Telomeric C-circles localize at nuclear pore complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

As in human cells, yeast telomeres can be maintained in cells lacking telomerase activity by recombination-based mechanisms known as ALT (Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres). A hallmark of ALT human cancer cells are extrachromosomal telomeric DNA elements called C-circles, whose origin and function have remained unclear. Here, we show that extrachromosomal telomeric C-circles in yeast can be detected shortly after senescence crisis and concomitantly with the production of survivors arising from "type II" recombination events. We uncover that C-circles bind to the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and to the SAGA-TREX2 complex, similar to other non-centromeric episomal DNA. Disrupting the integrity of the SAGA/TREX2 complex affects both C-circle binding to NPCs and type II telomere recombination, suggesting that NPC tethering of C-circles facilitates formation and/or propagation of the long telomere repeats characteristic of type II survivors. Furthermore, we find that disruption of the nuclear diffusion barrier impairs type II recombination. These results support a model in which concentration of C-circles at NPCs benefits type II telomere recombination, highlighting the importance of spatial coordination in ALT-type mechanisms of telomere maintenance.

Unprotected Replication Forks Are Converted into Mitotic Sister Chromatid Bridges.

Replication stress and mitotic abnormalities are key features of cancer cells. Temporarily paused forks are stabilized by the intra-S phase checkpoint and protected by the association of Rad51, which prevents Mre11-dependent resection. However, if a fork becomes dysfunctional and cannot resume, this terminally arrested fork is rescued by a converging fork to avoid unreplicated parental DNA during mitosis. Alternatively, dysfunctional forks are restarted by homologous recombination. Using fission yeast, we report that Rad52 and the DNA binding activity of Rad51, but not its strand-exchange activity, act to protect terminally arrested forks from unrestrained Exo1-nucleolytic activity. In the absence of recombination proteins, large ssDNA gaps, up to 3 kb long, occur behind terminally arrested forks, preventing efficient fork merging and leading to mitotic sister chromatid bridging. Thus, Rad52 and Rad51 prevent temporarily and terminally arrested forks from degrading and, despite the availability of converging forks, converting to anaphase bridges causing aneuploidy and cell death.

Histone deposition promotes recombination-dependent replication at arrested forks.

Replication stress poses a serious threat to genome stability. Recombination-Dependent-Replication (RDR) promotes DNA synthesis resumption from arrested forks. Despite the identification of chromatin restoration pathways after DNA repair, crosstalk coupling RDR and chromatin assembly is largely unexplored. The fission yeast Chromatin Assembly Factor-1, CAF-1, is known to promote RDR. Here, we addressed the contribution of histone deposition to RDR. We expressed a mutated histone, H3-H113D, to genetically alter replication-dependent chromatin assembly by destabilizing (H3-H4)2 tetramer. We established that DNA synthesis-dependent histone deposition, by CAF-1 and Asf1, promotes RDR by preventing Rqh1-mediated disassembly of joint-molecules. The recombination factor Rad52 promotes CAF-1 binding to sites of recombination-dependent DNA synthesis, indicating that histone deposition occurs downstream Rad52. Histone deposition and Rqh1 activity act synergistically to promote cell resistance to camptothecin, a topoisomerase I inhibitor that induces replication stress. Moreover, histone deposition favors non conservative recombination events occurring spontaneously in the absence of Rqh1, indicating that the stabilization of joint-molecules by histone deposition also occurs independently of Rqh1 activity. These results indicate that histone deposition plays an active role in promoting RDR, a benefit counterbalanced by stabilizing at-risk joint-molecules for genome stability.

Cdc13 and telomerase bind through different mechanisms at the lagging- and leading-strand telomeres.

Lagging-strand and leading-strand synthesis of chromosomes generates two structurally distinct ends at the telomeres. Based on sequence bias of yeast telomeres that contain a 250-300 bp array of C(1-3)A/ TG(1-3) repeats, we developed a method allowing us to distinguish which of the two daughter telomeres chromosome end-binding proteins bind to at the end of S phase. The single-stranded DNA-binding protein Cdc13 and the telomerase subunits Est1 and Est2 can bind to the two daughter telomeres, but only their binding to the leading-strand telomere depends on the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 (MRX) complex involved in both telomeric 5' nucleolytic resection and telomerase recruitment at short telomeres. Consistently, the MRX complex is mainly found to bind to the leading-strand telomere. Our results indicate that Cdc13 can bind to the telomeric template for lagging-strand replication. Since mre11-deficient strains have markedly short telomeres, telomere elongation by telomerase is likely to occur mainly at the leading-strand telomere.

The chromatin assembly factor 1 promotes Rad51-dependent template switches at replication forks by counteracting D-loop disassembly by the RecQ-type helicase Rqh1.

At blocked replication forks, homologous recombination mediates the nascent strands to switch template in order to ensure replication restart, but faulty template switches underlie genome rearrangements in cancer cells and genomic disorders. Recombination occurs within DNA packaged into chromatin that must first be relaxed and then restored when recombination is completed. The chromatin assembly factor 1, CAF-1, is a histone H3-H4 chaperone involved in DNA synthesis-coupled chromatin assembly during DNA replication and DNA repair. We reveal a novel chromatin factor-dependent step during replication-coupled DNA repair: Fission yeast CAF-1 promotes Rad51-dependent template switches at replication forks, independently of the postreplication repair pathway. We used a physical assay that allows the analysis of the individual steps of template switch, from the recruitment of recombination factors to the formation of joint molecules, combined with a quantitative measure of the resulting rearrangements. We reveal functional and physical interplays between CAF-1 and the RecQ-helicase Rqh1, the BLM homologue, mutations in which cause Bloom's syndrome, a human disease associating genome instability with cancer predisposition. We establish that CAF-1 promotes template switch by counteracting D-loop disassembly by Rqh1. Consequently, the likelihood of faulty template switches is controlled by antagonistic activities of CAF-1 and Rqh1 in the stability of the D-loop. D-loop stabilization requires the ability of CAF-1 to interact with PCNA and is thus linked to the DNA synthesis step. We propose that CAF-1 plays a regulatory role during template switch by assembling chromatin on the D-loop and thereby impacting the resolution of the D-loop.

Rad52 SUMOylation functions as a molecular switch that determines a balance between the Rad51- and Rad59-dependent survivors.

Functional telomeres in yeast lacking telomerase can be restored by rare Rad51- or Rad59-dependent recombination events that lead to type I and type II survivors, respectively. We previously proposed that polySUMOylation of proteins and the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase Slx5-Slx8 are key factors in type II recombination. Here, we show that SUMOylation of Rad52 favors the formation of type I survivors. Conversely, preventing Rad52 SUMOylation partially bypasses the requirement of Slx5-Slx8 for type II recombination. We further report that SUMO-dependent proteasomal degradation favors type II recombination. Finally, inactivation of Rad59, but not Rad51, impairs the relocation of eroded telomeres to the Nuclear Pore complexes (NPCs). We propose that Rad59 cooperates with non-SUMOylated Rad52 to promote type II recombination at NPCs, resulting in the emergence of more robust survivors akin to ALT cancer cells. Finally, neither Rad59 nor Rad51 is required by itself for the survival of established type II survivors.

The end-joining factor Ku acts in the end-resection of double strand break-free arrested replication forks.

Replication requires homologous recombination (HR) to stabilize and restart terminally arrested forks. HR-mediated fork processing requires single stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps and not necessarily double strand breaks. We used genetic and molecular assays to investigate fork-resection and restart at dysfunctional, unbroken forks in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Here, we report that fork-resection is a two-step process regulated by the non-homologous end joining factor Ku. An initial resection mediated by MRN-Ctp1 removes Ku from terminally arrested forks, generating ~110 bp sized gaps obligatory for subsequent Exo1-mediated long-range resection and replication restart. The mere lack of Ku impacts the processing of arrested forks, leading to an extensive resection, a reduced recruitment of RPA and Rad51 and a slower fork-restart process. We propose that terminally arrested forks undergo fork reversal, providing a single DNA end for Ku binding. We uncover a role for Ku in regulating end-resection of unbroken forks and in fine-tuning HR-mediated replication restart.

Sgs1 and Sae2 promote telomere replication by limiting accumulation of ssDNA.

In budding yeast, DNA ends are processed by the consecutive action of MRX/Sae2 and two redundant pathways dependent on Sgs1/Dna2 and Exo1, and this processing is counteracted by Ku heterodimer. Here we show that DNA end resection by Sae2 and Sgs1 is dispensable for normal telomere maintenance by telomerase. Instead, these proteins facilitate telomere replication and limit the accumulation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) at replication fork pause sites. Loss of Sae2 and Sgs1 drives selection for compensatory mutations, notably in Ku, which are responsible for abrupt telomere shortening in cells lacking Sae2 and Sgs1. In telomerase-negative cells, Sae2 and Sgs1 play non-overlapping roles in generating ssDNA at eroded telomeres and are required for the formation of type II survivors. Thus, although their primary function in telomerase-positive cells is to sustain DNA replication over the sites that are prone to fork pausing, Sae2 and Sgs1 contribute to telomere resection in telomerase-deficient cells.