Apparent Intracellular Helicobacter pylori Detected by Immunohistochemistry: The Missing Link in Eradication Failure.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is primarily an extracellularly living bacterium. However, seemingly intracellular occurrence can often be detected by immunohistochemical stains. Considering antimicrobial resistance, we investigated the impact of the apparent intracellular H. pylori (aiHp) on treatment failure of first-line triple therapies. METHODS: Gastric biopsies of 814 patients infected with H. pylori naive to treatment were analyzed before and after eradication therapy by immunohistochemistry. Of these, 373 received treatment consisting of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and proton pump inhibitor (AC/PPI). Availability of polymerase chain reaction-based clarithromycin susceptibility test results from pretreatment gastric biopsies was a precondition for matching 52 aiHp to 52 non-aiHp cases within the AC/PPI group. RESULTS: AiHp were detected mostly in low counts predominantly in corpus biopsies, rarely in antrum biopsies (95.2% vs 24.6%); they were found in 497 (61%) of all patients and in 192 of 373 patients (51.5%) in the AC/PPI group. The eradication rate in aiHp versus non-aiHp cases was 44.4% versus 72.9% in the entire sample and 45.3% versus 66.8% in the AC/PPI group. Among the 104 paired patients, respective values were 46.2% versus 78.8%; in clarithromycin-susceptible cases, 60.6% versus 91.9%. Both aiHp and resistance to clarithromycin proved to be highly significant (P ≤ .001) and independent predictors of eradication failure. Twelve of 13 aiHp cases with a clarithromycin-sensitive strain who failed eradication developed resistance to the antibiotic. CONCLUSIONS: AiHp found by immunohistochemical staining especially in corpus biopsies proved to be a risk factor for failure of first-line triple therapies; occurrence of aiHp should be considered with regard to therapy options.

When and why was the phrenicoabdominal branch of the left phrenic nerve placed into the esophageal hiatus in German textbooks of anatomy? An anatomical study on 400 specimens reevaluating its course through the diaphragm.

BACKGROUND: The phrenicoabdominal branch of the left phrenic nerve passes between muscle fiber bundles within the costal part of the diaphragm near the pericardium. In most German textbooks of anatomy, however, its passage is described to be found in the esophageal hiatus. The aim of this study was to reevaluate its topography relative to the diaphragm in a multicentric study and to identify the initiation of this description. METHODS: In this multicentric study, the most dorsomedial branch of the left phrenic nerve was identified as the phrenicoabdominal branch in 400 embalmed anatomic specimens of Caucasian origin. The distance between its passage and the apex of the pericardium, the left border of the esophageal hiatus, and the inner aspect of the left sixth rib was measured on the cranial aspect of the diaphragm. Textbooks on human anatomy published in German language between 1700 and 2018 were reviewed for their description of the passage of the left phrenicoabdominal branch through the diaphragm. RESULTS: The first statement on the passage of the left phrenicoabdominal branch through the esophageal hiatus was given in 1791 by Sömmering. Since then, in German textbooks of anatomy, a duality in the description of the passage of the left phrenicoabdominal branch persists. In none of the individuals examined in this study, the left phrenicoabdominal branch passed through the esophageal hiatus. In 99.5% of all cases, it pierced the costal part of the diaphragm dorsal to or at the same level as the apex of the pericardium. The mean distances (standard deviations) were 3.4 (±1.5) cm to the apex of the pericardium, 5.8 (±2.2) cm to the esophageal hiatus, and 5.5 (±1.6) cm to the inner aspect of the left sixth rib. CONCLUSION: The findings on the position of the left phrenicoabdominal branch relative to the diaphragm help to improve topographical knowledge and prevent inadvertent nerve injury during surgical interventions on or near the diaphragm. Further to this, these results may form a substantial basis to adopt the correct description of the passage of the left phrenicoabdominal branch to anatomical textbook knowledge.

Fascicular shifting: a novel technique to overcome large nerve defects.

OBJECTIVE Over the last decade, a number of authors have investigated the utility of different biological and synthetic matrices as alternatives to conventional nerve grafts. However, the autologous nerve graft remains the gold standard, even though it often involves using a pure sensory nerve to reconstruct a mixed or even a pure motor nerve. Furthermore, limited donor sites often necessitate a significant mismatch of needed nerve tissue, especially for large proximal nerve defects such as brachial plexus lesions. Here, the authors present a new technique that overcomes these problems: the fascicular shift procedure (FSP). A fascicular group of the nerve distal to the injury is harvested in a sufficient length to bridge the nerve defect. METHODS The method of fascicular shifting was tested at the sciatic nerve in 45 Lewis rats. In the experimental group, a 15-mm nerve defect was created and reconstructed with a fascicular group that was harvested directly distal to the gap. This group was compared with 1 negative control group (defect without reconstruction) and 3 positive control groups (sensory, motor, and mixed graft). After 12 weeks of nerve regeneration, outcome was evaluated using retrograde labeling, histomorphometric analysis, and muscle force analysis. RESULTS All reconstructed groups showed successful regeneration with various levels of function. The negative control group showed minimal force measurements that were of no functional value. The fascicular shift provided sufficient guidance to overcome nerve defects, had higher (p < 0.1) motor neuron counts (1958.75 ± 657.21) than the sensory graft (1263.50 ± 538.90), and was equal to motor grafts (1490.43 ± 794.80) and mixed grafts (1720.00 ± 866.421). This tendency of improved motor regeneration was confirmed in all analyses. The mixed graft group was compared with the experimental group to investigate the influence of the potential damage induced by the fascicular shift distal to the repair site. However, none of the analyses revealed an impairment of nerve regeneration for both the tibial and common peroneal index muscles. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that harvesting a transplant from the nerve segment distal to the injury site offers a mixed graft without causing additional donor-site morbidity. These grafts perform statistically better than a standard sensory graft in terms of motor recovery. The fascicular shift presents a novel method to reconstruct large proximal nerve defects, making it immensely attractive in brachial plexus reconstruction.