Chemoradiotherapy after curative surgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A 20-year single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is a highly malignant tumor with relevant morbidity and mortality. The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for primarily resected tumors remains controversial. We aimed to assess the outcome of patients treated at our institution with postoperative CRT for PAC. METHODS: We present a retrospective case series of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma at a single center in Switzerland. These patients were treated by primary surgery followed by adjuvant CRT between 1995 and 2015. The results were compared with published data. RESULTS: Median follow-up for the 60 patients was 33 months (range 19.9-193.9); median overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing a resection followed by combined CRT was 25.5 months. Overall, disease-free survival (DFS) was 15.2 months. A local recurrence occurred in 14 patients (23.3%) after a median time of 8.8 months, and in 43 patients (71.7%) distant metastasis was demonstrated with a median time to metastasis of 10.6 months. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study represents one of the sole reviews of outcome data after adjuvant CRT in resected PAC in Europe within the past years. OS was comparable to that of other institutional outcome data published previously but inferior when compared to most recent published results with an intense chemotherapy. However, not all patients are suitable to undergo such an intense chemotherapy with modified FOLFIRINOX after the extensive surgery for the PAC - these patients could benefit from adding adjuvant CRT to a less intensive chemotherapy with gemcitabine to enhance the benefit regarding locoregional recurrence-free survival.

How healthcare professionals contribute to hope in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore whether healthcare professionals influence the level of hope in patients with cancer and, if so, how they influence their hope. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative design. SETTING: An adult hematology/oncology unit in the upper midwestern United States. SAMPLE: Thirty-two men and women receiving active or supportive treatment or palliative care for cancer. METHODS: Semistructured interviews conducted in the participants' hospital rooms. Ten investigators and two consultants transcribed and analyzed the interview data using content analysis. They identified themes and subthemes that described healthcare professionals' roles. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Healthcare professionals' contributions to hope as described by patients with cancer. FINDINGS: Healthcare professionals positively and negatively influenced hope in this sample. Hope was facilitated by being present, giving information, and demonstrating caring behaviors. Negative influences on hope primarily concerned the way in which healthcare professionals gave information. CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals do influence patients' perceptions of their hope. Although most nursing actions are hope enhancing, nurses can reduce a patient's sense of hope if information provided or attitude toward the patient is insensitive or disrespectful. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses can increase patients' hope by being present, taking time to talk, and being helpful. They must provide information and answer questions in a compassionate, positive, honest, and respectful manner. Caring behaviors such as thoughtful gestures, showing warmth and genuineness, and being friendly and polite also increase patients' hope.