RESUMO
Background Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has been a long-debated topic in medical circles in the last 40 years. Studies usually concentrate on the opinions and responses of the family members of the patients being resuscitated. Only a handful of studies have focussed on the medical practitioner's opinions and beliefs on the topic. Hence, this study aimed to investigate opinions and beliefs regarding FPDR among emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methodology This was a self-filled, questionnaire-based study conducted among 450 EMPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Proportions and subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to gender, experience, and seniority. EMPs were asked about the number of family members they would allow to attend the resuscitation of a patient under their care in different clinical scenarios. Results A total of 392 (87.1%) EMPs participated in this study. Overall, 64% (n = 250) of EMPs reported that they would not allow FPDR in cases that involved trauma, or if the patient being revived was female. This percentage dropped to about 33% (n = 129) when the patient being resuscitated was a child or in out-of-hospital arrest. The majority of EMPs believed that the decision to allow FPDR was the physician's decision (n = 251, 64.8%) and not the right of the family (n = 133, 34.7%). Moreover, emergency medicine board-certified physicians were more likely to allow FPDR in different cases with 19 (18.5%) in adult arrest cases, 18 (18%) in pediatric cases, and 16 (15.1%) in trauma cases, than non-board-certified practitioners (p = 0.001, 0.007, and 0.031, respectively). Female EMPs were more likely to refuse FPDR than their male counterparts (p < 0.001). Conclusions Approximately, 60-70% of EMPs allowed a member of the family to attend the resuscitation of their loved one. However, this percentage dropped in cases where the patient was a female, or the case was a trauma case instead of a medical case. Most Saudi EMPs believed that FPDR hurts the resuscitating team and might hinder the resuscitation efforts.
RESUMO
Background The overuse of medical testing, be it ancillary testing or imaging, has been identified as a problem in all healthcare systems in the world. As the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia marches towards the 2030 vision of healthcare transformation, we have sought to get a perspective on medically unnecessary tests being conducted in Saudi Arabian emergency departments (EDs), the reasons behind this phenomenon, and possible solutions to it. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey among emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) working in Saudi Arabian EDs, taken through a self-filled online questionnaire, about their ordering habits, what they believe to be unnecessary testing in their practice, the practice of their colleagues, and other Saudi EMPs as a whole. Subjects have also been asked about the reasons why such practices are occurring and possible solutions to reduce such overuse of unnecessary tests in Saudi EDs. Results A total of 182 EMPs were surveyed from the different regions of the Kingdom, and CT head for patients presenting with asymptomatic stroke, and asymptomatic TBI were the most overused scans (both 44%). The most overused advanced body imaging was CT kidney-ureters-bladder (KUB) at 41.5%, while the most overused ancillary tests were complete blood count (CBC) and liver transaminases. The most common reason for the practice was found to be fear of medicolegal proceedings (70.9%). Continuous education of EMPs and increasing ED staffing were found to be the most helpful solutions to reduce unnecessary testing in the ED (70.9% and 67%, respectively). Conclusion It is clear from our data that overuse of medical tests and imaging is still a prominent practice. CT head in asymptomatic patients seems to be the most commonly overused imaging in Saudi EDs. Ancillary testing and unnecessary ordering of CBCs and transaminases seem to stem from fear of EMPs from legal consequences. More control over medical test ordering needs to be exercised to reduce these practices.