Bone turnover markers as determinants of bone density and fracture in men with distal forearm fractures: the pathogenesis examined in the Mr F study.

The pathogenesis for low-trauma wrist fractures in men is not fully understood. This study found that these men had evidence of significantly higher bone turnover compared with control subjects. Bone turnover markers were negative predictors of bone mineral density and were a predictor of fracture. INTRODUCTION: Men with distal forearm fractures have reduced bone density, an increased risk of osteoporosis and of further fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not men with distal forearm fractures had evidence of altered bone turnover activity. METHODS: Fifty eight men with low-trauma distal forearm fracture and 58 age-matched healthy control subjects were recruited. All subjects underwent a DXA scan of the forearm, both hips, and lumbar spine, biochemical investigations, and health questionnaires. Measurements of beta crosslaps (ßCTX), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), sclerostin, Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1), and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF 23) were made. RESULTS: Men with fracture had significantly higher PINP than controls at 39.2 ng/ml (SD 19.5) versus 33.4 ng/ml (SD13.1) (p<0.001). They also had significantly higher ßCTX at 0.45 ng/ml (SD 0.21) versus 0.37 ng/ml (SD 0.17) (p= 0.037). Fracture subjects had significantly lower aBMD and PINP was a negative predictor of aBMD at the total hip and ßCTX a negative predictor of forearm aBMD. Sclerostin was a positive predictor of aBMD at the lumbar spine and hip sites. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) at 37nmol/L (SD 15.0) was lower in fracture cohort compared to 47.9 nmol/L (SD 19.2) (p=0.001) in control. Multiple regression revealed that the best model for prediction of fracture included SHBG, P1NP, and ultra-distal forearm aBMD. The likelihood of distal forearm fracture was decreased by 5.1% for each nmol/L increase in SHBH and by 1.4% for every mg/cm2 increase in ultra-distal forearm aBMD, but increased by 6.1 % for every ng/ml increase in P1NP. Men in the highest quartile of PINP had a significantly greater likelihood of distal forearm fracture than those in the lowest quartile. CONCLUSION: The fracture group had significantly higher PINP and ßCTX compared with the control group, and these markers were negative predictors of aBMD at the total hip and forearm sites, respectively. Sclerostin was a positive predictor of the variance of spinal and hip aBMD. Likelihood of forearm fracture was best predicted by a combination of SHBG, PINP, and ultra-distal forearm aBMD. Findings of such cross-sectional data should be treated with caution, as longitudinal studies would be required to confirm or refute them.

Does regional loss of bone density explain low trauma distal forearm fractures in men (the Mr F study)?

The pathogenesis of low trauma wrist fractures in men is not fully understood. This study found that these men have lower bone mineral density at the forearm itself, as well as the hip and spine, and has shown that forearm bone mineral density is the best predictor of wrist fracture. INTRODUCTION: Men with distal forearm fractures have reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and hip sites, an increased risk of osteoporosis and a higher incidence of further fractures. The aim of this case-control study was to investigate whether or not there is a regional loss of bone mineral density (BMD) at the forearm between men with and without distal forearm fractures. METHODS: Sixty-one men with low trauma distal forearm fracture and 59 age-matched bone healthy control subjects were recruited. All subjects underwent a DXA scan of forearm, hip and spine, biochemical investigations, health questionnaires, SF-36v2 and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). The non-fractured arm was investigated in subjects with fracture and both forearms in control subjects. RESULTS: BMD was significantly lower at the ultradistal forearm in men with fracture compared to control subjects, in both the dominant (mean (SD) 0.386 g/cm2 (0.049) versus 0.436 g/cm2 (0.054), p < 0.001) and non-dominant arm (mean (SD) 0.387 g/cm2 (0.060) versus 0.432 g/cm2 (0.061), p = 0.001). Fracture subjects also had a significantly lower BMD at hip and spine sites compared with control subjects. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictor of forearm fracture was ultradistal forearm BMD (OR = 0.871 (0.805-0.943), p = 0.001), with the likelihood of fracture decreasing by 12.9% for every 0.01 g/cm2 increase in ultradistal forearm BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Men with low trauma distal forearm fracture have significantly lower regional BMD at the ultradistal forearm, which contributes to an increased forearm fracture risk. They also have generalised reduction in BMD, so that low trauma forearm fractures in men should be considered as indicator fractures for osteoporosis.

Effects of psychological distress and perceptions of illness on recovery from total knee replacement.

This cohort study investigated the influence of psychological factors, including perception of illness, anxiety and depression on recovery and functional outcome after total knee replacement surgery. A total of 100 patients (55 male; 45 female) with a mean age of 71 (42 to 92) who underwent a primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis were recruited into this study. In all 97 participants completed the six week and 87 the one year follow-up questionnaires. Pre-operatively patients completed the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Recovery Locus of Control Scale. Function was assessed pre-operatively, at six weeks and one year using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the goniometer-measured range of movement (ROM). The results showed that pre-operative function had the biggest impact on post-operative outcome for ROM and OKS. In addition questionnaire variables and depression had an impact on the OKS at six weeks. Depression and anxiety were also associated with a higher (worse) knee score at one year but did not influence the ROM at either six weeks or one year. Recovery from total knee replacement can be difficult to predict. This study has identified psychological factors that play an important role in recovery from surgery and functional outcome. These should be taken into account when considering patients for total knee replacement.

Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff: functional outcome and integrity of the repair after a mini-open procedure.

The aim of this study was to determine the functional outcome and rate of re-tears following mini-open repair of symptomatic large and massive tears of the rotator cuff using a two-row technique. The 24 patients included in the study were assessed prospectively before and at a mean of 27 months (18 to 53) after surgery using the Constant and the Oxford Shoulder scores. Ultrasound examination was carried out at follow-up to determine the integrity of the repair. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a simple questionnaire. The mean Constant score improved significantly from 36 before to 68 after operation (p < 0.0001) and the mean Oxford Shoulder score from 39 to 20 (p < 0.0001). Four of the 24 patients (17%) had a re-tear diagnosed by ultrasound. A total of 21 patients (87.5%) were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. The repair remained intact in 20 patients (83%). However, the small number of re-tears (four patients) in the study did not allow sufficient analysis to show a difference in outcome in relation to the integrity of the repair.