Ex vivo comparison of CBCT and digital periapical radiographs for the quantitative assessment of periodontal defects.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate imaging is essential for effective treatment planning in periodontology. The aim of this ex vivo study was to investigate the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiographs (PA) in imaging periodontal defects. Hypotheses are: 1. That CBCT is a more accurate method than PA concerning vertical measurements of periodontal bone defects2. That CBCT itself is an accurate method to describe vertical periodontal bone loss MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 117 periodontal defects from 10 human cadavers were investigated radiographically by CBCT and PA by one calibrated observer. Afterwards the vertical bone loss was measured with a periodontal probe by the same calibrated observer. Differences between radiographic and clinical measurements were calculated and analyzed. Bland-Altmann plots including 95% limits of agreement were calculated. RESULTS: The 95% limits of agreement ranged from 3.29 to -3.27 mm between clinical measurements and measurements in PAs, and from 2.13 to -1.97 mm in CBCTs. The mean difference between clinical and radiographic measurements was 0.0009 mm for PA and 0.0835 mm for CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the clinical measurements, CBCT had a higher agreement and less deviations than PAs, and CBCT seems to be an accurate method to describe vertical periodontal bone loss. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate description of defects is helpful for accurate treatment planning.

Ex vivo assessment of the buccal and oral bone by CBCT.

PURPOSE: Identifying buccal and oral bone as an important supporting periodontal structure for teeth provides important information for treatment planning in periodontics and orthodontics. This study aims to add evidence to the knowledge of preciseness of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of the vertical dimension of buccal and oral bone. The hypothesis is that CBCT is an accurate and reliable method to measure vertical vestibular and oral bone loss. METHODS: The amount of vertical buccal and oral bone loss (bl) of 260 sites of 10 human cadavers was investigated clinically and radiographically by CBCT. Radiographic measurements were rated by two blinded raters. Measurements and the corresponding differences between clinical and radiological findings are described by medians and quartiles (Q1-Q3). For statistical analysis, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman plots were calculated. RESULTS: The CCC between the raters was 0.994 (95% confidence interval 0.992-0.995). The median bone loss (bl) distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the bony defect (BD) was 3.5 mm (range 3-5 mm). The median bl measured in the CBCT was 3.8 mm (range 3.1-4.8 mm). The median difference of the 2 measurements for all sites included in the study (N = 260) was -0.2 mm (-0.7 to 0.3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT seems to be an accurate and highly reliable method to detect and describe vertical buccal and oral bone loss. It could improve planning and prediction for successful combined periodontal and orthodontic therapies.