ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2021 update).

The multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is an electrophysiological test that allows the function of multiple discrete areas of the retina to be tested simultaneously. This document, from the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV), presents an updated and revised ISCEV standard for clinical mfERG and defines minimum protocols for basic clinical mfERG recording and reporting so that responses can be recognized and compared from different laboratories worldwide. The major changes compared with the previous mfERG standard relate to the minimum length of m-sequences used for recording, reporting of results and a change in document format, to be more consistent with other ISCEV standards.

Retinal Dystrophy Associated With RLBP1 Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Five-Year Prospective Natural History Study.

Purpose: To assess the progression in functional and structural measures over a five-year period in patients with retinal dystrophy caused by RLBP1 gene mutation. Methods: This prospective, noninterventional study included patients with biallelic RLBP1 mutations from two clinical sites in Sweden and Canada. Key assessments included ocular examinations, visual functional measures (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], contrast sensitivity [CS], dark-adaptation [DA] kinetics up to six hours for two wavelengths [450 and 632 nm], Humphrey visual fields [HVF], full-field flicker electroretinograms), and structural ocular assessments. Results: Of the 45 patients enrolled, 38 completed the full five years of follow-up. At baseline, patients had BCVA ranging from -0.2 to 1.3 logMAR, poor CS, HVF defects, and prominent thinning in central foveal thickness. All patients had extremely prolonged DA rod recovery of approximately six hours at both wavelengths. The test-retest repeatability was high across all anatomic and functional endpoints. Cross-sectionally, poorer VA was associated with older age (right eye, correlation coefficient [CC]: 0.606; left eye, CC: -0.578; P < 0.001) and HVF MD values decreased with age (right eye, CC: -0.672, left eye, CC: -0.654; P < 0.001). However, no major changes in functional or structural measures were noted longitudinally over the five-year period. Conclusions: This natural history study, which is the first study to monitor patients with RLBP1 RD for five years, showed that severely delayed DA sensitivity recovery, a characteristic feature of this disease, was observed in all patients across all age groups (17-69 years), making it a potentially suitable efficacy assessment for gene therapy treatment in this patient population.

Structural and functional changes associated with normal and abnormal fundus autofluorescence in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

PURPOSE: To analyze the structure and visual function of regions bordering the hyperautofluorescent ring/arcs in retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: Twenty-one retinitis pigmentosa patients (21 eyes) with rings/arcs and 21 normal individuals (21 eyes) were studied. Visual sensitivity in the central 10° was measured with microperimetry. Retinal structure was evaluated with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The distance from the fovea to disruption/loss of the inner outer segment (IS/OS) junction and thicknesses of the total receptor plus retinal pigment epithelial complex and outer segment plus retinal pigment epithelial complex layers were measured. Results were compared with measurements of the distance from the fovea to the inner and outer borders of the ring/arc seen on fundus autofluorescence. RESULTS: Disruption/loss of the inner outer segment junction occurred closer to the inner border of the ring/arc and it was closer to the fovea in eight eyes. For 19 eyes, outer segment plus and receptor plus RPE complex thicknesses were significantly decreased at locations closer to the fovea than the appearance of the inner border of hyperautofluorescence. Mean visual sensitivity was decreased inside, across, and outside the ring/arc by 3.5 ± 3.8, 8.9 ± 4.8, and 17.0 ± 2.4 dB, respectively. CONCLUSION: Structural and functional changes can occur inside the hyperfluorescent ring/arc in retinitis pigmentosa.

A primer on common statistical errors in clinical ophthalmology.

Although biomedical statistics is part of any scientific curriculum, a review of the current scientific literature indicates that statistical data analysis is an area that frequently needs improvement. To address this, we here cover some of the most common problems in statistical analysis, with an emphasis on an intuitive, tutorial approach rather than a rigorous, proof-based one. The topics covered in this manuscript are whether to enter eyes or patients into the analysis, issues related to multiple testing, pitfalls surrounding the correlation coefficient (causation, insensitivity to patterns, range confounding, unsuitability for method comparisons), and when to use standard deviation (SD) versus standard error of the mean (SEM) "antennas" on graphs.

Qualitative Interviews to Better Understand the Patient Experience and Evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) in RLBP1 Retinitis Pigmentosa (RLBP1 RP).

INTRODUCTION: RLBP1 RP is an autosomal recessive form of retinitis pigmentosa (RP), characterized by night blindness, prolonged dark adaptation, constricted visual fields and impaired macular function. This study aimed to better understand the patient experience of RLBP1 RP and evaluate the content validity of existing patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments in this condition. METHODS: Semi-structured concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with RLBP1 RP patients in Canada and Sweden. Interviews started with open-ended concept elicitation questioning, and then patients were cognitively debriefed on The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) and four light/dark adaptation items of the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Qualitative interviews were also conducted with three expert clinicians. Anonymized, verbatim transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were interviewed (Canada n = 10; Sweden n = 11). Symptoms reported included night blindness (n = 21), difficulty adapting to changes in lighting (n = 21) and difficulties seeing in bright lighting (n = 18). Patients experienced substantial impacts on daily activities (n = 21) and physical functioning (n = 17). Patients had difficulty interpreting and selecting a response for some items in the NEI VFQ-25 and LLQ. Some items were not relevant to patients' disease experience. There were both gaps and overlaps in the conceptual coverage of the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Visual impairment due to RLBP1 RP has a substantial impact on physical functioning and daily activities. To adequately assess all important symptoms and associated functional impacts in RLBP1 RP, it is recommended to either modify one or more existing instruments or to develop a new non-syndromic RP specific instrument.

Scotopic sensitivity and color vision with a blue-light-absorbing intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To investigate possible adverse effects of a yellow-tinted intraocular lens (IOL) on scotopic sensitivity and hue discrimination. SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology, Columbia University and New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. METHODS: Nine patients with a yellow-tinted IOL in 1 eye and a colorless ultraviolet IOL in the fellow eye and 9 young phakic subjects with and without a yellow-tinted clip-on lens were tested. Hue discrimination was measured with the Farnsworth-Munsell (FM) 100-hue test. Dark-adapted thresholds to 440 nm, 500 nm, and 650 nm lights were measured at 23 locations using a modified Humphrey perimeter, and dark-adapted thresholds to white light were measured at 15 degrees temporal retina. RESULTS: In the 9 patients, there were no significant differences in dark-adapted sensitivities to 440, 500, 650 nm, or white-light stimuli and no differences in FM 100-hue error scores between eyes with yellow-tinted IOLs and those with colorless IOLs. Similarly, in young phakic subjects, there were no significant differences in FM 100-hue error scores or dark-adapted sensitivity to the white light with and without the yellow-tinted clip-on lens. However, with the clip-on lens, mean sensitivities to the 440 nm, 500 nm, and 650 nm stimuli were significantly decreased by 2.7 to 2.8 dB, 0.7 to 1.0 dB, and 0 to 1.2 dB, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that implantation of a yellow-tinted IOL has non-significant effect on scotopic sensitivity and hue discrimination.

The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields?

We examined the effects of inter-modal attention and mental arithmetic on Humphrey visual field sensitivity and multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) amplitude. Four normally sighted subjects (ages ranging from 24 to 58 years) participated in this study. Monocular visual field sensitivity was measured under two conditions: (1) standard testing condition and (2) while the subject performed a Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT). Monocular mfVEPs were recorded in response to a 60-sector stimulus. The checkerboard pattern in each sector was contrast reversed according to a binary m-sequence. mfVEPs were recorded under two conditions: (1) standard testing conditions and (2) while the subject performed a PASAT. We found that, when compared to the no-task condition, all subjects had locations of significantly reduced Humphrey visual field sensitivities when performing the PASAT. In contrast, there were no significant decreases in mfVEP amplitude in any sector for any of the subjects while performing the PASAT. Our findings indicate that divided attention and ongoing mental processes did not affect the mfVEP. Therefore, the mfVEP provides an objective measure of visual field function that may be useful for some patients with unreliable automated static perimetry results.

Rod and cone photoreceptor function in patients with cone dystrophy.

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of rod and cone photoreceptor dysfunction in patients with cone dystrophy using psychophysical and electrophysiological tests. METHODS: Ten patients with cone dystrophy participated. Rod and cone system psychophysical thresholds were measured as a function of retinal eccentricity. Bright-flash full-field electroretinograms were obtained under dark-adapted (rod-mediated) and light-adapted (cone-mediated) conditions. The a-wave data were fitted with a model based on photopigment transduction to obtain values for log Rmax (maximum response) and log S (sensitivity). b-Wave parameters were also examined by fitting a nonlinear, saturating function (the Naka-Rushton equation) to the rod-mediated responses. Oscillatory potentials were measured to the cone-mediated high-intensity flashes. RESULTS: On average, the rod-mediated psychophysical thresholds were elevated by 0.5 log unit. These threshold elevations did not differ significantly with retinal eccentricity. In contrast, cone-mediated psychophysical thresholds were elevated up to 3.0 log units. Threshold elevation was greatest in the central retinal locations. For rod-mediated conditions, the a-wave Rmax parameter was significantly reduced in three patients; the a-wave log S parameter was within normal limits. The rod-mediated b-wave Rmax parameter was reduced in six patients; log k was abnormal in one patient. For cone-mediated conditions, the a-wave Rmax parameter was reduced in six patients and the a-wave log S parameter was reduced in two patients. The cone system oscillatory potentials were abnormal in nine patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cone dystrophy show different patterns of psychophysical rod versus cone system sensitivity losses with retinal eccentricity. The full-field electrophysiological data indicate that most of the patients had abnormal cone photoreceptor function. Some patients also showed rod photoreceptor abnormalities. The rod system changes were smaller than the cone system changes.

Local cone and rod system function in progressive cone dystrophy.

PURPOSE: To compare the patterns of local cone and rod system impairment in patients with progressive cone dystrophy (CD) using psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques. METHODS: Local cone system function was assessed by measuring cone system thresholds (visual fields) and cone-mediated multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs). Rod system function was assessed by measuring rod system thresholds (visual fields) and rod-mediated mfERGs. The results in a group of eight patients with CD were compared with those in an age-similar control group. RESULTS: All the patients had abnormal cone system visual field thresholds and cone-mediated mfERGs. Cone system psychophysical thresholds were elevated for targets presented within the central 10 degrees, but were within normal limits for targets at peripheral locations. Cone-mediated mfERG measures of amplitude scale and time scale were abnormal for most of the hexagons tested. Most of the rod-mediated psychophysical thresholds and mfERGs were within normal limits. Rod system losses tended to be patchy and scattered throughout the area tested. CONCLUSIONS: There was poor correspondence among local measures of cone and rod system losses in these patients with CD. The results suggest that the spatial pattern of cone system losses in this disease differs from the spatial pattern of rod system losses.

Multifocal electroretinography as a function of age: the importance of normative values for older adults.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of age on local electroretinographic responses in humans. METHODS: Multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) were obtained from 62 normally sighted subjects ranging in age from 21 to 81 years. A stimulus array of 103 scaled hexagons was used to measure electrical signals within a retinal area approximately 46 degrees in diameter. Commonly reported mfERG methods were used to quantify the responses: peak-to-peak amplitudes and implicit times, scalar product amplitude, and amplitude and time scales derived from the algorithm of Hood and Li, published in 1997. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed significant linear relationships of amplitude and timing measures with age. The rates of losses were 10.5% per decade for peak-to-peak amplitude, 11.7% per decade for scalar product amplitude, and 9.5% per decade for a-scale. The rate of amplitude reduction was highest in the central 3 degrees. Age had less influence on implicit time measures. The rates of timing losses were 1.4% per decade for the N1 component and 1.0% per decade for both the P1 component and the t-scale measure. Using predicted interval ranges, the age was calculated at which 50% of the expected values would fall below the lower 95% prediction interval band of younger subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The age-associated mfERG alterations are presented to emphasize the importance of appropriate normative data in interpretation of mfERGs.

The spatial distribution of selective attention assessed using the multifocal visual evoked potential.

To determine the manner in which attention is distributed among numerous locations in the visual space, we used a multifocal recording technique that allowed simultaneous recordings of evoked cortical activity from 12 visual field areas out to 23.6 degrees. We found that multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) amplitude was larger when a region of visual space was attended than when it was not attended. The magnitude of this effect was inversely related to visual field eccentricity and there was no attention-related modulation of VEP amplitude for the most eccentric region. In addition, we found that mfVEP amplitudes in the regions contiguous to the attended region could also be larger, depending upon their spatial relationship to the attended region. Specifically, amplitudes in more central regions on the 'meridian of attention' were larger when the subject attended anywhere along that meridian.

A method for comparing psychophysical and multifocal electroretinographic increment thresholds.

The multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) has been commonly used as a method for obtaining objective visual fields. Although qualitative comparisons have been good, quantitative comparisons between the results from mfERG and the results from Humphrey Visual Field Analyser (HVFA) have found variable degrees of agreement depending upon the mfERG response parameter examined and/or the disease studied. Lack of agreement may be due to differences in methodology, differences in the sites of response generation, and/or differences derived from comparing suprathreshold versus threshold responses. In addition, the two procedures are performed at different levels of adaptation. We developed an approach for matching stimulus parameters and compared mfERG and psychophysical thresholds to assess the effects of technique and level of adaptation on the two responses. Psychophysical and mfERG thresholds were obtained as a function of the adaptation level (1.5-4.0 log td) and retinal location. The derived increment threshold-versus-intensity functions for both measures were fitted using the equation logT=logT(0)+log((A+A(0))/A(0))(n). We found that the values of A(0) for the mfERG data were one log unit higher than those for the psychophysical data. In addition, the value of the slope (n) for the mfERG data was shallower (0.8) than that of the psychophysical data (1.0). Predictions were made about comparisons of HVFA threshold and mfERG amplitude data in patients with retinal disease based upon a two-site model of adaptation. The data for some groups of patients could be best-fitted with a model of a disease acting at a site distal to all gain changes, whereas data from other patients were best fitted with a model of a disease acting at a site proximal to all retinal gain. The relationship between the Humphrey visual field threshold losses and mfERG amplitude reductions depends upon the site and mechanism of a particular disease process and the model of retinal gain assumed. In no case is a one-to-one relationship between the losses in the two measures predicted.

Electrophysiology.

Numerous electrophysiologic tests are available for use in the clinic. When properly recorded and analyzed, these tests provide important diagnostic and prognostic information about the site and nature of the disease process. If the results from these tests are combined with psychophysical findings (color vision, acuity, visual fields), their usefulness in defining disease can be further extended.

Method for deriving visual field boundaries from OCT scans of patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

The location of the loss of the inner segment (IS)/outer segment (OS) border, as seen with frequency domain optical coherence tomography (fdOCT), was determined on fdOCT scans from patients with retinitis pigmentosa. A comparison to visual field loss supported the hypothesis, based upon previous work, that the point at which the IS/OS border disappears provides a structural marker for the edge of the visual field. Repeat fdOCT measures showed good within day reproducibility, while data obtained on average 22.5 months later showed signs of progression. The IS/OS contour shows promise as a measure for following changes in patients undergoing treatment.

Multidimensional visual field maps: relationships among local psychophysical and local electrophysiological measures.

Multidimensional psychophysical and electrophysical maps of the central retina are essential for assessing the functioning of the diseased retina. In this study, grating acuity, contrast sensitivity, duration for letter identification, multifocal electroretinograms, and Humphrey visual field thresholds were measured at equivalent positions throughout the central 20 degrees. We found that the rates of sensitivity loss were not equivalent for all psychophysical measures. The rate of loss in the duration required for letter identification as a function of eccentricity was the steepest, followed by acuity and contrast sensitivity. The rate of loss in luminance sensitivity as measured in the Humphrey visual field was the shallowest. The pattern of losses also varied across meridians. Specifically, the rate of loss as a function of eccentricity was highest in the vertical meridian and lowest in the horizontal meridian. These maps and the correlations among measures as a function of retinal position serve as a baseline so that we can examine disease effects throughout the retina. In addition, the development of vision rehabilitation programs focused on eccentric viewing training should consider the differential sensitivities of the peripheral retina.

Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and humphrey visual fields in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

We examined the reliability of Humphrey visual field thresholds and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) amplitudes and timing in a group of patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP). Eight patients with RP and seven control subjects were tested five times: at baseline (visit #0), at three weekly follow-up visits (visits #1 - #3), and at three months (visit #4). For the Humphrey thresholds, differences between dB values on repeat visits were obtained. Differences between log values on repeat visits were calculated for mfERG amplitude and implicit time. We used the standard deviations of these difference scores as a measure of reliability and the means of the difference scores as a measure of progression. We found that the majority of the patients' repeat data were more variable than that of the control subjects for both the Humphrey and mfERG. We found no single factor that predicted the magnitude, or the variance, of the SD of differences scores for the patients. We recommend that each patient's reliability be assessed individually. Ultimately, the choice of an outcome measure must be guided by its reliability, as well as its ability to assess the visual function of interest.

The effect of variably tinted spectacle lenses on visual performance in cataract subjects.

PURPOSE: A body of clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that tinted spectacle lenses may have an effect on visual performance. The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of spectacle lens tint on the visual performance of 25 subjects with cataracts. METHODS: Cataracts were scored based on best-corrected acuity and by comparison with the Lens Opacity Classification System (LOCS III) plates. Visual performance was assessed by measuring contrast sensitivity with and without glare (Morphonome software version 4.0). The effect of gray, brown, yellow, green and purple tinting was evaluated. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated an increase in contrast thresholds under glare conditions regardless of lens tint. However, brown and yellow lens tints resulted in the least amount of contrast threshold increase. Gray lens tint resulted in the largest contrast threshold increase. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with lenticular changes may benefit from brown or yellow spectacle lenses under glare conditions.

Effect of variable tinted spectacle lenses on visual performance in control subjects.

PURPOSE: To evaluate quantitatively the effects of tinted spectacle lenses on visual performance in individuals without visual pathology. METHODS: Twenty-five subjects were assessed by measuring contrast sensitivity with and without glare. Gray, brown, yellow, green, purple, and blue lens tints were evaluated. Measurements were repeated with each lens tint and with a clear lens, and the order was counterbalanced within and between subjects. Glare was induced with a modified brightness acuity tester. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated an increase in contrast thresholds under glare conditions for all lens tints. However, purple and blue lens tints resulted in the least amount of contrast threshold increase; the yellow lens tint resulted in the largest contrast threshold increase. CONCLUSIONS: Purple and blue lens tints may improve contrast sensitivity in control subjects under glare conditions.