Detection of P2Y(14) protein in platelets and investigation of the role of P2Y(14) in platelet function in comparison with the EP(3) receptor.

mRNA encoding the recently discovered P2Y(14) receptor has been reported in platelets, but the presence of P2Y(14) receptor protein and its functionality have not been studied. If P2Y(14) is expressed along with P2Y(1) and P2Y(12) receptors it may have a role in haemostasis. It was the objective of this study to investigate the presence of the P2Y(14) receptor in platelets and its role in platelet function. The effects of the agonist UDP-glucose were compared with those of sulprostone, a selective EP(3) receptor agonist. Expression of P2Y(14) receptor was investigated by immunoblotting and confocal microscopy. Platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood was measured using light absorbance and platelet counting. VASP phosphorylation was investigated using flow cytometry. Immunoblotting provided evidence for P2Y(14) receptor protein and microscopy confirmed its presence on platelets. Despite this, UDP-glucose (up to 100 muM) did not induce platelet aggregation in either PRP or whole blood, and did not potentiate aggregation induced by other agonists. P2Y(14) did not substitute for P2Y(12) in experiments using the P2Y(12) antagonist AR-C69931. No effect of UDP-glucose was seen on adenylate cyclase activity as measured by VASP phosphorylation. In contrast, sulprostone acting via the EP(3) receptor promoted platelet aggregation with effects on adenylate cyclase activity. EP(3) also partially substituted for P2Y(12) receptor. We have demonstrated the presence of P2Y(14) receptor protein in platelets, but no contribution of this receptor to several measures of platelet function has been observed. Further studies are necessary to determine whether the P2Y(14) receptor in platelets has any functionality.

An observational study investigating the effect of platelet function on outcome after colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have assumed patients have uniform responses to aspirin, yet significant numbers are occult hypo- or hyper-responders. A new validated test of platelet function measures platelet P-selectin expression, which rises with increased platelet activity. This study investigated the measured perioperative changes in platelet function in response to aspirin, and subsequently whether quantitative variations in platelet activity affected perioperative complication severity and frequency. METHODS: 107 patients undergoing major colorectal surgery were recruited and assigned to either control (no antiplatelet therapy) or aspirin groups. P-selectin was measured following platelet stimulation at recruitment prior to cessation of medication, and at surgery before intervention. Perioperative complications, hemoglobin changes and blood transfusions were also recorded. RESULTS: Platelet function was higher in control (n = 87) than aspirin group (n = 20) at recruitment (median 1303u [IQR 1102-1499] vs 77u [IQR 63.5-113.5],P < 0.01) and surgery (median 1224u [IQR 944-1496] vs 281.5u [IQR 106.8-943], P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between length of aspirin cessation and platelet function at surgery (R(S) = 0.66, P < 0.01). Complication rates and hemorrhagic complication rates (P < 0.05) were higher with aspirin than control, although complication severity was not increased. Platelet function of the entire cohort at surgery was not associated with complication rate, severity or transfusion use. DISCUSSION: Although complication rates were higher in aspirin group, impaired platelet function within ranges seen with aspirin continuation did not affect complication severity or rate or blood transfusion use. Consequently, aspirin continuation may not affect clinical outcome in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery and requires further investigation with a large randomized trial.

Inhibition of platelet aggregation by AZD6140, a reversible oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: In a substudy of DISPERSE (Dose confIrmation Study assessing anti-Platelet Effects of AZD6140 vs. clopidogRel in non-ST-segment Elevation myocardial infarction)-2, we compared the antiplatelet effects of AZD6140 and clopidogrel and assessed the effects of AZD6140 in clopidogrel-pretreated patients. BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel, in combination with aspirin, reduces cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, patients with poor inhibition of platelet aggregation with clopidogrel may be less well protected. AZD6140 is a reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist that has been studied in ACS patients in comparison with clopidogrel (DISPERSE-2 study). METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either AZD6140 90 mg twice a day, AZD6140 180 mg twice a day, or clopidogrel 75 mg once a day for up to 12 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. One-half the patients allocated AZD6140 received a 270-mg loading dose. Patients randomized to receive clopidogrel were given a 300-mg loading dose unless they had already been treated with clopidogrel. Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation was assessed by optical aggregometry on day 1 and at 4-week intervals. RESULTS: AZD6140 inhibited platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent fashion and both doses achieved greater levels of inhibition than clopidogrel (e.g., 4 weeks, 4-h postdose [mean (+/-SD)]: clopidogrel 64% [+/-22%], AZD6140 90 mg 79% [+/-22%], AZD6140 180 mg 95% [+/-8%]. AZD6140 also produced further suppression of platelet aggregation in patients previously treated with clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: AZD6140 exhibited greater mean inhibition of platelet aggregation than a standard regimen of clopidogrel in ACS patients. In addition, AZD6140 further suppressed platelet aggregation in clopidogrel pretreated patients.

Leukocyte count and leukocyte ecto-nucleotidase are major determinants of the effects of adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate on platelet aggregation in human blood.

ADP induces platelet aggregation in human whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). ATP induces aggregation in whole blood only; this involves leukocytes and is mediated by ADP. Here we studied ATP- and ADP-induced aggregation in patients with raised leukocyte counts (mean 46.2x10(3) leukocytes/microl). Platelet aggregation was measured by platelet counting. ATP, ADP and metabolites were measured by HPLC. Aggregation to ADP (1-10 microM) and ATP (10-100 microM) was markedly reduced, but to ATP (1000 microM) was enhanced (all p<0.001). Aggregation to ADP in PRP was normal. Increasing the leukocyte count in normal blood reproduced the findings in the patients. Adding leukocytes (either MNLs or PMNLs) to normal PRP enabled a response to ATP and caused marked inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation. Breakdown of ATP or ADP to AMP and adenosine in leukocyte-rich plasma was rapid (t1/2=4 min) and far higher than in cell-free plasma or PRP. With ATP there was also formation of ADP, maximal at 4 min. The presence of the ectonucleotidase NTPDase1 (CD39) was demonstrated on MNLs (all of the monocytes and a proportion of the lymphocytes) and all PMNLs by flow cytometry. We conclude that leukocytes provide a means of dephosphorylating ATP which enables ATP-induced aggregation via conversion to ADP, but also convert ADP to AMP and adenosine. Platelet aggregation extent is a balance between these activities, and high white cell counts influence this balance.