High-volume injections in Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is common, particularly in runners. High-volume injections (HVIs) may be beneficial in the management of AT compared to other conservative management options, including exercise regimens, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. The published research on the effectiveness of HVI in the treatment of AT was evaluated in this systematic review. SOURCES OF DATA: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed when conducting this systematic review. The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, and OVID were thoroughly searched, from inception to 13 September 2023, for articles assessing HVI for AT. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: A total of 10 studies with 460 participants met the inclusion criteria. HVI typically consisted of saline, local anaesthetic, and corticosteroids. HVI combined with corticosteroids demonstrated immediate and long-term improvements in ankle function. Compared to HVI without corticosteroids, HVI with corticosteroids exhibited greater, early improvements in pain and function, with no significant differences at later follow-up points. Significant reductions in tendon thickness and neovascularity were also found with HVI treatment over time. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: No adverse events were reported with HVI, despite the use of corticosteroids. GROWING POINTS: HVI is an effective and safe modality, particularly in the short term, to significantly reduce pain and discomfort in the Achilles tendon, especially when supplemented with corticosteroids. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: More robust randomized controlled trials, with longer-term follow-ups and homogeneity, are needed to fully establish its efficacy for AT.

Non-surgical management of acute proximal hamstring avulsions can produce clinically acceptable results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes for the non-surgical and surgical management of acute proximal hamstring avulsions. METHODS: Sixty physically active individuals were offered surgical or non-surgical management for their proximal hamstring avulsion injuries. Distal retraction was defined as greater than 2 cm. Primary outcome measures were the Victorian Institute of sport assessment-proximal hamstring tendons (VISA-H) and functional assessment scale for acute hamstring injuries (FASH). Secondary outcome measures included palpable gap (cm), return to sport (RTS) and the ability to perform Nordic hamstring curls. Outcome variables were adjusted in regression models for gender, age, and treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients elected to undertake non-surgical management, and 29 chose surgery with a mean follow-up of 34.8 ± 8.7 and 34.9 ± 7.0 months, respectively. The mean VISA-H for the non-surgical and surgical groups were 87.3 ± 3.4 and 87.9 ± 4.1 (n.s.), respectively. The mean FASH for the non-surgical group was 89.3 ± 2.4 and 88 ± 3.6 for the surgical group (n.s.). This was consistent after adjusting for confounders. The mean gap for the non-surgical group was 4.5 ± 1.09 and 4.9 ± 1.19 cm for the surgical group (n.s.). No significant differences were found in the abilities to perform Nordic hamstring curls (n.s.). Both groups achieved comparable RTS rates (n.s.). On average, the non-surgical group achieved RTS at 5.5 ± 1.2 months post-injury, whereas the surgical group was at 5.7 ± 0.7 months (n.s.). CONCLUSION: Physically active individuals with acute proximal hamstring avulsions and distal retraction of the tendon stump can be managed non-surgically, achieving similar functional levels and RTS compared to patients treated surgically. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Efficacy of hydrodilatation in frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether hydrodilatation is beneficial in the management of frozen shoulder compared with other common conservative management modalities. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of hydrodilatation for the management of frozen shoulder. SOURCES OF DATA: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An extensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and CINAHL databases using multiple keyword combinations of 'shoulder', 'rotator', 'adhesive capsulitis', 'hydrodilatat*', 'distension' since inception of the databases to June 2023 was implemented. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Hydrodilatation leads to at least transient more marked improvements in shoulder disability and passive external rotation compared with intra-articular corticosteroid injections. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Hydrodilatation improves passive external rotation in the longer term. Moreover, hydrodilatation may be a preferable option over manipulation under anaesthesia, given its lower cost and better patient convenience. GROWING POINTS: Intensive mobilization after hydrodilatation is a promising adjuvant treatment option for patients suffering from a frozen shoulder. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Although current evidence suggests that hydrodilatation provides a transient improvement in disability in patients with frozen shoulder, its clinical relevance remains unclear. Further research is necessary to establish its role in the management of the condition.

Exploring the Application of Peer-Assisted Learning in Practical Neuroanatomy Classes: A Cohort Comparison Within a Medical Curriculum.

Despite well-documented benefits, the effectiveness of some aspects of near-peer (NP) teaching in medical education within anatomy curricula remains unclear. Here, we explored the impact of various permutations of staff/student laboratory-based co-teaching in neuroanatomy by determining the optimal staff and student teaching combination. We assessed student perceptions and knowledge acquisition using three different co-teaching strategies. Second-year medical students at the University of Southampton were co-taught neuroanatomy by faculty staff and third-year medical students (NP teachers). Three cohorts, 2016/2017, 2017/2018, and 2018/2019, were included in the study. Subsequent cohorts experienced increasingly structured NP teaching with more NP teachers. Students completed evaluations for anatomy sessions, which were statistically compared. The 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 cohorts completed lunchtime quizzes matched to the learning outcomes of each practical session, which were analysed. A focus group involving six students was transcribed and thematically analysed. Anatomy practical ratings were significantly higher when both session structure and NP teacher numbers increased from 3 to 5-6 (p = 0.0010) and from 3 to 7-8 (p = 0.0020). There were no significant differences in anatomy practical ratings using 5-6 and 7-8 NP teachers (p > 0.9999). There were no significant differences between the knowledge scores of students who experienced 5-6 and 7-8 NP teachers. Themes detailing the benefits of NP teaching and the importance of faculty involvement were identified, demonstrating that students appreciated NP teaching within a co-teaching environment. Therefore, increased NP teaching may augment students' perceptions and knowledge acquisition. In this context, the optimal number of NP teachers may sit between 5 and 8.