Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 19(5): 539-44, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17823399

RESUMO

A panel of 36 sera has been assembled from experimental cattle that had been infected by inoculation or contact exposure with 4 serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) with or without prior vaccination. Virus replication and persistence had been characterized in all of the animals. The proportion of the sera scored positive by 5 tests for antibodies to the nonstructural proteins of FMDV varied, suggesting that the panel can discriminate between the sensitivity with which such tests are able to identify infected cattle. Use of this panel will help in assessment of new tests and quality control of existing methods.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Doenças dos Bovinos/diagnóstico , Vírus da Febre Aftosa/imunologia , Febre Aftosa/sangue , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/imunologia , Animais , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/sangue , Doenças dos Bovinos/imunologia , Febre Aftosa/imunologia , Febre Aftosa/virologia , Vírus da Febre Aftosa/classificação
2.
Vaccine ; 28(11): 2318-22, 2010 Mar 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20056183

RESUMO

To determine the longevity of protective immunity following a single administration of emergency vaccine, and establish whether the immune response could be enhanced by increasing the antigen payload even further, cattle were vaccinated with an A22 Iraq vaccine containing either 1x antigen payload (field dose) or 5x antigen payload. Six months post-immunisation all cattle received a homologous virus challenge. The magnitude of the virus neutralising antibody response elicited was consistent with the response to similarly formulated A serotype vaccines with a PD(50) greater than 32. All the vaccinated cattle, regardless of antigen payload, were protected from clinical disease following challenge although some cattle in both groups became sub-clinically infected. We conclude that immunisation with a single inoculation of vaccine from the UK emergency reserve can protect cattle from clinical disease for at least 6 months post-vaccination and that a boost may be unnecessary in an outbreak situation. Some animals may become sub-clinically infected but this is likely to be dependent on the severity of challenge. The study confirmed that a booster at 21 days post-vaccination was not necessary to maintain a cell-mediated response in cattle for 6 months. No increased benefits were recognised by increasing the antigen payload of this vaccine 5x.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Bovinos/prevenção & controle , Febre Aftosa/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Bovinos , Imunização Secundária , Linfócitos/imunologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Reino Unido
3.
Vaccine ; 25(44): 7687-95, 2007 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17913309

RESUMO

The effect of administering higher payload FMD vaccines 10 days prior to severe direct contact challenge on protection from clinical disease and sub-clinical infection was investigated in cattle using two antigen payloads (single strength and 10-fold). Regardless of antigen payload, vaccination was shown to significantly reduce the number of clinically infected animals, and significantly reduce virus excretion shortly after challenge, when compared with the unvaccinated group (P<0.05). Although FMDV transmission occurred from single strength vaccinated infected cattle to similarly vaccinated cattle held in indirect contact, no disease was induced in these animals. These studies further confirm that emergency vaccination does significantly reduce clinical disease and sub-clinical virus replication and excretion, particularly early post exposure, thereby reducing the possibility of transmission between animals and herds. To be most effective, however, the results also substantiate that time of vaccination prior to challenge significantly influences the number of animals becoming infected, so the decision to vaccinate should be made swiftly, to allow maximum opportunity for protective immunity to develop.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Bovinos/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Febre Aftosa/imunologia , Febre Aftosa/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Bovinos , Masculino , Orofaringe/virologia , RNA Viral/análise , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Vacinação , Viremia/prevenção & controle , Viremia/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA