The ALPACA study: (In)Appropriate LAMA prescribing in asthma: A cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Since long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) are only indicated as add-on therapy in subjects with moderate-to-severe asthma, there are concerns whether LAMA monotherapy is associated with worse asthma control. AIM: To study the prevalence of LAMA monotherapy and its potential association with severe asthma exacerbations (SAE) in patients with asthma. METHODS: A cohort study (2007-2017) in the IPCI primary care database, in asthma patients aged 6-50, using LAMA during follow-up. Respiratory prescriptions were retrieved from the electronic medical records based on ATC code. Asthma treatment periods were created and categorized as LAMA mono, dual (LAMA + ICS), or triple therapy (LAMA + ICS + LABA). Relative rates (RR) of SAE, adjusting for patient characteristics, were estimated to compare treatments. RESULTS: From a total of 66,508 asthma patients, 1236 (1.9%) LAMA users were identified. Median age was 41 years, 65.9% were females. LAMA users were responsible for 3596 LAMA treatment periods of which 1390 (38.7%) were LAMA monotherapy, 553 (15.4%) dual therapy and 1653 (46.0%) triple therapy. The RR of SAE during LAMA monotherapy compared to dual therapy was 1.5 (95% CI 0.6-3.8). In patients alternating between mono and dual therapy (but never triple therapy), the RR for LAMA monotherapy increased to 5.7 (95% CI 1.4-23.6). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study shows that when LAMA is prescribed, it is often prescribed without concurrent ICS (LAMA monotherapy). LAMA monotherapy was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations when not used concurrently with ICS. This emphasizes the importance that LAMA should never be prescribed without concomitant ICS use in patients with asthma.

COVID-19 vaccination-induced antibody responses and waning by age and comorbidity status in a large population-based prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Information on the magnitude and duration of antibody levels after COVID-19 vaccination in different groups may be useful for prioritizing of additional vaccinations. METHODS: Serum samples were collected every six months in a prospective cohort study among adults in the Netherlands. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were calculated after the primary series, first, and second booster vaccinations. Effects of age (18-59 vs 60-85 years) and medical risk conditions on GMC 2-6 weeks and 21-25 weeks after each vaccination, and on waning during 3-25 weeks after each vaccination, were estimated by linear regression. RESULTS: We included 20,640, 15,229 and 8,392 samples collected after primary, first and second booster vaccination, respectively. GMCs at 2-6 and 21-25 weeks after primary series were lower in participants with older age or medical risk conditions. After the first booster, older age was associated with lower GMC at 2-6 weeks and at 21-25 weeks. Waning after the first and second boosters (only 60-85) was not associated with age or medical risk conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Since antibody differences by age and medical risk groups have become small with increasing number of doses, other factors such as COVID-19 disease severity rather than antibody levels are useful for prioritization of additional vaccinations.