Perioperative experiences of patients with high pain catastrophizing and knee arthroplasty after receiving or not preoperative physiotherapy: Qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Among the risk factors studied for persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), pain catastrophizing stands out above the others. In this regard, preoperative interventions based on pain neuroscience education or multimodal physiotherapy have been shown to be effective in reducing pain catastrophizing. OBJECTIVES: The present qualitative study aims to explore the perioperative experiences of high pain catastrophizing participants undergoing total knee arthroplasty surgery. Comparisons will be made between those who received, and those who did not receive a preoperative physiotherapy intervention. METHODS: Based on the purposive sampling approach, participants from a randomized controlled trial were selected. In total, 14 persons participated in face-to-face semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Following a thematic analysis, the results were divided into two themes: 1) The preoperative experiences of patients with symptomatic knee arthroplasty, covering aspects related to health, functioning, cognition, and behaviour; and 2) The perioperative TKA rehabilitation process, illustrating differing experiences between individuals who received the preoperative physiotherapy interventions and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: While participants who received no preoperative physiotherapy intervention showed limited coping strategies during post-surgery rehabilitation and the same cognitions as before (hypervigilance, rumination, or avoidance of activities), those participants who received the preoperative physiotherapy showed abilities to cope with their pain, felt empowered and were involved in their rehabilitation.

Intervention to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection in spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the incidence, characteristics, and risk factors of surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery and evaluates the efficacy of a preventive intervention. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental pretest/posttest study in patients undergoing spinal surgery in an orthopedic surgery department from December 2014 to November 2016. Based on the results of the study, we revised the preventive protocol with modification of wound dressing, staff training, and feedback. SSI rates were compared between the pre-intervention (December 2014 to November 2015) and post-intervention (December 2015 to November 2016) periods. The risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 139 patients included, 14 cases of SSI were diagnosed, with a significant decrease in the incidence of SSIs from the pre-intervention period to the post-intervention period (19.4% vs 2.6%; P = .001). The etiology was known in 13 cases, with enteric flora being predominant in the pre-intervention group. Univariate analysis showed that age, body mass index, days until sitting and ambulation, and incontinence were statistically significant risk factors. After multivariate analysis, only body mass index and days until ambulation remained significant. When the effect of intervention was adjusted with other risk factors, this variable remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention that includes modification of wound dressing and early mobilization, as well as staff awareness training, monitoring, and feedback, allowed a significant reduction in the incidence of SSI following spinal surgery, particularly infections caused by enteric flora.

What is the role of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses?

AIM: To analyse the role played by bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses. METHODS: The study included 77 patients, aged 32-77 years, in whom infection of a joint prosthesis (48 hip, 29 knee) was suspected. In all patients the following examinations were performed consecutively: a two-phase Tc methylene diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) bone scan, a Tc hexamethylproplyene amine oxime (Tc-HMPAO) labelled white blood cell (WBC) scan, and a Tc microcolloid bone marrow (BM) scan. The minimum interval between examinations was 48 h. The diagnoses were based on data obtained from bacteriological cultures. RESULTS: The bone scan was positive in all patients and 28 of them had an infection (sensitivity 100%, specificity 0%). The WBC scan was positive in 61 patients but only 27 had an infection. The WBC scan was negative in 16 patients, and the possibility of infection was discarded in 15 of these cases (sensitivity 96%, specificity 30%). The results of the bone marrow scan were not compatible with those of the WBC scan (suggestive of infection) in 27 patients: 26 of them had prosthesis infection. The results of both examinations were compatible in the other 34 patients and the possibility of infection was discarded in 33 of these patients (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 98%). The addition of a BM scan to a WBC scan decreased the sensitivity from 96% to 92.8% but increased specificity from 30% to 98%. The addition of a bone scan to this dual combination did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS: When infection of a prosthesis is suspected the diagnostic procedure should start with a WBC scan followed, if positive, by a BM scan. This procedure reduces the cost, the time required for a diagnosis, and the dose of radiation received by the patient.