Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Atypical Imaging Features: Review of the Morphologic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subtypes With Radiology-Pathology Correlation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest growing cause of cancer death in the United States with the incidence rate more than doubling in 20 years. HCC is unique since a noninvasive diagnosis can be achieved with imaging alone when specific clinical criteria and imaging characteristics are met, obviating the need for tissue sampling. However, HCC is a highly heterogeneous neoplasm. Atypical HCC subtypes vary significantly in their morphology, which can be attributed to specific histologic and molecular features, and can cause deviations from the classic imaging characteristics. The different morphologic subtypes of HCC frequently present a diagnostic challenge for radiologists and pathologists since their imaging and pathologic features can overlap with those of non-HCC malignancies. Identifying an atypical subtype can have important clinical implications. Liver transplant, albeit a scarce and limited resource, is the optimal treatment for conventional HCC, potentially curing both the tumor and the underlying pre-malignant condition. Some HCC subtypes as well as mimickers are associated with unacceptably high recurrence and poor outcome after transplant, and there remains limited data on the role and prognosis of liver transplantation for treatment of rare HCC subtypes. Other subtypes tend to recur later than classic HCC, potentially requiring a different follow-up scheme. This review will discuss the appearance of different HCC subtypes in relation to their histopathologic features. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Multidetector CT Findings in the Abdomen and Pelvis after Damage Control Surgery for Acute Traumatic Injuries.

After experiencing blunt or penetrating trauma, patients in unstable condition who are more likely to die of uncorrected shock than of incomplete injury repairs undergo emergency limited exploratory laparotomy, which is also known as damage control surgery (DCS). This surgery is part of a series of resuscitation steps, with the goal of stabilizing the patient's condition, with rapid surgical control of hemorrhage followed by supportive measures in the intensive care unit before definitive repair of injuries. These patients often are imaged with multidetector CT within 24-48 hours of the initial surgery. Knowledge of this treatment plan is critical to CT interpretation, because there are anatomic derangements and foreign bodies that would not be present in patients undergoing surgery for other reasons. Patients may have injuries beyond the surgical field that are only identified at imaging, which can alter the care plan. Abnormalities related to the resuscitation period such as the CT hypoperfusion complex and ongoing hemorrhage can be recognized at CT. Familiarity with these imaging and clinical findings is important, because they can be seen not only in trauma patients after DCS but also in other patients in the critical care setting. The interpretation of imaging studies can be helped by an understanding of the diagnostic challenges of grading organ injuries with surgical materials in place and the awareness of potential artifacts on images in these patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2019 See discussion on this article by LeBedis .

Spectrum of Extratesticular and Testicular Pathologic Conditions at Scrotal MR Imaging.

Diagnostic workup of scrotal lesions should begin with a complete clinical history and physical examination, including analysis of risk factors such as family history of testicular cancer, personal history of tumor in the contralateral testis, and cryptorchidism, followed by imaging. Scrotal ultrasonography (US) with a combination of gray-scale and color Doppler techniques has been the first-line imaging modality for evaluation of testicular and extratesticular lesions because of its low cost, wide availability, and high diagnostic accuracy. However, US has limitations related to operator dependence, the relatively small field of view, and lack of tissue characterization. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, because of its superior soft-tissue contrast and multiplanar capabilities, is increasingly being used as a supplemental diagnostic problem-solving tool in cases where scrotal US findings are inconclusive or nondiagnostic. In addition to morphology, lesion location, and tissue characterization (eg, fat, blood products, granulation tissue, and fibrosis), scrotal MR imaging provides important information that can affect surgical planning and improve patient care. MR imaging also is helpful for differentiating testicular and extratesticular lesions, distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions, and evaluating the local extent of disease. This review discusses the anatomy and MR imaging features of testicular and extratesticular neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions and describes relevant MR imaging techniques. ©RSNA, 2018 Contact information that appeared in the print version of this article was updated in the online version on May 14, 2018.

Role of Imaging in the Evaluation of Male Infertility.

Infertility is defined herein as the inability to achieve pregnancy after frequently engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse for 1 year. Among infertile couples, the cause of infertility involves the male partner in approximately 50% of cases. Male infertility is usually caused by conditions affecting sperm production, sperm function, or both, or blockages that prevent the delivery of sperm. Chronic health problems, injuries, lifestyle choices, anatomic problems, hormonal imbalances, and genetic defects can have a role in male infertility. The diagnostic workup of male infertility should include a thorough medical and reproductive history, physical examination, and semen analysis, followed by imaging. The main role of imaging is identification of the causes of infertility, such as congenital anomalies and disorders that obstruct sperm transport and may be correctable. Scrotal ultrasonography is the most common initially performed noninvasive examination used to image the male reproductive system, including the testes and extratesticular structures such as the epididymis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is another noninvasive imaging modality used in the pelvis to evaluate possible obstructive lesions involving the ductal system. MR imaging of the brain is extremely useful for evaluating relevant neurologic abnormalities, such as pituitary gland disorders, that are suspected on the basis of hormone analysis results. Invasive techniques are usually reserved for therapeutic interventions in patients with known abnormalities. In this article, the causes and imaging findings of obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia are discussed. In addition to detecting treatable conditions that are related to male infertility, identifying the life-threatening entities associated with infertility and the genetic conditions that could be transmitted to offspring-especially in patients who undergo assisted reproduction-is critical. ©RSNA, 2017.

Hematospermia Evaluation at MR Imaging.

Hematospermia is a challenging and anxiety-provoking condition that can manifest as a single episode or recur over the course of weeks to months. It is usually a benign self-limiting condition in younger sexually active males without a history of risk factors such as cancer, urogenital malformations, bleeding disorders, and their associated symptoms. However, patients with recurrent, refractory and painful hematospermia with associated symptoms, such as fever, pain, or weight loss, require evaluation through clinical assessment and noninvasive investigations to rule out underlying pathologic conditions such as ejaculatory obstruction, infectious and inflammatory causes, malignancy, vascular malformations, and systemic disorders that increase the risk of bleeding, especially when presenting in older men. If these investigations are negative, the patient should be reassured and treated accordingly. In the recent past, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has assumed a major role in the investigation of hematospermia due to its excellent soft-tissue contrast and multiplanar capabilities. In this review, we will discuss the potential causes of hematospermia and its diagnostic workup, including pathophysiology, anatomic considerations, the imaging appearance of associated pathologic conditions, and management. (©)RSNA, 2016.

Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine MDCT dose variability due to technologist variability in performing CT studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent two portal venous phase CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis on the same 64-MDCT scanner between January and December 2011 were retrospectively identified. Tube voltage (kVp), tube current (mA), use of automated tube current modulation (ATCM), dose-length product (DLP), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), table height, whether the localizer image was obtained using the posteroanterior or the anteroposterior technique, arm position, and number of overscanned slices were recorded. RESULTS: For a given patient, the total examination DLP difference comparing the two MDCT studies ranged from 0.1% to 238.0%. For the same patient, total examination DLP was always higher when the localizer image was obtained with the posteroanterior compared with the anteroposterior technique. When table position was closer to the x-ray source, patients appeared magnified in the posteroanterior localizer image (8-29%; average, 14%) and higher tube currents were selected with ATCM. Localizer technique, table height, arm position, number of overscanned slices, and technologist were all significant predictors of dose. CONCLUSION: Patient off-centering closer to the x-ray source resulted in patient magnification in the posteroanterior localizer image, leading to higher tube currents with ATCM and increased DLP. Differences in technologist, arm position, and overscanning also resulted in dose variability.

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease: proposed imaging classification.

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is the second most common tumor in adult transplant recipients. Most cases of PTLD are attributed to Epstein-Barr virus. Decreased levels of immunosurveillance against this tumor virus as a result of immunosuppressive regimens are thought to account for most cases of PTLD. Histologically, PTLD ranges from relatively benign lymphoid hyperplasia to poorly differentiated lymphoma, and tissue sampling is required to establish the subtype. The frequency of PTLD varies depending on the type of allograft and immunosuppressive regimen. PTLD has a bimodal manifestation, with most cases occurring within the first year after transplantation and a second peak occurring 4-5 years after transplantation. Patients are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms, and a mass visible at imaging may be the first clue to the diagnosis. Imaging plays an important role in identifying the presence of disease, guiding tissue sampling, and evaluating response to treatment. The appearance of PTLD at imaging can vary. It may be nodal or extranodal. Extranodal disease may involve the gastrointestinal tract, solid organs, or central nervous system. Solid organ lesions may be solitary or multiple, infiltrate beyond the organ margins, and obstruct organ outflow. Suggestive imaging findings should prompt tissue sampling, because knowledge of the PTLD subtype is imperative for appropriate treatment. Treatment options include reducing immunosuppression, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical resection of isolated lesions.

Exuberant Malakoplakia of the Prostate Presenting as Prostatic Abscesses in an Immunocompromised Patient.

Background: Malakoplakia is a rare benign lesion, usually associated with deficient intralysosomal degradation of microorganisms, more commonly, Escherichia coli. Malakoplakia occurs in various organ systems, the most frequently affected site being the urinary bladder. We report a rare case of isolated extensive malakoplakia involving the prostate, diagnosed on transurethral resection performed for radiologically suspected prostatic abscesses. Case Presentation: A 61-year-old African American male presented with symptoms of urinary obstruction for the past 2 months. His medical history was significant for immunosuppression (liver transplantation 3 months prior and diabetes mellitus). He reported four episodes of E. coli-associated urinary tract infection after his liver transplantation. Serum prostate specific antigen was 1.83 ng/cc (normal inferior to 4 ng/cc), and urine culture was positive for E. coli sensitive to ceftriaxone. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of prostatitis with prostatic abscesses; cystoscopy was unremarkable. The patient was started on intravenous ceftriaxone therapy. A standard bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate was performed, and purulent-like material was encountered in the resected tissue. Histologic examination demonstrated extensive infiltration and replacement of the prostatic tissue by sheets of pink histiocytes with targetoid inclusions consistent with Michaelis-Gutmann bodies, ultimately confirming malakoplakia of the prostate. Conclusion: Prostatic malakoplakia is an unexpected diagnosis in patients suspected of having malignancy or prostatitis. Its exact pathogenesis is unknown, but it involves defective bacterial degradation after phagocytosis. E. coli is often cultured from the patients' urine. Immunosuppression, present in our patient, is a well-known associated factor. Prostatic malakoplakia can radiologically masquerade as prostatic adenocarcinoma, despite the use of cutting-edge imaging technology. With the growing use of multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to screen for prostate cancer, it is possible that urologists, radiologists, and pathologists will encounter prostatic malakoplakia more frequently in the future.

Extra-hepatic sarcoma metastasis surveillance in the liver: is arterial phase imaging necessary?

PURPOSE: To assess the value of arterial phase imaging (ART) in the detection of liver metastases on CT compared to portal venous phase imaging (PV) alone in patients with primary sarcomas. METHODS: Multiphasic abdominal computed tomography (CT) images of patients with tissue-proven sarcomas were reviewed by five abdominal radiologists in a staggered fashion. Up to three of the largest or most conspicuous liver lesions were characterized on a four-point confidence level for PV independently, followed by PV + ART. Inter-observer reliability was evaluated with kappa statistics. Change in characterization of lesions by the addition of ART was calculated. Follow-up imaging was used to determine if index lesion characterization was valid. RESULTS: 55 of 149 patients had 470 liver lesion characterizations by the five readers with follow-up. Inter-observer agreement was κ = 0.62 on PV and κ = 0.58 on PV + ART. The intra-observer agreement between PV and ART interpretations of the same lesion was κ = 0.93. 426 lesion characterizations were possible on both PV and ART. Only 6 characterizations were changed after the addition of ART; 4 of the 6 changes were incorrect when compared to follow-up. Only 6 lesion characterizations could be made on ART alone (missed by PV), with all the malignant lesions arising from primary leiomyosarcomas. For the lesions seen on PV alone, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 98.8%, 100%, 100%, 99.3%, and 99.6%, respectively. After the addition of ART, they were 98.8%, 98.7%, 97.5%, 99.4%, and 98.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ART adds marginal value to PV for characterization of metastatic liver lesions in patients with primary sarcomas, except possibly in primary leiomyosarcomas.

Differentiation of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas with magnetic resonance imaging: Utility of dynamic, contrast enhancement and single-shot T2-weighted sequences.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of dynamic, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with single-shot T2-weighted (ssT2) sequences in the differentiation of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and is HIPAA compliant. Between January 2007 and December 2010, 46 patients with MRI demonstrating a lipid-poor adrenal lesion who underwent either surgical resection or a minimum of 24 months of imaging follow-up were identified retrospectively. All images were retrospectively reviewed in blinded fashion by two radiologists. Each adrenal lesion was categorized by dynamic enhancement features and qualitative signal on ssT2 images and was categorized as an adenoma if it demonstrated homogenous enhancement in the arterial phase, washout with capsule enhancement in the delayed phase, and T2 signal isointense to normal adrenal tissue. Any lesion that did not fulfill all the criteria was classified as a non-adenoma. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for characterization of adenoma were calculated for each reader with 95% confidence intervals. A κ test assessed level of agreement between readers. RESULTS: Application of our criteria lead to an MRI diagnosis of lipid-poor adrenal adenoma with a sensitivity of 84.2-89.5% (16/19-17/19), specificity of 96.3% (26/27), positive predictive value of 94.1-94.4% (16/17-17/18), negative predictive value of 89.7-92.9% (26/29-26/28), and accuracy of 91.3-93.5% (42/46-43/46). Agreement between the two readers showed substantial κ agreement for the differentiation of adenoma from non-adenoma. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient echo sequences in combination with ssT2 images can accurately differentiate lipid-poor adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas.