Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Acta Oncol ; 50(5): 653-9, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21261507

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Survivors after malignant lymphoma are at high risk of late effects. In order to take full responsibility for their own health they need knowledge about their diagnosis, treatment and risk of late effects. We assessed such knowledge in adult survivors of childhood malignant lymphoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2007-2009 128 five-year survivors after childhood malignant lymphoma participated in a national cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey combined with clinical examination. [Males: 69, females: 59, treatment period 1970-2000, median age (range) at diagnosis: 14 years (0-18), at survey: 32 years (19-55), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): 84, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): 44]. Prior to the clinical examination a semi-structured interview on the survivors' knowledge was conducted by a study nurse. The individual survivors' responses were compared with his/her medical record. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty one reported their diagnosis correctly, seven reported that they had cancer, but could not specify malignant lymphoma. Thirty-three could not differentiate between HL and NHL. One hundred and twenty three reported their treatment modalities correctly (radiotherapy vs. chemotherapy vs. combined). Eighty-five (66%) were not aware of any risks for late effects. The remaining 43 listed at least one of the following late effects; infertility, heart-problems, impaired dental status, hypothyroidism, breast cancer, reduced muscle growth, fatigue and reduced memory or concentration. Thirty-seven survivors who provided additional comments reported that they had received some information about risk of late effects from their therapists. Age at diagnosis or educational level were not associated with knowledge about possible late effects while treatment period was. CONCLUSIONS: Norwegian long-term survivors of childhood malignant lymphomas are showing improved level of knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment modalities during the last decade. Still, independent of age at diagnosis and level of education, they are insufficiently aware of their risk of late effects.


Assuntos
Conscientização/fisiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Linfoma/reabilitação , Lesões por Radiação , Sobreviventes , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/psicologia , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Linfoma/epidemiologia , Linfoma/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões por Radiação/complicações , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Lesões por Radiação/psicologia , Fatores de Risco , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 98(5): 604-11, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25704291

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Childhood cancer survivors need information about risks of late effects to manage their health. We studied how and when adult, long-term survivors prefer to receive information about late effects. METHODS: Five focus-groups with adult survivors of childhood lymphomas who had completed routine follow-up care and participated in a preceding follow-up study (n = 34, 19 females, mean age = 39). We used thematic analysis to identify themes regarding providing late effects information. RESULTS: The survivors wanted information about late effects (symptoms, prevention and treatment), lifestyle and social security rights. Information should be tailored, carefully timed, given "face-to-face" and in written format. Many expressed ambivalence regarding receiving information as adolescents, but it was seen as essential "to know" once a late effect occurred. A "re-information" consultation about late effects around age 25 was suggested as beneficial. CONCLUSION: Although ambivalent, all survivors wanted information about late effects. They preferred individualized information, disclosed "step-by-step" and in a "re-information consultation" when reaching young adulthood. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providing information about late effects should be an on-going process across the cancer care trajectory. (Re-)Informing survivors when older would enhance their understanding of their health risks and could aid better health self-management beyond completion of follow-up care.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/etiologia , Linfoma/reabilitação , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Preferência do Paciente , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Comunicação , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/psicologia , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/psicologia , Linfoma/terapia , Masculino , Avaliação das Necessidades , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adulto Jovem
3.
Res Rep Urol ; 6: 121-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25328865

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the finding of less than five circulating tumor cells (CTCs)/7.5 mL blood before start of cytotoxic treatment or shortly thereafter indicates prolonged survival. In this descriptive pilot study, we investigated whether this association depends on the sequence of the therapeutic attempts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CTCs were determined in 41 mCRPC patients before and 2-3 months after starting first-line treatment with docetaxel (group 1) or second-line treatment with either radium-223 (group 2) or placebo/best supportive care (group 3). A "favorable" CTC count was defined as <5 CTC/7.5 mL blood. The results were related to overall survival. RESULTS: Pretreatment, six of ten men in group 1, three of 19 in group 2, and three of 12 patients in group 3 had a favorable CTC count, leading to a significant difference between first- and second-line therapy (P=0.04). Decrease of pretreatment elevated CTCs to a favorable CTC count was significantly more often observed in patients on first-line therapy (three of four patients) than on second-line treatment (two of 26 men) (P=0.03). A favorable CTC count before or shortly after treatment start was observed in nine of ten patients on first-line and in eight of 31 men on second-line therapy (P=0.01). A favorable CTC count pretreatment or 2-3 months after therapy start was associated with beneficial overall survival in the three groups combined and in each group analyzed separately. CONCLUSION: In mCRPC, a favorable CTC count before or 2-3 months after start of therapy is associated with length of overall survival, though such favorable CTC counts are observed significantly less often in patients on second- than on first-line therapy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA