Factors Related to Difficulty in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer is technically challenging, and research on predictive factors related to the difficulty in the procedure is limited. This study aimed to investigate the factors predicting the difficulty in esophageal ESD. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 303 lesions treated at our institution between April 2005 and June 2021. The following 13 factors were evaluated: sex, age, tumor location, tumor localization, macroscopic type, tumor size, tumor circumference, preoperative diagnosis of histological type, preoperative diagnosis of invasion depth, previous radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, metachronous lesion located close to post-ESD scar, operator's skill, and use of a clip-and-thread traction method. Difficult esophageal ESD cases were defined as those requiring long procedure time (>120 min). RESULTS: Fifty-one lesions (16.8%) met the defined criterion for difficult cases of esophageal ESD. Logistic regression analysis identified tumor size larger than 30 mm (odds ratio: 9.17, 95% confidence interval: 4.27-19.69, p < 0.001) and tumor circumference more than half that of the esophagus (odds ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-5.54, p = 0.021) as independent predictive factors related to difficulty in esophageal ESD. CONCLUSION: Tumor size larger than 30 mm and tumor circumference more than half that of the esophagus can predict difficulty in performing esophageal ESD. This knowledge can provide useful information for developing ESD strategies and selecting a suitable operator on a case-by-case basis to achieve favorable clinical outcomes.

Efficacy of Endoscopic Resection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Smaller than 15 mm.

BACKGROUND: Local resection, including endoscopic resection, is recommended for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) < 15 mm in patients without risk factors for metastasis, though the short- and long-term outcomes are unclear. AIMS: This study investigates the efficacy of endoscopic resection for rectal NETs < 15 mm. METHODS: The short- and long-term outcomes of patients with rectal NETs < 15 mm who underwent endoscopic resection and the outcomes of each endoscopic technique were analyzed. The tumors were stratified as < 10 mm (small-size group, SSG) and 10-14 mm (intermediate-size group, IMG). RESULTS: Overall, 139 lesions (SSG, n = 118; IMG, n = 21) were analyzed. All tumors were classified as G1 (n = 135) or G2 (n = 4) according to the 2019 World Health Organization grading criteria. The complete resection rate was not different between the groups (P = 0.151). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) achieved complete resection rates > 90% in the SSG. The ESMR-L procedure time (P < 0.001) and hospitalized period (P < 0.001) were significantly shorter than those of ESD. ESD achieved a complete resection rate of 80.0% in the IMG. The tumor size did not affect the overall survival or rate of lymph node/distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection is a feasible and effective treatment for patients with rectal NETs < 15 mm without the risk factors of metastasis. ESMR-L and ESD are optimal techniques for resecting tumors smaller than 10 mm and 10-14 mm, respectively.

Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with acetic acid and narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of duodenal neoplasms: proposal of a diagnostic algorithm.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the features of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) on magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) and magnifying endoscopy with acetic acid and narrow-band imaging (M-AANBI), and evaluate the efficacy of M-NBI/M-AANBI to distinguish high-grade adenomas or adenocarcinomas (HGA/AC) from low-grade adenomas (LGA). METHODS: Clinicopathological data on 62 SNADETs in 58 patients who underwent preoperative M-NBI/M-AANBI and endoscopic resection were retrospectively reviewed. The pathological results were classified into two categories, LGA and HGA/AC. We evaluated microvascular patterns (MVPs) and microsurface patterns (MSPs) observed by M-NBI and MSPs observed by M-AANBI for characterizing LGA and HGA/AC. The kappa value was calculated to assess the interobserver and intraobserver agreements of evaluation of M-AANBI images. RESULTS: Pathologically, 38 lesions (61.3%) were LGA and 24 lesions (38.7%) were HGA/AC. HGA/AC tended to have irregular MVP and/or MSP on M-NBI. M-NBI diagnostic performance to distinguish HGA/AC from LGA showed 62.5% sensitivity, 68.4% specificity, and 66.1% accuracy. SNADETs had irregular MSP on M-AANBI. Three irregularity grades (iG) of MSP were observed by M-AANBI as follows: iG1, mild; iG2, moderate; iG3, significant. HGA/AC lesions had a significantly higher rate of iG3 than LGA lesions (p < 0.001). The iG2 was associated with HGA/AC in elevated lesions and LGA in depressed lesions. The diagnostic performance of M-AANBI was as follows: 95.8% sensitivity, 97.4% specificity, and 96.8% accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of M-AANBI was significantly higher than that of M-NBI (p < 0.001). The kappa value for interobserver agreement on the diagnosis and irregularity grading of M-AANBI images was 0.742 and 0.719, respectively. These data indicate substantial interobserver agreement. Based on the above-mentioned results, we developed a M-AANBI diagnostic algorithm for SNADETs. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic algorithm for SNADETs using M-AANBI may be useful for differentiating between LGA and HGA/AC.

Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2-60.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.

Utility of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyp histology in clinical practice: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) highlights the surface structures and vessels of colorectal polyps and is useful for determining the polyp histology. The narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification is a diagnostic tool for determining colorectal polyp histology based on NBI without optical magnification. In this study, we aimed to investigate the value of each type of the NICE classification for determining colorectal polyp histology using endoscopy data accumulated in a clinical setting. METHODS: Endoscopy data for 534 colorectal polyps (316 patients) treated at our facility were retrospectively analyzed. First, we investigated the diagnostic performance of each type of the NICE classification for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyp histology. The procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists using high-definition colonoscopy without optical magnification. Second, inter-observer and intra-observer agreements were assessed after providing experts and non-experts with a short lecture on the NICE classification. Using 50 fine NBI images of colorectal polyps without optical magnification, the inter-observer and intra-observer agreements between five experts and five non-experts were assessed. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 86.0%, 99.6%, and 98.5% for NICE type 1 lesions; 99.2%, 85.2%, and 97.8% for NICE type 2 lesions; and 81.8%, 99.6%, and 99.3% for NICE type 3 lesions, respectively. The inter-observer and intra-observer agreements ranged from substantial to excellent for both experts and non-experts. CONCLUSIONS: The NICE classification had good diagnostic ability in terms of determining the polyp histology and demonstrated a high level of reproducibility among experts and non-experts. Thus, the NICE classification is a useful clinical tool that can be used without optical magnification.

Esophageal squamous cell neoplasia is an independent negative prognostic factor for head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) have a high incidence of esophageal squamous cell neoplasms (ESCN). ESCN also has a negative impact on the survival of HNC patients. However, recent endoscopic advances enable the early detection of ESCN, and novel treatments may lead to improving survival rates for HNC patients with ESCN. METHODS: HNC patients who underwent magnifying esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) from 2005 to 2012 were included in this study (n = 226). We analyzed the prevalence and prognostic value of ESCN in HNC patients and the difference in overall survival between HNC patients with and without ESCN. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (15%) developed an ESCN during their clinical course. Of the 34 patients, 10 patients underwent endoscopic resection for ESCN and 10 patients underwent simultaneous chemoradiation therapy for HNC and ESCN. The 3-year survival rates in HNC patients with and without ESCN were 53% and 70%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the advanced clinical stage of the HNC [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.18-3.93; p = 0.012] and the presence of ESCN (HR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.00-2.97; p = 0.049) as significant and independent determinants of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that although the survival of HNC patients with ESCN may be improved by routine EGDS during tumor surveys and by advances in endoscopy, the presence of ESCN still remains an independent negative prognostic factor for HNC patients.

[Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooporative Surgery(LECS)for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Tumor - A Case Report].

INTRODUCTION: We report a case ofsuperf icial non-ampullary duodenal tumor(SNADT)resected by laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery(LECS)technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old man underwent screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy revealed 0- II a+ II c mucosal lesion measuring 15mm in size located the portion ofduodenum contralateral to the ampulla ofVater. During observation, irregularity in depressed mucosa was observed and malignant alteration was suspected. So, we performed local resection with LECS as diagnostic therapy. During operation, endoscopic mucosal resection(ESD)was performed first. Next, duodenum was mobilized laparoscopically and the floor of the ulcer was closed with endoscopy guided laparoscopic suturing technique. Histopathology revealed tubular adenoma and the resection margin was negative. DISCUSSION: SNADT is rare condition and therapeutic strategy for SNADT has not established. Further study are needed.