Impact of Regulatory Guidance on Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk of New Glucose-Lowering Therapies to Treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.

Responding to concerns about the potential for increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, specifically myocardial infarction, associated with certain glucose-lowering therapies, the US Food and Drug Administration and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency issued guidance to the pharmaceutical industry in 2008. Glucose-lowering therapies were granted regulatory approval primarily from smaller studies that have demonstrated reductions in glycated hemoglobin concentration. Such studies were overall underpowered and of insufficient duration to show any effect on cardiovascular outcomes. The 2008 guidance aimed to ensure the cardiovascular safety of new glucose-lowering therapies to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This resulted in a plethora of new cardiovascular outcome trials, most designed primarily as placebo-controlled noninferiority trials, but with many also powered for superiority. Several of these outcome trials demonstrated cardiovascular benefits of the newer agents, resulting in the first-ever cardiovascular protection indications for glucose-lowering therapies. Determining whether the guidance continues to have value in its current form is critically important as we move forward after the first decade of implementation. In February 2018, a think tank comprising representatives from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies convened to consider the guidance in light of the findings of the completed cardiovascular outcome trials. The group made several recommendations for future regulatory guidance and for cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering therapies. These recommendations include requiring only the 1.3 noninferiority margin for regulatory approval, conducting trials for longer durations, considering studying glucose-lowering therapies as first-line management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, considering heart failure or kidney outcomes within the primary outcome, considering head-to-head active comparator trials, increasing the diversity of patients enrolled, evaluating strategies to streamline registries and the study of unselected populations, and identifying ways to improve translation of trial results to general practice.

Associations of weight loss with obesity-related comorbidities in a large integrated health system.

AIMS: To determine the health outcomes associated with weight loss in individuals with obesity, and to better understand the relationship between disease burden (disease burden; ie, prior comorbidities, healthcare utilization) and weight loss in individuals with obesity by analysing electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using deidentified EHR-derived information from 204 921 patients seen at the Cleveland Clinic between 2000 and 2018. Patients were aged ≥20 years with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and had ≥7 weight measurements, over ≥3 years. Thirty outcomes were investigated, including chronic and acute diseases, as well as psychological and metabolic disorders. Weight change was investigated 3, 5 and 10 years prior to an event. RESULTS: Weight loss was associated with reduced incidence of many outcomes (eg, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obstructive sleep apnoea, hypertension; P < 0.05). Weight loss >10% was associated with increased incidence of certain outcomes including stroke and substance abuse. However, many outcomes that increased with weight loss were attenuated by disease burden adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the most comprehensive real-world evaluation of the health impacts of weight change to date. After comorbidity burden and healthcare utilization adjustments, weight loss was associated with an overall reduction in risk of many adverse outcomes.

Addressing Therapeutic Inertia in 2020 and Beyond: A 3-Year Initiative of the American Diabetes Association.

Research has shown that getting to glycemic targets early on leads to better outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes; yet, there has been no improvement in the attainment of A1C targets in the past decade. One reason is therapeutic inertia: the lack of timely adjustment to the treatment regimen when a person's therapeutic targets are not met. This article describes the scope and priorities of the American Diabetes Association's 3-year Overcoming Therapeutic Inertia Initiative. Its planned activities include publishing a systematic review and meta-analysis of approaches to reducing therapeutic inertia, developing a registry of effective strategies, launching clinician awareness and education campaigns, leveraging electronic health record and clinical decision-support tools, influencing payer policies, and potentially executing pragmatic research to test promising interventions.

Antidiabetic treatment patterns and specialty care utilization among patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate real-world patient characteristics, medication use, and health care utilization patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes with established cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes seen at Cleveland Clinic from 2005 to 2016, divided into two cohorts: with-CVD and without-CVD. Patient demographics and antidiabetic medications were recorded in December 2016; department encounters included all visits from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2016. Comorbidity burden was assessed by the diabetes complications severity index (DCSI) score. RESULTS: Of 95,569 patients with type 2 diabetes, 40,910 (42.8%) were identified as having established CVD. Patients with CVD vs. those without were older (median age 69.1 vs. 58.2 years), predominantly male (53.8% vs. 42.6%), and more likely to have Medicare insurance (69.4% vs. 35.3%). The with-CVD cohort had a higher proportion of patients with a DCSI score ≥ 3 than the without-CVD cohort (65.0% vs. 10.3%). Utilization rates of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors were low in both with-CVD (4.1 and 2.5%) and without-CVD cohorts (5.4 and 4.1%), respectively. The majority of patient visits (75%) were seen by a primary care provider. During the 1-year observation period, 81.9 and 62.0% of patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD were not seen by endocrinology or cardiology, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicated underutilization of specialists and antidiabetic medications reported to confer CV benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD. The impact of recently updated guidelines and cardiovascular outcome trial results on management patterns in such patients remains to be seen.

Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and rates of acute myocardial infarction, stroke and overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large integrated health system.

AIMS: To assess the potential impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) exposure on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), using a large retrospective cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients who had T2D between 2005 and 2014 (N = 105 862) were identified from the electronic health record system at Cleveland Clinic using a validated electronic phenotype. A time-dependent, Cox, multiple regression analysis was used to assess the association between GLP-1RA exposure and risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke/cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and overall mortality, as well as the composite of all three outcomes. The findings were further evaluated by assessing the effect of GLP-1RAs on the same variables in patients with and without prior CVD. The model adjusted for differences in demographic information, hypertension, laboratory/vital signs, history of outcomes, and T2D medications. RESULTS: There were significantly lower rates of AMI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65 to 0.99; P = .045), CVA (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91, P < .001), overall mortality (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.57; P < .001), and the composite outcome (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91; P < .002) during the consolidated time that patients were exposed to GLP-1RAs compared to corresponding rates during intervals without GLP-1RA exposure. GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a significant decrease in CVA, mortality, and the composite outcome in patients with and without established CVD, not significantly affecting AMI in these subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1RA exposure was found to be associated with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events observed and overall mortality among patients with T2D with and without established CVD, after adjusting for potential confounders.

A Review of Insulin-Dosing Formulas for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Dosing guidelines for patients with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), which are historically based on clinical experience and retrospective studies of patients consuming an American diet, recommend that basal insulin should represent approximately 50 % of the total daily dose (TDD). Recent prospective studies in the USA and Japan conclude that the more appropriate proportion is closer to 30-40 % of TDD. In addition, currently used formulas for calculating the carbohydrate-to-insulin ratio (CIR) and correction factor (CF) may lead to underdosing of bolus insulin by as much as 12.8-50 % for a hypothetical patient. The discrepancies between traditional formulas and data from newer studies can be accounted for by the more rigorous design of the newer studies (e.g., prospective design, controlled diets, meal omission, and frequent glucose monitoring). International differences in diet composition may also be important to consider when developing dosing recommendations for CSII.

Effect of a High-Fat Meal on Single-Dose Rencofilstat (CRV431) Oral Bioavailability in Healthy Human Subjects.

Rencofilstat (RCF) is a novel cyclophilin inhibitor under development for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. This phase 1, randomized, open-label study in healthy participants assessed the relative bioavailability of a single dose of RCF 225-mg soft gelatin capsules in both fasted and high-fat conditions. Forty-four participants were enrolled to either the fasted (n = 24) or the high-fat fed (n = 20) arm. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics were evaluated following a single 225-mg oral dose. Administration of RCF with a high-fat meal led to increases in maximum concentration, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 24 hours, and AUC from time 0 to infinity fed-to-fasted geometric mean ratios of 102.2%, 114.5%, and 132.9%, respectively. All AUC geometric mean ratios were outside of the 80% to 125% range, suggesting that a high-fat meal can increase the extent of RCF exposure. Time to maximum concentration increased from 1.5 to 1.8 hours in the fasted and high-fat groups, respectively, suggesting slightly delayed absorption. High fat intake may delay gastric emptying while increasing the absorption and bioavailability of RCF. No treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in the fasted group, and 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in the high-fat meal group. The differences in observed whole-blood concentrations are unlikely to have clinically relevant effects given the wide therapeutic index of RCF demonstrated in previous phase 1 studies.

Rencofilstat, a cyclophilin inhibitor: A phase 2a, multicenter, single-blind, placebo-controlled study in F2/F3 NASH.

Rencofilstat (RCF) demonstrated antifibrotic effects in preclinical models and was safe and well tolerated in Phase 1 studies. The aim of this Phase 2a study was safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and exploration of efficacy biomarkers in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This Phase 2a, multicenter, single-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 49 presumed F2/F3 subjects to RCF 75 mg once daily (QD), RCF 225 mg QD, or placebo for 28 days. Primary safety and tolerability endpoints were explored using descriptive statistics with post hoc analyses comparing active to placebo groups. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated using population pharmacokinetics methods. Efficacy was explored using biomarkers, transcriptomics, and lipidomics. RCF was safe and well tolerated, with no safety signals identified. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were constipation, diarrhea, back pain, dizziness, and headache. No clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters were observed, and RCF pharmacokinetics were unchanged in subjects with NASH. Alanine transaminase (ALT) reduction was greater in active subjects than in placebo groups. Nonparametric analysis suggested that ALT reductions were statistically different in the 225-mg cohort compared with matching placebo: -16.3 ± 25.5% versus -0.7 ± 13.4%, respectively. ProC3 and C6M reduction was statistically significant in groups having baseline ProC3 > 15.0 ng/ml. RCF was safe and well tolerated after 28 days in subjects with presumed F2/F3 NASH. Presence of NASH did not alter its pharmacokinetics. Reductions in ALT, ProC3, and C6M suggest direct antifibrotic effects with longer treatment duration. Reductions in key collagen genes support a mechanism of action via suppression and/or regression of collagen deposition. Conclusion: These results support advancement of rencofilstat into a larger and longer Phase 2b study.

Healthcare Costs of Diabetes and Microvascular and Macrovascular Disease in Individuals with Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Ten-Year Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the incremental long-term costs associated with T2DM attributable to vascular diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified newly diagnosed (incident) T2DM patients in 2007 (baseline to 01/01/2006) using the HealthCore Integrated Research Database, a repository of nationally representative claims data. Incident T2DM patients were 1:1 exact matched on age, gender and other factors of interest to non-DM patients, and followed until the earlier of 8 follow-up years or death. Patients with documented vascular disease diagnosis were identified during the study period. All-cause and T2DM/vascular disease-related annual healthcare costs were examined for each follow-up year. RESULTS: The study included 13,883 individuals with T2DM and matched non-DM controls. Among individuals with T2DM, 11,792 (85%) had vascular disease versus 9251 (66.6%) non-T2DM between 01/01/2006 and 12/31/2015. Among T2DM patients, mean all-cause annual costs were greater than in non-T2DM patients ($13,806 vs $7,243, baseline, $21,745 vs $8,524, post-index year 1, $12,756-$14,793 vs $8,349-$9,940 years 2-8, p< 0.001), respectively. A similar trend was observed for T2DM/vascular disease-related costs (p< 0. 001). T2DM/vascular disease-related costs were largest during post-index year 1, accounting for the majority of all-cause cost difference between T2DM patients and matched non-DM controls. Incident T2DM individuals without vascular disease at any time had significantly lower costs compared to non-DM controls (p< 0. 001) between years 2-8 of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Vascular disease increased the cost burden for individuals with T2DM. The cost impact of diabetes and vascular disease was highest in the year after diagnosis, and persisted for at least seven additional years, while the cost of T2DM patients without vascular disease trended lower than for matched non-DM patients. These data highlight potential costs that could be offset by earlier and more effective detection and management of T2DM aimed at reducing vascular disease burden.

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease by vascular bed and impact on healthcare costs in a large, real-world population with type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) according to number of affected vascular beds and the impact on healthcare utilization and costs in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM) and established ASCVD. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional analysis, adults with type 2 DM and ASCVD in a large US administrative claims database were categorized by number of ASCVD-affected vascular beds (brain, heart, peripheral vasculature). Annual healthcare utilization and costs for 2015 were determined, including subgroup analyses by age group (18-44, 45-64, ≥65 years). RESULTS: Among 539 089 individuals with type 2 DM and ASCVD, 47.0% had ASCVD affecting >1 vascular bed. The most prevalent ASCVD diagnoses were acute coronary syndrome (26.6%), peripheral arterial disease (24.5%) and stroke (18.6%). Mean annual total healthcare costs per person increased with increasing number of vascular beds, from 1 ($17 741) to 2 ($25 877) to 3 ($33 412). A similar pattern of increased healthcare utilization with increasing number of vascular beds was observed. Among individuals with 1 affected vascular bed, mean total healthcare costs per person were comparable across age subgroups; however, if >1 vascular bed was affected, the mean total healthcare costs were highest in the youngest age cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data showed that almost half of individuals with type 2 DM and ASCVD had ASCVD affecting >1 vascular bed. A higher number of affected vascular beds were associated with higher mean total healthcare costs and utilization, with a disproportionate increase noted in younger relative to older people.

Impact of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease on healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) on healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional study using US claims data. Adult patients with T2DM were stratified by presence or absence of ASCVD and compared regarding annual (2015) healthcare resource utilization and associated costs. Subgroup analyses were conducted for three age groups (18-44, 45-64, and ≥ 65 years). RESULTS: Among 1,202,596 eligible patients with T2DM, 45.2% had documented ASCVD. The proportions of patients with inpatient and ER-based resource utilization during 2015 were three-to-four times greater in the ASCVD cohort as compared to the non-ASCVD cohort for the categories of inpatient visits (15.6% vs 4.4% of patients), outpatient ER visits (18.4% vs 5.2% of patients), and inpatient ER visits (4.3% vs 0.9% of patients). Outpatient utilization also was higher among patients with ASCVD as compared to those without ASCVD (mean number of annual office visits per patient, 9.1 vs 5.6), and more than twice as many patients with ASCVD had ≥ 9 office visits (43.5% vs 19.8%). Average per-patient total healthcare cost was $22,977 for ASCVD vs $9735 for non-ASCVD, with medical costs primarily driving the difference ($17,849 vs $6079); the difference in pharmacy costs was smaller ($5128 vs $3656). In the 18-44, 45-64, and ≥ 65 age subgroups respectively, total annual healthcare costs were 143, 127, and 114% higher in ASCVD vs non-ASCVD patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate significantly higher healthcare resource utilization and associated costs in patients having T2DM with ASCVD compared to T2DM without ASCVD.

Association between shared medical appointments and weight loss outcomes and anti-obesity medication use in patients with obesity.

OBJECTIVE: In shared medical appointments (SMAs), multiple patients with a similar clinical diagnosis are seen by a multidisciplinary team for interactive group sessions. Very few studies have specifically studied SMAs and weight loss in patients with obesity. This study compared weight loss outcomes and anti-obesity medication (AOM) access between patients with obesity managed through (SMAs) versus individual appointments. METHODS: Retrospective study of adults seen for obesity between September 2014 and February 2017 at Cleveland Clinic Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Percent weight loss from baseline was compared between two propensity score-matched populations: patients who attended ≥1 SMA and patients managed with individual medical appointments. RESULTS: From all eligible patients identified (n=310 SMA, n=1,993 non-SMA), 301 matched pairs were evaluated for weight loss. The SMA group (n=301) lost a mean of 4.2%, 5.2% and 3.8% of baseline weight over 6, 12 and 24 months; the non-SMA group (n=301) lost significantly less weight (1.5%, 1.8% and 1.6%, respectively) (paired t-test, P<.05). All patients were eligible for US Food and Drug Administration-approved AOMs based on obesity diagnosis; however, 49.8% (150/301) of matched SMA patients were prescribed an AOM versus 12.3% (37/301) of matched non-SMA patients. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that SMAs may offer a promising alterative for obesity management and one that may facilitate greater utilization of AOMs. In propensity score-matched cohorts, SMAs were associated with greater weight loss outcomes when compared to usual care facilitated through individual medical appointments alone.

Natural Language Processing Improves Detection of Nonsevere Hypoglycemia in Medical Records Versus Coding Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes but Does Not Improve Prediction of Severe Hypoglycemia Events: An Analysis Using the Electronic Medical Record in a Large Health System.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if natural language processing (NLP) improves detection of nonsevere hypoglycemia (NSH) in patients with type 2 diabetes and no NSH documentation by diagnosis codes and to measure if NLP detection improves the prediction of future severe hypoglycemia (SH). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2017, we identified NSH events by diagnosis codes and NLP. We then built an SH prediction model. RESULTS: There were 204,517 patients with type 2 diabetes and no diagnosis codes for NSH. Evidence of NSH was found in 7,035 (3.4%) of patients using NLP. We reviewed 1,200 of the NLP-detected NSH notes and confirmed 93% to have NSH. The SH prediction model (C-statistic 0.806) showed increased risk with NSH (hazard ratio 4.44; P < 0.001). However, the model with NLP did not improve SH prediction compared with diagnosis code-only NSH. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of NSH improved with NLP in patients with type 2 diabetes without improving SH prediction.

The Probability of A1C Goal Attainment in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Integrated Delivery System: A Prediction Model.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient characteristics and treatment factors associated with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the probability of hemoglobin A1c (A1C) goal attainment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the electronic health record at Cleveland Clinic. Patients with uncontrolled T2D (A1C >9%) were identified on the index date of 31 December 2016 (n = 6,973) and grouped by attainment (n = 1,653 [23.7%]) or nonattainment (n = 5,320 [76.3%]) of A1C <8% by 31 December 2017, and subgroups were compared on a number of demographic and clinical variables. On the basis of these variables, a nomogram was created for predicting probability of A1C goal attainment. RESULTS: For the entire population, median age at index date was 57.7 years (53.3% male), and the majority were white (67.2%). Median A1C was 10.2%. Obesity (50.6%), cardiovascular disease (46.9%), and psychiatric disease (61.1%) were the most common comorbidities. Metformin (62.7%) and sulfonylureas (38.7%) were the most common antidiabetes medications. Only 1,653 (23.7%) patients achieved an A1C <8%. Predictors of increased probability of A1C goal attainment were older age, white/non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, Medicare health insurance, lower baseline A1C, higher frequency of endocrinology/primary care visits, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor use, thiazolidinedione use, metformin use, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist use, and fewer classes of antidiabetes drugs. Factors associated with lower probability included insulin use and longer time in the T2D database (both presumed as likely surrogates for duration of T2D). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients with an A1C >9% achieved an A1C <8% at 1 year. While most identified predictive factors are nonmodifiable by the clinician, pursuit of frequent patient engagement and tailored drug regimens may help to improve A1C goal attainment.

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and antidiabetes treatment characteristics among a large type 2 diabetes population in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevalence, antidiabetes medication usage and physician specialty encounters among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the United States during 2015. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. PATIENTS: Adults with T2DM in a large US administrative claims database. Patients were divided into ASCVD and non-ASCVD groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted for three age groups (18-44, 45-64 and 65+ years). RESULTS: Of 1 202 596 patients with T2DM, 45.2% had established ASCVD. About 40% of T2DM patients with ASCVD had visited a cardiologist during 2015, compared to 11% in the non-ASCVD group. The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) was low overall (<12%), and even lower in the ASCVD group (<9%). The prevalence of ASCVD was 15%, 36% and 71% in the 18-44, 45-64 and 65+ year age groups, respectively. GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i use was ≤5% in the 65+ subgroup, regardless of ASCVD status. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data showed a high prevalence of ASCVD among T2DM patients, and confirmed, as a baseline assessment, low use of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is in these at-risk patients prior to the 2017 American Diabetes Association guidelines recommending use of agents with proven cardiovascular benefits.

Incidence and Prevalence of Microvascular and Macrovascular Diseases and All-cause Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A 10-year Study in a US Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage Population.

PURPOSE: The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and increased microvascular and macrovascular disease and mortality is well established; however, data for the broad US T2DM population, especially by age, are limited. To help address this issue, we conducted a cohort study in a large national US commercially insured/Medicare Advantage population that incorporated a broad range of different age groups, including a large subset of younger individuals, during a 10-year study period. METHODS: This longitudinal study combined health plan claims and mortality data to identify incident T2DM patients and 1:1 directly matched non-DM controls. T2DM individuals (n = 13,883) were identified by a medical claim with a T2DM diagnosis or T2DM medication pharmacy claim in 2007; non-DM controls had no DM medical or pharmacy claims over the entire study period (January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015). The outcomes assessed were incidence, prevalence, time to vascular disease and all-cause mortality, as well as age-stratified incidence and mortality based on Centers of Disease Control and Prevention-defined age strata. FINDINGS: Individuals with T2DM developed vascular disease at twice the rate as non-DM controls, 197 versus 98 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Vascular disease (composite) rates increased by age in T2DM/non-DM groups, 107.1/28.2 (18-44 years), 166.3/70.3 (45-64 years), and 391.0/199.7 (≥65 years) per 1000 person-years. The largest rate ratio was observed in younger individuals. All-cause mortality over follow-up was higher in T2DM individuals (27.5%) than in non-DM controls (19.6%). The largest increases in vascular disease prevalence and mortality among T2DM individuals were observed in the first year of follow-up. IMPLICATIONS: T2DM has a substantial effect on microvascular and macrovascular disease and all-cause mortality rates in all age groups. These outcomes appear to occur early after T2DM diagnosis, and have more pronounced, nearly fourfold, relative impact on younger individuals with T2DM compared to matched non-DM controls.

Persistence of newer anti-obesity medications in a real-world setting.

AIMS: Evaluate real-world data on persistence with anti-obesity medications (AOMs) and explore associated patient factors. METHODS: Truven Health MarketScan® data were analyzed to evaluate utilization of AOMs approved for long-term use between 4/2015 and 3/2016. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to evaluate treatment persistence. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify associations between persistence and relevant factors. RESULTS: In total, 26,522 adult patients were identified as newly prescribed naltrexone/bupropion (44.0%, mean age 47.1, 80.5% female), lorcaserin (24.8%, 48.5, 79.3%), phentermine/topiramate extended release (15.8%, 46.7, 82.2%) or liraglutide 3.0 mg (15.4%, 46.9, 72.4%). At 6 months, 41.8% of patients were still on liraglutide 3.0 mg, compared to 15.9% lorcaserin (p < 0.001), 18.1% naltrexone/bupropion (p < 0.001), and 27.3% phentermine/topiramate (p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline factors, patients on liraglutide 3.0 mg had significantly lower risk of discontinuation compared to those on lorcaserin (HR = 0.46, p < 0.0001), naltrexone/bupropion (HR = 0.48, p < 0.0001), and phentermine/topiramate (HR = 0.64, p < 0.0001) over the course of follow-up (mean follow-up duration, 342-427 days). Older age, male gender, having hyperlipidemia, and no prior phentermine use were associated with higher persistence. Over 95% of study patients had commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, patients on liraglutide 3.0 mg had the highest persistence rate of the four AOMs studied.

Estimating the Real-World Cost of Diabetes Mellitus in the United States During an 8-Year Period Using 2 Cost Methodologies.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with substantial clinical and economic burdens on patients and on the US healthcare system. Treatment options for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes have increased significantly, from only 3 drug classes in 1995 to more than 12 distinct classes today. Although several of the newer treatments are reported to have improved efficacy and safety profiles, they are often substantially more costly than older medications. Consequently, as drug options increase, the cost of diabetes management continues to grow. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual real-world costs of type 1 and 2 diabetes, as well as diabetes prevalence, treatment patterns, care quality, and resource utilization during 8 years. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we examined 8 annual cohorts of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, on a biennial basis, using claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between 2006 and 2014. Patients were matched with controls by age, sex, residency, and health plan type. We assessed the prevalence of diabetes, treatment patterns, care quality measures, and all-cause and diabetes-related healthcare costs using 2 methods. Method 1 calculated the annual costs as the difference in all-cause costs between patients with diabetes and matched controls. Method 2 calculated the costs for healthcare encounters based on specific codes for a diabetes diagnosis or for antidiabetes medications. RESULTS: Between 346,486 and 410,234 patients with type 2 diabetes and between 21,176 and 26,228 patients with type 1 diabetes were included in each study year cohort. Between 2007 and 2014, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes increased from 4.9% to 6.3%. The costs associated with using Method 1 were almost double the cost estimates in Method 2 during most of the study period. For patients with type 1 diabetes, the associated costs were twice greater with Method 1 than with Method 2. Projections to the entire US population in 2014 indicated a total of 19.3 million individuals with diabetes and associated direct costs of $314.8 billion that year. CONCLUSION: Cost estimates can guide the prioritization of healthcare expenditures. The results of this study showed that costs attributable to diabetes differed by approximately 2-fold, depending on the estimation method. The management of the escalating expenses for diabetes management in the United States requires judicious selection of the methods for estimating costs.

Effect of glycemic control on the Diabetes Complications Severity Index score and development of complications in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the longitudinal accumulation of diabetes-related complications and the effect of glycemic control on the Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI) score in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health records from a large integrated healthcare system. People with newly diagnosed T2D were identified between 2005 and 2016 and stratified by initial HbA1c category (<7%, <8%, ≥8%). The DCSI scores were determined for each study year, and the cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications was assessed. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the effect of baseline HbA1c and worsening glycemic (HbA1c) control on longitudinal changes in DCSI scores. RESULTS: Of 32 174 people identified as having newly diagnosed T2D, 14 016 (44%), 21 657 (67%), and 9983 (31%) had an initial or baseline HbA1c <7%, <8%, and ≥8%, respectively. Ten years after diabetes diagnosis, retinopathy, chronic kidney disease, coronary heart disease, and neuropathy were diagnosed in 22%, 29%, 24%, and 36% of people. Baseline HbA1c did not affect the observed trend in longitudinal changes in DCSI scores throughout the 11-year period. For people in each of the initial HbA1c groups (<7%, <8%, ≥8%), worsening or persistently poor glycemic control was significantly associated with a 10%, 19%, or 16% increase in the risk of experiencing an increased DCSI score, respectively (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline glycemic control had no apparent effect on longitudinal changes in DCSI score. Worsening or persistently poor glycemic control was associated with an increased risk of an increase in the DCSI score.