Stability and activity of MCSP-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) depend on the scFv antigen-binding domain and the protein backbone.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells emerged as effective tools in the immunotherapy of cancer but can produce severe on-target off-tissue toxicities. This risk can conceivably be overcome, at least partially, by transient transfection. The design of CARs, however, has so far not been optimized for use in non-permanent T cell modification. Here we compared the performance of T cells modified with three different first- and second-generation CARs, each specific for MCSP (HMW-MAA) which is commonly expressed by melanoma cells. Upon RNA transfer, the expression of all receptors was limited in time. The second-generation CARs, which combined CD28-CD3ζ signaling, were expressed at higher levels and more prolonged than first-generation CARs with CD3ζ only. The CD28 domain increased the cytokine production, but had only an indirect effect on the lytic capacity, by prolonging the CAR expression. Especially for the second-generation CARs, the scFv clearly impacted the level and duration of CAR expression and the T cell performance. Thus, we identified a CAR high in both expression and anti-tumor cell reactivity. T cells transfected with this CAR increased the mean survival time of mice after challenge with melanoma cells. To facilitate clinical application, this CAR was used to redirect T cells from late-stage melanoma patients by RNA transfection. These T cells mediated effective antigen-specific tumor cell lysis and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, even after cryoconservation of the transfected T cells. Taken together, the analysis identified a CAR with superior anti-melanoma performance after RNA transfer which is a promising candidate for clinical exploration.

Brain boosters: Evaluating a pilot program for memory complaints in veterans.

This study investigated the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a pilot program designed to address subjective memory complaints among Veterans. The program, Brain Boosters, consisted of 10 once-weekly group sessions, during which psychoeducation and cognitive enhancement strategies were used to target memory concerns and related processes, specifically attentional difficulties. Given that memory complaints often are associated with psychiatric comorbidities, sessions also incorporated strategies for reducing symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress, and insomnia. Controlling for age, we examined pre- to posttreatment change in symptom ratings for 96 Veterans (aged 22 to 87 years) who participated in the Brain Boosters program. The effect of Brain Boosters on memory complaints interacted with age: younger (but not older) Veterans reported reductions in memory impairment from pre- to posttreatment. Additionally, irrespective of age, from pre- to posttreatment Veterans reported fewer attentional difficulties and fewer depression symptoms. Ratings of posttraumatic stress and insomnia symptoms did not change, although insomnia was negatively associated with age. Linear regression controlling for age revealed that reductions in attention problems predicted reductions in perceived memory impairment. Findings from this exploratory, uncontrolled pilot study suggest that a psychoeducational cognitive enhancement group is feasible to conduct in a heterogeneous Veteran population, and may be associated with improvements in perceived memory functioning for younger Veterans, and in attention and depression symptoms for Veterans across age groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).