Predictors and biomarkers of food allergy and sensitization in early childhood.

OBJECTIVE: To review existing literature on the early risk factors for and biomarkers of food allergy (FA) and food sensitization (FS) and highlight opportunities for future research that will further the understanding of FA pathogenesis in infancy and toddlerhood. DATA SOURCES: PubMed search of English-language articles related to FA and atopic disease. STUDY SELECTIONS: Human studies with outcomes related to FA, FS, and other atopic disease in childhood were selected and reviewed. Studies published after 2015 were prioritized. RESULTS: The prevalence of FA has greatly increased in recent decades and is now a global public health concern. A complex network of early life risk factors has been associated with development of FA and FS in childhood. Food allergy has a genetic component, but recent evidence suggests that interactions between risk alleles and other environmental exposures are important for disease pathogenesis, potentially through epigenetic mechanisms. Lifestyle factors, such as delivery mode, antibiotic use, and pet exposure also influence FA risk, which may be through their effect on the early life gut microbiome. How these early life risk factors, along with route and timing of antigen exposure, collectively target the developing immune system remains an ongoing and important area of study. CONCLUSION: The current body of evidence emphasizes the first 1000 days of life as a critical period for FA development. More observational studies and adequately powered clinical trials spanning early pregnancy through childhood are needed to identify novel biomarkers and risk factors that can predict susceptibility toward or protection against FA.

Management of Anaphylaxis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

Purpose of Review: Management of anaphylaxis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should consider local infection rates so as to not burden local ED at times of pandemic, while also protecting patients from infection risks and progression of anaphylaxis. In this review, we identify a treatment strategy for anaphylaxis that balances the risks versus benefits of ED versus home management in this unprecedented time. Recent Findings: Physicians and patients have had to adapt new approaches to medical care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to restricted access to health care facilities. Telemedicine has substituted in-person visits, and such a drastic change in the patient care paradigm presents a need to revise the acute management of anaphylaxis. Summary: Physicians should utilize telemedicine during this time to engage in shared decision-making with patients and their families to devise an anaphylaxis plan of management that emphasizes home care when symptoms are mild with an exception for ED care if a patient has had severe, near-fatal anaphylaxis episodes in the past. Previous anaphylaxis recommendations should remain in place despite the pandemic, including prompt use of epinephrine when needed, avoidance of known allergens, training of patients and their caregivers, and carrying of epinephrine autoinjector devices at all times to remain prepared in the event of an anaphylaxis episode. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40521-021-00284-0.