Factors associated with the acceptability of Lopinavir/Ritonavir formulations among children living with HIV/AIDS attending care and treatment clinics in Mbeya and Mwanza, Tanzania.

INTRODUCTION: Children living with chronic illnesses are offered formulations based on manufacturer and distributor research. The aim of this study is to better understand the perspectives of children and their caregivers in accepting Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) formulations. METHODS: 362 participants were recruited from two pediatric HIV/AIDS clinics in Mbeya and Mwanza, Tanzania, from December 2021 to May 2022. A translated questionnaire was piloted and validated at both clinics, followed by the implementation of a cross-sectional study. RESULTS: 169 participants (47.1%) reported general difficulties in swallowing, regardless of formulation, while 34.3% and 38.5% reported vomiting tablets and syrups, respectively. Statistical significance is shown to support that children can swallow medications if they can eat stiffened porridge (Ugali). This correlated with the lower incidence of younger children being able to swallow compared to older children (above six years of age). Children older than six years preferred taking tablets (independent of daily dosage) better than other formulations. Significantly, older children who attend school were associated with high odds of swallowing medicine (AOR = 3.06, 95%CI; 1.32-7.05); however, age was not found to be statistically related to ease of administration for Lopinavir/Ritonavir in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir/Ritonavir tablets remain the most accepted formulation among children and adolescents with HIV/AIDS. This study highlights the impact of various factors affecting the acceptability of pediatric formulation, suggesting that children younger than six years, unable to eat Ugali and not attending schools may be most vulnerable regarding their ability to accept Lopinavir/Ritonavir formulations. Further studies are needed to assess the acceptability of other medications in chronically ill children.

Realizing the Promise of Dolutegravir in Effectively Treating Children and Adolescents Living With HIV in Real-world Settings in 6 Countries in Eastern and Southern Africa.

BACKGROUND: Despite encouraging results from clinical trials and in high-income countries, large-scale data on the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV) are lacking in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed among CALHIV 0-19 years old and weighing greater than or equal to 20 kg who received DTG from 2017 to 2020 at sites in Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda to determine effectiveness, safety and predictors of viral load suppression (VLS) among CALHIV using DTG, including through single drug substitutions (SDS). RESULTS: Among 9419 CALHIV using DTG, 7898 had a documented post-DTG VL, and VLS post-DTG was 93.4% (7378/7898). VLS for antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiations was 92.4% (246/263), and VLS was maintained for the ART-experienced [92.9% (7026/7560) pre- vs. 93.5% (7071/7560) post-DTG; P = 0.14). Among previously unsuppressed, 79.8% (426/534) achieved VLS with DTG. Only 5 patients reported a Grade 3 or 4 adverse event (0.057 per 100 patient-years) requiring DTG discontinuation. History of protease inhibitor-based ART [odds ratio (OR) = 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-2.03], care in Tanzania (OR = 5.45; 95% CI: 3.41-8.70), and being 15-19 years old (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.03-1.65) were associated with gain of VLS post-DTG. Predictors of VLS on DTG included VLS before DTG (OR = 3.87; 95% CI: 3.03-4.95) and using the once-daily, single tab tenofovir-lamivudine-DTG regimen (OR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.43-2.22). SDS maintained VLS [95.9% (2032/2120) pre- vs. 95.0% (2014/2120) post-SDS with DTG; P = 0.19], and 83.0% (73/88) of unsuppressed gained VLS using SDS with DTG. CONCLUSIONS: We found DTG to be highly effective and safe within our cohort of CALHIV in LMICs. These findings can empower clinicians to prescribe DTG confidently to eligible CALHIV.

Achieving Antiretroviral Therapy Uptake and Viral Suppression Among Children and Adolescents Living With HIV in the UNAIDS 90-90-90 Era Across Six Countries in Eastern and Southern Africa-Lessons From the BIPAI Network.

BACKGROUND: Although achievements have been made globally since the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets were announced, paediatric data remain sparse. We describe achievements toward antiretroviral therapy (ART) uptake and viral load (VL) suppression, existing gaps, and potential best practices among children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV) across 6 Eastern and Southern African countries. SETTING: Baylor College of Medicine International Paediatric AIDS Initiative Network sites in Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. METHODS: We performed retrospective data analysis among CALHIV ages 0-19 years between 2014 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 25,370 CALHIV received care, 85.8% (21,773/25,370) received ART, 84.4% (18,376/21,773) had documented VL results, and 74.6% (13,715/18,376) had VL < 1000 cps/mL. By 2019, the pooled proportion of CALHIV receiving ART and having viral suppression increased to 99.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 98.1 to 100.0] and 89.8% (95 CI: 88.2 to 91.5) respectively. Lower rates of viral suppression and higher lost to follow-up (LTFU) were seen in the 0-4-year and 15-19-year cohorts. CALHIV on ART not achieving viral suppression were younger, received care in Malawi or Mbeya, had a history of tuberculosis, lower rates of integrase-strand inhibitor-based ART, and were on ART for shorter durations. Best practices reported included adopting universal ART, ART optimization with protease inhibitor-based and/or dolutegravir-based regimens, peer-supported activities, child/adolescent friendly services, community-supported activities, and technology-driven quality improvement activities and digital solutions. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of CALHIV receiving ART and having viral suppression can be achieved in settings in Eastern and Southern Africa through using pediatric best practices. Increased efforts must be made to address LTFU and to support under-fives and adolescents.

Antibiotic prescribing practice in management of cough and/or diarrhoea in Moshi Municipality, Northern Tanzania: cross-sectional descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION: The increase in resistance of many pathogens to currently available antibiotics has been recognized as life-threatening problem. The development of drug resistance is promoted by irrational prescribing behavior. Inappropriate use of antibiotics is attributed by over-prescription, inadequate dosage and use for non-bacterial infections. The purpose of this study was to assess antibiotic prescribing practices in the management of diarrhoea and cough among children attending hospitals in Moshi municipal, Tanzania. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive hospital based study, from September 2010 to March 2011. All children presenting with diarrhoea and cough, aged between one month and 5 years attended at the two hospitals were enrolled. Data were collected by a standard questionnaire. Information on the prescribed drugs was obtained from patient files. RESULTS: A total of 384 children were enrolled. Of these, 326 (84.9%) received antibiotics; common prescribed antibiotics were penicillins, sulphonamides, aminoglycosides and macrolides. Eighty percent of children with acute watery diarrhoea and 68.9% with common cold were given antibiotics inappropriately. Inappropriate antibiotic prescription was significantly associated with prescriber being a clinical officer and assistant medical officer, and child having diarrhoea. Inappropriate antibiotic dosage was significantly occurred when prescriber was clinical officer with reference to medical officer. CONCLUSION: This study observed a high antibiotic prescription rate by clinicians and treatment guidelines for management of patients who presented with cough and/or diarrhoea are followed. Continuing professional development programmes for clinicians on prescription would help in reducing irrational prescribing practices.