Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 702: 134642, 2020 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31734606

RESUMO

Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) are elements with similar chemistry, toxicity and binding properties, but different environmental risks and prevailing anthropogenic sources. A significant source of Sb contamination is associated with braking in extremely loaded traffic areas, where the produced abrasion dust contains up to 5% wt. of Sb2S3. In these same exposure areas, As still originates mostly from the combustion of fossil fuels. Heavily loaded crossroads from three different regions of the Czech Republic (Central Europe) were monitored for Sb content in road dusts, topsoils and reference soils during a two-year season (2016-2017). The same samples were also tested for As content to evaluate current contamination trends of both elements in exposed urban areas. The concentration of Sb varied from 5 to 70 µg g-1 in topsoils, and from 20 to 350 µg g-1 in road dusts with the preference for binding to the fine particle fraction (<0.1 mm). The average Sb concentration was up to 60 times the background value and decreased in the order: brake abrasion (103 µg g-1) > road dust (102 µg g-1)> topsoils (101 µg g-1) >> reference soils (<1 µg g-1). The concentration of As in road dust, topsoils and reference soils had about the same level, 101 µg g-1 indicating a more regional character of As pollution. Correlation factors for Sb/As versus iron (Fe)/organic matter (OM) indicated a more robust correlations in soils compared to road dusts and generally better correlations of Sb compared to As. While arsenic contamination has recently decreased thanks to a massive decline of arsenic emissions, antimony contamination indicates a dangerous trend due to growing automotive traffic.

2.
Appl Opt ; 44(30): 6426-43, 2005 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16252654

RESUMO

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) Ames Research Center's Airborne Sensor Facility (ASF) is responsible for the calibration of several airborne Earth-viewing sensor systems in support of NASA Earth Observing System (EOS) investigations. The primary artifact used to calibrate these sensors in the reflective solar region from 400 to 2500 nm is a lamp-illuminated integrating sphere source. In September 1999, a measurement comparison was made at the Ames ASF Sensor Calibration Facility to validate the radiometric scale, establish the uncertainties assigned to the radiance of this source, and examine its day-to-day repeatability. The comparison was one of a series of validation activities overseen by the EOS Calibration Program to ensure the radiometric calibration accuracy of sensors used in long-term, global, remote-sensing studies. Results of the comparison, including an evaluation of the Ames Sensor Calibration Laboratory (SCL) measurement procedures and assigned radiometric uncertainties, provide a validation of their radiometric scale at the time of the comparison. Additionally, the maintenance of the radiance scale was evaluated by use of independent, long-term, multiyear radiance validation measurements of the Ames sphere source. This series of measurements provided an independent assessment of the radiance values assigned to integrating sphere sources by the Ames SCF. Together, the measurements validate the SCF radiometric scale and assigned uncertainties over the time period from September 1999 through July 2003.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA