RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The bone-specific physical activity questionnaire (BPAQ) provides a bone-relevant index of physical activity participation according to the mechanical loads experienced across the life span. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We aimed to examine relationships between historical bone-relevant physical activity and pQCT-derived parameters of bone strength. We recruited 532 healthy volunteers (277 males, 255 females) across a broad age range (4-97 years). Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (XCT-3000, Stratec, Germany) was used to examine volumetric bone density, area, and strength indices of the non-dominant tibia and radius. Exercise loading history from birth was determined using the past BPAQ (pBPAQ) score. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine relationships between pBPAQ scores and pQCT parameters. RESULTS: Independent of sex, pBPAQ scores were associated with total density at the 38% and 66% tibial sites and the 66% radial site (r = 0.145-0.261, p Ë 0.05), total area at the 38% tibial site and 4% and 66% radial sites (r = 0.129-0.156, p Ë 0.05), and strength indices at all measured sites (r = 0.123-0.234, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that, independent of sex, historical bone-relevant physical activity is associated with pQCT-derived indices of bone strength, indicating that pBPAQ captures the characteristics of bone loading history that are likely to be relevant adaptive stimuli. A larger sample is required to examine the influence of age on this relationship.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Osso e Ossos , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Exercício Físico , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Rádio (Anatomia)/diagnóstico por imagem , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
ISSUE ADDRESSED: Osteoporosis presents a serious public health issue and physical activity is recognised as the most effective modifiable risk factor for the condition. The reasons behind physical activity participation, however, are complex. We therefore aimed to explore the experiences related to a bone-targeted exercise intervention, determine enjoyment and acceptability of each exercise mode, and identify barriers and facilitators to osteogenic exercise for young adult women. METHODS: The present study was conducted within the Osteoporosis Prevention Through Impact and Muscle-loading Approaches to Exercise (OPTIMA-Ex) trial, a three-arm RCT comparing musculoskeletal outcomes from two supervised, high-intensity, exercise programs (impact and resistance training) with an unsupervised low-intensity exercise control. A mixed-methods approach was used, including quality of life and physical activity enjoyment questionnaires and qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: All groups had improvements in the 'mental health' domain of the quality of life measure; however, the two supervised exercise groups had greater levels of physical activity enjoyment. The qualitative analysis revealed that overall the trial activities were positively, yet the two supervised groups had 'richer' exercise experiences. Motivations for participation, barriers to physical activity and desired continuation of participation differed between all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that bone-targeted exercise interventions for young adult women must address perceived time demands and environmental barriers to participation in order to maximise compliance and adherence. SO WHAT?: As physical activity is the most effective lifestyle strategy to improve bone health and young adulthood an important window for its augmentation, increasing convenience, accessibility and understanding of osteoporosis preventative behaviours in this demographic is vital.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Prazer , Adulto , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Motivação , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Physical exercise induces spatially heterogeneous adaptation in bone. However, it remains unclear where the changes in BMD and geometry have the greatest impact on femoral neck strength. The aim of this study was to determine the principal BMD-and-geometry changes induced by exercise that have the greatest effect on femoral neck strength. Pre- and post-exercise 3D-DXA images of the proximal femur were collected of male participants from the LIFTMOR-M exercise intervention trial. Meshes with element-by-element correspondence were generated by morphing a template mesh to each bone to calculate changes in BMD and geometry. Finite element (FE) models predicted femoral neck strength changes under single-leg stance and sideways fall load. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) models were developed with BMD-only, geometry-only, and BMD-and-geometry changes to determine the principal modes that explained the greatest variation in neck strength changes. The PLSR models explained over 90% of the strength variation with 3 PLS components using BMD-only (R2 > 0.92, RMSE < 0.06 N) and 8 PLS components with geometry-only (R2 > 0.93, RMSE < 0.06 N). Changes in the superior neck and distal cortex were most important during single-leg stance while the superior neck, medial head, and lateral trochanter were most important during a sideways fall. Local changes in femoral neck and head geometry could differentiate the exercise groups from the control group. Exercise interventions may target BMD changes in the superior neck, inferior neck, and greater trochanter for improved femoral neck strength in single-leg stance and sideways fall.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Colo do Fêmur , Masculino , Humanos , Fêmur , Exercício Físico , Absorciometria de Fóton/métodosRESUMO
Physical exercise induces spatially heterogeneous bone changes in the proximal femur. Recent advances have enabled 3D dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)-based finite element (FE) models to estimate bone strength. However, its ability to detect exercise-induced BMD and strength changes is unclear. The aim of this study was to quantify the repeatability of vBMD and femoral neck strength obtained from 3D-DXA images and determine the changes due an exercise intervention. The DXA scans included pairs of same-day repeated scans from ten healthy females and pre- and post-exercise intervention scans of 26 males. FE models with element-by-element correspondence were generated by morphing a template mesh to each bone. BMD and femoral strength under single-leg-stance and sideways fall loading configurations were obtained for both groups and compared. In the repeated images, the total hip vBMD difference was 0.5 ± 2.5%. Element-by-element BMD differences reached 30 ± 50%. The strength difference in single-leg stance was 2.8 ± 13% and in sideways fall was 4.5% ± 19%. In the exercise group, strength changes were 6 ± 19% under single-leg stance and 1 ± 18% under sideways fall. vBMD parameters were weakly correlated to strength (R2 < 0.31). The exercise group had a mean bone accrual exceeding repeatability values in the femoral head and cortical regions. The case with the highest vBMD change (6.4%) caused 18% and -7% strength changes under single-leg stance and sideways fall. 3D-DXA technology can assess the effect of exercise interventions in large cohorts but its validity in individual cases should be interpreted with caution.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Colo do Fêmur , Absorciometria de Fóton , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , MasculinoRESUMO
It is well known that the bone response to physical activity is highly dependent on the nature of the loads imposed. Despite this, few direct comparisons of the effect of impact-style loading and resistance training on bone have been made. We therefore aimed to compare the effects of 10-month, twice-weekly, high-impact loading and 10-month, twice-weekly, high-intensity resistance training on indices of bone strength of both the upper and lower limbs of young adult women. Physically inactive, otherwise healthy, young adult women (18-30 years) with below average bone mass (T-score ≤ 0) were recruited as part of the OPTIMA-Ex trial. Testing included DXA- and pQCT-derived measures of bone mass and indices of bone strength and QUS-derived measures of bone quality of the dominant (D) and non-dominant (ND) upper (radius) and lower limbs (femoral neck, tibia, calcaneus). The present study examined those participants who completed the impact training (IT; n = 10) and resistance training (RT; n = 12) arms of the trial. Age differed between groups at baseline (IT = 23.2 ± 3.8 years, RT = 20.5 ± 1.8 years; p = 0.042). Compliance with the training programs did not differ (IT = 61.4 ± 15.1%, RT = 66.4 ± 11.2%, p = 0.381). Age and baseline differences in bone outcomes served as covariates for repeated measures and univariate ANCOVA conducted for dependent variables and percent change respectively. IT improved distal pQCT-derived bone mineral density (BMD) of the upper limb (ND radius: total BMD = 8.55 ± 2.26% versus 1.50 ± 2.04%, p = 0.040 and trabecular BMD = 1.86 ± 0.90% versus -1.30 ± 0.81%, p = 0.029) and lower limb (ND tibia trabecular BMD = 1.22 ± 0.55% versus -0.82 ± 0.50%, p = 0.017), more than RT. IT also improved upper limb bone strength index (BSI) (ND radius total BSI = 15.35 ± 2.83% versus 2.67 ± 2.55, p = 0.005) and lower limb BSI (D tibia total BSI = 5.16 ± 1.13% versus 0.37 ± 1.02%, p = 0.008; D tibia trabecular BSI = 3.93 ± 1.76% versus -2.84 ± 1.59, p = 0.014, ND tibia trabecular BSI = 3.57 ± 1.63% versus -3.15 ± 1.48%, p = 0.009) more than RT. Conversely, RT improved DXA-derived cortical volumetric BMD at the femoral neck more than IT (3.68 ± 1.99% versus -4.14 ± 2.20%, p = 0.021). Results suggest that IT and RT provide differing site-specific effects in both the upper and lower limbs, with superior bone responses observed at the distal segment from IT, while RT appeared to have greater effect on the shaft of the bone, on indices of bone-strength in young adult women.
Assuntos
Treinamento Resistido , Adulto , Densidade Óssea , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Rádio (Anatomia)/diagnóstico por imagem , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Few data exist on the effects of bone-targeted exercise on geometric and biomechanical indices of bone strength in men. The Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis Rehabilitation for Men (LIFTMOR-M) trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of two novel, supervised, twice-weekly, high-intensity exercise programs in middle-aged and older men with osteopenia and osteoporosis on musculoskeletal health and risk factors related to falls and fractures. The current report includes secondary outcomes of the LIFTMOR-M exercise intervention trial. PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine the effects of two supervised, twice-weekly, high-intensity exercise programs on bone geometry and strength of the proximal femur, and distal and proximal sites of the tibia and radius in middle-aged and older men with osteopenia and osteoporosis. METHODS: Generally-healthy men (≥45 years), with low lumbar spine (LS) and/or proximal femur areal bone mineral density (aBMD), were recruited from the community. Eligible participants were randomised to either eight months of twice-weekly supervised high-intensity progressive resistance and impact training (HiRIT) or supervised machine-based isometric axial compression (IAC) exercise training. Intervention group outcomes were compared at baseline and eight months with a matched but non-randomised control group (CON) who self-selected to usual activities. DXA scans (Medix DR, Medilink, France) of the skeletally non-dominant proximal femur were analysed using 3D hip software (DMS Group, France) to derive femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) bone mineral content (BMC), volume, and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) for total, trabecular and cortical bone compartments. Total FN cortical thickness was determined as well as anterior, posterior, lateral and medial subregions. pQCT scans (XCT-3000, Stratec, Germany) of the 4 and 38% sites of the tibia, and 4 and 66% sites of the radius were conducted to determine a range of geometric and bone structural strength indices. Intervention effects were examined using univariate ANCOVA of percent change, and repeated measures ANCOVA of raw baseline and follow-up data, controlling for initial values, using intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. RESULTS: Ninety-three men (67.1 ± 7.5 yrs, 175.2 ± 6.7 cm, 82.1 ± 11.6 kg, 26.7 ± 3.5 kg/m2) with lower than average aBMD (LS T-score -0.06 ± 1.04, FN T-score -1.58 ± 0.58, TH T-score -1.00 ± 0.58) were recruited, and designated CON (n = 26) or randomised to HiRIT (n = 34) or IAC (n = 33). Compliance to the supervised exercise programs did not differ (HiRIT 77.8 ± 16.6% versus IAC 78.5 ± 14.8%, p = 0.872). HiRIT improved medial FN cortical thickness compared with CON (5.6 ± 1.7% versus -0.1 ± 1.9%, p = 0.028) and IAC (5.6 ± 1.7% versus 0.7 ± 1.7%, p = 0.044). Distal tibia total BMC, vBMD, area and bone strength index, and trabecular BMC and bone strength index all declined for CON compared with maintenance for both HiRIT and IAC (all p < 0.05). HiRIT maintained distal tibia trabecular area compared with a loss in CON (0.2 ± 0.5% versus -1.6 ± 0.5%, p = 0.013). HiRIT and IAC maintained distal radius total BMC compared with loss in CON (-0.1 ± 0.7% versus -3.7 ± 0.8%, p = 0.001; 1.3 ± 0.7% versus -3.7 ± 0.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). HiRIT and IAC maintained distal radius total bone strength index compared with loss in CON (1.4 ± 1.4% versus -6.0 ± 1.6%, p = 0.001; 0.2 ± 1.3% versus -6.0 ± 1.6%, p = 0.004, respectively). HiRIT reduced proximal radius cortical area compared with CON (-3.1 ± 1.0% versus 1.1 ± 1.2%, p = 0.011) and IAC (-3.1 ± 1.0% versus -0.2 ± 1.0%, p = 0.042). No between-group differences were detected in any pQCT-derived bone outcome at the diaphyseal tibia 38% site. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that supervised HiRIT provides a positive stimulus to cortical bone at the medial FN compared with supervised IAC exercise, and both HiRIT and IAC preserve bone strength at the distal tibia and distal radius. These effects may translate into a reduced risk of lower and upper extremity fracture in middle-aged and older men with low bone mass.
Assuntos
Osteoporose , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , França , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculos , Rádio (Anatomia) , TíbiaRESUMO
The Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis Rehabilitation for Men (LIFTMOR-M) trial examined efficacy and safety of two novel exercise programs in older men with low BMD. Men with low hip and/or LS BMD were randomized to high-intensity progressive resistance and impact training (HiRIT) or machine-based isometric axial compression (IAC) and compared to a nonrandomized matched control (CON). Outcomes included: hip and LS BMD; calcaneal ultrasound parameters; anthropometry; body composition; function (timed up-and-go [TUG], five-times sit-to-stand [FTSTS]); back extensor strength (BES); leg extensor strength (LES); compliance and adverse events. Ninety-three men (67.1 ± 7.5 years; 82.1 ± 11.6 kg; 175.2 ± 6.7 cm; FN T-score -1.6 ± 0.6) were randomized to HiRIT (n = 34) or IAC (n = 33), or allocated to CON (n = 26). HiRIT improved trochanteric BMD (2.8 ± 0.8%; -0.1 ± 0.9%, p = .024), LS BMD (4.1 ± 0.7%; 0.9 ± 0.8%, p = .003), BUA (2.2 ± 0.7%; -0.8 ± 0.9%, p = .009), stiffness index (1.6 ± 0.9%; -2.0 ± 1.1%, p = .011), lean mass (1.5 ± 0.8%; -2.4 ± 0.9%, p = .002), TUG, FTSTS, BES, and LES (p < .05) compared with CON. IAC improved lean mass (0.8 ± 0.8%; -2.4 ± 0.9%, p = .013) and FTSTS (-4.5 ± 1.6%; 7.5 ± 2.0%, p < .001) compared with CON. HiRIT improved LS BMD (4.1 ± 0.7%; 2.0 ± 0.7%, p = .039), stiffness index (1.6 ± 0.9%; -1.3 ± 0.9%, p = .025), and FTSTS (-10.7 ± 1.6%; -4.5 ± 1.7%, p = .010) compared with IAC. Exercise compliance was high (HiRIT 77.8 ± 16.6%; IAC 78.5 ± 14.8%, p = .872). There were five minor adverse events (HiRIT, 2; IAC, 3). HiRIT was well-tolerated and improved bone, function and fracture risk more than CON or IAC. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas , Fraturas Ósseas , Osteoporose , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , MúsculosRESUMO
Optimal osteogenic mechanical loading requires the application of high-magnitude strains at high rates. High-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) applies such loads but is not traditionally recommended for individuals with osteoporosis because of a perceived high risk of fracture. The purpose of the LIFTMOR trial was to determine the efficacy and to monitor adverse events of HiRIT to reduce parameters of risk for fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Postmenopausal women with low bone mass (T-score < -1.0, screened for conditions and medications that influence bone and physical function) were recruited and randomized to either 8 months of twice-weekly, 30-minute, supervised HiRIT (5 sets of 5 repetitions, >85% 1 repetition maximum) or a home-based, low-intensity exercise program (CON). Pre- and post-intervention testing included lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) and measures of functional performance (timed up-and-go, functional reach, 5 times sit-to-stand, back and leg strength). A total of 101 women (aged 65 ± 5 years, 161.8 ± 5.9 cm, 63.1 ± 10.4 kg) participated in the trial. HiRIT (n = 49) effects were superior to CON (n = 52) for lumbar spine (LS) BMD (2.9 ± 2.8% versus -1.2 ± 2.8%, p < 0.001), femoral neck (FN) BMD (0.3 ± 2.6% versus -1.9 ± 2.6%, p = 0.004), FN cortical thickness (13.6 ± 16.6% versus 6.3 ± 16.6%, p = 0.014), height (0.2 ± 0.5 cm versus -0.2 ± 0.5 cm, p = 0.004), and all functional performance measures (p < 0.001). Compliance was high (HiRIT 92 ± 11%; CON 85 ± 24%) in both groups, with only one adverse event reported (HiRIT: minor lower back spasm, 2/70 missed training sessions). Our novel, brief HiRIT program enhances indices of bone strength and functional performance in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Contrary to current opinion, HiRIT was efficacious and induced no adverse events under highly supervised conditions for our sample of otherwise healthy postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/fisiopatologia , Treinamento Resistido , Idoso , Composição Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Desempenho Físico Funcional , Treinamento Resistido/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Exercise is commonly recommended in the prevention and management of osteoporosis. The most common method to monitor bone mass and its response to interventions is bone densitometry. While closely associated with risk of fracture, densitometry-derived areal bone mineral density (aBMD) does not provide a reliable indication of bone geometry or morphological adaptation to stimuli. In fact, the effects of exercise interventions on aBMD are frequently modest, and may not fully represent the benefit of exercise to bone. Animal models suggest that mechanical loading indeed influences bone geometry and thus strength. Such an effect in humans has the potential to reduce osteoporotic fracture. The aim of the current narrative review is to provide an overview of what is known about the effects of exercise on bone geometry, with a focus on relevance to osteoporosis.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of the proposed study is to examine the efficacy of an 8-month supervised, high-intensity progressive resistance training and impact loading programme in comparison with a supervised machine-based isometric exercise training programme using the bioDensity system in older men with low bone mass. We will also determine the safety and acceptability of each exercise training mode. Intervention group responses will be compared with those of a self-selected, non-randomised control sample of sex-matched and age-matched men who will follow their usual lifestyle activities for 8 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Apparently healthy men over 50 years with low bone mass, screened for medical conditions and medications known to adversely affect bone health, will be recruited. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to 8 months of either exercise programme with block randomisation based on presence or absence of osteoporosis medications. A twice-weekly, 30-minute, supervised exercise programme will be conducted for both groups. The primary outcome will be change in femoral neck areal bone mineral density determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcomes, assessed at baseline and 8 months, will include: DXA-derived whole-body, bilateral proximal femur and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density; proximal femur bone geometry and volumetric density extracted using three-dimensional hip analysis software; anthropometry; body composition; kyphosis; vertebral fracture assessment; physical function; safety (adverse events and injuries); and compliance. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be conducted. DISCUSSION: Whether a high-intensity, low-repetition progressive resistance training and impact loading programme or a machine-based isometric exercise programme can improve determinants of fracture risk, without causing injury, has not been examined in men. Determination of the efficacy, safety and acceptability of such programmes will facilitate formulation of future exercise guidelines for older men with low bone mass at risk of fragility fracture, a group who have previously been under-represented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Participant confidentiality will be maintained with publication of results. The study has been granted ethical approval from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Protocol number AHS/07/14/HREC). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www.anzctr.org.au)ANZCTR12616000344493; Pre-results.
Assuntos
Remoção , Osteoporose/reabilitação , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Treinamento Resistido/métodos , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Composição Corporal , Densidade Óssea , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Método Simples-CegoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop and determine convergent validity and reliability of a simple and inexpensive clinical test to quantify back extensor muscle strength. METHODS: Two testing sessions were conducted, 7 days apart. Each session involved three trials of standing maximal isometric back extensor muscle strength using both the novel test and isokinetic dynamometry. Lumbar spine bone mineral density was examined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Validation was examined with Pearson correlations (r). Test-retest reliability was examined with intraclass correlation coefficients and limits of agreement. Pearson correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients are presented with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Linear regression was used to examine the ability of peak back extensor muscle strength to predict indices of lumbar spine bone mineral density and strength. RESULTS: A total of 52 healthy adults (26 men, 26 women) aged 46.4 ± 20.4 years were recruited from the community. A strong positive relationship was observed between peak back extensor strength from hand-held and isokinetic dynamometry (r = 0.824, p < 0.001). For the novel back extensor strength test, short- and long-term reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.983 (95% confidence interval, 0.971-0.990), p < 0.001 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.901 (95% confidence interval, 0.833-0.943), p < 0.001, respectively). Limits of agreement for short-term repeated back extensor strength measures with the novel back extensor strength protocol were -6.63 to 7.70 kg, with a mean bias of +0.71 kg. Back extensor strength predicted 11% of variance in lumbar spine bone mineral density (p < 0.05) and 9% of lumbar spine index of bone structural strength (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our novel hand-held dynamometer method to determine back extensor muscle strength is quick, relatively inexpensive, and reliable; demonstrates initial convergent validity in a healthy population; and is associated with bone mass at a clinically important site.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Osteoporosis Prevention Through Impact and Muscle-loading Approaches to Exercise trial is to compare the bone response to two known osteogenic stimuli - impact loading exercise and resistance training. Specifically, we will examine the effect of a 10-month, twice-weekly, high-intensity impact loading exercise intervention and a 10-month, twice-weekly, high-intensity resistance training intervention on bone mass and strength at clinically important skeletal sites. The intervention groups will be compared against a home-based 'positive' control group. Safety and acceptability of each exercise modality will also be determined. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sedentary otherwise healthy young women aged 18-30 years with bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores less than or equal to 0 at the hip and lumbar spine, screened for conditions and medications that influence bone and physical function, will be recruited. Eligible participants are randomised to 10-month, twice-weekly, either supervised high-intensity impact training, high-intensity resistance training or a home-based 'positive' control group. The primary outcome measure will be lumbar spine areal BMD, while secondary outcome measures will include: whole body, femoral neck and regional measures (upper and lower limb) of bone, muscle and fat; anthropometrics; muscle strength and power; quality of life and exercise safety, enjoyment and acceptability. All outcome measures will be conducted at baseline (T0) and 10 months (T10) and will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle and per protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been granted ethical approval from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (GU Ref: 2015/775). Standard scientific reporting practices will occur, including publication in peer-reviewed journals. Participant confidentiality will be maintained in all forms of reporting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001444471.