Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonist dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin.

PURPOSE: This dose-ranging trial of intravenous dolasetron mesylate (MDL73,147EF) was performed to determine its adverse and antiemetic effects in patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients treated with initial cisplatin received a single intravenous dose of dolasetron mesylate administered over 20 minutes beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. The following four dose levels were studied: 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, and 5.0 mg/kg. Emesis and adverse effects were measured for 24 hours after cisplatin. RESULTS: All adverse effects were mild and transient including loose stools, headache, serum AST/ALT elevations, and asymptomatic prolongation of ECG intervals. Among the dose levels, no-emesis rates from 24% to 52% were observed, and the percentage of patients having zero, one, or two emetic episodes ranged from 48% to 82%. Complete control of vomiting increased as the dose was escalated to 2.4 mg/kg, but did not improve further with higher doses. CONCLUSION: Dolasetron mesylate can be administered safely at doses up to 5.0 mg/kg, with comparable complete protection rates and increased adverse effects at doses greater than 2.4 mg/kg. Antiemetic activity was seen after cisplatin. Trials comparing single infusions of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron are under way.

Integrated acidity and rabeprazole pharmacology.

BACKGROUND: Integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity can be calculated from measurements of gastric and oesophageal pH and used to quantify gastric and oesophageal acidity over time. Rabeprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor that is effective in treating gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: To use measurement of integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity to determine the onset, duration and overall effect of rabeprazole in subjects with GERD. METHODS: Subjects with GERD were required to have oesophageal pH less-than-or-equal 4 for at least 10% of a 24-h recording. Effects of 20 mg rabeprazole on 24-h gastric and oesophageal pH were measured on days 1 and 7 of dosing. Integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity were calculated from time-weighted average hydrogen ion concentrations at each second of the 24-h record. RESULTS: At steady-state, 20 mg rabeprazole inhibited gastric acidity by 89% and oesophageal acidity by 95%. The first dose of rabeprazole inhibited gastric and oesophageal acidity by at least 70% of the steady-state effect. Oesophageal acidity could be divided into monophasic and biphasic patterns, and rabeprazole had different effects on oesophageal and gastric acidity in these two GERD subpopulations. The onset of action of the first dose of rabeprazole on gastric acidity was 4 h and on oesophageal acidity was 4 h in monophasic subjects and 7 h in biphasic subjects. Integrated acidity was more sensitive than time pH less-than-or-equal 4 in measuring the inhibitory actions of rabeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity are quantitative measurements that provide useful and novel information regarding the pathophysiology of GERD as well as the impact of antisecretory agents such as rabeprazole.

Pharmacokinetics of dolasetron after oral and intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate in healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic dysfunction.

In previous studies, dolasetron was shown to have both renal and hepatic elimination mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine the impact of varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics and safety of dolasetron and its reduced metabolites. Seventeen adults were studied: six healthy volunteers (group I), seven patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A; group II), and four patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B or C1; group III). Single 150-mg doses of dolasetron mesylate were administered intravenously and orally, with a 7-day washout period separating treatments. After intravenous administration, no differences were observed between healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), or elimination half-life (t1/2) of intact dolasetron. No significant differences were found in Cmax, AUC, or apparent clearance (C(lapp)) of hydrodolasetron, the primary metabolite of dolasetron. The mean t1/2 increased from 6.87 hours in group I to 11.69 hours in group III. After oral administration, C(lapp) of hydrodolasetron decreased by 42%, and Cmax increased by 18% in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. There were less changes in patients with mildly hepatic impairment. Total percentage of dose excreted as metabolites was similar for healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment, although urinary metabolite profiles differed slightly. Dolasetron was well tolerated and there were no apparent differences in adverse effects between groups or treatments. Because hepatic impairment did not influence Cl(app) of hydrodolasetron after intravenous administration, and the range of plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron after oral administration was not different from those observed in healthy volunteers, dosage adjustments are not recommended for patients with hepatic disease and normal renal function.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging safety evaluation of single-dose intravenous dolasetron in healthy male volunteers.

The safety and tolerability of dolasetron mesylate, a potent and selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, were evaluated after single intravenous doses in healthy male volunteers. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase I study, 80 subjects received either placebo or dolasetron in escalating doses (0.6 to 5.0 mg/k). Subjects were monitored for adverse events, vital sign and laboratory alterations, and changes in electrocardiographic (ECG) intervals and electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns. Overall, the percentage of subjects reporting adverse events was similar in those receiving dolasetron (44/64; 68.8%) or placebo (10/16; 62.5%); most adverse events were mild in severity. Subjects receiving dolasetron reported a higher incidence of central nervous system (headache and dizziness/lightheadedness), gastrointestinal (increased appetite and nausea), and visual adverse events and taste alterations. No clinically significant changes in laboratory variables were observed. Transient and asymptomatic ECG changes (small mean increases in PR interval and QRS complex duration versus baseline) were noted in several subjects at 1 to 2 hours after infusion at doses > or = 3.0 mg/kg. Transient, mild blood pressure decreases were observed in five subjects, including one on placebo. Dolastron mesylate was well tolerated in single intravenous doses up to 5.0 mg/kg in healthy male volunteers. Clinical studies of the drug are ongoing for antiemetic indications.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of single-dose and divided multiple-dose dolasetron for cisplatin-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: Intravenous dolasetron has been shown to be an effective antiemetic agent in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Previous studies have suggested that 1.8 mg/kg is an optimal dose for achieving control of emesis and nausea. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous (IV) dose of dolasetron with an equal divided multiple dose. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of a single 1.8-mg/kg dose of dolasetron given 30 min prior to high-dose cisplatin ( > or = 80 mg/m2) chemotherapy was compared with the same total amount of dolasetron administered in three separate doses (0.6 mg/kg each) over a 12-h interval commencing 30 min prior to beginning chemotherapy and ending 11.5 h later. Antiemetic efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared in 55 patients with various malignancies during the 24 h following the initiation of chemotherapy. The number of emetic episodes was the primary efficacy parameter. RESULTS: A single IV dose of dolasetron was generally more effective than a multiple-dose regimen in all measures of efficacy. There was a larger proportion of complete responders in the single-dose group compared with the multiple-dose group (48% vs 23%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Compared with the multiple-dose group, patients who received a single dose of dolasetron had a significantly (P = 0.034) longer median time to the first emetic episode (10.1 h vs > 24 h, respectively). Overall, 53% of patients had either a complete response or a major response to dolasetron, and only 40% of the total patient population received escape antiemetic medication in the 24 h after cisplatin administration. Except for headache, adverse events were similar with both regimens and were generally of mild or moderate intensity; no serious adverse events occurred. Neither dolasetron treatment regimen was associated with any clinically important events, trends in laboratory variables, or differences in safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: single-dose dolasetron was well tolerated and effectively controlled emesis and nausea in patients who received highly emetogenic, high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. The greater antiemetic efficacy of a single prophylactic dose of dolasetron offers both convenience and potential cost savings, compared with a multiple-dose schedule of administration.

Single-dose, placebo-controlled, phase I study of oral dolasetron.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single, escalating doses of oral dolasetron mesylate, a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase I study. SETTING: A clinical research center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty healthy male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either placebo or oral dolasetron mesylate 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, or 400 mg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with placebo, subjects receiving dolasetron mesylate reported a greater frequency of headache, light-headedness, dizziness, increased appetite, and nausea. There were no clinically significant changes in mean laboratory values from before to after treatment. Adverse events were transient, mild or moderate, and similar to those after single intravenous doses of the drug. No clinically significant electrocardiographic changes occurred, but lengthening of the QRS complex duration and dose-dependent lengthening of PR and QTc intervals were observed 1-2 hours after dosing. These effects were asymptomatic and were mainly associated with higher doses (< or = 300 mg). CONCLUSION: Dolasetron mesylate is well tolerated when administered in single oral doses up to 400 mg to healthy volunteers. Clinical trials are under way to evaluate the agent's efficacy in preventing chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting with doses up to 200 mg.

Multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, phase I study of oral dolasetron.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of increasing dose levels of oral dolasetron mesylate, a new 5-HT3 antagonist. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase I study. SETTING: A clinical research center. PATIENTS: Forty healthy male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Eight subjects at each dose level were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive either dolasetron mesylate 25, 50, 100, 150, or 200 mg in a single oral dose on days 1 and 9, and twice/day on days 2-8, or placebo for 9 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Dolasetron was well tolerated at all dose levels. The adverse event rates for dolasetron- and placebo-treated subjects who experienced at least one adverse event were 80% and 50%, respectively. Most frequently reported by subjects receiving dolasetron were headache, constipation, flatulence, and lightheadedness. They generally were mild, and none was severe. No dose-response relationship was apparent for any adverse event. There were no clinically significant changes in mean laboratory values or vital signs. Asymptomatic treatment-related electrocardiographic changes were consistent with the drug's electrophysiologic properties. These changes have been well characterized and have thus far been clinically unimportant. Pharmacokinetics of the reduced metabolite were dose independent, and multiple-dose exposure of this metabolite can be predicted from its single-dose values. CONCLUSION: Oral dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated when administered in doses up to 200 mg/day for 9 days in healthy volunteers.

Antiemetic efficacy of two different single intravenous doses of dolasetron in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study compared the antiemetic effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of two different intravenous (i.v.) doses of dolasetron mesylate (0.6 and 1.8 mg/kg) in cancer patients receiving their first course of high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (> or = 75 mg/m2). Efficacy was assessed by recording the timing, number, and severity of emetic episodes in the 24 h following high-dose cisplatin. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, and electrocardiograms. Of the 62 patients enrolled in the study, 29 received 0.6 mg/kg of dolasetron mesylate and 33 received 1.8 mg/kg. Patients who received dolasetron mesylate 1.8 mg/kg consistently experienced a greater degree of antiemetic control than those who received 0.6 mg/kg. Complete responses were achieved by 55% of patients who received 1.8 mg/kg compared with 31% for the 0.6-mg/kg group. The 1.8-mg/kg group achieved a significantly (p = 0.039) higher complete/ major response rate than the 0.6-mg/kg group (77% vs 55%, respectively) and a significantly (p = 0.004) longer time to the first emetic episode (> 24 h vs 13.5 h, respectively). More than 80% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with dolasetron treatment. The most common adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, consistent with other studies, and included headache (24.1% of patients) and diarrhea (4.8%). These results demonstrated that a single 1.8-mg/kg i.v. dose of dolasetron mesylate provided effective antiemetic activity in a majority of patients given high-dose cisplatin for the first time and should be evaluated further in clinical trials.

Phase II trial of a single intravenous dose of ondansetron in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2.

Ondansteron, a serotonin antagonist antiemetic, controls emesis caused by cisplatin when given as multiple 0.15 mg/kg dosages in a variety of administration schedules. This trial evaluated a single 0.45 mg/kg i.v. dose of ondansetron in 21 cancer patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2 as initial chemotherapy. Twenty-five percent of patients had no emetic episodes (95% confidence interval: 9-49%), and 45% had two or fewer emetic episodes (95% confidence interval: 23-69%). No significant adverse effects were seen. In prior trials at this institution in similarly treated patients, ondansetron given in three divided doses yielded a 42% no emesis rate. In this trial a single i.v. 0.45 mg/kg dose of ondansetron prevented emesis in 25% of patients receiving initial cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2. For this dose of cisplatin and ondansetron, the observed emesis complete control rate was lower than that previously seen using multiple dose schedules.

Randomized comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of a serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist (MDL 72,222) with a high-dose metoclopramide regimen.

This pilot randomized study compared MDL 72,222, a highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, with a high-dose metoclopramide regimen (HDM) for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. MDL 72,222 was given in 20 mg intravenous doses 30 minutes before chemotherapy, as well as 2, 6, and 12 hours after chemotherapy infusion. The HDM was composed of diphenhydramine 50 mg i.v., metoclopramide 2 mg/kg i.v., and lorazepam 0.04 mg/kg i.v. administered 30 minutes before chemotherapy and 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to either MDL 72,222 (n = 12) or the HDM (n = 12) and were matched for age, weight, Karnofsky performance status, and chemotherapy. More patients in the MDL 72,222 group had received prior cisplatin. The MDL 72,222 group and the HDM group received a mean cisplatin dose of 66 mg/m2 and 62 mg/m2, respectively. Patients were observed for retching and/or emesis for 24 hours and completed a visual analog scale (VAS) for nausea. Six MDL 72,222 and five HDM patients had no vomiting. One MDL 72,222 and two HDM patients had one episode of emesis within 24 hours of chemotherapy. The median number of emetic episodes in the first 24 hours was 0.5 for MDL 72,222 and 1.0 for HDM patients. HDM patients were frequently asleep and were not awakened for evaluation of nausea with the VAS; 58% (70 of 120) of the HDM (mean score: 19.1 mm) and 14% (17 of 119) of the MDL 72,222 (mean score: 17.1) patients could not have VAS scores obtained (X2 = 50.74, p < 0.001). MDL 72,222 had similar efficacy with less sedation, and further trials are warranted.

Intravenous dolasetron mesilate in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in females undergoing gynecological surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a range of doses of intravenous (i.v.) dolasetron mesilate, in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial. SETTING: Ten hospitals and/or surgical centers. PATIENTS: 281 women undergoing gynecologic surgery with general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received one of four single, i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate (12.5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) or placebo administered following cessation of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were monitored for 24 hours following study drug administration. The antiemetic efficacy of each dolasetron mesilate dose was evaluated by recording the number and timing of emetic episodes, and the effects on nausea were assessed by use of visual analog scales (VAS). Safety was assessed by adverse event reports, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiographic (ECG) measurements, and monitoring vital signs. Complete responses (patients with no emetic episodes and no escape antiemetic medication requirements in 24 hours) were achieved by 54% in the 12.5-mg, 67% in the 25-mg, and 59% in both the 50-mg and 100-mg dolasetron mesilate dose groups, and by 43% in the placebo group. Nausea VAS assessments demonstrated that dolasetron-treated patients were significantly (p = 0.048) more likely to report no nausea (VAS score < 5 mm) than those in the placebo group. Adverse events reported generally were mild in intensity, and there were no clinically significant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs, or ECG parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Dolasetron was effective and well tolerated for the prevention of PONV in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery with general anesthesia.

Oral dolasetron mesylate for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Oral Dolasetron PONV Prevention Study Group.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and effectiveness of a range of single oral doses of dolasetron mesylate for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 32 hospitals. PATIENTS: 789 female ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, ages 18 to 60 years, weighing between 45 and 100 kg, scheduled for major gynecologic surgery (including abdominal hysterectomy, gynecologic laparotomy, or vaginal hysterectomy) with general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg oral doses of dolasetron mesylate or placebo were administered 1 to 2 hours before induction of anesthesia. Efficacy was assessed for 24 hours postrecovery by measuring complete response (no emetic episodes, no rescue medication), total response (complete response with no nausea), time to first emetic episode or rescue, and patient visual analog scale evaluations of nausea severity and satisfaction with antiemetic therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Complete response rates for the 50, 100, and 200 mg dose groups were statistically greater than placebo (p < or = 0.018). Likewise, total response rates were statistically greater in the 50, 100, and 200 mg dose groups than in the placebo group (p = 0.012). Percentage of patients with no nausea and patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher for each dolasetron dose group than placebo (p < or = 0.047 and p < or = 0.004, respectively). Efficacy peaked at the 50 mg dose. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the placebo (30.1%) and dolasetron groups (29.4%). Headache was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event, with 2% to 5% incidence across groups. Incidence of adverse events did not increase with increasing dolasetron doses. Dose-related decreases in blood pressure at acute time points were not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Single oral doses of dolasetron, administered 1 to 2 hours before induction of anesthesia, are safe and effective for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in this patient sample. Maximal antiemetic response was seen with the 50 mg oral dolasetron dose.

Parenteral control of gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Parenteral control of gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is increasingly required; however, existing methods of determining the required dose are cumbersome and not applicable in all centers. A previous study suggested that the required parenteral dose of histamine H2-receptor antagonists correlated with the previous oral dose. In the present study, in 31 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome we evaluated the hypothesis that an effective parenteral histamine H2-receptor antagonist dose could be predicted from the previous oral dose. Twenty-three patients were taking oral ranitidine (mean 1.3 g/day), six patients famotidine (152 mg/day), and two patients cimetidine (1.8 g/day). Each patient was treated with a continuous intravenous infusion of the equivalent dose of ranitidine (mean dose 1 mg/kg/hr with 35% requiring 0.5 mg/kg/hr, 49% 1 mg/kg/hr, 3% 1.5 mg/kg/hr, 10% 2 mg/kg/hr, and 3% 2.5 mg/kg/hr. This dose of ranitidine acutely controlled acid secretion (< 10 meq/hr) in all patients. To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety, 20 patients were maintained on this dose through the peri- and postoperative periods. Mean duration was 7.1 days with 25% treated 3-5 days, 40% 6-8 days, 30% 8-10 days, and 5% > 10 days. The predicted dose continued to control acid secretion in 95% of patients with one patient requiring one dose adjustment. No biochemical, clinical, or hematological toxicity was seen, although ranitidine was stopped in one patient because of skin rash. These results demonstrate that the parenteral dose of ranitidine required to control acid secretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome can be predicted from the oral dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Proglumide and benzotript: members of a different class of cholecystokinin receptor antagonists.

In dispersed acini from guinea pig pancreas, proglumide (DL-4-benzamido-N, N-dipropylglutaramic acid) and benzotript (N-p-chlorobenzoyl-L-tryptophan) caused a rightward shift in the dose--response curve for cholecystokinin-stimulated amylase secretion but did not alter the maximal increase in amylase secretion caused by cholecystokinin. At relatively low concentrations, proglumide did not alter the stimulation of enzyme secretion caused by secretagogues whose effects are mediated by adenosine 3'5'-monophosphate (e.g., vasoactive intestinal peptide or secretin) and did not alter the stimulation of enzyme secretion caused by secretagogues that have a mode of action similar to that of cholecystokinin but act through different receptors (e.g., bombesin, physalaemin, eledoisin, and ionophore A23187). There was a close correlation between the ability of proglumide or benzotript to inhibit binding of 125I-labeled cholecystokinin to its receptors on pancreatic acini and the abilities of these compounds to inhibit the action of cholecystokinin on enzyme secretion and on calcium outflux. These results indicate that proglumide and benzotript are members of a different class of cholecystokinin receptor antagonists.

A double-blind, randomized study of two different dosage regimens of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

This study compared the antiemetic efficacy and safety of two different intravenous (i.v.) dolasetron dosing regimens in patients receiving their first course of high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin. Of 30 patients enrolled, 14 received a single i.v. dolasetron dose (0.6 mg/kg) before cisplatin and 16 received a multiple i.v. dose regimen (0.6 mg/kg x 3) given before and after cisplatin. Complete plus major responses were achieved by 71% (10/14) of patients who received single-dose dolasetron and by 50% (8/16) of those who received the multiple-dose regimen. Forty-three percent (6/14) of patients who received the single dose had a complete response compared with 25% (4/16) who received multiple doses. Multiple doses resulted in less nausea at 24 hr following cisplatin; however, differences were not statistically significant. Both regimens were well tolerated, with mild headache (33%) and diarrhea (13%) the most common adverse events. This study demonstrated that a single 0.6-mg/kg dose of dolasetron given before chemotherapy provides equivalent antiemetic efficacy to three 0.6-mg/kg doses given before and after high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy; thus, there was no additional antiemetic benefit by using the multiple-dose regimen.

Intravenous pharmacokinetics and absolute oral bioavailability of dolasetron in healthy volunteers: part 1.

In this first part of a two-part investigation, the intravenous dose proportionality of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and the absolute bioavailability of oral dolasetron mesylate were investigated. In an open-label, randomized, four-way crossover design, 24 healthy men between the ages of 19 and 45 years received the following doses: 50, 100, or 200 mg dolasetron mesylate administered by 10-min intravenous infusion or 200 mg dolasetron mesylate solution administered orally. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 48 h after dosing. Following intravenous administration, dolasetron was rapidly eliminated from plasma, with a mean elimination half-life (t1/2) of less than 10 min. Dolasetron was rarely detected in plasma after oral administration of the 200 mg dose. Hydrodolasetron, the active primary metabolite of dolasetron, appeared rapidly in plasma following both oral and intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate, with a mean time to maximum concentration (t(max)) of less than 1 h. The mean t1/2 of hydrodolasetron ranged from 6.6-8.8 h. The plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity)) for both dolasetron and hydrodolasetron increased proportionally with dose over the intravenous dose range of 50-200 mg dolasetron mesylate. Approximately 29-33%) and 22% of the dose was excreted in urine as hydrodolasetron following intravenous and oral administration of dolasetron, respectively. For dolasetron as well as hydrodolasetron, mean systemic clearance (C1), volume of distribution (Vd), and t1/2 were similar at each dolasetron dose. The mean 'apparent' bioavailability of dolasetron calculated using plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron was 76%. The R(+) enantiomer of hydrodolasetron represented the majority of drug in plasma (> 75%) and urine (> 86%). Dolasetron was well tolerated following both oral and intravenous administration.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of oral dolasetron and its active metabolites in healthy volunteers: part 2.

The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and dose-proportionality of oral dolasetron and its active metabolites over the therapeutic dose range was investigated in 18 healthy men. In an open-label, randomized, complete three-way crossover design, each subject received three separate doses: 50, 100, and 200 mg doses of dolasetron mesylate solution given orally. Each dose was administered on the morning of Days 1 and 3-7 during each of the three treatment periods. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 48 h after the first and last doses. Blood was analysed for dolasetron and hydrodolasetron concentrations; urine was analysed for dolasetron, the R(+) and S(-)-enantiomers of hydrodolasetron, and the 5'-hydroxy and 6'-hydroxy metabolites of hydrodolasetron. Dolasetron was rarely detected in plasma. Hydrodolasetron was formed rapidly, with a time to maximum concentration (t(max)) of less than 1 h. Steady-state conditions for hydrodolasetron were reached 2-3 days after starting once-daily dosing. Although statistical significance was found for hydrodolasetron AUC(0->infinity) and C(max) between dose groups after both single and multiple doses of dolasetron, the differences were small and unlikely to be of clinical significance. About 17-22% of the dose was excreted in urine as hydrodolasetron, with the majority (> 83%) as the R(+) enantiomer.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous dolasetron in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147, Anzemet, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Kansas City, MO) is a 5-HT ( 3 ) receptor antagonist undergoing clinical evaluation as an antiemetic agent. Dolasetron is rapidly metabolized to form hydrodolasetron (MDL 74,156). The pharmacokinetics of hydrodolasetron were studied after administration of a single intravenous infusion of 0.6 mg/kg (group I) or 1.8 mg/kg (group II) in 21 cancer patients participating in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial of the drug in patients receiving their first course of high-dose (>/=75 mg/m ( 2 ) ) cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. The intent of this study was to obtain preliminary data on the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite, hydrodolasetron, in cancer patients. The reduced metabolite, hydrodolasetron, was formed rapidly with peak plasma concentrations (group I, mean = 128.6 ng/mL; group II, mean = 505.3 ng/mL) occurring at or shortly after the end of the infusion. Plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron remained quantifiable for up to 24 hours. Increases in peak plasma concentrations and AUC of hydrodolasetron were proportional to dose, suggesting linear pharmacokinetics over this dose range. Apparent clearance, apparent volume of distribution, elimination rate, and terminal elimination half-life of the reduced metabolite were similar at both doses. The results support a pharmacokinetic basis for the prolonged duration of antiemetic efficacy after a single intravenous dose.

Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting with single intravenous doses of dolasetron mesylate: a multicenter trial. Dolasetron Mesylate PONV Treatment Study Group.

UNLABELLED: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of four intravenous (I.V.) doses of dolasetron, an investigational 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) after outpatient surgery under general anesthesia. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial compared the antiemetic efficacy of 12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg I.V. dolasetron with placebo over 24 h using complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication), time to first emetic episode or rescue medication, and patient nausea and satisfaction with antiemetic therapy as rated by visual analog scale (VAS). Of 1557 patients enrolled, 620 patients were eligible for treatment. Complete response rates for all dolasetron doses--12.5 mg (35%), 25 mg (28%), 50 mg (29%), and 100 mg (29%)--were significantly more effective than placebo (11%, P < 0.05). There was a significant gender interaction for complete response (P < 0.01). Of the patients in the 25-mg and 100-mg dose groups, 12% and 13%, respectively, experienced no nausea (VAS score < 5 mm) versus 5% in the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs or laboratory values and no trends with dose for adverse events. Dolasetron is effective for treating PONV and has an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. The 12.5-mg dose was as effective as larger doses for complete response. IMPLICATIONS: Nausea and vomiting are common problems for postsurgical patients. In this study of 620 patients undergoing surgery, a 12.5-mg dose of intravenous dolasetron, a new serotonin-receptor blocker, was significantly more effective than placebo in treating established postoperative nausea and vomiting. Dolasetron 12.5 mg was as safe as placebo.