Relationship Between Food Insecurity and Neighborhood Child Opportunity Index.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the Child Opportunity Index (COI) and food insecurity. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a comprehensive screening instrument for social determinants of health and behavioral health risks. It was administered in 2 urban pediatric emergency departments to adolescents aged 13-21 years and caregivers of children aged 0-17 years. Food insecurity was assessed using the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign. Residential addresses were geocoded and linked with COI data. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were developed to measure the relationship between COI and food insecurity. RESULTS: Of the 954 participants (384 adolescents, 570 caregivers) who underwent screening, 15.7% identified food insecurity (14.3% of adolescent and 16.7% of caregiver participants). The majority of participants were non-Hispanic Black (overall, 62.3%; food secure, 60.9%; food insecure, 72.0%), were publicly insured (overall, 56.6%; food secure, 53.1%; food insecure, 73.3%), and lived in neighborhoods of low/very low opportunity (overall, 76.9%; food secure, 74.7%; food insecure, 88.3%). In adjusted analyses, participants living in neighborhoods of low/very low child opportunity had 3-fold greater odds of being food insecure compared with children living in neighborhoods of high child opportunity (aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4-6.3). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that food insecurity is associated with lower neighborhood opportunity. Our results could inform future screening initiatives and support the development of novel, place-based interventions to tackle the complex issue of food insecurity.

Correlation of clinical and chest radiograph findings in pediatric submersion cases.

BACKGROUND: Submersion injuries are a leading cause of injury death in children in the United States. The clinical course of a submersion patient varies depending on the presence of anoxic brain injury and acute respiratory failure. OBJECTIVE: We studied changes in clinical findings and chest radiograph findings and determined the sensitivity/specificity of the presenting chest radiograph in predicting clinical improvement within the first 24 h in pediatric submersion cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of pediatric submersion patients through age 18 years treated at a children's hospital from 2010 to 2013. We reviewed demographics, comorbidities, prehospital/hospital course and chest radiographic findings. Clinical improvement occurred when a child demonstrated normal vital signs and mentation. We compared radiographic findings among children based on clinical improvement up to 24 h post submersion. Using odds ratios, we calculated associations between radiographic findings and clinical improvement. We studied the sensitivity/specificity of the presenting chest radiograph in predicting clinical improvement within 24 h. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two of 262 (54%) patients had initial chest radiographs; 41% had follow-up radiographs. The odds of an abnormal initial chest radiograph were 4 times higher in children with respiratory distress or abnormal mentation at emergency department (ED) presentation compared to children without these findings (odds ratio [OR]=4.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.1-10.85; P<0.001). Improvement in radiographic findings occurred in 85% of children within 24 h. Children with an abnormal initial chest radiograph were 87% less likely to improve clinically by 24 h (P<0.001). A presenting chest radiograph that was normal or with mild pulmonary edema/atelectasis predicted clinical improvement within 24 h (sensitivity 95%, specificity 57%). CONCLUSION: Most chest radiographic findings improve in pediatric submersion patients who recover within the first 24 h. An initial chest radiograph that is normal or with mild pulmonary edema/atelectasis satisfactorily predicts clinical improvement by 24 h post submersion.