Preventing brachial plexus injury during shoulder surgery: a real-time cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexopathy is not uncommon after shoulder surgery. Although thought to be due to stretch neuropathy, its etiology is poorly understood. This study aimed to identify arm positions and maneuvers that may risk causing brachial plexopathy during shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Tensions in the cords of the brachial plexuses of 6 human cadaveric upper limbs were measured using load cells while each limb was placed in different arm positions and while they underwent shoulder hemiarthroplasty and revision reverse arthroplasty. Arthroplasty procedures in 4 specimens were performed with standard limb positioning (unsupported), and 2 specimens were supported from under the elbow (supported). Each cord then underwent biomechanical testing to identify tension corresponding to 10% strain (the stretch neuropathy threshold in animal models). RESULTS: Tensions exceeding 15 N, 11 N, and 9 N in the lateral, medial, and posterior cords, respectively, produced 10% strain. Shoulder abduction >70° and combined external rotation >60° with extension >50° increased medial cord tension above the 10% strain threshold. Medial cord tensions (mean ± standard error of the mean) in unsupported specimens increased over baseline during hemiarthroplasty (sounder insertion [4.7 ± 0.6 N, P = .04], prosthesis impaction [6.1 ± 0.8 N, P = .04], and arthroplasty reduction [5.0 ± 0.7 N, P = .04]) and revision reverse arthroplasty (retractor positioning [7.2 ± 0.8 N, P = .02]). Supported specimens experienced lower tensions than unsupported specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder abduction >70°, combined external rotation >60° with extension >50°, and downward forces on the humeral shaft may risk causing brachial plexopathy. Retractor placement, sounder insertion, humeral prosthesis impaction, and arthroplasty reduction increase medial cord tensions during shoulder arthroplasty. Supporting the arm from under the elbow protected the brachial plexus in this cadaveric model.

Comparing clinical outcomes between rotator cuff repairs, SLAP repairs, and combined repairs.

BACKGROUND: Superior labrum lesion from anterior to posterior (SLAP) often presents together with other shoulder pathologies such as rotator cuff tear (RCT), but it is uncertain if repairing both SLAP and RCT has superior clinical outcomes over isolated repairs of SLAP and RCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data, reviewing 157 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of either RCT, SLAP (type II lesion), or both. Before surgery and after 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks, shoulder objective range of motion and strength were measured, patient-reported function and pain was assessed by the modified L'Insalata questionnaire with a Likert scale, and complications after each repair were examined. RESULTS: At 24 weeks after surgery, the combined group (n = 22) and SLAP group (n = 47) had significantly higher forward flexion (165° ± 4° and 167° ± 4° vs. 154° ± 3°, P = .01 and P = .01), external rotation strength (82 ± 6 N, 81 ± 6 N vs. 61 ± 3 N, P = .01 and P = .01), and abduction strength (94 ± 14 N, 78 ± 8 N vs. 53 ± 3 N, P = .001 and P = .02) compared with the rotator cuff tear repair (RCR) group (n = 88). The combined group also had stronger internal rotation than the RCR group (107 ± 12 N vs. 72 ± 4 N, P = .02). Function and pain improved from "severe-moderate" to "moderate-mild" in all groups after surgery. CONCLUSION: Repairing RCT and SLAP tears together results in significant clinical benefits compared to repairing just RCT and analogous results against SLAP-only repair.

Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study.

Bone loss of the glenoid is a common finding in anterior glenohumeral instability. Several methods to measure the size of a glenoid defect have been described but have not been validated. In this study, 14 cadaver glenoids with a randomly created anteroinferior glenoid defect were used for validation of the so-called circle method. Measurements were done by 2 researchers on digital photographs, 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance images (MRI). The correlation coefficient (r(2)) for comparing measurements from the digital photographs with the CT scans was 0.97 for researcher 1 and 0.90 for researcher 2. When they compared digital images with MRI, the r(2) was 0.93 for researcher 1 and 0.92 for researcher 2. No statistical differences were found between the 2 researchers. The circle method is a simple method for preoperative quantification of a glenoid defect. Measurements can be done with 3D CT scans as well as MRI.

The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study.

Previously, the shape of the inferior glenoid has been described as a circle with a bare spot being the center of that circle. This cadaveric study was done to test that statement. Forty cadaveric scapulae were used in this study. Two researchers used a digital image analysis program to assess the shape of the inferior glenoid and measured the distances from the bare spot to the anterior, inferior, and posterior cartilage and the bone rim. In 39 of 40 scapulae, the inferior glenoid had the shape of a true circle. Statistical analysis showed that the center of the bare spot is not the mathematical center of the inferior glenoid, but the differences in distances to the anterior, inferior, and posterior rims were very small (1.16-2.41 mm). Both observations can be used for further development of methods for measuring glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability.