Fifth metacarpal neck fractures treated with soft wrap/buddy taping compared to reduction and casting: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of fifth metacarpal neck fractures (boxers fracture) are treated conservatively without surgery. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial was to determine if the outcomes of soft wrap and buddy taping (SW) was noninferior to reduction and cast (RC) in boxer's fracture with palmar angulation ≤70° and no rotational deformity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with similar characteristics were prospectively enrolled and randomized at four institutions. Our primary outcome was measured by the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) questionnaire at 4 months. Noninferiority was claimed if there was no more than +10 points difference in the quickDASH. Other secondary radiographic and clinical outcomes were measured. RESULTS: At 4 months, mean difference in the quickDASH between the two groups was -10.4 (95 % confidence interval, -27.0; +6.2) which was under the pre-specified margin. There was no significant difference between both groups' secondary outcomes of pain, satisfaction with the esthetic appearance, mobility of the metacarpophalangeal-joint at flexion and extension, or power grip. Increased fracture angulation, as measured on follow-up radiographs, was not significantly different between both groups. The degree of palmar fracture angulation was not related to work leave or profession. Duration of time off from work was 11 days shorter in SW compared to RC (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of soft wrap and buddy taping for treatment of boxer's fracture with palmar angulation ≤70° and no rotational deformity. Although there was no statistical difference in satisfaction with the esthetic appearance, the patient must be willing to accept the loss of the "knuckle" with this treatment method.

The traumatic lower extremity amputee: surgical challenges and advances in prosthetics.

The mangled lower extremity is a challenging injury to treat. Orthopaedic surgeons treating patients with these severe injuries must have a clear understanding of contemporary advantages and disadvantages of limb salvage versus amputation. It is helpful to review the acute management of mangled extremity injuries in the civilian and military populations, to be familiar with current postoperative protocols, and to recognize recent advances in prosthetic devices.

Morel-Lavallee Lesion in the Upper Extremity.

Background: The Morel-Lavallee lesion (MLL) is a closed internal degloving injury that results from shearing of the skin and subcutaneous tissue from the underlying fascia. Disruption of the perforating blood vessels and lymphatics results in a lesion filled with serosanguinous fluid and necrotized fat. MLLs are most commonly described in association with pelvic and lower extremity trauma, and there are limited reports of these lesions in other locations. Methods: This case report describes a 58-year-old male referred from his primary care physician with a soft tissue mass in the upper arm. Careful history discovered prior trauma with extensive bruising and MRI revealed a large encapsulated mass consistent with MLL. Results: An open debridement with excision of pseudocapsule was performed. Meticulous closure over a drain was performed and the patient healed without complication or recurrence. Intra-operative cultures were negative and pathology was consistent with MLL. Conclusion: MLL should always be considered in the setting of previous trauma regardless the location. In the chronic setting an open approach with excision of pseudocapsule can have an acceptable result.