Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Res Notes ; 16(1): 370, 2023 Dec 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111014

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Roller swabbing of surfaces is an effective way to obtain environmental DNA, but the current DNA extraction method for these samples is equipment heavy, time consuming, and increases potential contamination through multiple handling. Here, we used rollers to swab a dog kennel and compared three DNA extraction approaches (water filtration, roller trimming and direct buffer) using two different platforms (Qiacube, Kingfisher). DNA extraction methods were evaluated based on cost, effort, DNA concentration and PCR result. RESULTS: The roller trim method emerged as the optimal method with the best PCR results, DNA concentration and cost efficiency, while the buffer-based methods were the least labour intensive but produced mediocre PCR results and DNA concentrations. Additionally, the Kingfisher magnetic bead extractions generally ranked higher in all categories over the Qiacube column-based DNA extractions. Ultimately, the ideal DNA extraction method for a particular study is influenced by logistical constraints in the field such as the size of the roller, the availability of cold storage, and time constraints on the project. Our results demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, allowing for informed decision making by researchers.


Assuntos
DNA Ambiental , Animais , Cães , DNA/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Água , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA