RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospital emergency departments (EDs) are confronted with managing dental emergencies of both traumatic and non-traumatic origin. However, the literature suggests inadequate knowledge of the management of traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) among medical professionals. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes regarding management of TDIs among Istanbul ED physicians. METHODS: Surveys were distributed to emergency departments (ED) directors and their physicians. The survey contained questions about their characteristics and tested their knowledge of managing dental trauma. RESULTS: A total of 126 surveys (13 ED directors and 113 physicians) were returned and included in the analysis. ED physician's knowledge of the appropriate management of crown fractures and avulsion was generally good (p=0.221), but poor for luxation injuries (p=0.0001). Physicians were more likely to have a better knowledge about permanent teeth than about primary teeth (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: Education, monitoring, improved availability of resources, and disciplinary measures in cases of poor compliance are necessary to improve TDI management in hospitals, especially among physicians.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos , Fraturas dos Dentes/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Médicos/normas , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of dental anomalies in a Turkish population according to the gender and age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using panoramic radiographs of 2025 patients (885 males and 1140 females) ranging in age from 9 to 35 (mean age 25.61±10.04) years attending Department of Oral Radiology, University of Istanbul, Faculty of Dentistry. These patients were examined to determine the presence of developmental dental anomalies involving hypodontia, hyperdontia, microdontia, taurodontism and other root anomalies. The incidence of these anomalies were assessed according to the gender and age. RESULTS: Among the 2025 subjects, a total of 96 individuals (42 males and 54 females) showed at least one of the selected dental anomalies (4.74%). Tooth agenesis was the most common dental abnormality (1.77%) followed by taurodontism (1.18%), hyperdontia (0.79%), microdontia (0.54%) and root anomalies (0.44%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Tooth agenesis is the most common developmental dental anomaly in the studied Turkish population followed by taurodontism.