Recipient body mass index and age interact to impact survival after heart transplantation.

Although recipient body mass index (BMI) and age are known risk factors for mortality after heart transplantation, how they interact to influence survival is unknown. Our study utilized the UNOS registry from 1997 to 2012 to define the interaction between BMI and age and its impact on survival after heart transplantation. Recipients were stratified by BMI: underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.99), overweight (25-29.99), and either moderate (30-34.99), severe (35-39.99), or very severe (≥40) obesity. Recipients were secondarily stratified based on age: 18-40 (younger recipients), 40-65 (reference group), and ≥65 (advanced age recipients). Among younger recipients, being underweight was associated with improved adjusted survival (HR 0.902; p = 0.010) while higher mortality was seen in younger overweight recipients (HR 1.260; p = 0.005). However, no differences in adjusted survival were appreciated in underweight and overweight advanced age recipients. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was associated with increased adjusted mortality in normal age recipients (HR 1.152; p = 0.021) and even more so with young (HR 1.576; p < 0.001) and advanced age recipients (HR 1.292; p = 0.001). These results demonstrate that BMI and age interact to impact survival as age modifies BMI-mortality curves, particularly with younger and advanced age recipients.

Impact of donor age on survival after heart transplantation: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding the influence of donor age on outcomes after heart transplantation. We sought to determine if advanced donor age is associated with differences in survival after heart transplantation and how this compares to waitlist survival. METHODS: All adult heart transplants from 2000 to 2012 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Donors were stratified into four age groups: 18-39 (reference group), 40-49, 50-54, and 55 and above. Propensity scoring was used to compare status IA waitlist patients who did not undergo transplantation with IA recipients who received hearts from advanced age donors. The primary outcome of interest was recipient survival and this was analyzed with multivariate Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 22,960 adult heart transplant recipients were identified. Recipients of hearts from all three older donor groups had significantly increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.187-1.426, all p < 0.001) compared to recipients from donors age 18 to 39. Additionally, propensity-matched status IA patients managed medically without transplantation had significantly worse adjusted survival than status IA recipients who received hearts from older donors age ≥55 (HR, 1.362, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to donors aged 18-39, age 40 and above is associated with worse adjusted recipient survival in heart transplantation. This survival difference becomes more pronounced as age increases to above 55. However, the survival rate among status IA patients who receive hearts from advanced age donors (≥55) is significantly better compared to similar status IA patients who are managed without transplantation.

Treatment and Imaging Modalities of Giant Coronary Aneurysms Resulting from Kawasaki Disease and Presenting as Acute Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction.

Giant coronary aneurysms are late sequelae of Kawasaki disease (KD). We describe a 53-year-old patient who presented with acute myocardial infarction and proximal aneurysms of all three coronary arteries. Coronary angiography demonstrated the aneurysms, but CT angiography allowed accurate assessment of the real dimensions of the aneurysms and making the decision on the preferred method of revascularization. The patient underwent coronary bypass surgery and is asymptomatic at follow-up.

Anticholinergic medications: an additional contributor to cognitive impairment in the heart failure population?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have a high prevalence of cognitive impairment and the association is multifactorial. In general, the burden of anticholinergic drugs has consistently been shown to be a risk factor for cognitive impairment in the elderly. The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive burden of medications in patients with CHF. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective, single-center study. SETTING: The study was conducted in an outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who presented to a comprehensive heart failure clinic during a 1-month period were included. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes of interest were mean anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) score of all medications and CHF medications (ACB-CHF), calculated based on the ACB Scoring Scale (ACB-SS). The ACB-CHF score was further dichotomized as 0 or 1 (low anticholinergic burden) versus 2 or 3 (high anticholinergic burden). RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included. The mean ACB and ACB-CHF scores were 2.4 (range 0-13) and 1.0 (range 0-4), respectively, while 25.8 % of patients had an ACB-CHF score of 2 or 3. There was no association found between ejection fraction in patients with systolic heart failure and the ACB (p = 0.28) or ACB-CHF (p = 0.62) score. CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients with CHF have a substantial exposure to anticholinergic medications with adverse cognitive effects. This may be another important contributor to the increased prevalence of cognitive impairment in these patients.