RESUMO
Knowledge and perception on transmission and control of SARS-COV-2 infection are key to preventing outbreak of the disease in healthcare settings and in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. This study assessed the level of knowledge on SARS-COV-2 infection prevention, transmission and symptoms of COVID-19, as well as perceptions regarding prevention of SARS-COV-2 infection among allied radiation medicine professionals. Cross-sectional descriptive survey was carried out among 145 radiation medicine professionals in Ghana using facts on COVID-19 as presented on the website of the World Health Organization and data was analyzed based on weighted average indices. Overall, the extent of knowledge among allied radiation medicine professionals on the symptoms of COVID-19, transmission and control of SARS-COV-2 infection in radiation medicine facilities were all adequate, with weighted average indices of 3.8, 4.1 and 4.4 respectively. However, overall perception of the respondents regarding the use of radiation medicine procedures in management of COVID-19 was diverse, with weighted index of 3.5. The facts about COVID-19 that were identified to be most known were shortness of breath being a serious symptom of the disease and fever being a common symptom. The extent of knowledge on the fact that "SARS-COV-2 infection can be transmitted through small droplets from the nose or mouth of an infected person" was almost excellent, with weighted average index of 4.9. Also, the thinking that provision of hand washing and sanitizing facilities is a measure for controlling the infection was almost perfectly shared among the respondents. Computed tomography was perceived by majority of the respondents as the most preferred imaging modality for screening patients for COVID-19. The study shows that some aspects of the awareness of radiation medicine professionals on COVID-19 pandemic are adequate and others need critical improvement to help reduce spread of the disease.
RESUMO
We aimed to assess the relationship between bone scintigraphy findings and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score in a group of treatment naïve West Africans with prostate cancer. The age, PSA, and Gleason scores of 363 patients with prostate cancer were collected. Patients were risk stratified using the D'Amico criteria. Logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between bone scan results and PSA and Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic reliability of the bone scan findings. Ninety of the 96 patients with metastases had high risk, and only 6 had low-to-intermediate risk disease (P = 0.0001). PSA (odds ratio [OR] 2.4 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-3.8], P = 0.001) and GS (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.5-3.1], P = 0.001) were independently predictive of the presence of metastases. ROC analysis revealed that PSA predicted the presence of metastases with an area under the curve of 0.72, and using a cut-off value of ≥20 predicted metastases with a sensitivity of 86.5% and specificity of 41.2%. A Gleason score of ≥7 had an 89.6% sensitivity and 34.8% specificity for bone metastases. Using a Gleason cutoff of ≥8, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting bone metastases were 54.2% and 71.5%, respectively. The area under the Gleason score ROC curve was 0.68. PSA and Gleason score are independent predictors of the presence of bone metastases in West Africans with prostate cancer.