Strategies for responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in a rural health system in New York state.

Research and media reports about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have largely focused on urban areas due to their high caseloads. However, the COVID-19 pandemic presents distinct and under-recognized challenges to rural areas. This report describes the challenges faced by Bassett Healthcare Network (BHN), a health network in rural upstate New York, and the strategies BHN devised in response. The response to COVID-19 at BHN focused on 4 strategies: (1) Expansion of intensive-care capacity. (2) Redeployment and retraining of workforce. (3) Provision of COVID-19 information, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral testing, and appropriate follow-up for a geographically dispersed population. (4) Coordination of the response to the pandemic across a large, diverse organization. Rural health systems and hospitals can take steps to address the specific challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in their communities. We believe that the strategies BHN employed to adapt to COVID-19 may be useful to other rural health systems. More research is needed to determine which strategies have been most effective in responding to the pandemic in other rural settings.

Surgical Education and the Longitudinal Model at the Columbia-Bassett Program.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate a longitudinal medical student surgical curriculum. DESIGN: This is a case-controlled study of students who participated in a longitudinal surgical curriculum compared to students who participated in a standard 12-week surgical clerkship. This study evaluates qualitative data including exam scores as well as qualitative data regarding student experience. SETTING: All students were from Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City. A portion of the students completed their clerkship at the main university campus and others performed their clerkship at an affiliate site including Bassett Health Network. The longitudinal curriculum was only at the Bassett Health Network. PARTICIPANTS: All medical students who completed their surgical curriculum from 2012 to 2015 were eligible. The survey response rate was 45% for a total of 128 students. RESULTS: The students receiving the longitudinal curriculum outperformed the block students on the national shelf exam (77 vs 71, p = 0.001). The longitudinal students were also more likely to learn directly from attending surgeons and were more likely to have a greater interest in a surgical career after their surgery experience. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal approach to teaching surgery to medical students achieves non-inferior or superior testing outcomes when compared to the block model, and superior outcomes in terms of students' own attitudes and perceptions.

Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey.

The ongoing decline in the number of general surgeons practicing in rural areas of the United States is concerning. Existing data show that rural surgeons perform a broad spectrum of cases including procedures that are not considered to be in the repertoire of most general surgeons. In particular, rural surgeons seem to be performing a sizeable number of endoscopic procedures. A sixty-item survey was mailed to 1700 rural surgeons while a random sample of 154 urban surgeons were telephoned and administered the same questionnaire. The general surgeons were identified using a list obtained from the American Medical Association Masterfile. The response rate was 25 per cent and 74 per cent among rural and nonrural surgeons respectively. Seventy four per cent of rural surgeons performed more than 50 flexible endoscopies a year in contrast to 33 per cent of nonrural surgeons (P < 0.05). Approximately 42 per cent of rural surgeons reported doing more than 200 procedures annually, whereas only 12 per cent of the nonrural surgeons did so. Additionally, 63 per cent of rural surgeons wished they had further training in endoscopy before starting practice as compared with 46 per cent (P < 0.05) of nonrural surgeons. Rural surgeons perform flexible endoscopy at a much higher rate than their nonrural counterparts. The majority of rural surgeons feel they would have benefited from additional flexible endoscopy training before entering practice.

Starting a general surgery program at a small rural critical access hospital: a case study from southeastern Oregon.

CONTEXT: Surgical services are frequently unavailable in rural American communities. Therefore, rural residents often must travel long distances to receive surgical care. Rural hospitals commonly have difficulty providing surgical services despite potential economic benefits. PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to identify the key challenges and describe the initial outcomes experienced by Harney District Hospital (HDH), a rural critical access facility in Oregon, as it develops a surgical program. Since few models exist, this information will be valuable for those considering offering surgical services in a rural setting. METHODS: This project employed a single case study design. Qualitative information was gathered from semi-structured interviews, a focus group, reviews of historical documents, and informal observations. Quantitative data sources included HDH financial and utilization records, US Census records, and economic and demographic statistics from the state of Oregon, Harney County, and the city of Burns. FINDINGS: HDH is learning that initiating a change such as expanding surgical services within an organization is a challenging process requiring collaboration among the administration, staff, and community. Preliminary findings indicate that the new surgical program has resulted in significant financial gains for the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: While starting a rural surgery program is a complex undertaking, there are benefits for the hospital. If a rural hospital is to be successful in this mission, collaboration and adaptability must be key components of the process.

General surgery programs in small rural New York State hospitals: a pilot survey of hospital administrators.

CONTEXT: Hospitals play a central role in small rural communities and are frequently one of the major contributors to the local economy. Surgical services often account for a substantial proportion of hospital revenues. The current shortage of general surgeons practicing in rural communities may further threaten the financial viability of rural hospitals and communities. PURPOSE: To describe hospital administrators' perceptions regarding the current state of general surgery programs at small rural hospitals in New York State, including the impact that surgical services have on hospital financial viability. METHODS: A list of hospitals belonging to the rural hospitals group of the Healthcare Association of New York State was obtained to determine prospective survey recipients. Sixty-eight administrators at each of the identified hospitals were subsequently surveyed and 38 respondents met all inclusion criteria. FINDINGS: Approximately 87% of hospital administrators perceive that the general surgery program is critical to the hospital's financial viability. Forty percent of respondents report that they would be forced to close the hospital if the surgical program was lost. Among the 42% of administrators trying to recruit a general surgeon, almost two thirds have been searching for more than 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: According to the perceptions of hospital administrators, the financial viability of rural hospitals in New York State depends in large part on their ability to provide surgical services. Additionally, general surgeons appear to be in high demand at a significant number of the surveyed institutions.

Comparison of urban and rural general surgeons: motivations for practice location, practice patterns, and education requirements.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the differences between rural and urban surgeons with regard to practice patterns, factors in choosing a practice location, and educational needs. STUDY DESIGN: A list of surgeons obtained from the American Medical Association was examined using the Office of Management and Budget definition of rural. Seventeen hundred rural surgeons were mailed surveys; 421 responded. One hundred fourteen urban surgeons were contacted by telephone. Questions were designed to measure job and community satisfaction, factors influencing their decision to practice in their current location, spectrum and volume of cases, and their perceived educational needs. RESULTS: Age distribution did not differ markedly between urban and rural surgeons. Motivation to practice in their current location varied considerably between urban and rural surgeons. Both groups equally rated quality of life as the leading factor influencing their current practice location. Urban surgeons rated other factors, such as income, practice growth, hospital facilities, and proximity to family, higher than rural surgeons. Practice patterns and educational needs also varied between the two groups. Rural surgeons performed more procedures per year with more variety in procedure type. Both groups felt that additional training in advanced laparoscopic techniques would be helpful, and rural surgeons felt that additional training in the surgical subspecialty areas was important. CONCLUSIONS: Although rural and urban surgeons do not differ in age or the importance of lifestyle in deciding career location, different factors do impact their choice of location. Practice pattern and educational needs varied markedly between rural and urban general surgeons.

A rural, community-based program can train surgical residents in advanced laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Advanced laparoscopy requires mastery of complex surgical skills. A steep learning curve, lack of an adequate number of cases, and a shortage of experienced staff are reasons cited as barriers to the acquisition of these skills by surgical residents. We hypothesize that advanced laparoscopy can be taught during residency without additional fellowship training. STUDY DESIGN: ast surgical residents who completed training at our rural, community-based, 140-bed hospital from 1992 to 2000 were contacted by mailed surveys and a followup telephone interview. Advanced laparoscopy was defined as cases other than cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and diagnostic laparoscopy. Five attending surgeons routinely perform advanced laparoscopy. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 93.3% with 15 of 18 graduates currently practicing general surgery and 100% of the surgeons performing advanced laparoscopy. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, splenectomy, colectomy, Nissen fundoplication, and adrenalectomy were performed by 12 (85.7%), 10 (71.4%), 11 (78.6%), 13 (92.9%), and 9 (64.3%) surgeons, respectively. Eight (57.1%) surgeons reported confidence to perform advanced laparoscopy immediately after residency. All graduating chief residents from the last 3 years expressed this confidence. On average each of two chief residents from the past 3 academic years graduated with 99 basic and 50 advanced laparoscopic cases. CONCLUSIONS: A rural, community-based program can train residents to perform advanced laparoscopy. Increasing the volume of advanced cases handled by resident correlates with increasing confidence in graduates.

Surgical clips to help identify anatomy after a Nissen fundoplication.

Laparoscopic fundoplication has had a remarkable growth in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. But a failure rate of more than 5% has led to increasing numbers of patients with recurrent symptoms presenting for corrective surgery. A simple technique of placing surgical clips on the sutures used to place the wrap helps identify the anatomy during contrast studies and helps plan for corrective surgery.

Bassett healthcare rural surgery experience.

The surgical training at Bassett is naturally broader than in many university settings, with a survey showing that nearly 70% of graduates who practice general surgery remain in a rurally designated area. Rural surgery experience falls into 3 categories: undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate. The general surgery training program has no competing fellowships or subspecialty residencies; residents get significant experience with endoscopy; ear, nose, and throat; plastic and hand surgery; and obstetrics and gynecology. The rural setting lifestyle is valued by the students, residents, and fellows alike. It provides an ideal setting for recognizing the specific nuances of small-town American life, with a high-quality education and surgical experience.

General surgery contributes to the financial health of rural hospitals and communities.

Rural hospitals and communities often profit from the ability to provide surgical services. There can also be substantial financial costs for individuals, hospitals, and communities associated with not having access to surgical care in rural areas. Despite these advantages, limitations that include a shortage of rural general surgeons and other surgical staff and financial constraints prevent some rural institutions from offering surgical services. Few concrete data are available on this subject, and more research is needed to confirm anecdotal reports regarding the positive economic impact derived from general surgical services. It is especially important to examine and quantify the direct and indirect financial contribution that a general surgeon makes to a rural hospital and community.

General surgery at rural hospitals: a national survey of rural hospital administrators.

BACKGROUND: Many rural residents have limited access to surgical care. Rural hospitals frequently struggle to provide surgical services due to workforce shortages and financial constraints. The purpose of this study is to describe rural hospital administrators' perceptions regarding the state of their general surgery programs and the impact that providing surgical services has on their hospitals' financial viability. METHODS: A 12-item survey was mailed to a random sample of national rural hospital administrators (n=233). One hundred and eleven surveys were completed, yielding a response rate of 48%. In addition to overall descriptive analyses, comparisons were made between hospitals located in large versus small rural communities. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent of rural hospital administrators perceived their surgical program to be very important to the financial viability of their hospital and stated that they would reduce services if the hospital were to lose its surgery program. Thirty-four percent of hospitals have a surgeon leaving within the next 2 years and more than one-third of hospital administrators are currently searching for a surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical care is a vital component of the health care services delivered by rural hospitals. Surveyed administrators' view the ability to provide surgical services as crucial to the financial viability of their rural hospitals. A shortage of general surgeons is a potential major threat to these rural hospitals.

How does degree of rurality impact the provision of surgical services at rural hospitals?

CONTEXT: Rural residents frequently have decreased access to surgical services. Consequences of this situation include increased travel time and financial costs for patients. There are also economic implications for hospitals as they may lose revenue when patients leave the area in order to obtain surgical services. Rural communities vary in size and distance from more populated centers. Since rural hospitals are located in varying types of rural communities, they likely differ with regard to the provision of surgical care. PURPOSE: To describe the differences between hospitals located in smaller versus larger rural areas regarding the provision of surgical care. METHODS: A 12-item survey instrument based on one previously used in a pilot study was mailed to a national random sample of rural hospital administrators (n = 233). Rural location was determined using rural-urban commuting area codes. FINDINGS: One hundred and eleven surveys were received, yielding a 48% response rate. Hospitals in larger rural areas had an average of 9 surgeons compared to 1 at hospitals in smaller rural areas. More administrators at hospitals located in larger rural areas viewed the ability to provide surgical care as very important to the financial viability of their hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Among rural hospitals located in communities of varying sizes there are significant differences in how surgical services are delivered and the financial importance of providing surgical care. Administrators at hospitals located in larger rural areas, more than in smaller ones, report financial reliance on their ability to offer surgical care and have significantly more resources available to do so.

Is a broadly based surgical residency program more likely to place graduates in rural practice?

BACKGROUND: There is a shortage of general surgeons practicing in rural America. Rural surgical practices differ from those in urban settings encompassing a broader case mix with a larger percentage of time spent performing abdominal, alimentary, gynecological, genitourinary, and orthopedic procedures. Present graduates of many general surgical residencies do not obtain the range of experience necessary to practice effectively in this environment. We hypothesize that general surgical residents undergoing broadly based training are more likely to practice in a rural location. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a survey of graduates from the Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital's (MIBH) broadly based surgical residency program in 2004. Additionally, the surgical resident logs from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the residency program were reviewed for years 2001-2004. RESULTS: Of the 56 surveys sent out, 42 (75%) were completed and used in the analysis. A majority of the general surgeons who were raised in a rural environment reported that they are residing and practicing in a rural setting. Graduates of the MIBH residency program, on average, performed more cases as residents in the following subspecialty areas: genitourinary, plastics/hand, gynecology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics than national residency graduates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, surgical residents graduating from a broadly based training program appear more likely to practice in a rural setting.

Lipolysis in adipocytes isolated from deep and superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue.

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) occurs in two depots separated by a fascial plane: deep SAT and superficial SAT. In a recent study it was demonstrated that the amount of deep SAT has a much stronger relationship to insulin resistance than does superficial SAT. Because insulin resistance may be related to fatty acid release from adipose tissue, we hypothesized that the two SAT depots may have a different lipolytic activity. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: To test this hypothesis, we obtained samples of deep and superficial SAT from patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. The rate of lipolysis was determined in the collagenase-digested adipocytes obtained from the two fat depots by measuring glycerol release in the presence and absence of isoproterenol. In addition, the relative concentration of hormone-sensitive lipase was determined in both SAT depots by Western blot analysis. RESULTS: Our results showed that the rate of isoproterenol-stimulated lipolysis was approximately 20% higher in cells from deep SAT compared with those from superficial SAT, indicating that the deep SAT is more lipolytically active. The concentration of hormone-sensitive lipase did not differ between the two adipose tissue depots. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that the higher lipolytic activity of deep SAT may account for its stronger association with insulin resistance. The mechanism seems to be independent of differences in hormone-sensitive lipase concentration.