTV receiving high dose RT calls for caution and correct interpretation of CG. Clarification of the existing guidelines seems appropriate especially for oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Results of a multicenter 4D computed tomography quality assurance audit: Evaluating image accuracy and consistency.

Background and purpose: 4D Computed Tomography (4DCT) technology captures the location and movement of tumors and nearby organs at risk over time. In this study, a multi-institutional multi-vendor 4DCT audit was initiated to assess the accuracy of current imaging protocols. Materials and methods: Twelve centers, including thirteen scanners performed a 4DCT acquisition of a dynamic thorax phantom using the institution's own protocol with the in-house breathing monitoring system. Five regular and three irregular breathing patterns were used. Image acquisition and reconstruction were followed by automated image analysis with our in-house developed 4DCT QA program (QAMotion). CT number accuracy, volume deviation, amplitude deviation, and spatial integrity were assessed per pattern using both the segmented volumes and line profiles. Results: Regular breathing curves showed relatively accurate results across all institutions, with mean volume and CT number deviations and median amplitude deviation below 2%, 5 HU and 2 mm, respectively. Results obtained for irregular patterns showed more variation across the institutions. Volume and CT number deviations co-occurred with a blurring of the sphere, interpolation, or double-structure artifacts that were confirmed through the line profiles. For some of the irregular patterns, amplitude deviations up to 6 mm were observed. Maximum Intensity Projection (MaxIP) correctly captured the applied motion amplitude with deviations across all institutions within 2 mm except for double amplitude pattern. Conclusions: All centers invited to participate in the audit responded positively, highlighting the need for a comprehensive yet easy-to-execute 4DCT quality assurance program. The largest variances between the results from one institution to another confirmed that a standardized 4DCT audit is warranted.

A comprehensive quality assurance program for four-dimensional computed tomography in radiotherapy.

This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive, reproducible and automatic 4DCT Quality Assurance (QA) workflow (QAMotion) that evaluates image accuracy across various regular and irregular breathing patterns. Volume and amplitude deviations, CT number accuracy, and spatial integrity were used as evaluation metrics. For repeatability tests, tolerances were respected with a mean CT number deviation < 10 HU, volume deviation < 2% and diameter and amplitude deviation < 2 mm except for irregular amplitude curves for which an amplitude deviation up to 6 mm was measured. QAMotion was able to flag image artefacts for our clinical 4DCT system.

Pancreatic SABR using peritumoral fiducials, triggered imaging and breath-hold.

Background: We aim to present our linear accelerator-based workflow for pancreatic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in order to address the following issues: intrafractional organ motion management, Cone Beam CT (CBCT) image quality, residual errors with dosimetric consequences, treatment time, and clinical results. Methods: Between 2016 and 2021, 14 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy and SABR using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Internal target volume (ITV) concept (5), phase-gated (4), or breath hold (5) techniques were used. Treatment was verified by CBCT before and after irradiation, while tumor motion was monitored and controlled by kV triggered imaging and beam hold using peritumoral surgical clips. Beam interruptions and treatment time were recorded. The CBCT image quality was scored and supplemented by an agreement analysis (Krippendorff's-α) of breath-hold CBCT images to determine the position of OARs relative to the planning risk volumes (PRV). Residual errors and their dosimetry impact were also calculated. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier analysis with acute and late toxicity reporting (CTCAEv4). Results: On average, beams were interrupted once (range: 0-3) per treatment session on triggered imaging. The total median treatment time was 16.7 ± 10.8 min, significantly less for breath-hold vs. phase-gated sessions (18.8 ± 6.2 vs. 26.5 ± 13.4, p < 0.001). The best image quality was achieved by breath hold CBCT. The Krippendorff's-α test showed a strong agreement among five radiation therapists (mean K-α value: 0.8 (97.5%). The mean residual errors were <0.2 cm in each direction resulting in an average difference of <2% in dosimetry for OAR and target volume. Two patients received offline adaptation. The median OS/PFS after induction chemotherapy and SABR was 20/12 months and 15/8 months. No Gr. ≥2 acute/late RT-related toxicity was noted. Conclusion: Linear accelerator based pancreatic SABR with the combination of CBCT and triggered imaging + beam hold is feasible. Peritumoral fiducials improve utility while breath-hold CBCT provides the best image quality at a reasonable treatment time with offline adaptation possibilities. In well-selected cases, it can be an effective alternative in clinics where CBCT/MRI-guided online adaptive workflow is not available.

Radiomics software comparison using digital phantom and patient data: IBSI-compliance does not guarantee concordance of feature values.

INTRODUCTION: Radiomics is a promising imaging-based tool which could enhance clinical observation and identify representative features. To avoid different interpretations, the Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative (IBSI) imposed conditions for harmonisation. This study evaluates IBSI-compliant radiomics applications against a known benchmark and clinical datasets for agreements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three radiomics platforms compared were RadiomiX Research Toolbox, LIFEx v7.0.0, and syngo.via Frontier Radiomics v1.2.5 (based on PyRadiomics v2.1). Basic assessment included comparing feature names and their formulas. The IBSI digital phantom was used for evaluation against reference values. For agreement evaluation (including same software but different versions), two clinical datasets were used: 27 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of colorectal liver metastases and 39 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of breast cancer, including intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, lower 95% confidence interval) was used, with 0.9 as the threshold for excellent agreement. RESULTS: The three radiomics applications share 41 (3 shape, 8 intensity, 30 texture) out of 172, 84 and 110 features for RadiomiX, LIFEx and syngo.via, respectively, as well as wavelet filtering. The naming convention is, however, different between them. Syngo.via had excellent agreement with the IBSI benchmark, while LIFEx and RadiomiX showed slightly worse agreement. Excellent reproducibility was achieved for shape features only, while intensity and texture features varied considerably with the imaging type. For intensity, excellent agreement ranged from 46% for the DCE maps to 100% for CECT, while this lowered to 44% and 73% for texture features, respectively. Wavelet features produced the greatest variation between applications, with an excellent agreement for only 3% to 11% features. CONCLUSION: Even with IBSI-compliance, the reproducibility of features between radiomics applications is not guaranteed. To evaluate variation, quality assurance of radiomics applications should be performed and repeated when updating to a new version or adding a new modality.

Pre-trial quality assurance of diffusion-weighted MRI for radiomic analysis and the role of harmonisation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to perform a quantitative quality assurance of diffusion-weighted MRI to assess the variability of the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and other radiomic features across the scanners involved in the REGINA trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NIST/QIBA diffusion phantom was acquired on six 3 T scanners from five centres with a rectum-specific diffusion protocol. All sequences were repeated in each scan session without moving the phantom from the table. Linear interpolation to two isotropic voxel spacing (0.9 and 4 mm) was performed as well as the ComBat feature harmonisation method between scanners. The absolute accuracy error was evaluated for the mean ADC. Repeatability and reproducibility within-subject coefficients of variation (wCV) were computed for 142 radiomic features. RESULTS: For the mean ADC, accuracy error ranged between 0.1 % and 8.5 %, repeatability was <1 % and reproducibility was <3 % for diffusivity range between 0.4 and 1.1x10-3mm2/s. For the other radiomic features, wCV was below 10 % for 24 % and 15 % features for repeatability with resampling 0.9 mm and 4 mm, respectively, and 13 % and 11 % feature for reproducibility. ComBat method could improve significantly the wCV compared to reproducibility without ComBat (p-value < 0.001) but variation was still high for most of the features. CONCLUSION: Our study provided the first investigation of feature selection for development of robust predictive models in the REGINA trial, demonstrating the added value of such a quality assurance process to select conventional and radiomic features in prospective multicentre trials.

Patient-reported outcomes in terms of swallowing and quality of life after prophylactic versus reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in advanced oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy: Swall PEG study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is often used to provide nutritional support in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients undergoing multimodality treatment. However, there is little published data on the impact of prophylactic versus reactive PEG. PEG placement may affect swallowing-related physiology, function, and quality of life. The Swall PEG study is a randomized controlled phase III trial testing the impact of prophylactic versus reactive PEG on patient-reported outcomes in terms of swallowing and quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer receiving chemo-radiotherapy will be randomized to either the prophylactic or reactive PEG tube group. Randomization will be stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status and unilateral versus bilateral positive neck lymph nodes. The primary objective of the study is the patient's reported outcome in terms of swallowing (MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)) at 6 months. Secondary objectives include health-related quality of life, dosimetric parameters associated with patient-reported outcomes, chemo-radiation toxicities, PEG tube placement complications, the impact of nutritional status on survival and toxicity outcomes, loco-regional control, overall survival, the impact of HPV and tobacco smoking on survival outcomes and toxicities, and the cost-effectiveness of each treatment strategy. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will enhance clinical evidence regarding nutritional management in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated by concurrent chemo-radiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04019548, study protocol version 2.0_08/08/2019. Registered on 15 July 2019.

[Conformal stereotactic radiosurgery therapy: plan evaluation methods and results]. / Konformális sztereotaxiás együléses sugársebészeti kezelés: tervértékelési módszerek és eredmények.

The purpose of our study was the objective evaluation of micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans. Forty-seven patients, 71 lesions received static beam conformal stereotactic radiosurgery treatment in our institute between November 2005 and June 2008. Target volume and organs at risk were outlined on a MRI-CT image fusion basis. BrainSCAN 5.31 system (BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany) was used for treatment planning, Elekta Presice TS linear accelerator (Elekta Oncology Systems Ltd, Crawley, UK) and BrainLAB m3 mMLC were used for treatment delivery. An invasive head frame, mounted to the treatment table, was used with four screws for patient head fixation. Treatment plans were analysed with objective parameters, such as conformal index (COIN), homogeneity index (HI), coverage index (CI) and healthy tissue relative overdose factor (HTOF) tools. x2 tests were performed between COIN, HI and the geometrical parameters of the target volume (lesion volume - LV, lesion-organ distance - LOD, lesion deformity index - LDI). Mean value of COIN, HI, HTOF and CI was 0.52 (SD 0.13), 1.16 (SD 0.1), 0.88 (SD 0.53), and 0.94 (SD 0.11), respectively. COIN significantly correlated with (p<0.001 in all three cases), while HI was independent of LV, LOD, LDI (p=0.94; 0.14 and 0.72). COIN is similar, HTOF is less than data from the literature. According to our results geometrical parameters of the target volume (size, location, deformation) significantly influence the COIN, but they have no effect on HI.

[Modern three-dimensional conformal craniospinal radiotherapy]. / Modern három dimenziós konformális craniospinalis besugárzási technika.

The main problem of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is the matching of the fields. The use of a suitable technique is very important because matching of the fields is necessary to use for the optimal cancer irradiation of the long planning target volume (PTV). Since 2007, 8 patients have received CT-based, 3D-planned conformal CSI in our Institute. Patient immobilization was made in prone position in a vacuum bed, using skull and pelvis masks. Organ-at-risk (OAR) contours were made by radiographers. PTV was contoured by radiation oncologists. The prescribed dose to the PTV was 36 Gy with 1.8 Gy dose per fraction. In the planning process the following aspects were taken under consideration: all points of the PTV had to receive at least 95% of the prescribed dose (according to ICRU 50, 62); at junction field edges the overlapping parts were eliminated using a multisegmental technique, where the adjacent segment ends of the neighbouring fields were shifted two times 2 cm, so that the three equally weighted segments used in one field had 2-2 cm distance from each other. In the CSI planning the shape of the patient and so the length of the PTV has made a big emphasis on determining the number of field matching. Thus in some cases instead of two, only one field matching was sufficient - this could be achieved by increasing the source-to-skin distance (SSD) of the fields. The verification made with a solid-water phantom justified the precision of the field matching. The offset used at junction field edges in between one treatment facilitates the verification of field matching - and so the patient positioning. Thus the possibility of having overdosed regions could be reduced, which was very important from a radiation biological point of view.

Improving generalization in MR-to-CT synthesis in radiotherapy by using an augmented cycle generative adversarial network with unpaired data.

PURPOSE: MR-to-CT synthesis is one of the first steps in the establishment of an MRI-only workflow in radiotherapy. Current MR-to-CT synthesis methods in deep learning use unpaired MR and CT training images with a cycle generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) to minimize the effect of misalignment between paired images. However, this approach critically assumes that the underlying interdomain mapping is approximately deterministic and one-to-one. In the current study, we use an Augmented CycleGAN (AugCGAN) model to create a robust model that can be applied to different scanners and sequences using unpaired data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included T2-weighted MR and CT pelvic images of 38 patients in treatment position from five different centers. The AugCGAN was trained on 2D transverse slices of 19 patients from three different sites. The network was then used to generate synthetic CT (sCT) images of 19 patients from the two other sites. Mean absolute errors (MAEs) for each patient were evaluated between real and synthetic CT images. Original treatment plans of nine patients were recalculated using sCT images to assess the dose distribution in terms of voxel-wise dose difference, gamma, and dose-volume histogram analysis. RESULTS: The mean MAEs were 59.8 Hounsfield units ( HU ) and 65.8 HU for the first and second test sites, respectively. The maximum dose difference to the target was 1.2 % with a gamma pass rate using the 3%, 3 mm criteria above 99%. The average time required to generate a complete sCT image for a patient on our GPU was 8.5 s. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that our unpaired approach achieves good performance in generalization with respect to sCT image generation.

Monte Carlo as quality control tool of stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to verify the accuracy of treatment plans of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to verify the feasibility of the use of Monte Carlo (MC) as quality control (QC) on a daily basis. MATERIAL/METHODS: Using EGSnrc, a MC model of Agility™ linear accelerator was created. Various measurements (Percentage depth dose (PDD), Profiles and Output factors) were done for different fields sizes from 1x1 up to 40x40 (cm2). An iterative model optimization was performed to achieve adequate parameters of MC simulation. 40 SBRT patient's dosimetry plans were calculated by Monaco™ 3.1.1. CT images, RT-STRUCT and RT-PLAN files from Monaco™ being used as input for Moderato MC code. Finally, dose volume histogram (DVH) and paired t-tests for each contour were used for dosimetry comparison of the Monaco™ and MC. RESULTS: Validation of MC model was successful, as <2% difference comparing to measurements for all field's sizes. The main energy of electron source incident on the target was 5.8 MeV, and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Gaussian electron source were 0.09 and 0.2 (cm) in X and Y directions, respectively. For 40 treatment plan comparisons, the minimum absolute difference of mean dose of planning treatment planning (PTV) was 0.1% while the maximum was 6.3%. The minimum absolute difference of Max dose of PTV was 0.2% while the maximum was 8.1%. CONCLUSION: SBRT treatment plans of Monaco agreed with MC results. It possible to use MC for treatment plans verifications as independent QC tool.