[Pelotherapy and pelotherapy combined with intravenous laser blood irradiation at the sanatorium-resort stage of treatment of patients with psoriasis vulgaris]. / Peloidoterapiya i peloidoterapiya v sochetanii s vnutrivennym lazernym osvechivaniem krovi na sanatorno-kurortnom etape lecheniya bol'nykh vul'garnym psoriazom.

Search of new rational ways to increase the effectiveness of treatment and rehabilitation measures for patients with psoriasis vulgaris continues to be one of the urgent problems in modern clinical dermatology. OBJECTIVE: To carry out a comparative analysis of the impact of different variants of sanatorium-resort treatment (SRT) - pelotherapy and pelotherapy in combination with intravenous laser blood irradiation (ILBI) - on the level of IL-17 and TNF-a, dermatological status, psychoemotional state and quality of life (QL) assessment of patients with psoriasis vulgaris. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A naturalistic comparative study included 120 patients with psoriasis vulgaris, who were undergoing SRT: 57 patients in the pelotherapy group and 63 in the group of pelotherapy in combination with ILBI. The SRT effectiveness was assessed using the PASI index, the HARS and HDRS scales and the DLQI questionnaire. The dynamics of IL-17 and TNF-a plasma levels in blood plasma was studied. The study duration was 6 months 14 days. RESULTS: After 14 days of SRT, a decrease in IL-17 and TNF-a levels in blood plasma was statistically significant both in the pelotherapy group and in the group of pelotherapy in combination with ILBI, no statistically significant differences between the groups were found. Furthermore, the comprehensive use of pelotherapy in combination with ILBI has contributed to a more pronounced statistically significant decrease in the PASI index, the HARS and HDRS scales' total scores and an increase in the level of QL. The number of patients with clinical remission was statistically higher in the group of pelotherapy combined with ILBI compared to the pelotherapy group (87.3% versus 42.1%) six months after SRT. CONCLUSION: The advantage of comprehensive application of pelotherapy and ILBI in comparison with pelotherapy in patients with psoriasis vulgaris in SRT has been shown. The comprehensive application of pelotherapy and ILBI reduces the level of inflammatory biomarkers, improves dermatological and psychoemotional status, improves QL and is well tolerated by patients.

[Comparison of balneotherapy and balneotherapy combined with magnetic-laser therapy at a sanatorium-resort stage of treatment of patients with eczema]. / Sravnenie bal'neoterapii i bal'neoterapii v sochetanii s magnitolazernoi terapiei na sanatorno-kurortnom etape lecheniya bol'nykh s istinnoi ekzemoi.

The search for new rational ways to improve the effectiveness of treatment and rehabilitation measures of patients with true eczema continues to be one of the pressing issues in modern clinical dermatology. OBJECTIVE: The comparative analysis of influence of different variants of SCL: balneotherapy and balneotherapy combined with magnetic laser therapy on the dermatological status, IL-4 and IL-13 level, psycho-emotional state and QOL evaluation in patients with true eczema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 112 patients with true eczema undergoing spa treatment (SCR) (54 in the balneotherapy group and 58 in the balneotherapy group combined with magnetic laser therapy. The effectiveness of SCR was assessed using the EASI, HARS and MADRS scales, and the DLQI questionnaire. The dynamics of IL-4 and IL-13 plasma levels were studied. The duration of the study was 6 months and 14 days. RESULTS: After 14 days of SCR, a statistically significant reduction of the EASI index was more pronounced in the balneotherapy group in combination with MLT compared to the balneotherapy group (p=0.041). Balneotherapy combined with MLT contributed to a statistically significant reduction in the HARS and HDRS scores. The decrease in IL-4 and IL-13 levels was statistically more significant in the balneotherapy group in combination with MLT. The combined use of balneotherapy and MLT in comparison with the balneotherapy group was accompanied by a more pronounced improvement in QOL. The combined use of balneotherapy and MLT in the follow-up phase showed a long-term positive effect: 6 months after completing SCR, the number of patients who had clinical remission was statistically significantly higher than that of the balneotherapy group (87.4% vs 22.5%). CONCLUSION: The combined use of balneotherapy and MLT compared with balneotherapy in patients with true eczema on SCR was shown to be advantageous. The complex application of balneotherapy and MLT decreases inflammatory biomarker scores, improves dermatological and psychoemotional status, QOL parameters and is well tolerated.