Screening for large rearrangements of the BRCA1 gene in German breast or ovarian cancer families using semi-quantitative multiplex PCR method.

Since the identification of the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, a large number of different germline mutations in both genes have been found by conventional PCR-based mutation detection methods. Complex germline rearrangements such as those reported in the BRCA1 gene are often not detectable by these standard diagnostic techniques. To detect large deletions or duplications encompassing one or more exons of the BRCA1 gene and in order to estimate the frequency of BRCA1 rearrangements in German breast or ovarian cancer families, a semi-quantitative multiplex PCR method was developed and applied to DNA samples of patients from families negatively tested for disease causing mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding regions by direct sequencing. Out of 59 families analysed, one family was found to carry a rearrangement in the BRCA1 gene (duplication of exon 13). The results indicate that the semi-quantitative multiplex PCR method is useful for the detection of large rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene and therefore represents an additional valuable tool for mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Subareolar injection of technetium-99m nanocolloid yields reliable data on the axillary lymph node tumour status in breast cancer patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour: a prospective study of 117 patients.

According to recently published guidelines, histological clarification by interventional techniques should be undertaken before planning the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma. In patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour, peritumoural injection in the context of preoperative scintigraphic detection of the sentinel lymph nodes is not possible. The aim of this prospective study was to clarify whether subareolar injection of nanocolloid can yield reliable data on the axillary lymph node tumour status in breast cancer patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour. To date, 117 women (age 31-80 years) with breast carcinoma have been enrolled. All of these patients had undergone a biopsy (n=88) or surgery on the primary tumour (n=29) and were without clinical suspicion of lymph node metastases. Subareolar injection of 40 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid was carried out in at least eight deposits around the areolar margin [one deposit in the middle of each quadrant and one deposit at each quadrant intersection (0.05 ml/deposit)]. Immediately after injection, dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy of the axillary, thoracic and cervical areas was performed in various views with a gamma camera (LEAP collimator, 256x256 matrix). Lymphatic drainage was directed exclusively to the ipsilateral axilla. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and elective dissection of axillary lymph nodes were performed in all patients. All lymph nodes removed were examined by histology and immunohistochemistry. In 26 patients, lymph node metastases were found in the sentinel lymph nodes. In six of them, non-sentinel lymph nodes also showed tumour involvement. In the remaining 91 patients, lymph node metastases could be found neither in sentinel lymph nodes nor in non-sentinel lymph nodes. In conclusion, subareolar nanocolloid injection can yield reliable information on the axillary lymph node tumour status in patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour in the breast.

Limited relevance of the CHEK2 gene in hereditary breast cancer.

To establish the importance of CHEK2 mutations for familial breast cancer incidence in the German population, we have screened all 14 of the coding exons in 516 families negative for mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We found 12 distinct variants in 30 unrelated patients (5.81%), including 5 that are novel and an additional 4 found for the first time in breast cancer. These aberrations were evaluated in 500 healthy women aged over 50 years and in the case of the 2 exon 10 mutations, 1100delC and 1214del4bp, in 1315 randomized healthy controls. According to our results, a statistically significant association for the exon 10 mutations was observed (p = 0.006). The prevalence of the 1100delC mutation in the German population, however, is significantly lower than those reported for other Caucasian populations both in familial breast cancer patients (1.6%) and controls (0.5%), and shows independent segregation with breast cancer in 2 of 4 families analyzed. The remaining 10 variants were more abundant in patients (21) compared to the controls (12) although the difference was not statistically significant. Interestingly, we found no increased breast cancer risk associated with the splice site mutation IVS2+1G-->A or the most common missense mutation I157T, which account for more than half (12/21) of the variants observed in patients. The low prevalence and penetrance of the exon 10 deletion mutations together with no, or an uncertain elevation in risk for other CHEK2 mutations suggests a limited relevance for CHEK2 mutations in familial breast cancer. Further evaluation of the unique variants observed in breast cancer is required to determine if they may play a role in a polygenic model of familial breast cancer. Nevertheless, it seems premature to include CHEK2 screening in genetic testing.