Significance of extensive hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal smears.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the significance of reporting hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal (CV) smears. STUDY DESIGN: Cases diagnosed with extensive hyperkeratosis (E-HK) and without prior or concurrent history of neoplasia, squamous intraepithelial lesion or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) were retrieved from our files for the period January 1994-August 2001. E-HK is defined in our practice as patches of anucleated squames with irregular, angulated edges present in at least 5 low-power (10 x eyepiece and 10 x objective) fields on a conventional CV smear. On liquid-based preparations, we use 3 low-power fields. Only cases with a follow-up CV smear and/or cervical biopsy (CB) were selected. RESULTS: Among 328 cases of E-HK, 138 patients met the study selection criteria. Eighty-one cases had negative CV smears and/or CB, 17 (12.3%) patients had persistent E-HK, and a subsequent diagnosis of ASCUS or higher was made in 40 patients (28.9%). Among the 40 cases with subsequent abnormalities, 13 (9.4%) were diagnosed with ASCUS, 24 (17.4%) with HPV or dysplasia, and 3 (2.1%) with malignancy. CONCLUSION: While isolated, anucleate squames may have no clinical importance in patient management, E-HK can be a significant marker of underlying neoplastic disease. This should be kept in mind as one decides how to report CV cytology based on 2001 Bethesda System recommendations.

Reclassification of "atypical" diagnoses in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography-guided biliary brushings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of reclassifying "atypical" diagnoses in reporting biliary cytology using strict morphologic criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic specimens from 139 patients (direct, alcohol-fixed smears or cytocentrifuge preparations) were evaluated. Diagnoses were benign (70), atypical (36) and malignant (33). Using strict criteria--major (nuclear contour, chromatin pattern) and minor (polarity, cell types, nuclear size, nuclear grooves, nucleoli, mitosis, nuclear/cytoplasmic [N/C] ratio)--atypical cases were reevaluated and reclassified. Follow-up (F/U) was available on all cases. RESULTS: Atypical cases, (36) were reclassified as malignant (26), atypical favor benign (2)/reactive (3) and atypical, not otherwise specified (NOS) (5). Cases reclassified as malignant showed irregular nuclear contours, chromatin irregularities and rare mitosis. Nuclear enlargement, nucleoli and cellularity varied widely in all groups. N/C ratio was increased in most reclassified malignant cases. All 26 malignant reclassifications correlated with F/U of malignancy. Benign and reactive cases (5) were negative for malignancy on F/U (4), and in 1 case a metastatic carcinoma involving the biliary tree was found. In the 5 atypical (NOS) cases, F/U showed malignancy (3) and pancreatitis (2). Cytocentrifuge preparations made in our laboratory were of superior quality when compared to other methods of cell preparation. CONCLUSION: Irregularities in nuclear membrane and abnormal chromatin pattern were the most consistently useful features correlating with malignancy. The sensitivity and specificity of biliary brush cytology can be enhanced by using strict cytomorphologic criteria and proper collection and fixation, all of which decrease atypical diagnoses.