RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Perigraft seroma (PGS) causing enlargement of the native aneurysm sac after open abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAA) repair is a rarely recognized complication with unknown clinical consequences. This study was undertaken to determine the frequency of PGS, identify associated risk factors, and review resulting complications and their management strategies. METHODS: Charts of all patients who underwent open AAA repair at our institution from 1995 to 2009 and had at least one postoperative abdominal cross-sectional imaging study (the study subjects) were retrospectively reviewed. PGS was defined as a perigraft fluid collection present > 3 months postoperatively, ≥ 3-cm in diameter and having a radiodensity ≤ 25 Hounsfield units on computed tomography (CT). Patient records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, operative and postoperative variables, and long-term outcome. RESULTS: Of the 111 study subjects identified, 13 had aortic reconstruction with Dacron grafts and 98 with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts. Twenty patients (18%) had PGS, all of whom had PTFE grafts (20 of 98; 20.4%). Mean age was 68.5 years and mean aneurysm diameter preoperatively was 6.4 cm (range, 4.0-10.9 cm). The average time from AAA repair to PGS detection was 51 months (range, 4-156 months). PGS averaged 6.0-cm in diameter (range, 3.0-11.0 cm). Multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors were associated with PGS development: diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-21.2; P = .013), smoking (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 0.73-33.74; P = .01), anticoagulation (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.6-63.3; P = .003), bifurcated graft reconstruction (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 2.6-94.1; P = .017), and left flank retroperitoneal approach for repair (OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 1.9-26.5; P = .003). Four patients (4 of 20; 20%) required intervention for PGS-related complications: 3 patients for symptomatic PGS expansion (1 patient with rupture) and 1 patient for acute limb ischemia secondary to graft limb compression and thrombosis. Two patients had open exploration, sac evacuation/reduction, and graft replacement with a Dacron graft: 1 patient for a ruptured aneurysm sac and 1 patient for persistent pain associated with sac enlargement. A third patient underwent a failed CT-guided drainage for abdominal pain and was subsequently treated with partial graft excision. The patient with acute limb ischemia was treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis and graft limb stenting. CONCLUSION: PGS after open AAA repair occurs more frequently than previously reported. Complications requiring intervention can occur in up to 20% of patients with PGS. A variety of treatment modalities can be used to deal with the complications. Earlier CT surveillance is advised after open AAA repair with a PTFE graft if symptoms are suggestive of PGS development.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Seroma/etiologia , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia/métodos , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Michigan , Razão de Chances , Polietilenotereftalatos , Politetrafluoretileno , Desenho de Prótese , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Seroma/diagnóstico por imagem , Seroma/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that stenosis of the arterial anastomosis of thrombosed hemodialysis (HD) grafts, unmasked after conventional thrombectomy, very often necessitate subsequent arterial angioplasty. The aim of this study was to describe a novel fluoroscopic-assisted balloon thrombectomy technique which permits simultaneous arterial angioplasty (should this is required) for thrombosed HD grafts. METHODS: Thirty patients with 36 thrombotic episodes of their prosthetic HD grafts participated in this study. A balloon angioplasty catheter is placed beyond the arterial anastomosis, over a guidewire; the balloon is inflated with contrast solution under fluoroscopy and pulled back to remove the arterial thrombus from the anastomosis. Any coexisting stenosis revealed by balloon indentation is completely dilated at that time, rather than after the thrombectomy. Mechanical thrombolysis of the graft and venous outflow is then performed with the AngioJet catheter (Possis Medical, Inc). RESULTS: Technical and clinical success rates (the latter defined as one subsequent HD session) of the procedure were 100% and 94%, respectively. No complications, including arterial embolism, vessel rupture or pulmonary embolism, were encountered. Primary assisted patency at 3 and 6 months was 51% and 32%, respectively, while functional secondary patency at the same follow-up points was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique is safe and also effective in both short- and long-term follow-up. Because it offers convenience, since the treatment of arterial anastomotic stenoses is accomplished in one (rather than two) steps, this method deserves further investigation.
Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Radiografia Intervencionista , Diálise Renal , Trombectomia , Trombose/terapia , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Constrição Patológica , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Falha de Prótese , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
PURPOSE: The brachio-basilic vein fistula (BBVF) is currently the third vascular access option for patients on hemodialysis, following radio-cephalic and brachio-cephalic arterio-venous fistulas. Like all types of hemodialysis vascular access, a variety of procedures may have to be performed in order to maintain long-term use of the BBVF. The aim of the present study was to perform a literature review of endovascular or surgical revisions of BBVFs. METHODS: On Pubmed search, 676 records were obtained and reviewed for relevance with the aim of the search. RESULTS: A variety of endovascular and surgical revision techniques has been described to manage BBVF poor maturation, dysfunction manifested as failing BBVF (most often the result of a stenosis at the transposed/swing segment), thrombosis, aneurysm formation and hemodialysis access-induced hand ischemia (steal syndrome). The role of revision is crucial in BBVF maintenance, taking into account that around 70% of these fistulas will require some intervention by 18 months and as a result of revision, secondary patency is preserved in the vast majority, according to the results of one study. Endovascular revision is the treatment of choice for most cases of BBVF dysfunction or thrombosis, with redo surgery reserved for failures of endovascular techniques or other specific indications. CONCLUSIONS: BBVF revision, more often in the form of endovascular surgery, plays a crucial role in BBVF maintenance and its continued use for hemodialysis, necessary for reducing graft and catheter use and the associated morbidity.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Artéria Braquial/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Nefropatias/terapia , Diálise Renal , Trombose/terapia , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Veias/cirurgia , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/métodos , Artéria Braquial/fisiopatologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/diagnóstico , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/fisiopatologia , Falha de Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Veias/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that routine preoperative mapping and transposed brachial-basilic vein fistula (TBBVF) increases arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) construction rates, without altering maturation rate. PATIENTS: Over a 4-year period, 709 vascular accesses were performed, including 467 AVFs (radial-cephalic fistula [RCF], n = 217, brachial-cephalic fistula [BCF], n = 139, TBBVF, n = 111) and 251 prosthetic grafts. During the last 2 years, preoperative mapping was performed routinely by means of ultrasound, and TBBVFs were preferentially used over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). RESULTS: Over the study, construction rate of upper arm AVF increased significantly from 12% to 53% and use of prosthetic grafts decreased from 55% to 19% (P < .001). Maturation rate of RCFs, BCFs, and TBBVFs during the first part of the study was 75%, 50%, and 30% (P = .003), compared to 79%, 82%, and 86% (P = .43), respectively, during the second part. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative upper extremity mapping with ultrasound increases not only AVF construction rate, but also their maturation likelihood.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Diálise Renal , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Artéria Braquial/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Braquial/cirurgia , Veias Braquiocefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Veias Braquiocefálicas/cirurgia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Michigan , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Radial/cirurgia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
In the present report, we describe a two-stage technique of combined basilic and brachial vein transposition. Our patient had a brachial-basilic vein fistula created, but during the second stage for the transposition, a low basilic-brachial vein confluence was found. Instead of abandoning the procedure, the brachial vein was mobilized and transposed to primarily constitute a usable fistula, which subsequently was successfully used for hemodialysis. A detailed description of our technique is provided. Surgeons should be aware of this alternative procedure to maximize fistula creation rates.
Assuntos
Braço/irrigação sanguínea , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/métodos , Cateteres de Demora , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Diálise Renal , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Veias/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To study the outcome of rheolytic thrombectomy for hemodialysis access occlusion. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 187 patients (88 men; median age 63 years, range 21-89) with end-stage renal disease treated with the AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy catheter followed by angioplasty (+/- stenting) of the culprit lesions in 285 episodes of arteriovenous graft (n = 261) or fistula (n = 24) thrombosis. Clinical success was defined as at least one successful subsequent hemodialysis session. Graft monitoring and surveillance included clinical and hemodialysis parameters, respectively, to detect a failing/failed access. RESULTS: Rheolytic thrombectomy had a technical (immediate) success rate of 98.2% and a clinical success rate of 95.1%. Technical and clinical success for patients presenting within 2 days of the thrombosis was 99.6% and 96.6%, respectively, compared to 91.8% (p = 0.003, odds ratio 20.8) and 87.8% (p = 0.019, odds ratio 4) for later presentation. The number of stenoses that was managed (median, interquartile range) was significantly higher in grafts (4, 3-4) compared to fistulae (2, 2-3; p<0.001) and in accesses that had been treated for dysfunction or thrombosis in the past (4, 3-4) compared to accesses that had not (3, 3-4; p = 0.07). During follow-up, 95 (36.6%) accesses had no further thrombotic events, 23 (9%) accesses became dysfunctional and were treated with endovascular techniques, 137 (52.3%) developed recurrent thrombosis for which rheolytic thrombectomy was attempted, and 30 (11.5%) were abandoned or removed for infection. Functional assisted primary patency at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months was 72.4%, 45.1%, 30.3%, and 22.4%, respectively. Reintervention and venous outflow stenosis were associated with better and worse outcomes, respectively; multivariate analysis identified patient age, central vein stenosis, and stenting as additional independent predictors of improved patency. CONCLUSION: Rheolytic thrombectomy is a highly successful procedure, with acceptable long-term assisted primary patency. Early referral for thrombectomy should be encouraged.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Trombectomia/métodos , Trombose/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia com Balão , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Diálise Renal , Stents , Trombose/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare infection and malfunction rates of two different types of antimicrobial-eluting tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) for hemodialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HemoSplit TCC with BioBloc (silver sulfadiazine) coating (n = 100, control group) and the Tal Palindrome Ruby TCC, which has a novel silver antimicrobial sleeve and a spiral-z tip design (n = 100, study group), were compared in this case-controlled study. The main endpoints were TCC infection and malfunction. RESULTS: Primary-assisted TCC patency was significantly reduced with the BioBloc TCC (71% and 61% at 90 and 180 days, respectively) compared with the Palindrome Ruby TCC (94% at 90 and 180 days, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis identified only the BioBloc TCC and common femoral access site as independent predictors of worse patency. The unadjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval) for TCC dysfunction with the BioBloc compared with the Palindrome Ruby was 6.0 (2.33-15.53, P < .001), and the relative risk adjusted for access site was 3.2 (1.71-11.96, P = .002). The infection-free rates of the two TCC types were similar (P = .36). The reintervention-free rate for infection or malfunction was significantly better with the Palindrome Ruby TCC (76% and 58% at 90 and 180 days, respectively) than with the BioBloc TCC (60% and 45% at 90 and 180 days, respectively; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of the Palindrome Ruby TCC on the basis of the significantly lower thrombosis and reintervention rate; randomized trials are justified to confirm this finding and to evaluate its role in the prevention of TCC infection.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Cateterismo/instrumentação , Cateteres de Demora , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Sulfadiazina de Prata/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Desenho de Equipamento , Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/fisiopatologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The 2006 update of the DOQI guidelines has stated that in patients with end-stage renal disease, autogenous radial-cephalic, or brachial-cephalic fistulas are the preferred access modalities, followed by transposed brachial-basilic (TBB) fistulas and prosthetic arteriovenous (AV) grafts. AV grafts are in general least preferred; however, there is very limited data comparing directly the last two modalities. The aim of the present study is to compare outcomes of the TBB fistula and the Vectra Vascular Access Graft. METHODS: Seventy-six patients had a prosthetic brachial-axillary Vectra graft placed, while in 41 patients brachial-basilic upper arm transposition was performed. Graft surveillance to detect a failing/failed access was followed by endovascular treatment, rheolytic thrombectomy (AngioJet, Possis Medical), and/or angioplasty +/- stenting of the responsible anatomical lesion(s). RESULTS: Use of Vectra grafts and TBB fistulas started after a median (interquartile range) of 14 (7-30) and 70 (52-102) days, respectively (P < .001), as early as the operative day in some patients with grafts. Postoperative complications were more frequent in TBB fistulas and late complications (mainly access thrombosis) in Vectra grafts. Total number of thrombectomy sessions performed for graft or fistula occlusion was 45 and 7, respectively (P = .032); total number of isolated angioplasty sessions, performed for failing graft or fistula was 31 and 45, respectively (P = .004). Although primary patency of the two access modalities was equivalent, primary assisted patency was significantly reduced in Vectra grafts (70% at 12 months and 58% at 18 months), compared with TBB fistulas (82% at 12 months and 78% at 18 months, P = .033); however, as a result of endovascular intervention, secondary patency rates at 12 months (87% vs 88%) and 18 months (87% vs 83%) were equivalent (P = .91). Presence of arterial anastomosis stenosis treated with angioplasty at any stage had a significant negative predictive value on secondary patency rates at 12 and 18 months which were 61%, compared with 96% for Vectra grafts that had any intra-graft, venous outflow, draining or central vein stenosis treated with angioplasty at any stage (P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive graft surveillance and endovascular treatment methods can yield equivalent long-term secondary patency rates between Vectra graft and TBB fistulas. The advantage of earlier use of Vectra graft must be balanced against the need for more frequent secondary interventions and the risk of graft infection.
Assuntos
Angioplastia/instrumentação , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Artéria Braquial/cirurgia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Stents , Trombectomia , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Idoso , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Artéria Braquial/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poliuretanos , Desenho de Prótese , Diálise Renal , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Veias/fisiopatologia , Veias/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of an aggressive graft surveillance and endovascular treatment protocol on secondary patency rates of a polyetherurethaneurea vascular access graft, specially designed to provide early access and rapid hemostasis. METHODS: One hundred and ninety Vectra Vascular Access Grafts (C. R. Bard, Inc, Murray Hill, NJ) were placed in 176 patients (78 females and 98 males, mean age 61.7 years). There were 41 forearm grafts, 145 upper arm grafts and four thigh grafts. Graft surveillance was performed by using clinical and hemodialysis parameters to detect a failing/failed graft and followed by endovascular treatment, rheolytic thrombectomy (AngioJet, Possis Medical Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) and/or angioplasty +/- stenting of the anatomical lesion (arterial anastomosis, graft, venous outflow, draining or central veins). RESULTS: Hemodialysis started after a median of 15.5 days, as soon as from the day of the operation in some cases. Bleeding complications occurred in six patients (3.2%), venous hypertension in seven (3.7%), steal syndrome in two (1.1%), neurological complications in two (1.1%), while late infection (range 2.7-14.6 months) was seen in six patients (3.2%). Thrombectomy and angioplasty (median number of sessions 1, interquartile range 1-2) was performed in 43 grafts. Isolated angioplasty, not associated with thrombosis (median number of sessions 1, interquartile range 1-2), was performed in 50 grafts. These interventions increased primary assisted patency from 69% and 63% at 12 and 18 months, respectively to a secondary patency rate of 86%. Taking into account grafts removed for late infection, functional secondary patency rate dropped to 83% and 81%, at 12 and 18 months, respectively. Arterial anastomosis angioplasty was performed more frequently in thrombosed grafts (28.6%) than failing grafts (6.7%), P < .001 and had a significant negative predictive value on secondary patency rates at 12 and 18 months, which were 60.5% compared with 89% for grafts that had no interventions performed (P = .007) and 90.9% for grafts that had any intra-graft, venous outflow, or draining or central vein stenosis treated with angioplasty at any stage (P = .002). Multivariate analysis identified the presence of arterial anastomosis stenosis as the single predictor of secondary patency (relative risk 0.247, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive graft surveillance and endovascular treatment increases significantly secondary patency rates of Vectra Vascular Access Grafts. Longer follow-up will determine the effectiveness of this policy. The role of inflow stenosis on graft longevity and alternative treatment options warrant further investigation.