Systematic Review of Nondrug, Nonsurgical Treatment of Shoulder Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative nondrug, nonsurgical interventions, either alone or in combination, for conditions of the shoulder. METHODS: The review was conducted from March 2016 to November 2016 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and was registered with PROSPERO. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, or meta-analyses studying adult patients with a shoulder diagnosis. Interventions qualified if they did not involve prescription medication or surgical procedures, although these could be used in the comparison group or groups. At least 2 independent reviewers assessed the quality of each study using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists. Shoulder conditions addressed were shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), rotator cuff-associated disorders (RCs), adhesive capsulitis (AC), and nonspecific shoulder pain. RESULTS: Twenty-five systematic reviews and 44 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Low- to moderate-quality evidence supported the use of manual therapies for all 4 shoulder conditions. Exercise, particularly combined with physical therapy protocols, was beneficial for SIS and AC. For SIS, moderate evidence supported several passive modalities. For RC, physical therapy protocols were found beneficial but not superior to surgery in the long term. Moderate evidence supported extracorporeal shockwave therapy for calcific tendinitis RC. Low-level laser was the only modality for which there was moderate evidence supporting its use for all 4 conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings of this literature review may help inform practitioners who use conservative methods (eg, doctors of chiropractic, physical therapists, and other manual therapists) regarding the levels of evidence for modalities used for common shoulder conditions.

Interprofessional veno-veno bypass simulation improved team confidence.

BACKGROUND: Rarely performed procedures can cause stress and communication challenges in emergency situations. A simulation was developed to practice and improve team performance and procedural workflow when it has been determined that a liver transplant patient will need veno-veno bypass. The scenario involved a patient predetermined to need veno-veno bypass to allow team members to practice procedural workflow and communication. The simulation used a checklist outlining steps of the procedure and expected communication needed among surgeon, anesthesiologist, nurses, and perfusion team members. Perfusion and nursing supplied equipment to simulate the veno-veno bypass. Debriefing and a brief survey followed the simulation. RESULTS: During the simulation participants performed steps outlined in the checklist. During debriefing, discussion occurred regarding equipment usage, step order, time documentation, and medication use. Additional discussions occurred regarding modifying perfusion tubing and supplies. Participants rated their confidence in understanding communication (4.2), ability to work with others (4.6), knowledge of supplies (4.4), and use of closed-loop communication (4.4) on a scale of 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (extremely confident) (n = 5). CONCLUSION: Participants concluded going through veno-veno bypass steps was a positive experience. Surgeons acknowledged there were multiple ways to perform this procedure and agreed it should be done the same way each time for standardization. Nursing staff commented they liked reviewing equipment in a nonemergency situation. The checklist will be turned into a resource for future operating room procedures. The perfusion team made modifications to their equipment based on surgeon recommendations. Future training is planned when new members join the team.