Effects of 20% albumin infusion therapy during liver transplantation on plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin level: A randomized controlled trial.

The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after liver transplantation was lower in patients with serum albumin levels ≥3.0 mg/dL during surgery. We tested whether intraoperative infusion of 20% albumin affects neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) level, a reliable indicator of AKI. We randomly assigned 134 patients undergoing liver transplantation into albumin group (n=70, 20% albumin 200 mL) and the control group (n=66, crystalloid solution 200 mL). The 2 study fluids were infused at 100 mL/h from the start of the anhepatic phase. The primary outcome was plasma NGAL level at 1 hour after graft reperfusion. Albumin level at the start of graft reperfusion was significantly greater in albumin group than in the control group [2.9 (2.4-3.3) g/dL vs. 2.3 (2.0-2.7) g/dL, p <0.001]. The NGAL level at 1 hour after graft reperfusion was not significantly different between the 2 groups [100.2 (66.7-138.8) ng/mL vs. 92.9 (70.8-120.6) ng/mL, p =0.46], and the AKI risk was not either (63.9% vs. 67.8%, adjusted p =0.73). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding hospital readmission within 30 days/90 days after transplantation (32.6% vs. 41.5%, adjusted p =0.19 and 55.0% vs. 55.7%, adjusted p =0.87). Graft survival probability at 30 days/90 days/1 year after transplantation was 90.0%/84.3%/78.6% in albumin group and 97.0%/90.9%/89.4% in the control group [HR=1.6 (0.6-4.0), adjusted p =0.31]. In conclusion, intraoperative infusion of 20% albumin 200 mL increased the albumin level but failed to maintain serum albumin ≥3.0 mg/dL during surgery. The hypertonic albumin therapy did not significantly affect plasma NGAL level and clinical outcomes including AKI.

Comparison of two doses of intrathecal morphine in laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection is an effective postoperative analgesic strategy in open or laparoscopic donor hepatectomy; however, the optimal dose has not been determined. In this trial, we compared the post-operative analgesic effects of two doses (300 vs. 400 µg) of ITM injections. METHODS: In this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial, 56 donors were divided into either the 300 µg or 400 µg ITM group (n = 28, each). The primary outcome was the resting pain score at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, and side effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were compared up to 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-five donors participated in the entire study. The mean resting pain scores at 24 h after surgery were 1.7 ± 1.6 and 1.7 ± 1.1 in the ITM 300 and ITM 400 groups, respectively (mean difference, 0 [95% CI, -.8 to .7], p = .978). The upper limit of the 95% CI was lower than the prespecified non-inferiority margin (δ = 1), indicating that non-inferiority had been established. The incidence of PONV was lower in the ITM 300 group than in the ITM 400 group at 18 (p = .035) and 24 h postoperatively (p = .015). There were no significant differences in the resting and coughing pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at any time point. CONCLUSION: For laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, preoperative ITM 300 µg exhibited non-inferior postoperative analgesic effects compared to ITM 400 µg, with a lower incidence of PONV.

Contribution of Salvaged Blood Red Blood Cell Transfusion During Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of allogeneic blood products can have adverse effects and profoundly influence postoperative liver transplantation outcomes, including graft survival. To minimize allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, salvaged blood can be used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of salvaged blood to allogeneic RBC transfusion in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. METHODS: Data of 311 adult-to-adult LDLT recipients between January 2015 and April 2019 were analyzed. The primary outcome was a change in requirement for allogeneic RBCs due to the use of salvaged blood. Additionally, predictors of intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion were investigated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three (49.2%) recipients required allogeneic RBC transfusion. If recipients did not receive salvaged blood, 253 (81.4%) recipients would have needed allogeneic RBC transfusion. The total volume of salvaged blood transfused into recipients during surgery was 269,165 mL, which corresponded to 993 units of allogeneic RBCs and accounted for 76.1% of total RBC transfusion volume. Multivariate analysis showed that male recipients, model for end-stage liver disease score, preoperative hemoglobin level, and volume of salvaged blood used during surgery were independent predictors of the need for intraoperative allogenic RBC transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative use of salvaged blood significantly reduced allogeneic RBC transfusion in LDLT recipients. It can help transplant teams manage transfusion of allogeneic RBCs during liver transplantation.

Blood Salvage and Autotransfusion With Single Leukoreduction Does Not Increase the Risk of Tumor Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether autotransfusion of salvaged blood with single leukoreduction is associated with post-transplant tumor recurrence in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have consistently demonstrated the safety of autotransfusion of salvaged and leukoreduced blood during liver transplantation for HCC. However, the effects of this technique remained unknown for advanced HCC. METHODS: Of 349 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation for advanced HCC: 74 of 129 without autotransfusion were matched with 74 of 220 with autotransfusion using propensity score based on tumor biology, allogeneic transfusion, and others. Survival analysis was performed with death as a competing risk event. The primary outcome was HCC recurrence. RESULTS: Recipients in autotransfusion group received 811 (497-1247) mL of salvaged blood with single leukoreduction. In the matched cohort, cumulative overall recurrence probability at 1/2/5 years after transplantation was 24.6%/ 38.3%/39.7% for nonautotransfusion group and 16.2%/23.1%/32.5% for autotransfusion group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in overall recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72 (0.43-1.21)], intrahepatic recurrence [HR = 0.70 (0.35-1.40)], and extrahepatic recurrence [HR = 0.82 (0.46-1.47)]. Also, there were no significant differences in overall death [HR = 0.57 (0.29-1.12)], HCC-related death [HR = 0.59 (0.29-1.20)], and HCC-unrelated death [HR = 0.48 (0.09-2.65)]. CONCLUSIONS: When allogeneic transfusion was matched, autotransfusion was not significantly related to HCC recurrence, with more favorable probabilities for autotransfusion, in patients with advanced HCC. Thus, blood salvage and autotransfusion could be safely used with single leukoreduction, without double-filtered leukoreduction, during liver transplantation for HCC with potential benefits from avoiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion.

Bile duct anastomosis does not promote bacterial contamination of autologous blood salvaged during living donor liver transplantation.

Bile duct surgeries are conventionally considered to promote bacterial contamination of the surgical field. However, liver transplantation recipients' bile produced by the newly implanted liver graft from healthy living donors may be sterile. We tested bacterial contamination of autologous blood salvaged before and after bile duct anastomosis (BDA) during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In 29 patients undergoing LDLT, bacterial culture was performed for four blood samples and one bile sample: two from autologous blood salvaged before BDA (one was nonleukoreduced and another was leukoreduced), two from autologous blood salvaged after BDA (one was nonleukoreduced and another was leukoreduced), and one from bile produced in the newly implanted liver graft. The primary outcome was bacterial contamination. The risk of bacterial contamination was not significantly different between nonleukoreduced autologous blood salvaged before BDA and nonleukoreduced autologous blood salvaged after BDA (44.8% and 31.0%; odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.03-1.86; p = 0.228). No bacteria were found after leukoreduction in all 58 autologous blood samples. All bile samples were negative for bacteria. None of the 29 patients, including 13 patients who received salvaged autologous blood positive for bacteria, developed postoperative bacteremia. We found that bile from the newly implanted liver graft is sterile in LDLT and BDA does not increase the risk of bacterial contamination of salvaged blood, supporting the use of blood salvage during LDLT even after BDA. Leukoreduction converted all autologous blood samples positive for bacteria to negative. The clinical benefit of leukoreduction for salvaged autologous blood on post-LDLT bacteremia needs further research.

One-Year Recipient Morbidity of Liver Transplantation Using Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Propensity Score Analysis.

Donor safety and graft results of pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) have previously been compared with those of open living donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). However, the clinical outcomes of recipients at 1-year follow-up have never been accurately compared. We aimed to compare 1-year outcomes of recipients of living donor right liver transplantation (LRLT) using pure LLDRH and OLDRH. From May 2013 to May 2017, 197 consecutive recipients underwent LRLT. Donor hepatectomies were performed either by OLDRH (n = 127) or pure LLDRH (n = 70). After propensity score matching, 53 recipients were included in each group for analysis. The clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was recipient death or graft failure during the 1-year follow-up period. In the propensity-matched analysis, the incidence of death or graft failure during the 1-year follow-up period was not different between the 2 groups (3.8% versus 5.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-8.95; P = 0.69). However, the composite of Clavien-Dindo 3b-5 complications was more frequent in the pure LLDRH group (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.15-5.96; P = 0.02). In conclusion, although pure LLDRH affords a comparable incidence of fatal complications in recipients, operative complications may increase at the beginning of the program. The safety of the recipients should be confirmed to accept pure LLDRH as a feasible option.

Superior Trunk Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia Compared with Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block of the C5-C6 roots provides highly effective postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery but usually results in hemidiaphragmatic paresis. Injection around the superior trunk of the brachial plexus is an alternative technique that may reduce this risk. The authors hypothesized that the superior trunk block would provide noninferior postoperative analgesia compared with the interscalene block and reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive a preoperative injection of 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 5 µg · ml epinephrine around either (1) the C5-C6 nerve roots (interscalene block group) or (2) the superior trunk (superior trunk block group). The primary outcome was pain intensity 24 h after surgery measured on an 11-point numerical rating score; the prespecified noninferiority limit was 1. Diaphragmatic function was assessed using both ultrasonographic measurement of excursion and incentive spirometry by a blinded investigator before and 30 min after block completion. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients completed the study. The pain score 24 h postoperatively (means ± SDs) was 1.4 ± 1.0 versus 1.2 ± 1.0 in the superior trunk block (n = 38) and interscalene block (n = 40) groups, respectively. The mean difference in pain scores was 0.1 (95% CI, -0.3 to 0.6), and the upper limit of the 95% CI was lower than the prespecified noninferiority limit. Analgesic requirements and all other pain measurements were similar between groups. Hemidiaphragmatic paresis was observed in 97.5% of the interscalene block group versus 76.3% of the superior trunk block group (P = 0.006); paresis was complete in 72.5% versus 5.3% of the patients, respectively. The decrease in spirometry values from baseline was significantly greater in the interscalene block group. CONCLUSIONS: The superior trunk block provided noninferior analgesia compared with interscalene brachial plexus block for up to 24 h after arthroscopic shoulder surgery and resulted in significantly less hemidiaphragmatic paresis.

A retrospective analysis of re-exploration after living donor right lobe liver transplantation: incidence, causes, outcomes, and risk factors.

Despite technical difficulties, right lobe liver grafting is preferred in living donor liver transplantation because of the graft size. Re-exploration after living donor right lobe liver transplantation (LRLT) has never been separately analyzed. We aimed to analyze the incidence, causes, outcomes, and risk factors of re-exploration after LRLT. We reviewed medical records of 1016 LRLT recipients from October 2003 to July 2017 and identified recipients who underwent re-exploration within hospital stay. Separate analyses were also performed according to cause of re-exploration. The overall incidence of re-exploration was 17.0% (173/1016). The most common cause of re-exploration was bleeding (50%). Overall re-exploration was associated with clinical outcome, but different results were shown on analyses according to cause of re-exploration. Risk factors of re-exploration were underlying hepatocellular carcinoma and operative duration [Odds ratio (OR), 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-2.12; P = 0.03, and OR, 1.002; 95% CI, 1.001-1.004; P = 0.0023, respectively]. Re-exploration after LRLT is relatively common, and is strongly associated with mortality and graft failure.

Perioperative Fresh Red Blood Cell Transfusion May Negatively Affect Recipient Survival After Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between fresh red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and recipient survival after liver transplantation. BACKGROUND: Fresh RBC products contain many viable leukocytes. Allogeneic leukocytes are responsible for adverse transfusion reactions in the immunocompromised host. METHODS: Among 343 liver transplant recipients who underwent perioperative RBC transfusion, 91 of 226 who did not receive fresh RBCs were matched with 91 of 117 who received fresh RBCs with 1:1 matching ratio using the propensity score based on the amount of transfused blood products and others. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox model. RESULTS: All transfused 3230 RBCs were leukoreduced and irradiated. Before matching, recipients in fresh RBC group received 3 U (2-6 U) of fresh RBCs. After a median follow-up of 60 months, 60 of 343 recipients (17.5%) died. Survival probability at 1/2/5 years after transplantation was 94.7%/92.0%/85.8% for nonfresh RBC group and 82.9%/76.0%/72.0% for fresh RBC group [death hazard ratio (HR) = 2.37 (1.43-3.94), P = 0.001]. In multivariable analysis, fresh RBC transfusion was significantly associated with increased death risk [HR = 2.33 (1.35-4.01), P = 0.002]. After matching, recipients in fresh RBC group received 3 U (2-5 U) of fresh RBCs. After a median follow-up of 56 months, 35 of 182 recipients (19.2%) died. Survival probability at 1/2/5 years was 95.6%/93.2%/86.0% for nonfresh RBC group and 85.7%/78.0%/73.0% for fresh RBC group [HR = 2.23 (1.43-3.94), P = 0.028]. Multivariable analysis confirmed a significance of fresh RBC transfusion [HR = 3.20 (1.51-6.78), P = 0.002]. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a potential negative impact of fresh RBC transfusion on the survival of patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Risk of Post-transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Is Higher in Recipients of Livers From Male Than Female Living Donors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between donor sex and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation. BACKGROUND: HCC shows a male predominance in incidence and recurrence after tumor resection due to sex differences in hepatic sex hormone receptors. There have been no studies evaluating the importance of donor sex on post-transplant HCC recurrence. METHODS: Of 384 recipients of livers, from living donors, for HCC: 104/120 who received grafts from female donors were matched with 246/264 who received grafts from male donors using propensity score matching, with an unfixed matching ratio based on factors like tumor biology. Survival analysis was performed with death as a competing risk event. The primary outcome was overall HCC recurrence. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 39 months. Before matching, recurrence probability at 1/2/5 years after transplantation was 6.1/9.7/12.7% in recipients with female donors and 11.7/19.2/25.3% in recipients with male donors. Recurrence risk was significantly higher with male donors in univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04 [1.15-3.60], P = 0.014) and multivariable analysis (HR=2.10 [1.20-3.67], P = 0.018). In the matched analysis, recurrence risk was also higher with male donors (HR=1.92 [1.05-3.52], P = 0.034): both in intrahepatic recurrence (HR=1.92 [1.05-3.51], P = 0.034) and extrahepatic recurrence (HR=1.93 [1.05-3.52], P = 0.033). Multivariable analysis confirmed the significance of donor sex (HR=2.08 [1.11-3.91], P = 0.023). Interestingly, the significance was lost when donor age was >40 years. Two external cohorts validated the significance of donor sex. CONCLUSIONS: Donor sex appears to be an important graft factor modulating HCC recurrence after living donor liver transplantation.

Risk of posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence is greater in recipients with higher platelet counts in living donor liver transplantation.

Platelets interact with tumor cells and promote metastasis. The importance of platelets in posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence is unclear. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative platelet count (PLT) and HCC recurrence after living donor liver transplantation. Of 359 recipients of livers from living donors for HCC, 209 of 240 patients who had preoperative PLT ≤75 × 109 /L were matched with 97 of 119 patients who had preoperative PLT >75 × 109 /L using propensity score matching, with an unfixed matching ratio based on factors such as tumor biology. The cutoff value of 75 × 109 /L was set based on optimum stratification analysis. Survival analysis was performed with death as a competing risk event. The primary outcome was overall HCC recurrence. The median follow-up time was 59 months. Before matching, recurrence probability at 1, 2, and 5 years after transplantation was 4.7%, 9.2%, and 11.3% for the low platelet group and 14.5%, 23.0%, and 30.5% for the high platelet group. Recurrence risk was significantly greater in the high platelet group in both univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.86-5.14; P < 0.001) and multivariate analyses (HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23-3.60; P = 0.007). In the matched analysis, recurrence risk was also greater in the high platelet group in both univariate (HR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.36-4.01; P = 0.002) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.02-3.54; P = 0.04). Preoperative PLT had no interaction with the Milan criteria, alpha-fetoprotein level, Edmonson grade, microvascular invasion, or intrahepatic metastasis. Incorporation of preoperative PLT into the Milan criteria significantly improved predictive power. Inflammation-based scores including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and the inflammation-based index did not show superiority to preoperative PLT in predicting HCC recurrence. In conclusion, preoperative PLT appears to be an important host factor affecting HCC recurrence after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 24 44-55 2018 AASLD.

Longer storage of red blood cells does not affect mortality in transfused liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of red blood cell (RBC) products change after 2 weeks of cold storage. It is unclear whether older RBCs affect mortality after liver transplantation. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the association between the age of transfused RBCs and death after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Of 200 recipients who underwent LDLT, 118 who received RBCs with a mean storage duration of less than 10 days (shorter storage group) were compared with 82 with an RBC mean storage duration of more than 14 days (longer storage group). Key exclusion criteria were transfusion of very fresh RBCs stored for less than 4 days and transfusion of old RBCs in recipients of the shorter storage group. The primary outcome was posttransplant overall death. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox model. RESULTS: Mean RBC storage duration was 7 days in the shorter storage group and 17 days in the longer storage group. Death probability at 1, 2, and 5 years posttransplant was 5.1%, 7.6%, and 13.6% in the shorter storage group, respectively, and 6.1%, 8.5%, and 13.5% in the longer storage group. Death risk was comparable between the two groups in univariable (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-2.16, p = 0.991) and multivariable (HR 1.07, 95% CI, 0.46-2.50, p = 0.882) analyses. Graft failure risk was also comparable (HR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.50-2.18, p = 0.916). Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence probability at 1, 2, and 5 years was 10.8%, 15.4%, and 23.1%, respectively, in the shorter storage group and 11.4%, 15.9%, and 20.7% in the longer storage group (HR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.37-1.89, p = 0.670). No significant differences were observed regarding graft regeneration/function, vascular/biliary complications, acute kidney injury, surgical site infection, or rejection (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found that transfusion of old RBCs contributes to death after LDLT.

Safety of the Use of Blood Salvage and Autotransfusion During Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether autotransfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) salvaged during liver transplantation is associated with the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND: Blood salvage is widely used during liver transplantation to reinfuse salvaged autologous RBCs and reduce allogeneic transfusion. However, the reintroduction of cancer cells via autotransfusion is a major concern in HCC patients. METHODS: Among 397 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation for HCC, 97 of 114 recipients without intraoperative autotransfusion were matched with 222 of 283 recipients with intraoperative autotransfusion with unfixed matching ratio using the propensity score based on age, sex, allogeneic transfusion, immunosuppression, tumor biology, and others. Competing risks Cox regression was used to compare HCC recurrence risk of the 2 paired groups. RESULTS: Recipients in autotransfusion group received 1177 ±â€Š1318 mL of salvaged RBCs during surgery. A leukocyte depletion filter was used for all autotransfused RBCs. Cumulative HCC recurrence rate at 1, 2, and 5 years after transplantation were 10.4% (5.3%-17.6%), 19.1% (11.6%-28.0%), and 24.1% (15.2%-34.0%) for nonautotransfusion group and 10.8% (7.2%-15.4%), 14.9% (10.5%-20.0%), and 20.3% (14.9%-26.4%) for autotransfusion group, respectively. Autotransfusion versus nonautotransfusion group was not significantly different in overall recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.53, P = 0.579] and intrahepatic recurrence (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.36-1.56) or extrahepatic recurrence (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49-2.04). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of a significant impact of autotransfusion on posttransplant HCC recurrence. Thus, salvaged and filtered RBCs could be used in HCC patients undergoing liver transplantation with potential benefits from avoiding allogeneic RBCs transfusion and its complications.

Association Between Intraoperative Platelet Transfusion and Early Graft Regeneration in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between anesthetic management before and after graft reperfusion and early graft regeneration in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). BACKGROUND: Sufficient graft regeneration is essential for the success of LDLT. Diverse signals start to trigger liver regeneration immediately after graft reperfusion. METHODS: Graft volume at 14 ±â€Š2 days after LDLT was measured in 379 consecutive recipients using computed tomography images with 3-dimensional reconstruction. The association between anesthetic variables and the degree of graft regeneration for 2 weeks was analyzed using simple and multiple linear regressions. The anesthetic variables included hemodynamics, laboratory measurements, vasoactive drugs, and blood products transfusion. RESULTS: The degree of graft regeneration for 2 weeks was 52% in median and ranged from 5% to 123%. Platelet transfusion was identified as the sole independent anesthetic factor contributing to graft regeneration. Platelet concentrate transfusion of 1 to 6 units vs none was correlated with a 6.5% increase in graft regeneration (P = 0.012). Platelet concentrate transfusion of more than 6 units vs none was further correlated with an 18.4% increase in regeneration (P < 0.001). In the subgroup of recipients without intraoperative platelet transfusion, mean platelet count measured during the intraoperative reperfusion phase was positively associated with graft regeneration (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Graft regeneration after LDLT increased in relation to a graded increase in the amount of transfused platelets and higher postreperfusion platelet counts during surgery. These results offer additional evidence regarding the important role of platelets in initiating liver regeneration and, furthermore, the indications for and the benefits vs risks of platelet transfusion during LDLT.

Microsteatosis may not interact with macrosteatosis in living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The insignificance of pure microsteatosis (MiS) was reported in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, since steatosis is mostly found in a mixed form of microsteatosis (MiS) and macrosteatosis (MaS), we aimed to determine the importance of MiS mixed with MaS in LDLT. METHODS: Donor matching and recipient matching were independently performed with unfixed matching ratios. In donor matching, 51 donors with high (⩾30%) MiS mixed with MaS (H-MiS) were matched with 160 donors with low (⩽10%) MiS mixed with MaS (L-MiS), based on MaS degree, remnant liver volume, and others. In recipient matching, 50 recipients who received H-MiS grafts were matched with 176 recipients who received L-MiS grafts, based on MaS degree, graft volume, MELD score, and others. RESULTS: The median MiS degree was 10% (range 0%-10%) vs. 35% (range 30%-80%) in L-MiS livers vs. H-MiS livers after both matching. L-MiS and H-MiS donors were not significantly different regarding postoperative biochemical liver function (e.g. peak AST 232 vs. 246 IU/L, p=0.931). L-MiS and H-MiS recipients were not significantly different regarding 2-week graft regeneration (51% for both) and 5-year survival (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.43-1.76, p=0.699). Post-transplant donor/recipient complication rates were not significantly different, either. CONCLUSIONS: There were no evidences of a significant impact of MiS mixed with MaS on post-LDLT outcomes. The results suggest less importance of MiS, and further indicate that there is no interaction between MiS and MaS. Thus, the risk of steatosis may be determined by the relative composition of MiS and MaS, rather than the total quantitative degree.

Glycemic responses to intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion in living liver donors.

The occurrence of glycemic disturbances has been described for patients undergoing intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion (IHIO) for tumor removal. However, the glycemic responses to IHIO in living liver donors are unknown. This study investigated the glycemic response to IHIO in these patients and examined the association between this procedure and the occurrence of hyperglycemia (blood glucose > 180 mg/dL). The data from 154 living donors were retrospectively reviewed. The decision to perform IHIO was made on the basis of the extent of bleeding that occurred during parenchymal dissection. One round of IHIO consisted of 15 minutes of clamping and 5 minutes of unclamping the hepatic artery and portal vein. Blood glucose concentrations were measured at predetermined time points, including the start and end of IHIO. Repeated hyperglycemic episodes occurred after unclamping. The mean maximum intraoperative blood glucose concentration was greater in donors who underwent ≥3 rounds of IHIO versus those who underwent 1 or 2 rounds (169 ± 30 versus 149 ± 31 mg/dL, P = 0.005). The incidence of intraoperative hyperglycemia was also greater in donors who underwent ≥3 rounds of IHIO versus those who underwent 1 or 2 rounds (38.7% versus 7.7%, odds ratio = 7.1, 95% confidence interval = 2.5-20.4, P < 0.001). Donors who did not undergo IHIO and those who underwent 1 or 2 rounds of IHIO exhibited similar maximum glucose concentrations and similar incidence rates of hyperglycemia. In conclusion, IHIO induced repeated hyperglycemic responses in living donors, and donors who underwent ≥3 rounds of IHIO were more likely to experience intraoperative hyperglycemia. These results provide additional information on the risks and benefits of IHIO in living donors.

Macrosteatotic and nonmacrosteatotic grafts respond differently to intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion: Comparison of recipient survival.

Intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion (IHIO) during liver graft procurement is known to confer protection against graft ischemia/reperfusion injury and thus may benefit the recipient's outcome. We evaluated whether the protective effect of IHIO differs with the presence of macrosteatosis (MaS) and with an increase or decrease in the cumulative occlusion time. The subgroup of 188 recipients who received grafts with MaS was divided into 3 groups according to the number of total IHIO rounds during graft procurement: no IHIO, n = 70; 1 to 2 rounds of IHIO, n = 50; and ≥3 rounds of IHIO, n = 68. Likewise, the subgroup of 200 recipients who received grafts without MaS was divided into 3 groups: no IHIO, n = 108; 1 to 2 rounds of IHIO, n = 40; and ≥3 rounds of IHIO, n = 52. The Cox model was applied to evaluate the association between the number of total IHIO rounds and recipient survival separately in the subgroup of MaS recipients and the subgroup of non-MaS recipients. Analyzed covariables included the etiology, Milan criteria, transfusion, immunosuppression, and others. In the subgroup of MaS recipients, 1 to 2 rounds of IHIO were favorably associated with recipient survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.80; P = 0.03 after Bonferroni correction], whereas ≥3 rounds of IHIO were not associated with recipient survival (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.25-1.23). In the subgroup of non-MaS recipients, neither 1 to 2 rounds of IHIO (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.30-1.61) nor ≥3 rounds of IHIO (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.42-1.96) were associated with recipient survival. In conclusion, 1 to 2 rounds of IHIO may be used for the procurement of MaS grafts with potential benefit for recipient survival, whereas IHIO has a limited impact on recipient survival regardless of the cumulative occlusion time when it is used for non-MaS grafts.

Effect of remote ischemic postconditioning on patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPostC) on graft function and acute kidney injury (AKI) after living donor liver transplantation (LT). Recipients undergoing elective living donor LT were randomly assigned to either the RIPostC group or the control group. Immediately after reperfusion, 4 cycles of ischemia and reperfusion lasting for 5 minutes each were performed on 1 upper limb in the RIPostC group. Graft function was assessed through evaluations of the serum levels of total bilirubin and liver enzymes and the prothrombin time for 28 days after surgery. The incidence of AKI, as defined by the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-Stage Kidney Disease classification, was evaluated within 28 days of the operation. In addition, the incidences of graft dysfunction, acute cellular rejection, and major complications; the 1-, 3-, and 6-month mortality rates; the length of stay in the intensive care unit; and the length of hospital stay were also investigated. In all, 78 patients were enrolled in the analysis (n = 39 in each group). No differences in graft function or clinical outcomes were observed between the groups. The incidences of postoperative AKI were 38% (n = 15) in the RIPostC group and 72% (n = 28) in the control group (P = 0.006). Despite no improvements in postoperative graft function, RIPostC decreased the incidence of postoperative AKI after living donor LT in this study. However, no other clinical benefits with respect to the complication rate, length of hospital stay, or short-term mortality rate were observed. Thus, further studies will be needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of RIPostC in LT fully.

The effect of hepatocellular carcinoma bile duct tumor thrombi in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The presence of bile duct tumor thrombi (BDTT) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in explant liver is considered to be a poor prognostic factor. However, studies about HCC BDTT in liver transplant recipients are rare. We compared the characteristics of liver transplant recipients with HCC BDTT in their pathology with those of recipients who had portal vein tumor thrombi (PVTT) of HCC in their pathology. METHODOLOGY: The medical records of patients who underwent liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008 at Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. HCC recurrence was considered as an end-point. RESULTS: Eight patients were identified as having HCC BDTT in explant liver. The disease-free survival rates at 1-year and 5-year were 37.5% and 25.0%, respectively. Patients whose HCC did not recur had lower alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels than others (P=0.046). Patients with HCC BDTT were compared with recipients who had PVTT in their pathology, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.750). CONCLUSIONS: HCC BDTT of explant liver has been considered to be a poor prognostic factor, like PVTT of HCC. However, we found that patients with low AFP levels before transplantation could be expected to have a longer disease-free survival.