Humanitarian Surgical Missions in Times of COVID-19: Recommendations to Safely Return to a Sub-Saharan Africa Low-Resource Setting.

BACKGROUND: Since the declaration of the pandemic, humanitarian medicine has been discontinued. Until now, there have been no general recommendations on how humanitarian surgical missions should be organized. METHODS: Based on our experience in the field of humanitarian surgical missions to Sub-Saharan Africa, a panel of recommendations in times of COVID-19 was developed. The fields under study were as follows: (1) Planning of a multidisciplinary project; (2) Organization of the infrastructure; (3) Screening, management and treatment of SARS-COV-2; (4) Diagnostic tests for SARS-COV-2; (5) Surgical priorization and (6) Context of patients during health-care assistance. We applied a risk bias measurement to obtain a consensus among humanitarian health-care providers with experience in this field. RESULTS: A total of 94.36% of agreement were reached for the approval of the recommendations. Emergency surgery must be a priority, and elective surgery adapted. For emergency surgery, we established a priority level 1a (< 24 h) and 1b (< 72 h). For an elective procedure, according our American College of Surgeon adaptation score, process with more than 60 points should be reconsidered. Due to the low life expectancy in many African countries, we consider 45-50 years as age of risk. In case of SARS-COV-2 active infection or high clinical suspicion, the screening, management and treatment should be following the international guidelines adapted to duration of the stay, available infrastructure, size of the cooperation team and medical resources. CONCLUSIONS: Humanitarian surgical mission in times of COVID-19 is a challenge that must extrapolate the established recommendations to the local cooperation environment.

Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI).

BACKGROUND: Right hemicolectomy is a very common surgery. Many studies compare different options for laparoscopic ileocolic anastomoses: intra- or extracorporeal; handsewn or stapled; side-to-side or end-to-side. However, there are no studies about the influence that peristalsis could have on this anastomosis. The aim of this study is to compare safety and feasibility of isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomosis in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality between both groups. The secondary endpoint is to compare long-term functional outcomes (chronic diarrhoea) and quality of life (GIQLI questionnaire) after a 1-year follow-up period. METHODS: A double-blind, randomised, prospective trial in patients undergoing scheduled surgery for right colon cancer with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and isoperistaltic (ISO) or antiperistaltic (ANTI) ileocolic anastomoses. RESULTS: Hundred and eight patients were included in the study. Patients were randomised either to isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic configuration (54 ISO/ANTI). No significant differences in baseline variables were found. No differences in surgical time (130 [120-150] min ISO vs. 140 [127-160] ANTI, p = 0.481), nor in anastomotic time (19 [17-22] vs. 20 [16-25], p = 0.207) and nor in postoperative complications: 37.0% ISO versus 40.7% ANTI, (p = 0.693) were found. There were no differences in postoperative ileus (p = 0.112) nor in anastomotic leakage (3.7% vs. 5.56%, p = 1.00). Differences in "time to first flatus" and "time to first deposition" were found in favour of the antiperistaltic group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017). Anastomotic configuration did not influence hospital stay (3 days [2-6] isoperistaltic vs. 3 [2-4] antiperistaltic, p = 0.236). During follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups at 1, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.154, p = 0.498 and p = 0.683), nor in chronic diarrhoea rates in GIQLI scores (24% ISO vs. 31.4% ANTI, p = 0.541). CONCLUSIONS: The isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis present similar results in terms of performance, safety and functionality. However, further studies must be carried out in order to assess relationship between postoperative ileus and anastomosis configuration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomised Clinical trial (Identifier: NCT02309931).

V-Y advancement flaps for extensive perianal defect repair. / El colgajo V-Y como método de reparación de defectos perianales extensos.

OBJECTIVES: Some perianal pathologies require aggressive surgery that will need techniques to allow to re-establish the integrity of the perianal region. The purpose is to analyze short and long term results after perineal reconstruction with V-Y flaps. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected database was conducted at Virgen de la Arrixaca's Hospital in Murcia (España) between January 2000 and December 2013. The study includes all patients who underwent a perineal reconstruction with V-Y flaps. Demographic and surgical data and short-/long- term morbidity was recorded. RESULTS: 10 patients were included, 6 males and 4 females. The average age was 58,1±17,4 years. Surgical indication included both malignant and benign pathologies. Operating time was 143,5±41,3min. R0 resection was performed in all cases although histopathological analysis showed involvement of the deeper margin in 3 cases. Length of hospital stay was 7,8±7,6 days. Regarding complications: 6 patients had partial dehiscence of the flap. None of the patients lost the flap completely. The most frequent late complication was anal stenosis (n=4). Follow up showed total continence in 7 patients. Two patients had variable fecal and/or flatus incontinence. A colostomy was made in one case due to severe incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: V-Y flaps are an effective and feasible technique to cover large perianal defects after aggressive surgeries. However, this technique is not free of postoperative morbidity.

The learning curve of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer does not increase morbidity.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of rectal cancer via laparoscopy is controversial due to its technical complexity. Several randomized prospective studies have demonstrated clear advantages for the patient with similar oncological results to those of open surgery, although during the learning of this surgical technique there may be an increase in complications and a worse prognosis. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to analyze how the learning curve for rectal cancer via laparoscopy influences intra- and postoperative results and oncological markers. A retrospective review was conducted of the first 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal neoplasia. The operations were performed by the same surgical team with a wide experience in the treatment of open colorectal cancer and qualified to perform advanced laparoscopic surgery. We analyzed sex, ASA, tumour location, neoadjuvant treatment, surgical technique, operating time, conversion, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, number of lymph nodes, stage and involvement of margins. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed with regard to surgical time (224 min in the first group, 204 min in the second group), with a higher rate of conversion in the first group (22.5%) than in the second (11.3%). No significant differences were noted for rate of conservative sphincter surgery, length of hospital stay, post-surgical complications, number of affected/isolated lymph nodes or affected circumferential and distal margins. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to learn this complex surgical technique without compromising the patient's safety and oncological outcome.

Goiter surgery recommendations in sub-Saharan Africa in humanitarian cooperation.

Background: The standard treatment for endemic goiter is usually total thyroidectomy. In low- and middle-income countries, the management of thyroid disease, which is commonplace in fully developed countries, is not always possible. The purpose of this study is to establish a treatment algorithm to calculate the extent of thyroidectomy based on the risk factors of each patient. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study conducted during the period between 2017 and 2019. A total of 287 patients with thyroid pathology were treated in Maragua Hospital (Kenya). The results of surgical treatment were analyzed after the implementation of an individualized treatment protocol. Results: One hundred and sixty patients with different types of goiter underwent surgery: solitary nodule (54.4%), multi-nodular goiter (30.6%), diffuse goiter (10.6%), and intrathoracic goiter (3.8%). The techniques used were hemithyroidectomy (78.8%), Dunhill thyroidectomy (9.4%), bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy (6.9%), and total thyroidectomy (3.1%). There was no mortality. The surgical morbidity rate was 16% (only one major complication (3b)). Two cases of dysphonia were resolved in the first week. There were three cases of symptomatic hypocalcaemia, two of which resolved in the first week and the other of which was definitive. The follow-up at 6 months was 67%. The cancer rate found in the resection specimens was 5%. Discussion: The implementation of individualized surgical protocols for thyroid surgery in sub-Saharan Africa can improve outcomes. The cooperation projects can increase access to complex surgical treatment for patients with limited resources in low- and middle-income countries.

Status of the management of hypertension and diabetes in rural Kenya: a multi-institutional joint intervention of cross-sectional surveys.

Introduction: the aim of this study was to analyze the status of the management of vascular risk factors (hypertension and diabetes) at hospital level (3, 4 and 5) in Murang'a County (Kenya) health system. Methods: between July and December 2018 we performed a joint intervention about the strategies for improving care management of hypertension and diabetic patients in Murang'a (Kenya). A survey based on the recommendations from WHO about management of diabetes and hypertension was completed for 9 health-care centers. The survey made use of a semi-structured questionnaire, while the units of analysis for the survey were households. Results: the number of patients recorded at medical registers with diabetes and hypertension registered in public hospitals in Murang'a County were 6628 (0.45%) and y 6694 (0.45%), respectively. In the surveyed health-care centers, no hospital use electrogram and only one had troponin test. No hospital stocked Isosorbide dinitrate and Glicerine trinitate to prevent chest pain in patients with a heart condition. Only 3 of the clinics performed visual acuity examination and no facility did neurologic examination for neuropathy complications. No public hospital had HbA1 and did microalbuminuria test available. Conclusion: it is necessary to improve to establish screening methods, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with hypertension and diabetes in Murang'a County at the various levels of health care.

[Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: initial experience]. / Apendicectomía laparoscópica mediante incisión única transumbilical: experiencia inicial.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency. The treatment is surgical and single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) involves performing laparoscopic surgery through a single transumbilical point, in an attempt to improve the results of laparoscopic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 73 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were operated on using the SILS technique between June 2009 and August 2010. All patients were operated on by the same surgical team, and the navel was the only point of entrance. Post-surgical pain was assessed using a numerical scale at the time of discharge. RESULTS: None of the patients required conversion to conventional laparoscopy. The mean surgical time was 40±14 (16-80) minutes. There were no complications during or after the surgery. The mean post-surgical pain score was 3±1 (1-7) and the mean hospital stay was 18±7 (9-42) hours. CONCLUSION: SILS is a safe and effective technique for appendicitis. In the future, the most common surgical procedures could be performed through the navel. This would be by surgeons, highly experienced in advance laparoscopic surgery in order to introduce this new technique safely without increasing morbidity and mortality.

Screening for the effectiveness of conservative treatment in chronic anal fissure patients using anorectal manometry.

PURPOSE: Chemical sphincterotomy (CS) is routinely applied in order to avoid the irreversible anal incontinence associated with the surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF). However, CS has a lower cure rate than surgery. We developed a screening test (using anal manometry) to separate those patients that are unlikely to benefit from CS and should undergo a more aggressive treatment. METHODS: Changes in pressure both at rest and during voluntary contraction of the anal sphincter in 187 patients with chronic anal fissure and 25 healthy subjects (control group) of both sexes were measured. Patients were then sequentially treated (1:1:1) with botulin toxin injections (TOX) (n = 63) or ointments of either nitroglycerine (NTG) (n = 65) or diltiazem (DTZ) (n = 59) for 2 months. The cure rate (overall and for each treatment group) and its relationship with changes in anal pressure were determined. RESULTS: The overall cure rate was 53% (NTG = 54%, DTZ = 53% and TOX = 51%). Healing was not related to differences in resting or voluntary contraction pressure. However, the probability of healing was associated with an increase in the percentage change between resting and squeeze pressure (PI index) higher than 150% (190 +/- 122), similar to that of the control subjects (200 +/- 115). Failure of CS was observed in patients with a lower PI (114 +/- 77). CONCLUSIONS: The ratio resting/voluntary contraction pressure may be predictive of healing in CAF, thus allowing the selection of patients at high risk of failure of conservative treatment.

Clinical pathway for laparoscopic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are ideal candidates for a clinical pathway, as it is a standardized, common, and elective procedure and most patients have a predictable clinical course. OBJECTIVE: The aim of developing this clinical pathway is the result of a wide consolidated experience with patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the purpose of which is to minimize complications without affecting patient care or the outcome of the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The clinical pathway was applied to the 311 patients that received a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The clinical pathway includes a temporary matrix, which shows the sequence of events that will occur on each of the days between patient admission and discharge. It also includes medical interventions, nursing care, medication, determinations, physical activity, diet, and information for the patient. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 36 patients (11.5%): 14 patients (4.5%) during admission and 22 patients (7%) after discharge. Of the 22 patients presenting with complications after discharge, 12 required readmission to hospital (3.8%), and the other 10 were treated on an ambulatory basis. CONCLUSIONS: We can say that, because of its frequency and predictability, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is nowadays a procedure for systematization using a clinical pathway, providing it is controlled by a team with a wide experience in bariatric surgery. This clinical pathway is to offer our patients with morbid obesity a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with the smallest possible range of complications.

Intragastric balloon reduces liver volume in super-obese patients, facilitating subsequent laparoscopic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Surgery in patients with super-obesity (BMI > or = 50) involves technical difficulties that are related, among other factors, to increased liver volume. Although the intragastric balloon is not a definitive alternative to surgery, it has been used in these patients as a primary therapeutic means of reducing excess weight and the risks of subsequent surgery. It has also been reported to considerably diminish liver volume to facilitate technical aspects of the operation. We evaluated preoperative weight loss in patients with super-obesity after placement of an intragastric balloon and its effect on liver volume measured by computed axial tomography (CT) prior to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). METHODS: The balloon was implanted preoperatively under endoscopic guidance and sedation in 31 patients with super-obesity, to reduce weight prior to LRYGBP. Two patients were excluded from the study for intolerance and the balloon was removed 2 weeks after placement. Measurement of liver volume was done with axial images obtained by spiral CT with a section thickness of 10 mm, reconstitution index 10 mm, pitch 1.5 and acquisition delay 60 seconds. Volumes were calculated using the sum of areas technique. Measurement of volume was done in these 29 patients prior to balloon placement and the week before surgery. RESULTS: After placement of the balloon, 27 patients (93%) had nausea and 25 patients (86%) had vomiting, which abated 1 week after placement. Mean liver volume prior to balloon placement was 2938.53 +/- 853.1 cm3, which at 6 weeks dropped to values of 1918.2 +/- 499.8 cm3, revealing a considerable reduction in liver volume [31.8% +/- 18.16% (range 3.1%-58.5%)]. Percent of excess weight loss was 22.14% +/- 7.39. LRYGBP was performed at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with super-obesity, preoperative treatment with intragastric balloon considerably reduces liver volume to facilitate LRYGBP.

Results of laparoscopic gastric bypass in patients > or =55 years old.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is a commonly performed surgical intervention for morbid obesity. Some authors considered age > or =55 years as a relative contraindication to bariatric surgery. We examined the operative outcomes, weight loss, hospital stay and resolution of co-morbidities in patients > or =55 years old compared with those <55 years old undergoing LRYGBP. METHODS: From Jan 2000 to Feb 2005, 350 LRYGBPs were performed. 48 patients > or =55 years old (13.7%) were compared to the remaining patients. RESULTS: Analysis of the 48 patients > or =55 years old compared with 302 patients <55 revealed no difference in complication rate, although the older patients had a significantly greater percentage of serious complications. Younger patients lost more weight than older patients. Both groups demonstrated resolution of comorbidities, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: LRYGBP is safe and well tolerated in morbidly obese patients > or =55 years. The older patients had more serious complications and lost less weight; however, their weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities improved their quality of life. Age should not be a contraindication to bariatric surgery.

Utility of rectoscopy in the assessment of response to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has changed substantially over the last few decades with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The aim of the present study is to compare the results between neoadjuvant post-treatment rectoscopy and the anatomopathological findings of the surgical specimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 67 patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum (stages II and III). Two groups were established: One with complete clinical response (cCR) and one without (non-cCR), based on the findings at rectoscopy. Assessment of tumor regression grade in the surgical specimen was determined using Mandard's tumor regression scale. RESULTS: Seventeen patients showed a cCR. Thirty-five biopsies were negative and 32 were positive for malignancy. All the cCR patients had a negative biopsy (P < 0.0001). All 32 positive biopsies revealed the presence of adenocarcinoma, and of the 35 negative biopsies, 18 had no malignancy and 17 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (P < 0.0001). Sixteen of the 17 cCR patients showed a complete pathological response and one patient showed the presence of adenocarcinoma. Of the 50 non-cCR patients 48 revealed the presence of adenocarcinoma and two had absence of malignancy. According to the Mandard classification, 16 of the 17 cCR patients were grade I and 1 grade II; 2 non-cCR patients were grade I, 7 grade II, 13 grade III, 19 grade IV, and 9 grade V. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and histological findings could be determinants in the assessment of response to neoadjuvant treatment.

Experience with the circular stapler for the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass (350 cases).

BACKGROUND: The increased incidence of morbid obesity has resulted in an increase in bariatric surgery. The gastrojejunostomy performed during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) operations has technical variability with different outcomes and complication-rates immediate postoperatively and at long-term follow-up. METHODS: Between Jan 2000 and Feb 2005, 350 laparoscopic RYGBP procedures were performed. We present our immediate and follow-up rate of complications with total intraabdominal gastrojejunostomy, performed with the circular stapler. RESULTS: Complications of gastrojejunostomy were detected in 24 patients (6.8%): 3 anastomotic leaks (0.8%); 6 bleeding (1.7%) immediately postoperatively, and 4 stenoses (1.1%), 10 ulcers (2.8%) and 1 stenosis plus ulcer (0.3%) during long-term follow-up. There was no mortality related to the gastrojejunostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The gastrojejunostomy with circular stapler is an easily reproducible procedure. The rate of complications has been low. Surgeons who perform laparoscopic RYGBP should have a careful learning curve, and should be aware of the potential complications and their management.

The influence of the percentage of the common limb in weight loss and nutritional alterations after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity. There is no consensus over ideal limb length when the bypass is created and published studies do not take into account the influence of the common limb (CL) on weight loss. The objective was to study the influence of the common limb after RYGB. The setting was the Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital in Murcia, Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study includes 151 patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB surgery for morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their body mass index. The small intestine (SI) was measured using micro forceps so that the percentage of common limb (%CL) could then be compared against the total SI in each patient. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) in relation to the %CL was calculated at 3, 12, and 24 months. A series of tests was conducted simultaneously to analyze nutritional deficiencies and their relation to the %CL. RESULTS: The total jejunoileal segment and the %CL in the groups of both obese and super-obese patients had no influence on the %EWL in either group for any of the periods studied. The patients with a %CL<50% had greater nutritional deficiencies in the follow-up period and required supplements and more frequent laboratory tests. CONCLUSIONS: The %CL has no effect on weight loss in RYGB patients. A lower %CL is related to greater nutritional deficiencies.

Gastrojejunal anastomotic stenosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass with a circular stapler (21 mm): incidence, treatment and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: One of the keys to the long-term success of laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) is performing a small-diameter gastrojejunal anastomosis, which occasionally involves an increased incidence of stenosis. METHODS: Between May 2000 and October 2008, 676 patients underwent LGBP with a no. 21 circular stapler to create the gastrojejunoanastomosis (GJA). We define stenosis when clinical symptoms suggest an obstruction and it is impossible to pass a 10-mm endoscope through the GJA. The treatment of patients with stenosis was endoscopic dilation with 10-15-mm balloons. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients (3.4%) developed stenosis of whom 20 were females (3%) and three males (0.4%) with a mean age of 40.7+/-11.6 years (range, 16-71 years) and a body mass index of 48.1+/-6.9 kg/m2 (range, 34-78 kg/m2). The time between surgery and the onset of symptoms was 46.8+/-24.5 days (range, 15-93 days). The stricture was resolved in all patients with endoscopic dilation: 18 patients with one dilation, three patients with two dilations and two patients with three dilations. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of gastrojejunal anastomotic stenosis in LGBP performed with a 21-mm circular stapler is low, and endoscopic dilation is an effective and complication-free treatment in 100% of cases.

[Long-term results of laparoscopic gastric bypass in patients with morbid obesity. a prospective study of 508 cases]. / Resultados a largo plazo del bypass gástrico laparoscópico en pacientes con obesidad mórbida. Estudio prospectivo de 508 casos.

INTRODUCTION: Although there are publications on the short-medium term results of gastric bypass, publications of long-term results are very limited and the results are less documented. PATIENTS AND METHOD: In this article we present the experience of the same surgical team with laparoscopic gastric bypass over 7 years, with a follow-up of 97% of the patients. From March 2000 until May 2007, 508 laparoscopic gastric bypasses were performed by the same surgical team. RESULTS: Of the 508 patients who were subjected to laparoscopic gastric bypass, 353 were women (69.5%) and 155 were men (30.5%), with a mean age of 40 years (16-71), a mean pre-operative weight of 131.3 +/- 24.5 kg (80-230) and a mean BMI of 48.3 +/- 7 (34-78). There were early complications (< 30 days) in 14.7% of the patients and delayed complications (> 30 days) in 7.3%. The mean operation time was 125.8 +/- 35.6 minutes (60-300). The mean hospital stay was 3 +/- 2.6 days (1-40). The mortality of the series was 0.8%. The EWL and BMI loss at 3 and 5 years was 77.8% and 75.1% and 82.7% and 79.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic gastric bypass is an effective technique for the long-term treatment of morbid obesity, with a low number of complications, low mortality, excellent weight loss and recovery or improvement of the comorbidities associated with these patients.

[Influence of the surgeon as a factor in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer with preoperative radiochemotherapy. A comparative study]. / Influencia del factor cirujano en el tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de recto con radioquimioterapia preoperatoria. Estudio comparativo.

INTRODUCTION: In the last few years, changes have been introduced in rectal cancer surgery that have improved its results. These changes include autosuture devices, total mesorectal excision, and neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the surgeon influences the results of surgical treatment for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comparative, retrospective study was performed in 194 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative radiotherapy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of surgeon performing the intervention: group I: 3 surgeons with 101 patients; group II: 16 surgeons with 93 patients. RESULTS: Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 77% of patients in group I and in 52% of those in group II (p < 0.001). In group I anterior resection was performed in 100%, 100% and 58% when the tumor was between 11-15 cm, 6-10 cm and 1-5 cm, respectively, compared with 100%, 69% and 23.5% in group II. Complications occurred in 41% of patients in group I and in 48% of those in group II (p = 0.037). Length of hospital stay was 9.9 days in group I and 13.9 days in group II (p < 0.001). Local recurrence occurred in 3.5% of patients in group I and in 11.3% of those in group II (p = 0.054). Survival was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon is a key factor in rectal cancer, despite the introduction of autosuture devices, neoadjuvant treatment, and total mesorectal excision. These patients should be operated on by experts in this type of surgery and not by surgeons who perform these interventions only occasionally.

Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gastric bypass is one of the most commonly acknowledged surgical techniques for the management of morbid obesity. It is usually performed as an open surgery procedure, although now some groups perform it via the laparoscopic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and January 2002 we conducted a randomized prospective study in 104 patients diagnosed with morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 group with gastric bypass via the open approach (OGBP) comprising 51 patients, and 1 group with gastric bypass via the laparoscopic approach (LGBP) comprising 53 patients. The parameters compared were as follows: operating time, intraoperative complications, early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) postoperative complications, hospital stay, and short-term evolution of body mass index. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 186.4 minutes (125-290) in the LGBP group and 201.7 minutes (129-310) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 8% of the LGBP patients. Early postoperative complications (<30 days) occurred in 22.6% of the LGBP group compared with 29.4% of the OGBP group, with no significant differences. Late complications (>30 days) occurred in 11% of the LGBP group compared with 24% of the OGBP group (P < 0.05). The differences observed between the 2 groups are the result of a high incidence of abdominal wall hernias in the OGBP group. Mean hospital stay was 5.2 days (1-13) in the LGBP group and 7.9 days (2-28) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Evolution of body mass index during a mean follow-up of 23 months was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LGBP is a good surgical technique for the management of morbid obesity and has clear advantages over OGBP, such as a reduction in abdominal wall complications and a shorter hospital stay. The midterm weight loss is similar with both techniques. One inconvenience is that LGBP has a more complex learning curve than other advanced laparoscopic techniques, which may be associated with an increase in postoperative complications.