Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 10(15): 2284-6, 2004 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15259084

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) determination methods and to determine fructosamine in patients with chronic hepatitis, compensated cirrhosis and in patients with chronic hepatitis treated with ribavirin. METHODS: HbA(1c) values were determined in 15 patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and in 20 patients with chronic hepatitis using the ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography and the immunoassay methods. Fructosamine was determined using nitroblue tetrazolium. RESULTS: Forty percent of patients with liver cirrhosis had HbA(1c) results below the non-diabetic reference range by at least one HbA(1c) method, while fructosamine results were either within the reference range or elevated. Twenty percent of patients with chronic hepatitis (hepatic fibrosis) had HbA(1c) results below the non-diabetic reference range by at least one HbA(1c) method. In patients with chronic hepatitis treated with ribavirin, 50% of HbA(1c) results were below the non-diabetic reference using at least one of the HbA(1c) methods. CONCLUSION: Only evaluated in context with all liver function parameters as well as a red blood count including reticulocytes, HbA(1c) results should be used in patients with advanced liver disease. HbA(1c) and fructosamine measurements should be used with caution when evaluating long-term glucose control in patients with hepatic cirrhosis or in patients with chronic hepatitis and ribavirin treatment.


Assuntos
Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Hepatite Crônica/sangue , Cirrose Hepática/sangue , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Frutosamina/sangue , Hepatite C Crônica/sangue , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico
3.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 116(15-16): 530-5, 2004 Aug 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15471180

RESUMO

There is currently no accepted therapeutic regimen for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to standard combination treatment with interferon-alpha plus ribavirin. We investigated triple combination treatment with induction dosing of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine in these difficult-to-treat patients. Nonresponders (n = 67), breakthroughs (n = 16) and relapsers (n = 19) to previous interferon/ribavirin combination treatment of at least 6 months were included. For the first 16 weeks, patients received interferon-alpha2a 6 MU daily, ribavirin 800-1200 mg/d, and amantadine 200 mg/d. In cases of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12, treatment was continued with interferon-alpha2a 6 MU every other day and the same doses of ribavirin and amantadine until week 48. In cases of HCV RNA positivity at week 12, treatment was stopped. A total of 102 patients were enrolled (80%: genotype 1, 19%: cirrhosis). HCV RNA was negative in 35/102 patients (34%) at week 12 and in 27/ 102 patients (26%) at the end of treatment. Virological response was sustained in 15/102 patients (15%). On-treatment virological response was higher in previous relapsers/breakthroughs than in previous nonresponders (week 12: 49% vs. 27%, p < 0.05; week 48: 46% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) but no such difference was found for sustained virological response (20% vs. 12%, NS). In conclusion, triple combination treatment with daily interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine for 3 months can induce virological response in a considerable number of nonresponders/relapsers to previous dual combination treatment, but the sustained virological response rate remains low.


Assuntos
Amantadina/administração & dosagem , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Áustria/epidemiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Combinação de Medicamentos , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Feminino , Hepatite C Crônica/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevenção Secundária , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Clin Med Insights Oncol ; 7: 221-34, 2013 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24179413

RESUMO

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in industrialized and developing countries. Approximately 80% of patients are diagnosed with non-small cell histology. Although a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the treatment of patients at early or locally-advanced stages of the disease, further successes in the treatment of patients with advanced disease will largely rely on improved systemic tumor control. Although therapies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been incorporated into daily clinical practice, the value of other treatments remains to be elucidated. The current review highlights the most important driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and describes recent study results and the status of EGFR-directed therapy, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-directed agents, antiangiogenic therapy, and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitors. However, many other agents with different modes of action are being examined in clinical research.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA