RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In regions endemic for tuberculosis and brucellosis, distinguishing between tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and brucella meningitis (BM) poses a substantial challenge. This study investigates the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with TBM and BM. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with either TBM or BM who were admitted to two referral hospitals between March 2015 and October 2022, were included, and the characteristics of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy patients formed the study group, 28 with TBM and 42 with BM, were included. TBM patients had a 2.06-fold (95% CI: 1.26 to 3.37, P-value: 0.003) higher risk of altered consciousness and a 4.80-fold (95% CI: 1.98 to 11.61, P-value: < 0.001) higher risk of extra-neural involvement as compared to BM patients. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed a significantly higher percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) in TBM compared to BM (Standardized mean difference: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.20, P-value: 0.008). Neuroimaging findings indicated higher risks of hydrocephalus (P-value: 0.002), infarction (P-value: 0.029), and meningeal enhancement (P-value: 0.012) in TBM compared to BM. Moreover, TBM patients had a 67% (95% CI: 21% to 131%, P-value:0.002) longer median length of hospital stay and a significantly higher risk of unfavorable outcomes (Risk ratio: 6.96, 95% CI: 2.65 to 18.26, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasizes that TBM patients displayed increased frequencies of altered consciousness, PMN dominance in CSF, extra-neural involvement, hydrocephalus, meningeal enhancement, and brain infarction. The findings emphasize the diagnostic difficulties and underscore the importance of cautious differentiation between these two conditions to guide appropriate treatment strategies.
Assuntos
Brucelose , Tuberculose Meníngea , Humanos , Brucelose/complicações , Brucelose/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Brucelose/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Tuberculose Meníngea/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Tuberculose Meníngea/complicações , Tuberculose Meníngea/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Meningites Bacterianas/microbiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Meningites Bacterianas/patologia , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Hidrocefalia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The objective of this study is to describe our COVID-19 patients with herpesviridae reactivation in the central nervous system (CNS). Four patients were described including two with acute encephalitis and two with acute encephalomyelitis. Three of four patients had abnormal findings on neuroimaging studies. One of four patients died, one survived with major neurological sequelae, and two others fully recovered. Herpesviridae reactivation in the CNS in patients with COVID-19 is a rare but serious coincidence. The optimal therapeutic management has not been investigated and until more information is available, it is prudent to treat these patients with appropriate antivirals with or without anti-inflammatory agents.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Encefalite , Herpesviridae , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sistema Nervoso Central/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Considering the outbreak pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lack of effective therapeutic strategies for the management of this viral disease, and the increasing evidence on the antiviral potential of silymarin, this study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of silymarin nanomicelles on the symptom's resolution time, laboratory parameters, and liver enzymes in patients with COVID-19. The participants were assigned to the nano-silymarin (n = 25) (receiving SinaLive soft gel, containing 70 mg silymarin as nanomicelles) or placebo groups (n = 25) three times daily for two weeks. Patients' symptoms and laboratory findings were assessed at baseline and during the follow-up period (one week and one month after the beginning of the treatment). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of symptoms resolution time, laboratory parameters, and hospitalization duration (p > 0.05). However, the alanine aminotransferase level decreased significantly in the treatment group, compared to the placebo group (p < 0.001). Concomitant use of dexamethasone and remdesivir with silymarin might make the effects of silymarin on the improvement of patients' condition unclear. Further clinical trials are recommended with diverse dosages and larger sample sizes.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Silimarina , Alanina Transaminase , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Silimarina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Post-traumatic meningitis is a potentially fatal condition that presents as a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The vast majority of post-traumatic meningitides are caused by infectious pathogens, most commonly multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens. However, aseptic meningitis occurs less frequently due to tissue response to injury or stimulation by noninfectious agents, such as blood breakdown products or chemicals. Here, we present a case of post-traumatic persistent neutrophilic meningitis who was found to be steroid responsive. Diagnostic evaluation in our patient did not reveal any infectious pathogen, and the patient did not respond to broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment. We suggest that physicians who treat patients with post-traumatic meningitis should consider steroid-responsive post-traumatic persistent neutrophilic meningitis (SPNM) in the list of differential diagnosis particularly when no infectious etiology is found and the patient does not respond to empirical antimicrobial treatment. Brain injury-induced immune dysregulation causing exaggerated inflammatory reaction might play a role in the pathogenesis of SPNM; however, further neuropathological studies are absolutely necessary to evaluate and characterize trauma-induced immune dysregulation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is among the most widespread zoonotic diseases worldwide. Although rare, nervous system involvement due to Brucella infection is a major diagnostic challenge in endemic regions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional investigation of hospitalized adults with neurobrucellosis from March 2007 to February 2017. We described the clinical characteristics, radiographical and laboratory features, and clinical outcomes of patients with neurobrucellosis. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with neurobrucellosis were included. The median age was 35 (interquartile range, 25-50) years, and 32 (59%) cases were male. Thirty-four (63%) patients were stockmen or shepherds. The most common clinical manifestations were fever in 49 (91%) cases, headache in 47 (87%), decreased consciousness in 12 (22%), and seizures in 6 (11%). Meningeal signs were detected in 36 (67%) cases. Brucella species were isolated in five cases from blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The median of CSF leukocytes was 75 per µL, CSF protein 83 mg/dL, and CSF glucose 39 mg/dL. Only two cases had severe hypoglycorrhachia and one CSF protein ≥ 500 mg/dL. No patient died during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms of neurobrucellosis could be mild and nonspecific and the classic triad of meningitis is uncommon. Mild CSF pleocytosis of fewer than 50 leukocytes per microliter of CSF was common but severe hyperproteinorrhachia and severe hypoglycorrhachia were rare in neurobrucellosis. Differentiation between neurobrucellosis and systemic brucellosis is important, because more prolonged treatment is indicated for neurobrucellosis, and it could be associated with a broad spectrum of complications that require close follow-up.
RESUMO
Background: Infectious diseases are commonly missed or misdiagnosed. Errors in diagnosing infectious diseases not only affect the patient but also the community health. Objectives: To describe our investigation on the most common errors in diagnosing infectious diseases and their causes according to the physicians' reports. Methods: Between August 2018 and February 2019, specialist physicians and residents across Mashhad, Iran were invited to participate in a survey to report errors they had made or witnessed regarding the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Results: Overall, 465 cases were reported by 315 participants. The most common infectious diseases affected by diagnostic errors were upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) (n = 69, 14.8%), tuberculosis (TB) (n = 66, 14.1%), pleuro-pulmonary infections (n = 54, 11.6%), central nervous system (CNS) infections (n = 51, 10.9%), and urinary tract infections (n = 45, 9.6%). Errors occurred most frequently in generating a diagnostic hypothesis (n = 259, 55/7%), followed by history taking (n = 200, 43%), and physical examination (n = 191, 41/1%). Errors related to the diagnosis of TB (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.9-5.7; P value: 0.047) and intra-abdominal infections (OR: 7.2, 95% CI: 0.9-53.8; P value: 0.02) were associated with more-serious outcomes. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of errors in diagnosing infectious diseases moderately or seriously affect patients' outcomes. URTIs, TB, and pleuropulmonary infections were the most frequently reported infectious diseases involved in diagnostic error while errors related to the diagnosis of TB and intraabdominal infections were more frequently associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, contagious and potentially life-threatening infectious diseases should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who present with compatible clinical syndromes.