Borderline mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with systemic sclerosis: transpulmonary gradient predicts risk of developing pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and borderline mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) at cardiac catheterization are more likely to develop pulmonary hypertension (PH) than those in whom pulmonary pressure is normal. METHODS: Patients with SSc in whom PH and significant interstitial lung disease had been excluded at baseline were enrolled in our prospective cohort. Analysis of followup data identified patients who met prespecified criteria prompting repeat catheterization to reassess for possible PH. Using Kaplan-Meier, receiver operating characteristic, and Cox regression methods, we studied the development of PH and death. RESULTS: Of 228 patients in this study, 86 had borderline mean PAP (21-24 mm Hg) at baseline. Following prespecified criteria, 76 patients underwent repeat catheterization, and 29 of these developed PH. Two cases were related to disease of the left side of the heart. The average mean PAP increased from baseline (20.2 mm Hg) to followup (24.3 mm Hg) (P<0.05 by Student's t-test). Patients with borderline mean PAP were more likely to develop PH than patients with mean PAP≤20 mm Hg (P<0.001 by log rank test, hazard ratio [HR] 3.7). A transpulmonary gradient (TPG)≥11 mm Hg at baseline also predicted PH (P<0.001 by log rank test, HR 7.9). Incident development of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was not benign, with a mortality of 18% within 3 years. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that borderline mean PAP and an elevated TPG in patients with SSc predict progression to PH. These patients should be monitored closely for the development of PH. Our findings indicate that catheterization data are useful in patients considered at risk of PAH.

Clinical experience with bosentan and sitaxentan in connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: To report outcomes in patients with CTD-pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTD-PAH) in an observational cohort treated with bosentan or sitaxentan and determine whether differences would justify a randomized, controlled multicentre study in this subpopulation. METHODS: Patients with CTD-PAH, diagnosed by right-heart catheter studies, were assigned to either bosentan or sitaxentan based on physician choice. All patients were followed up with repeat assessments and data were collected for the local registry database. RESULTS: The bosentan- (n = 32) and sitaxentan- (n = 22) treated groups had comparable haemodynamic and prognostic measures at baseline. Repeat haemodynamic assessments showed reductions in pulmonary vascular resistance with bosentan (-99 dynes/s/cm(5), P < 0.01) and sitaxentan (-92 dynes/s/cm(5), P < 0.05). The 6-min walk distance improved at 3 months with sitaxentan (25 m, P < 0.05). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels fell in the bosentan cohort at 6 months (-70 pmol/l, P < 0.05) and 1 year (-83 pmol/l, P < 0.01). Haemoglobin fell with both drugs (at 3 months -0.5 g/dl bosentan, P < 0.05 and -0.9 g/dl sitaxentan, P < 0.005). Calculations of the difference in treatment effect did not demonstrate superiority of either therapy. The 1-year estimated clinical worsening event rates were high: 41% sitaxentan, 62% bosentan (P = 0.142), with serious event rates of 27 and 14% (P = 0.263, log-rank test), respectively. Six patients discontinued bosentan because of transaminase elevation within the first year. Estimated 1-year survival was similar in both groups and 96% overall. CONCLUSION: Both sitaxentan and bosentan appear effective in CTD-PAH, but the apparent additional benefit of sitaxentan reported from the open-label Sitaxentan To Relieve ImpaireD Exercise-2X study was not confirmed in this observational cohort. Although survival has improved, event rates continue to be substantial and CTD-PAH remains a therapeutic challenge.

Characteristics and Survival of Anti-U1 RNP Antibody-Positive Patients With Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe complication of connective tissue diseases (CTDs). This study aimed to investigate the clinical and hemodynamic characteristics and survival of anti-U1 RNP-positive patients with CTD-associated PAH, with a focus on systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated PAH. METHODS: We implemented a prospective database that included patients with CTD-associated PAH for whom there were clinical, autoantibody, and mortality data. We compared clinical and hemodynamic characteristics to anti-U1 RNP antibody status. We then assessed whether anti-U1 RNP antibodies could be a prognostic factor in CTD-associated PAH with a focus on SSc-associated PAH. RESULTS: We studied a total of 342 patients with CTD-associated PAH, of whom 36 (11%) were anti-U1 RNP antibody positive. Anti-U1 RNP-positive patients were younger and less functionally impaired than were anti-U1 RNP-negative patients in CTD- and SSc-associated PAH. Hemodynamic parameters were similar in anti-U1 RNP-positive and anti-U1 RNP-negative patients. In CTD-associated PAH, anti-U1 RNP positivity was associated with decreased mortality in univariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.34 [95% confidence interval 0.18-0.65], P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, anti-U1 RNP positivity was also associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio 0.44 [95% confidence interval 0.20-0.97], P = 0.043) independently of age, sex, functional parameters, lung involvement, and hemodynamic parameters. Results were similar in SSc-associated PAH, although the association between anti-U1 RNP positivity and survival did not reach significance in univariable (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% confidence interval 0.22-1.02], P = 0.055) and multivariable (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% confidence interval 0.20-1.11], P = 0.085) analyses. CONCLUSION: Anti-U1 RNP positivity was associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival in CTD- and SSc-associated PAH. While hemodynamic parameters were similar in anti-U1 RNP-positive and anti-U1 RNP-negative patients, our results suggest that anti-U1 RNP positivity could be a factor protecting against mortality in CTD- and SSc-associated PAH.

Role of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-TproBNP) in scleroderma-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic value and to explore the prognostic value of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-TproBNP) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) both with and without pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS AND RESULTS: N-TproBNP, six-minute walk distance (SMWD), haemodynamics (at right heart catheterization) or tricuspid gradient (by echocardiography), and survival were assessed in 109 patients with SSc. The study population included 68 individuals with PAH [mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) >25 mmHg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure <15 mmHg] and 41 individuals without PAH. In patients with PAH, the prognostic value of baseline and change in WHO functional class, N-TproBNP levels, and SMWD were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 months (range 1-18 months). One year survival in patients with normal PAP was 100% when compared with 83.5% in those with SSc-PAH (P < 0.05). The patients without PAH had a mean N-TproBNP level of 139 pg/mL (SD 151); those with SSc-PAH had a significantly higher mean N-TproBNP level of 1474 pg/mL (SD 2642) (P = 0.0002). Among patients with PAH for every order of magnitude increase in N-TproBNP level there was a four-fold increased risk of death (P = 0.002 for baseline level and P = 0.006 for follow-up level). Baseline N-TproBNP levels were correlated positively with mean PAP (r = 0.62; P < 0.0001), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (r = 0.81; P < 0.0001), and inversely with SMWD (r = -0.46; P < 0.0001). Among patients with SSc-PAH, 13 patients (19%) were in WHO functional classes II and had mean N-TproBNP levels of 325 pg/mL (SD 388). Fifty-three patients (78%) were in WHO classes III and IV and had significantly higher mean N-TproBNP levels of 1677 pg/mL (SD 2835) (P = 0.02). At an N-TproBNP level of 395 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting the presence of SSc-PAH were 56 and 95% respectively. CONCLUSION: Raised N-TproBNP levels are directly related to the severity of PAH. In screening programs, SSc patients with an N-TproBNP in excess of 395 pg/mL have a very high probability of having pulmonary hypertension. Baseline and serial changes in N-TproBNP levels are highly predictive of survival. A 10-fold increase in N-TproBNP level on therapy is associated with a greater than three-fold increase in mortality, and may indicate therapeutic failure.