Shoulder Activity Level is Associated With Type of Employment and Income in the Normative Population Without Shoulder Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic variables influence various healthcare issues in different ways. The effect of socioeconomic variables on the shoulder has not been well studied. Because activity level, defined by how much a patient actually does, is an important patient outcome measure and prognostic factor for the shoulder, studying its association with occupation and income will advance our understanding of how these variables relate to shoulder disorders, treatments, and outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: We asked: (1) Does shoulder activity score correlate with income level, stratified by gender? (2) Do different employment groups-heavy, moderate, light, student, retired-have different shoulder activity scores, as stratified by gender? (3) Is type of sports participation (contact or overhead) associated with income level, employment type, race, or household size? METHODS: A survey collected the Brophy and Marx shoulder activity score and demographic information, such as age, gender, race, income, type of employment, and household size from 1625 individuals 18 years and older with no current or previous shoulder pain or injury who are members of a research panel matched to the United States population by age, gender, household income and size, race/ethnicity, and geography. Men and women were analyzed separately. Activity level was controlled for age. RESULTS: Shoulder activity correlated with income level among men (R = 0.03; p < 0.001) and women (R = 0.06; p = 0.0002). For men, heavy employment had the highest Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS) level (12.1 ± 4.9), which was more than SAS levels in sedentary (9.1 ± 4.5; mean difference, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.5-3.6; p = 0.001), student (8.8 ± 5.1; mean difference, 3.3; 95% CI, 3.0-3.7; p = 0.007), retired (8.0 ± 4.6; mean difference, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.6-4.7; p = 0.0001), and not working (7.5 ± 5.3; mean difference, 4.6; 95% CI, 4.6-4.6; p < 0.001) categories; similarly, for women, heavy employment had the highest SAS level (12.0 ± 5.8). However, as there were few women working in heavy labor, the only significant difference in women was between moderate employment (8.8 ± 4.2) and sedentary employment (7.0 ± 4.1; mean difference, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-1.9; p = 0.0015). Participation in contact (19.9% vs 12.0%; p = 0.006) and overhead sports (25.2% vs 14.2%; p < 0.001) was greater among males with higher incomes. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder activity level is related to the socioeconomic factors of income and type of employment. Heavy laborers have higher shoulder activity level, likely directly related to their work. Individuals with higher incomes also have higher shoulder activity level, probably attributable to recreation as evidenced by their greater participation in contact and overhead sports. Independent of the underlying cause, these patients probably are more likely to seek treatment for shoulder disorders and may be more challenging to treat because of their elevated activity level. Future research should focus on how elevated activity level in these populations affects their risk for shoulder disorders, and their use of and outcomes from treatment for these disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study.

Inadvertent Intra-Arterial Drug Injections in the Upper Extremity: Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To review the literature pertaining to inadvertent intra-arterial drug injection in the upper extremity, explore the various treatment options and their outcomes, and identify risk factors for limb amputation following intra-arterial injection. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (inception to March 2013) was completed for patients presenting with intra-arterial drug injection of the upper extremity. Details on intervention and outcome were extracted and subjected to pooled analysis with amputation as the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles (209 patients) were included for review. Mean patient age was 31 ± 8 years (male, 71%; female, 29%). Prescription opioids (33%) were the most commonly injected substance, and the brachial artery (39%) was the most common site. The overall weighted mean amputation incidence was 29%. Anticoagulants were the most common treatment used (77%). From pooled analysis, conditions requiring antibiotic use were significantly associated with a higher incidence of amputation; whereas use of steroids was associated with a lower incidence of amputation. Patients presenting 14 hours or more after injection and those injecting crushed pills rather than pure substances had significantly higher incidences of amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial drug injection of the upper extremity carries an amputation incidence of nearly 30%. Conditions requiring adjunctive antibiotic use and delay in receiving care were both significantly associated with higher incidences of amputation. No single treatment protocol to date has established superiority. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The effect of distal radius translation in the coronal plane on forearm rotation: a cadaveric study of distal radius fractures.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of lateral translation of the distal radius in the coronal plane on forearm rotation after distal radius fracture. METHODS: Ten fresh cadaveric limbs underwent distal radius osteotomy just proximal to the distal radial-ulnar joint to simulate an extra-articular distal radius fracture. We used an Agee Wrist Jack external fixator to create increasing magnitudes of distal fragment lateral translation in 2-mm increments. Forearm rotation was measured using a 3-dimensional camera at each magnitude of lateral translation. RESULTS: Total forearm rotation for the intact specimen and 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm (maximal) radial translations was 186° ± 53°, 188° ± 54°, 189° ± 55°, 190° ± 57°, and 193° ± 59°, respectively. There was no significant difference for any magnitude of radial translation. The average maximal radial translation possible before radioulnar abutment was 8 ± 0.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric model, translation of the distal radius fragment in the lateral direction had no effect on forearm rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the level of the proximal border of the distal radioulnar joint, isolated distal radius translation does not significantly affect forearm rotation.

The efficacy and duration of intra-articular corticosteroid injection for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of level I studies.

We performed a systematic review of the current literature to determine the efficacy and duration of intra-articular corticosteroid injection in reducing pain caused by knee osteoarthritis and to determine whether the type of corticosteroid used affected these results. Following an electronic search of multiple databases and a review of reference lists from various articles, we found six trials in five papers that compared corticosteroid versus placebo and four papers that compared different corticosteroids. Results of corticosteroid compared with placebo showed both a statistically and clinically significant reduction in pain at 1 week, with an average difference between groups of 22%. Two of four trials showed triamcinolone to be more effective in pain reduction than other corticosteroids. We concluded that intra-articular corticosteroids reduce knee pain for at least 1 week and that intra-articular corticosteroid injection is a short-term treatment of a chronic problem.