Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52031, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344546

RESUMO

Introduction Hysterectomy is the most common procedure performed in females worldwide in response to a variety of indications. Abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies are the most common routes preferred but laparoscopic hysterectomy is one of the minimal access methods that are being used more often for hysterectomies. Additionally, there are numerous postoperative complications associated with hysterectomies; therefore, the goal of the present study was to determine the indications, commonly preferred routes of surgery, and associated postoperative complications in hysterectomy. Methodology A prospective observational study was carried out for 14 months in 2018 and 2019. Based on the selection criteria 120 patients who underwent hysterectomy were recruited for the study in which indications for hysterectomy, route of surgery, and associated postoperative complications were assessed. Results The age range of 36-45 accounted for the greatest number of hysterectomies consisting of 47 patients (39.2%) out of 120 participated. Hypertension was the most commonly associated comorbidity in 33 patients (27.5%). The most common indication for hysterectomy was a fibroid in 34 (28.3%) patients and the most preferred route of surgery was through the abdomen in 52 (43.3%) patients. The postoperative complications were more in peripartum hysterectomy and least in vaginal hysterectomy. Conclusion Although hysterectomy is frequently performed to enhance quality of life, it can also be a life-saving treatment. As there is a chance of problems with any surgical operation, the indication needs to be carefully considered. Since there are now a lot of conservative methods available for treating benign gynecological disorders, it is wise to talk to the patient about her options before deciding to remove her uterus surgically.

2.
J Robot Surg ; 16(3): 587-596, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34282555

RESUMO

With the previous experiences in performing laparoscopic for over a period of 15 years and da Vinci colorectal surgeries from 2010 to 2013, we started operating using the Cambridge Medical Robotics (CMR) Versius Surgical Robot System. The aim of the study is a prospective analysis and evaluation of short-term results of consecutive patients to study the technical feasibility and oncological outcome of robot-assisted low anterior resection (LAR) and ultralow anterior resection (ULAR), using the CMR Versius Surgical Robot System. This study was conducted at single minimal access surgery institute. 31 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent robot-assisted LAR and ULAR between August 2019 and March 2020. Patient characteristics, perioperative parameters and complications were evaluated. Surgical and pathological outcomes such as quality of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), free circumferential resection margins and number of lymph nodes dissected were also evaluated. Of 31 patients, 23 were men and 8 women, with mean age of 55.6 years. The mean robotic operative time was 51 min and the mean blood loss was 55 ml. The mean robot docking and undocking time was 17 min and 5 min, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 7 days. The longitudinal and circumferential resection margins were negative in all patients. Histopathological reports of 27 among 31 patients showed complete TME. Splenic flexure of colon mobilization was done laparoscopically. We feel that Versius robot has the qualities in terms of dexterity, vision and intuitive movements, and to translate this technical ability into oncological safety.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Robot Surg ; 15(3): 451-456, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32710253

RESUMO

The main objective of this study was to assess in a series of 30 patients, the feasibility, oncological safety and efficacy of radical hysterectomy by a new robotic system. Prospective study design. Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute and Multispeciality Hospital. We performed Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in patients from August 2019 through February 2020. All the surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (Puntambekar S). Since August 2019, 30 patients with early cervical cancer/endometrial cancer were selected for radical hysterectomy. All patients were in good general condition with controlled medical comorbidities. The mean operative time was 104 min, with mean total lymph node yield of 24.7. The average blood loss was 60 ml and the hospital stay was 2.1 days, and majority of the patients were catheter free by 1 week. Two patients developed uretero-vaginal fistula on the 8th day of surgery. One was managed with Double J stenting and in the other we did laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. Our study has demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RRH by the Versius robotic systems.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Histerectomia/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentação , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento , Fístula Urinária/etiologia , Fístula Vaginal/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA