Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Adolesc Health ; 65(1): 116-123, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879881

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In Victoria (Australia), the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is delivered within a state-wide secondary school vaccine program, administered by local government. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that sending a short message service (SMS) reminder to parents who had consented to their child's receiving the HPV vaccine would lead to greater uptake of the vaccine within the program. The secondary aim was to assess the effect of self-regulatory versus motivational message content in the SMS. METHODS: A randomized control trial design was used across 31 schools within seven local government areas. Parents of 4,386 consented adolescents were randomized into three study conditions: motivational SMS versus self-regulatory SMS versus no SMS. Follow-up extended beyond the final school visit to the end of the calendar year to capture those who may have attended a catch-up vaccination session. RESULTS: On the day of the final school visit, 85.71% of consented students in the control condition received the HPV vaccine, compared with 88.35% (2.64% point increase) in the motivational message condition, and 89.00% (3.29% point increase) in the self-regulatory message condition, χ2 (2, N = 4,386) = 8.31, p = .016. Both intervention messages were similarly effective at increasing vaccination rates. This effect was maintained in the extended follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The trial findings supported the hypothesis that SMS reminders to parents/guardians would lead to greater uptake of the HPV vaccine in adolescents participating in school-based vaccination. Also, this effect was observed whether we used a motivational or self-regulatory message framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617001307392). Registration Date: September 12, 2017. Retrospectively registered.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Pais/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Sistemas de Alerta , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Feminino , Programas Governamentais , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Masculino , Motivação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Instituições Acadêmicas , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Vitória
2.
Vaccine ; 36(45): 6790-6795, 2018 10 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30279091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Australia, the influenza vaccine is funded for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter referred to as Aboriginal) children aged 6 months to <5 years old. In Victoria, only 2% of Aboriginal children are vaccinated against influenza. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether sending a letter or sending a pamphlet directly to parents/guardians would improve influenza vaccine uptake amongst Aboriginal identified children. DESIGN: The study involved a multi-arm, parallel, randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups and one control group. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: Participants included parents or guardians of Victorian children (aged 6 months to <5 years) who identified as Aboriginal. Households (n = 5534) were randomised (using a random number generator) to receive either a personalised letter (n = 1845), a pamphlet (n = 1845), or no direct communication (control) (n = 1844). The letter and the pamphlet were designed using the INSPIRE framework - a set of behaviour change techniques for action-oriented communication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of households where all eligible children received the influenza vaccine between 2 May 2017 and 1 September 2017. RESULTS: The control group's vaccination rate was 4.4%, higher than previous years. The pamphlet group achieved a similar vaccination rate (4.5%). The letter group's vaccination rate of 5.9% was significantly higher than the control group [χ2 (1, n = 3689) = 4.33, p = .037]. CONCLUSIONS: Sending a personalised letter directly to parents/guardians was an effective strategy for increasing influenza vaccination among Aboriginal children. The ineffectiveness of the pamphlet may be due to the lack of personalisation and the authority associated with the letter. Additional research is required to understand participant responses to the material. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 13 September 2017 (ACTRN12617001315303).


Assuntos
Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Austrália , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Masculino , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA