Predictors of Treatment Response to a Psychoeducational Intervention for Anger in Chronic Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: The investigators examined predictors of treatment response to anger self-management training (ASMT) among patients with chronic moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A multicenter randomized clinical trial comprising 90 participants with moderate-severe TBI was conducted. Fifty-four participants who were randomly assigned to receive active treatment and provided complete data were included in the current secondary analysis. Model averaging was used to examine the relative importance and significance of pretreatment variables for predicting change during treatment. Dependent variables were pre- to posttreatment changes in trait anger (TA) and anger expression-out (AX-O) subscale scores of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-Revised. Predictors included demographic, injury-related, and neuropsychological variables, including both objective and self-reported measures of executive function, as well as readiness to change and participation of a significant other in treatment. RESULTS: Change in both dependent variables was predicted by higher baseline anger. Greater change in TA was additionally predicted by White race, higher education, shorter posttraumatic amnesia, and worse self-reported (but not objectively measured) executive dysfunction; the latter predictor may have indicated better self-awareness. Greater change in AX-O was additionally predicted by better episodic memory and, paradoxically, lower readiness to change. CONCLUSIONS: Further research should focus on adapting psychoeducational anger treatments to better serve the diverse populations affected by moderate-severe TBI. These findings suggest that providing memory aids to support the use of learned strategies after treatment cessation would be beneficial. Further research should also examine the construct of readiness to change and specific aspects of executive function that may affect treatment response in psychoeducational treatments. These findings were derived from only one model of anger intervention, and the relevance to other treatment approaches cannot be assumed.

Brain Injury Functional Outcome Measure (BI-FOM): A Single Instrument Capturing the Range of Recovery in Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of global functioning after moderate-severe TBI with similar measurement precision but a longer measurement range than the FIM. DESIGN: Phase 1: retrospective analysis of 5 data sets containing FIM, Disability Rating Scale, and other assessment items to identify candidate items for extending the measurement range of the FIM; Phase 2: prospective administration of 49 candidate items from phase 1, with Rasch analysis to identify a unidimensional scale with an extended range. SETTING: Six TBI Model System rehabilitation hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=184) with moderate-severe injury recruited during inpatient rehabilitation or at 1-year telephone follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were administered the 49 assessment items in person or via telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Item response theory parameters: item monotonicity, infit/outfit statistics, and Factor 1 variance. RESULTS: After collapsing misordered rating categories and removing misfitting items, we derived the Brain Injury Functional Outcome Measure (BI-FOM), a 31-item assessment instrument with high reliability, greatly extended measurement range, and improved unidimensionality compared with the FIM. CONCLUSIONS: The BI-FOM improves global measurement of function after moderate-severe brain injury. Its high precision, relative lack of floor and ceiling effects, and feasibility for telephone follow-up, if replicated in an independent sample, are substantial advantages.

Psychosocial and Functional Predictors of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Veterans and Service Members With TBI: A VA TBI Model Systems Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify psychosocial and functional predictors of self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms at year 2 following traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: Five Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers (PRCs) within the TBI Model Systems (TBIMS). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 319 service members/veterans enrolled in VA TBIMS who were eligible for and completed both 1- and 2-year follow-up evaluations. DESIGN: Secondary analysis from multicenter prospective longitudinal study. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic, injury-related, military, mental health, and substance use variables. Questionnaires included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory. Rating scales included the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective and Disability Rating Scale. RESULTS: The final sample was largely male (96%) and predominantly White (65%), with a median age of 27 years. In unadjusted analyses, pre-TBI mental health treatment history and year 1 employment status, community activity, sleep difficulties, and self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms were associated with year 2 PHQ-9 scores; pre-TBI mental health treatment history and year 1 community activity, social contact, problematic substance use, sleep difficulties, and self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms were associated with year 2 GAD-7 scores. In multivariable analyses, only year 1 community activity and depression symptoms uniquely predicted year 2 PHQ-9 scores, and only year 1 employment status, community activity, problematic substance use, and anxiety symptoms uniquely predicted year 2 GAD-7 scores. CONCLUSION: Anxiety and depression commonly occur after TBI and are important treatment targets. Some predictors (eg, participation and substance use) are modifiable and amenable to treatment as well. Early identification of anxiety and depression symptoms is key.

Psychoeducational Interventions for Problematic Anger in Chronic Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study of Treatment Enactment.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment enactment, a final stage of treatment implementation, refers to patients' application of skills and concepts from treatment sessions into everyday life situations. We examined treatment enactment in a two-arm, multicenter trial comparing two psychoeducational treatments for persons with chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and problematic anger. METHODS: Seventy-one of 90 participants from the parent trial underwent a telephone enactment interview at least 2 months (median 97 days, range 64-586 days) after cessation of treatment. Enactment, quantified as average frequency of use across seven core treatment components, was compared across treatment arms: anger self-management training (ASMT) and personal readjustment and education (PRE), a structurally equivalent control. Components were also rated for helpfulness when used. Predictors of, and barriers to, enactment were explored. RESULTS: More than 80% of participants reported remembering all seven treatment components when queried using a recognition format. Enactment was equivalent across treatments. Most used/most helpful components concerned normalizing anger and general anger management strategies (ASMT), and normalizing traumatic brain injury-related changes while providing hope for improvement (PRE). Higher baseline executive function and IQ were predictive of better enactment, as well as better episodic memory (trend). Poor memory was cited by many participants as a barrier to enactment, as was the reaction of other people to attempted use of strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment enactment is a neglected component of implementation in neuropsychological clinical trials, but is important both to measure and to help participants achieve sustained carryover of core treatment ingredients and learned material to everyday life.

Heterogeneity in Temporal Ordering of Depression and Participation After Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine heterogeneity in the temporal patterns of depression and participation over the first 2 years post traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Observational prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centers, with 1- and 2-year follow-up conducted primarily by telephone. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with TBI (N=2307) enrolled in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems database, followed at 1 and 2 years post injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O). RESULTS: Using latent class modeling we examined heterogeneity in the longitudinal relationship between PHQ-9 and PART-O. The identified 6 classes were most distinct in terms of (1) level of PHQ-9 score and (2) association between the year 1 PART-O score and year 2 PHQ-9 score. For most participants, PART-O at year 1 predicted PHQ-9 at year 2 more than the reverse. However, there was a subgroup of participants that demonstrated the reverse pattern, PHQ-9 predicting later PART-O, who were on average, older and in the "other" employment category. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that links between participation and depression are stronger for some people living with TBI than for others and that variation in the temporal sequencing of these 2 constructs is associated with demographic characteristics. These findings illustrate the value in accounting for population heterogeneity when evaluating temporal among outcome domains.

The Association Between Community Participation and Social Internet Use Among Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between social Internet use and real-world societal participation in survivors of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Ten Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 331 participants in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems, interviewed at any follow-up year between April 2014 and March 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Survey on Internet use, including social media and other online socialization; Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective with separate analyses of Productivity, Social Relations, Out and About subscales; covariates included demographics, injury variables, and functional and emotional status at follow-up. RESULTS: Participants were classified as social Internet users (N = 232) or nonusers (N = 99). Users had significantly higher Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective Social Relations scores than nonusers. A similar finding pertained to Out and About scores, with the between-group difference significantly greater for those with greater depressive symptoms severity. Users and nonusers did not differ significantly on Productivity subscale. CONCLUSIONS: The positive association between social Internet use and real-world social participation suggests that people with traumatic brain injury do not use social media as an alternative to real-world socialization. Rather, it is likely that similar barriers and facilitators affect both online and real-world social participation following traumatic brain injury. Emotional function should be considered as a moderating factor in further studies.

Influence of Prior and Intercurrent Brain Injury on 5-Year Outcome Trajectories After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the influence of additional (both prior and subsequent) traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) on recovery after a moderate to severe index TBI. SETTING: Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems centers. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with moderate to severe TBI (N = 5054) enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database with complete outcome data for the outcomes of interest at 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal data set. MAIN MEASURES: Prior and intercurrent TBI from the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method (OSU TBI-ID), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). RESULTS: Prior moderate-severe TBIs significantly predicted overall level of functioning on the DRS, FIM Cognitive, and FIM Motor for participants with less severe index injuries. Moderate-severe intercurrent TBIs (TBIs subsequent to the index injury) were predictive of poorer functioning for both Index Severity groups, reflected in higher mean scores on the DRS in participants with less severe index injuries and lower mean Cognitive FIM in participants with more severe index injuries. CONCLUSION: Multiple brain injuries, particularly those of moderate or greater severity, have a significantly greater impact on patients' level of functioning compared with a single injury, but not the rate or shape of recovery.

Improving communication with patients in post-traumatic amnesia: development and impact of a clinical protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of staff training focused on improved treatment and communication with patients in post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) or other disorders of explicit (declarative) memory. A major aim was to minimize questions demanding recall from explicit memory, e.g., orientation quizzing, and personal/medical history questions, which may produce unreliable information and exacerbate patient frustration and anxiety. METHODS: Mixed-methods design. Inpatients with impairments of explicit memory were observed before (n = 4) and after (n = 4) training, with staff interactions recorded verbatim. Records were coded for types of questions and patient responses. Clinicians who worked before and after training were surveyed regarding perceived changes in practice, team functioning, and patient behavior. RESULTS: Explicit memory questions decreased significantly, as did irrelevant or "don't know" responses from patients, with large nonparametric effect sizes noted. The frequency of questions not relying on explicit memory remained stable. Most clinicians reported positive effects on their own and others' practice with memory impaired patients, and one-quarter noted less patient frustration or agitation. CONCLUSIONS: Although questioning patients is a natural part of medical care, targeted staff training can result in positive changes in communication practice and should be considered for facilities treating patients in PTA.

Promoting mental health in traumatic brain injury using single-session Behavioural Activation and SMS messaging: A randomized controlled trial.

We compared two treatments for depression and/ or anxiety in chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02061553). Fifty-nine participants were randomized 2:1 to a single session of Behavioural Activation followed by 8 weeks of daily SMS (text) messages in the form of implementation intentions supporting individualized goals for increased rewarding/ meaningful activities (INT), or a single (attention control) session focused on the importance of motivation followed by 8 weeks of motivational SMS messages (MOT). Both conditions resulted in modestly improved emotional status. The INT condition led to more exposure to environmental reward and greater productivity. Gains in both conditions were of questionable clinical significance but suggested different mechanisms of action, which should be confirmed by further research. The delivery of frequent text messages proved to be a very feasible means of supporting treatment in this population.

Neuropsychological Characteristics of the Confusional State Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Individuals with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience a transitory state of impaired consciousness and confusion often called posttraumatic confusional state (PTCS). This study examined the neuropsychological profile of PTCS. METHODS: Neuropsychometric profiles of 349 individuals in the TBI Model Systems National Database were examined 4 weeks post-TBI (±2 weeks). The PTCS group was subdivided into Low (n=46) and High Performing PTCS (n=45) via median split on an orientation/amnesia measure, and compared to participants who had emerged from PTCS (n=258). Neuropsychological patterns were examined using multivariate analyses of variance and mixed model analyses of covariance. RESULTS: All groups were globally impaired, but severity differed across groups (F(40,506)=3.44; p<.001; ŋp 2 =.206). Rate of forgetting (memory consolidation) was impaired in all groups, but failed to differentiate them (F(4,684)=0.46; p=.762). In contrast, executive memory control was significantly more impaired in PTCS groups than the emerged group: Intrusion errors: F(2,343)=8.78; p<.001; ŋ p 2=.049; False positive recognition errors: F(2,343)=3.70; p<.05; ŋp 2=.021. However, non-memory executive control and other executive memory processes did not differentiate those in versus emerged from PTCS. CONCLUSIONS: Executive memory control deficits in the context of globally impaired cognition characterize PTCS. This pattern differentiates individuals in and emerged from PTCS during the acute recovery period following TBI. (JINS, 2019, 25, 302-313).

Self-Report of Outpatient Therapy Dose at 6 and 12 Months After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Determine agreement between self-reported dose and dose reflected in administrative records of outpatient physical, occupational, and speech therapies at 6 and 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), for the purpose of examining accuracy and predictors of accuracy of self-reported health care utilization in this population. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of survey used in a larger study; participants were queried about therapy doses using a structured interview, either alone or assisted by relatives if they so chose, with responses compared to administrative records. SETTING: Rehabilitation center providing outpatient TBI therapies. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five people with severe TBI living in the community provided 6-month data (N=65); 54 provided 12-month data. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Degree of agreement with administrative records of scheduled and billed therapy appointments, measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), with linear regression used to predict accuracy from demographic variables and cognitive status. RESULTS: ICCs were in the moderate range at 6 months, but were more variable, with some in the poor range, at 12 months. Agreement was higher for scheduled than for billed (attended) appointments. Assisted and unassisted patients provided comparable agreement with records. No demographic factors were associated with accuracy, but lower cognitive FIM scores, as hypothesized, tended to predict lower agreement at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: People with severe TBI can provide reasonable estimates of commonly prescribed outpatient therapy doses at 6 months postinjury. Accuracy may be improved by inviting patients to request assistance from relatives and by asking them to consider attended (vs scheduled) sessions.

The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Implications for Improvements in Research Design, Reporting, Replication, and Synthesis.

Despite significant advances in measuring the outcomes of rehabilitation interventions, little progress has been made in specifying the therapeutic ingredients and processes that cause measured changes in patient functioning. The general approach to better clarifying the process of treatment has been to develop reporting checklists and guidelines that increase the amount of detail reported. However, without a framework instructing researchers in how to describe their treatment protocols in a manner useful to or even interpretable by others, requests for more detail will fail to improve our understanding of the therapeutic process. In this article, we describe how the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) provides a theoretical framework that can improve research intervention reporting and enable testing and refinement of a protocol's underlying treatment theories. The RTSS framework provides guidance for researchers to explicitly state their hypothesized active ingredients and targets of treatment as well as for how the individual ingredients in their doses directly affect the treatment targets. We explain how theory-based treatment specification has advantages over checklist approaches for intervention design, reporting, replication, and synthesis of evidence in rehabilitation research. A complex rehabilitation intervention is used as a concrete example of the differences between an RTSS-based specification and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. The RTSS's potential to advance the rehabilitation field can be empirically tested through efforts to use the framework with existing and newly developed treatment protocols.

The Importance of Voluntary Behavior in Rehabilitation Treatment and Outcomes.

Most rehabilitation treatments are volitional in nature, meaning that they require the patient's active engagement and effort. Volitional treatments are particularly challenging to define in a standardized fashion, because the clinician is not in complete control of the patient's role in enacting these treatments. Current recommendations for describing treatments in research reports fail to distinguish between 2 fundamentally different aspects of treatment design: the selection of treatment ingredients to produce the desired functional change and the selection of ingredients that will ensure the patient's volitional performance. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a conceptual scheme for standardizing the way that rehabilitation treatments are defined by all disciplines across all areas of rehabilitation. The RTSS highlights the importance of volitional behavior in many treatment areas and provides specific guidance for how volitional treatments should be specified. In doing so, it suggests important crosscutting research questions about the nature of volitional behavior, factors that make it more or less likely to occur, and ingredients that are most effective in ensuring that patients perform desired treatment activities.

A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments.

The field of rehabilitation remains captive to the black-box problem: our inability to characterize treatments in a systematic fashion across diagnoses, settings, and disciplines, so as to identify and disseminate the active ingredients of those treatments. In this article, we describe the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS), by which any treatment employed in rehabilitation may be characterized, and ultimately classified according to shared properties, via the 3 elements of treatment theory: targets, ingredients, and (hypothesized) mechanisms of action. We discuss important concepts in the RTSS such as the distinction between treatments and treatment components, which consist of 1 target and its associated ingredients; and the distinction between targets, which are the direct effects of treatment, and aims, which are downstream or distal effects. The RTSS includes 3 groups of mutually exclusive treatment components: Organ Functions, Skills and Habits, and Representations. The last of these comprises not only thoughts and feelings, but also internal representations underlying volitional action; the RTSS addresses the concept of volition (effort) as a critical element for many rehabilitation treatments. We have developed an algorithm for treatment specification which is illustrated and described in brief. The RTSS stands to benefit the field in numerous ways by supplying a coherent, theory-based framework encompassing all rehabilitation treatments. Using a common framework, researchers will be able to test systematically the effects of specific ingredients on specific targets; and their work will be more readily replicated and translated into clinical practice.

Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Through Improved Specification of Interventions.

Rehabilitation clinicians strive to provide cost-effective, patient-centered care that optimizes outcomes. A barrier to this ideal is the lack of a universal system for describing, or specifying, rehabilitation interventions. Current methods of description vary across disciplines and settings, creating barriers to collaboration, and tend to focus mostly on functional deficits and anticipated outcomes, obscuring connections between clinician behaviors and changes in functioning. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is the result of more than a decade of effort by a multidisciplinary group of rehabilitation clinicians and researchers to develop a theory-based framework to specify rehabilitation interventions. The RTSS describes interventions for treatment components, which consist of a target (functional change brought about as a direct result of treatment), ingredients (actions taken by clinicians to change the target), and a hypothesized mechanism of action, as stated in a treatment theory. The RTSS makes explicit the connections between functional change and clinician behavior, and recognizes the role of patient effort in treatment implementation. In so doing, the RTSS supports clinicians' efforts to work with their patients to set achievable goals, select appropriate treatments, adjust treatment plans as needed, encourage patient participation in the treatment process, communicate with team members, and translate research findings to clinical care. The RTSS may help both expert and novice clinicians articulate their clinical reasoning processes in ways that benefit treatment planning and clinical education, and may improve the design of clinical documentation systems, leading to more effective justification and reimbursement for services. Interested clinicians are invited to apply the RTSS in their local settings.

Employment Stability in the First 5 Years After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize employment stability and identify predictive factors of employment stability in working-age individuals after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) that may be clinically addressed. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study of an inception cohort from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database (TBIMS-NDB) using data at years 1, 2, and 5 post-TBI. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centers with telephone follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals enrolled in the TBIMS-NDB since 2001, aged 18-59, with employment data at 2 or more follow-up interviews at years 1, 2, and 5 (N=5683). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Employment stability, categorized using post-TBI employment data as no paid employment (53.25%), stably (27.20%), delayed (10.24%), or unstably (9.31%) employed. RESULTS: Multinomial regression analyses identified predictive factors of employment stability, including younger age, white race, less severe injuries, preinjury employment, higher annual earnings, male sex, higher education, transportation independence postinjury, and no anxiety or depression at 1 year post-TBI. CONCLUSIONS: Employment stability serves as an important measure of productivity post-TBI. Psychosocial, clinical, environmental, and demographic factors predict employment stability post-TBI. Notable predictors include transportation independence as well as the presence of anxiety and depression at year 1 post-TBI as potentially modifiable intervention targets.

Longitudinal Effects of Medical Comorbidities on Functional Outcome and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury: An Individual Growth Curve Analysis of NIDILRR Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Data.

OBJECTIVE: To explore associations of specific physical and neuropsychiatric medical conditions to motor and cognitive functioning and life satisfaction over the first 10 years following traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: Telephone follow-up through 6 TBI Model System centers. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 404 individuals or proxies with TBI enrolled in the TBI Model System longitudinal study participating in 10-year follow-up. DESIGN: Individual growth curve analysis. MAIN MEASURES: FIM Motor and Cognitive subscales, Satisfaction With Life Scales, and Medical and Mental Health Comorbidities Interview. RESULTS: Hypertension, diabetes, cancers, rheumatoid arthritis, and anxiety negatively affected the trajectory of motor functioning over time. Diabetes, cancers, chronic bronchitis, anxiety, and depression negatively impacted cognitive functioning. Numerous neuropsychiatric conditions (sleep disorder, alcoholism, drug addiction, anxiety, panic attacks, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and bipolar disorder), as well as hypertension, liver disease, and cancers, diminished life satisfaction. Other medical conditions had a negative effect on functioning and satisfaction at specific follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: Natural recovery after TBI may include delayed onset of functional decline or early recovery, followed by progressive deterioration, and is negatively affected by medical comorbidities. Results contribute to the growing evidence that TBI is most appropriately treated as a chronic medical condition complicated by a variety of comorbid conditions.

Prevalence of Medical and Psychiatric Comorbidities Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of selected medical and psychiatric comorbidities that existed prior to or up to 10 years following traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring acute rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Six TBI Model Systems (TBIMS) centers. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 404 participants in the TBIMS National Database who experienced TBI 10 years prior. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported medical and psychiatric comorbidities and the onset time of each endorsed comorbidity. RESULTS: At 10 years postinjury, the most common comorbidities developing postinjury, in order, were back pain, depression, hypertension, anxiety, fractures, high blood cholesterol, sleep disorders, panic attacks, osteoarthritis, and diabetes. Comparing those 50 years and older to those younger than 50 years, diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 3.54; P = .0016), high blood cholesterol (OR = 2.04; P = .0092), osteoarthritis (OR = 2.02; P = .0454), and hypertension (OR = 1.84; P = .0175) were significantly more prevalent in the older cohort while panic attacks (OR = 0.33; P = .0022) were significantly more prevalent in the younger cohort. No significant differences in prevalence rates between the older and younger cohorts were found for back pain, depression, anxiety, fractures, or sleep disorders. CONCLUSIONS: People with moderate-severe TBI experience other medical and mental health comorbidities during the long-term course of recovery and life after injury. The findings can inform further investigation into comorbidities associated with TBI and the role of medical care, surveillance, prevention, lifestyle, and healthy behaviors in potentially modifying their presence and/or prevalence over the life span.

There's no cure for brain injury: work-related stress in brain injury rehabilitation professionals.

Objective: To explore the experience of work-related stress in brain injury professionals and to identify the contributing factors to work-related stress. Methods: 17 brain injury professionals participated in one-time interviews conducted either in person or utilising video conferencing. The data were analysed utilising a Grounded Theory approach. Results: Participants reported that working in brain injury rehabilitation is difficult due to the complex and unpredictable nature of brain injury. The impact of limited funding and resources was endorsed by all participants as the most stressful aspect of working in this field. Emotional experiences associated with treating survivors and organisational factors increase the risk for work-related stress. Brain injury professionals rely on support provided by coworkers and supervisors. Conclusion: This study provides a deeper understanding of work-related stress and challenges of working in the brain injury rehabilitation field, as well as appreciation for the personal and organisational strategies that may help to offset stress. The unpredictable nature of working in brain injury rehabilitation impacted professionals at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels of practice. Overall, it was apparent that the participants interviewed were highly resilient individuals, demonstrating acceptance and flexibility in the limitations they face working in the field of brain injury rehabilitation.

Predictive utility of an adapted Marshall head CT classification scheme after traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To study the predictive relationship among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) between an objective indicator of injury severity (the adapted Marshall computed tomography [CT] classification scheme) and clinical indicators of injury severity in the acute phase, functional outcomes at inpatient rehabilitation discharge, and functional and participation outcomes at 1 year after injury, including death. PARTICIPANTS: The sample involved 4895 individuals who received inpatient rehabilitation following acute hospitalization for TBI and were enrolled in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database between 1989 and 2014. DESIGN: Head CT variables for each person were fit into adapted Marshall CT classification categories I through IV. MAIN MEASURES: Prediction models were developed to determine the amount of variability explained by the CT classification categories compared with commonly used predictors, including a clinical indicator of injury severity. RESULTS: The adapted Marshall classification categories aided only in the prediction of craniotomy or craniectomy during acute hospitalization, otherwise making no meaningful contribution to variance in the multivariable models predicting outcomes at any time point after injury. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that head CT findings classified in this manner do not inform clinical discussions related to functional prognosis or rehabilitation planning after TBI. ABBREVIATIONS: CT: computed tomography; DRS: disability rating scale; EGOS: extended Glasgow outcome scale; FIM: functional independence measure; NDB: National Data Base; PTA: posttraumatic amnesia; RLOS: rehabilitation length of stay; SPOS: semipartial omega squared statistic; TBI: traumatic brain injury; TBIMS: Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.