Balloon aortic valvuloplasty to improve candidacy of patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in improving candidacy of patients for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Patients who are not candidates for TAVR may undergo BAV to improve functional and clinical status. METHODS: 117 inoperable or high-risk patients with critical aortic stenosis underwent BAV as a bridge-to-decision for TAVR. Frailty measures including gait speed, serum albumin, hand grip, activities of daily living (ADL); and NYHA functional class before and after BAV were compared. RESULTS: Mean age was 81.6 ± 8.5 years and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 9.57 ± 5.51, with 19/117 (16.2%) patients non-ambulatory. There was no significant change in mean GS post-BAV, but all non-ambulatory patients completed GS testing at follow-up. Albumin and hand grip did not change after BAV, but there was a significant improvement in mean ADL score (4.85 ± 1.41 baseline to 5.20 ± 1.17, P = 0.021). The number of patients with Class IV congestive heart failure (CHF) was significantly lower post BAV (71/117 [60.7%] baseline versus 18/117 [15.4%], P = 0.008). 78/117 (66.7%) of patients were referred to definitive valve therapy after BAV. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating frailty measures post BAV, we saw no significant improvement in mean GS, however, we observed a significant improvement in non-ambulatory patients and ADL scores. We also describe improved Class IV CHF symptoms. With this improved health status, the majority of patients underwent subsequent valve therapy, demonstrating that BAV may improve candidacy of patients for TAVR.

The outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a cohort of patients with end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe and effective treatment option for aortic stenosis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). BACKGROUND: Patients with ESRD undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement have an operative mortality approaching 20% and a 10-year survival of approximately 12%. We investigated whether TAVR is a more reasonable option. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study of all patients with ESRD who underwent TAVR in 8 institutions between 12/2011 and 02/2013. Demographic characteristics, mortality, major, and minor complications were evaluated. Outcomes were stratified by operative approach. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with a mean age 76.2 ± 11.0 years and a mean STS predicted risk of mortality of 15.53 ± 8.70% underwent TAVR. Mean duration of dialysis was 45.2 ± 52.3 months (median 29.5 months). Transfemoral (TF) TAVR was performed in 31/43 (72.1%), transapical in 11/43 (25.6%), and transaortic in 1/43 (2.3%). Operative mortality was 14.0% (6/43) with TF mortality 6.5% (2/31) and 33.3% (4/12) in non-TF patients. Six-month mortality was 11/43 (25.6%: 16.1% TF, 50.0% non-TF). Complications included stroke in 2.3% (1/43) and life-threatening or major bleeding in 14.0% (6/43). Discharge to another healthcare facility was 27.0% (10/37). Readmission within 30 days of procedure for any cause was 18.9% (7/37). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD who undergo TAVR are at high risk for mortality and complications. TAVR outcomes are comparable to but not substantially better than those with SAVR. Transfemoral TAVR seems to be at least as safe and effective as the current standard SAVR in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Use of novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndromes.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) encompass a broad spectrum of clinical presentations based on underlying pathology that results in myocardial ischemia and/or infarction. Despite advancements in invasive management and secondary preventive therapies, recurrent atherothrombotic coronary events remain a prevalent cause of death and recurrent cardiac events after ACS and, in those who survive, the root of long-standing cardiac comorbidities. Antiplatelet drug therapy has proven beneficial in the reduction of these events, and novel antiplatelet agents have resulted in significant improvement in clinical outcomes over the last decade. However, the balance of optimal platelet inhibition with minimal bleeding complications remains a clinical challenge. This review focuses on more recent advances in antiplatelet therapies used in the treatment of ACS.

Aortic root rupture after TAVR in two renal transplant patients on chronic immunosuppressant therapy.

Patients on chronic immunosuppressant therapy after renal transplantation have a high rate of in-hospital mortality and approximately 20% mortality rate per year after conventional valve surgery. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an appealing option to consider for such patients, there are not significant outcome data for the procedure in this patient population. We report two cases of aortic root rupture after TAVR in renal transplant patients on chronic immunosuppressant therapy.

Randomized trial of surgical cutdown versus percutaneous access in transfemoral TAVR.

OBJECTIVES: To compare iliofemoral arterial complications with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) utilizing surgical cutdown versus percutaneous access with closure devices in a randomized trial. BACKGROUND: Major vascular complications following TAVR are a significant risk of the procedure. There are no randomized data comparing whether access method in TF-TAVR influences the risk of such complications. METHODS: From June to December 2011, 30 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVR were randomized to either surgical cutdown (C) or percutaneous (P) access. Subjects underwent preoperative CT scans, pre- and post-operative bilateral femoral arterial ultrasound and angiography. The primary endpoint was the composite of major and minor vascular complications at 30 days, as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Multivariate predictors of vascular complications were identified. RESULTS: Of the 30 subjects enrolled, 27 were treated with the randomized method of access as randomized. Iliofemoral complications were observed in eight patients (26.7%; C = 4, P = 4), all of which were dissections and/or stenoses that required percutaneous and/or surgical intervention. There were two (13.3%) major and two (13.3%) minor complications in each group. Two covariates that were significantly associated with vascular complications included female sex and baseline femoral arterial velocity on ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: While surgical cutdown in TF-TAVR is the recommended access for new centers initiating a TAVR program, this small randomized pilot study suggests the lesser invasive percutaneous method in an experienced center is equivalent in safety to the surgical method. Doppler ultrasound may be useful in predicting complications prior to the procedure.

Comparison of drug-eluting and bare metal stents in large coronary arteries: findings from the NHLBI dynamic registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) for patients with large coronary vessels. BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have demonstrated that DES reduce the risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) compared to BMS. This benefit is less pronounced as artery diameter increases. Whether DES are superior to BMS for larger coronary arteries in the setting of routine clinical practice is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed data from 869 patients undergoing de novo lesion PCI with reference vessel diameter greater than or equal to 3.5 mm in the NHLBI Dynamic Registry according to whether they were treated with DES or BMS. Patients were followed for 3 years for the occurrence of cardiovascular events. RESULTS: At 3-year follow-up, rates of TVR at 3 years were similar and low in both groups (4.4% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.62). After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics, the adjusted hazard ratio for 3-year MI for DES was 1.85 (95% CI 0.93-3.7, P = 0.08), for TVR at 3 years 1.14 (95% CI 0.52-2.49, P = 0.75) and for mortality 0.89 (95%CI 0.49-1.62, P = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: In our study of the unrestricted use of DES for patients with lesions in larger diameter coronary arteries, first generation DES did not reduce 3-year risk of TVR. Our findings do not support the preferred use of DES over BMS for patients with lesions located in arteries >3.5 mm. It is unknown whether secondary generation DES can offer better outcome compared to BMS in large coronary vessels. Further study on this issue is warranted.

Outcomes of small coronary artery stenting with bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents: results from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Examine 1-year outcomes of patients with small coronary arteries in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry (NHLBI) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) vs. bare-metal stent (BMS) placement. BACKGROUND: While randomized trials of DES vs. BMS demonstrate reduced target vessel revascularization, it is unclear whether similar outcomes are seen in unselected patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for small coronary arteries. METHODS: Utilizing patients from the NHLBI Registry Waves 1-3 for BMS (1997-2002) and Waves 4-5 for DES (2004 and 2006), demographic, angiographic, in-hospital, and 1-year outcome data of patients with small coronary arteries treated with BMS (n = 686) vs. DES (n = 669) were evaluated. Small coronary artery was defined as 2.50-3.00 mm in diameter. RESULTS: Compared to BMS-treated patients, the mean lesion length of treated lesions was longer in the DES treated group (16.7 vs. 13.1 mm, P < 0.001) and the mean reference vessel size of attempted lesions was smaller (2.6 vs. 2.7 mm, P < 0.001). Adjusted analyses of 1-year outcomes revealed that DES patients were at lower risk to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.95, P = 0.04), repeat PCI (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.82, P = 0.004), and experience the combined major adverse cardiovascular event rate (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.83, P = 0.002). There was no difference in the risk of death and myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46-1.35, P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world registry, patients with small coronary arteries treated with DES had significantly lower rates of repeat revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year compared to patients treated with BMS, with no increase in the risk of death and MI. These data confirm the efficacy and safety of DES over BMS in the treatment of small coronary arteries in routine clinical practice.

Association of chronic lung disease with treatments and outcomes patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic lung disease (CLD) is common among patients with myocardial infarction (MI), little is known about the influence of CLD on patient management and outcomes following MI. METHODS: Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's ACTION Registry-GWTG, demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, processes of care, and in-hospital adverse events after acute MI were compared between patients with (n = 22,624) and without (n = 136,266) CLD. Multivariable adjustment was performed to determine the independent association of CLD with treatments and adverse events. RESULTS: CLD (17.0% of non-ST-elevation MI [NSTEMI] and 10.1% of ST-elevation MI [STEMI] patients) was associated with older age, female sex, and a greater burden of comorbidities. Among NSTEMI patients, those with CLD were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft compared to those without; in contrast, no differences were seen in invasive therapies for STEMI patients with or without CLD. Multivariable-adjusted risk of major bleeding was significantly increased in CLD patients with NSTEMI (13.0% vs 8.1%, OR(adj) = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.20-1.34, P < .001) and STEMI (16.0% vs 10.5%, OR(adj) = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.10-1.29, P < .001). In NSTEMI, CLD was associated with a higher risk of inhospital mortality (OR(adj) = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.11-1.33); in STEMI no association between CLD and mortality was seen (OR(adj) = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.95-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: CLD is common among patients with MI and is independently associated with an increased risk for major bleeding. In NSTEMI, CLD is also associated with receiving less revascularization and with increased in-hospital mortality. Special attention should be given to this high-risk subgroup for the prevention and management of complications after MI.

Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on quality of life: a consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreases ischemic complications of acute coronary syndromes. The benefits of PCI in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) depend on its effect on quality of life (QoL), including angina, physical activity, and emotional well-being. PCI decreases angina and the need for anti-anginal medications, and increases exercise capacity and QoL, compared with baseline status and compared with medical therapy without PCI. These benefits are greater when QOL is markedly impaired by severe angina before the procedure. When considering treatment options for symptomatic SIHD, physicians should consider and provide objective data regarding QoL effects for each treatment strategy. QoL outcomes should be considered in clinical trials, appropriate use criteria, practice guidelines, and reimbursement policies for PCI.

Transfemoral use of the GuideLiner catheter in complex coronary and bypass graft interventions.

The GuideLiner catheter (Vascular Solutions, Minneapolis, MN) is a novel, rapid exchange catheter that allows deep vessel intubation. We describe 21 patients in whom the GuideLiner catheter [7 French (F) in 76% and 6F in 24%] was used to facilitate equipment delivery (n = 14) or vessel engagement (n = 7). Pressure dampening after GuideLiner catheter insertion was observed in 12 patients (57%). The procedure was successfully completed in 19 patients (90%) and one patient developed acute vessel closure, likely due to dissection. The GuideLiner catheter can facilitate complex coronary interventions but should be used with caution to minimize the risk for vessel injury.

A comparison of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for off-label indications.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that off-label use of drug-eluting stents is associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. Whether the use of bare-metal stents would yield different results is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed data from 6551 patients in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry according to whether they were treated with drug-eluting stents or bare-metal stents and whether use was standard or off-label. Patients were followed for 1 year for the occurrence of cardiovascular events and death. Off-label use was defined as use in restenotic lesions, lesions in a bypass graft, left main coronary artery disease, or ostial, bifurcated, or totally occluded lesions, as well as use in patients with a reference-vessel diameter of less than 2.5 mm or greater than 3.75 mm or a lesion length of more than 30 mm. RESULTS: Off-label use occurred in 54.7% of all patients with bare-metal stents and 48.7% of patients with drug-eluting stents. As compared with patients with bare-metal stents, patients with drug-eluting stents had a higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, renal disease, previous percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary-artery bypass grafting, and multivessel coronary artery disease. One year after intervention, however, there were no significant differences in the adjusted risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients with drug-eluting stents as compared with those with bare-metal stents, whereas the risk of repeat revascularization was significantly lower among patients with drug-eluting stents. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with off-label indications, the use of drug-eluting stents was not associated with an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction but was associated with a lower rate of repeat revascularization at 1 year, as compared with bare-metal stents. These findings support the use of drug-eluting stents for off-label indications.

Temporal changes in the outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute dynamic registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at higher risk for adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: To determine whether outcomes have improved over time, we analyzed data from 2,838 consecutive patients with medically treated DM, including 1,066 patients (37.6%) treated with insulin, in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry undergoing PCI registered in waves 1 (1997-1998), 2 (1999), 3 (2001-2002), 4 (2004), and 5 (2006). We compared baseline demographics and 1-year outcomes in the overall cohort and in analyses stratified by recruitment wave and insulin use. RESULTS: Crude mortality rates by chronological wave were 9.5%, 12.5%, 8.9%, 11.6%, and 6.6% (P value(trend) = .33) among those treated with insulin and, respectively, 9.7%, 6.5%, 4.1%, 5.4%, and 4.7% (P value(trend) = .006) among patients treated with oral agents,. The adjusted hazard ratios of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and overall major adverse cardiovascular events (death, MI, revascularization) in insulin-treated patients with DM in waves 2 to 5 as compared with wave 1 were either higher or the same. In contrast, the similar adjusted hazard ratios for oral agent-treated patients with DM were either similar or lower. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements over time in adverse events by 1 year were detected in patients with DM treated with oral agents. In insulin-treated diabetic patients, despite lower rates of repeat revascularization over time, death and MI following PCI have not significantly improved. These findings underscore the need for continued efforts at optimizing outcomes among patients with DM undergoing PCI, especially those requiring insulin treatment.

Relative spatial distributions of coronary artery bypass graft insertion and acute thrombosis: a model for protection from acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have demonstrated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) to be superior to percutaneous coronary intervention with respect to long-term mortality and morbidity from myocardial infarction within specific high-risk cohorts. The purpose of this study was to analyze the spatial distribution of coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses relative to acute thromboses in native coronary arteries. We hypothesized that insertion sites of bypass grafts are located distal to sites of acute thrombosis and consequently decrease cardiac morbidity and mortality associated with plaque rupture. METHODS: We analyzed 168 patients with prior CABG and 208 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) presenting to the Brigham and Women's Hospital who underwent coronary angiography. We constructed a spatial map of the coronary arterial bypass graft insertion sites and compared these locations to sites of acute thrombosis leading to STEMI. RESULTS: Graft insertion sites were consistently located distal to acute thrombosis sites (left anterior descending artery median graft insertion versus median thrombosis site = 72 versus 34 mm, right coronary artery 91 versus 42 mm, left circumflex artery 44 versus 37 mm). Greater than 97% of thrombosis sites were located proximal to 75% of graft insertion sites. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary arterial bypass grafts provide the coverage of anatomic zones at risk for STEMI. The superior performance of CABG in high risk patients may be attributed to targeting of proximal coronary locations where thrombosis risk is clustered.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Mitral Valve Surgery: Results From the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

BACKGROUND: Due to perceived technical challenges, patients with previous surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR) have been excluded from most transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) trials. Our objective was to compare the 30-day and 1-year outcomes of TAVR for patients with and without prior SMVR. METHODS: In a retrospective review of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry, we compared 1097 patients with prior SMVR to 46,327 patients without prior SMVR who underwent TAVR between November 2011 and September 2015 at 394 US centers. Preoperative characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with previous SMVR were younger, more often female, and had higher STS predicted risk of mortality (8.6% vs 6.8%, P < .001). However, there was no difference in 30-day mortality (4.6% vs 5.5%, P = .293), myocardial infarction, stroke, reintervention, new dialysis, or readmission. Moderate/severe paravalvular leak at discharge was also similar (5.8% vs 4.9%, P = .343). At 1 year, morbidity was similar with slightly higher mortality among patients with prior SMVR (20% vs 17.5%, P = .087) that was significant after adjustment (hazard ratio 1.18, P = .043). The type of prior SMVR (repair, bioprosthetic replacement, or mechanical replacement) had no impact on 30-day or 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior SMVR undergoing TAVR had similar 30-day outcomes, slightly higher 1-year mortality, and no increase in early paravalvular leak compared with patients who did not have previous SMVR. Prior SMVR should not preclude TAVR for appropriately selected patients.

Validation of a low-dose contrast 64-slice cardiac computed tomography angiography protocol for aortic valve annulus sizing.

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the gold standard for accurately sizing the aortic valve annulus prior to aortic valve replacement. A reduction of contrast volume administered for CCTA, without sacrificing image quality, is desirable. Signal-to-noise ratio represents final CCTA image quality. Consecutive patients referred to CCTA for aortic valve annulus sizing were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped into a low-dose contrast (LDCT) group and traditional dose contrast (TDCT) group. In the LDCT group, contrast dose was <50% of the maximal allowable dose (3.7 × estimated glomerular filtration rate). Guided by a time-density curve, the contrast was administered in a two-stage infusion, and retrospectively gated images were acquired with a 64-multidetector computed tomography scanner. Out of 123 patients (age 80 ± 9 years; 46% female), 65 (52.9%) underwent LDCT and 58 (47.2%) underwent TDCT. Contrast volume was significantly lower in the LDCT group (LDCT 41.2 ± 9.8 vs TDCT 76.2 ± 14.2 mL; P < 0.001). The signal-to-noise ratio of the aortic root was 10.4 ± 4.1 for the LDCT group and 8.4 ± 3.3 for the TDCT group (P = 0.004). Aortic root dimensions could be measured in both LDCT and TDCT groups. In conclusion, LDCT with 64-slice CCTA can effectively size the aortic valve annulus to direct aortic valve replacement while offering reduced contrast exposure.

Novel renal biomarker evaluation for early detection of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The biomarkers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and interleukin-18 (IL-18) are predictive of AKI after cardiac surgery, but there is little data regarding these biomarkers after TAVI. We evaluated the associations between NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 levels and the incidence and severity of AKI and changes in serum creatinine after TAVI. This was a prospective pilot study of 66 TAVI cases. Urinary biomarkers were measured at baseline and at 2, 4, and 12 hours after TAVI. Demographics, procedural features, and renal function until discharge were compared between patients with and without subsequent AKI. Seventeen patients (25.8%) developed AKI postoperatively (stage 1, n = 14; stage 2, n = 1; stage 3, n = 2). There were no significant differences in unadjusted mean NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 levels between patients with and without AKI at 2, 4, and 12 hours following surgery. After adjusting for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk of mortality, this study of three urinary biomarkers showed no association with AKI or creatinine after TAVI. Ongoing efforts to predict and modify the risk of AKI after TAVI remain challenging.

Description of a Method to Obtain Complete One-Year Follow-Up in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination requires centers performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to report clinical outcomes up to 1 year. Many sites encounter challenges in obtaining complete 1-year follow-up. We report our process to address this challenge. A multidisciplinary process involving clinical personnel, data and quality managers, and research coordinators was initiated to collect TAVI data at baseline, 30 days, and 1 year. This process included (1) planned clinical follow-up of all patients at 30 days and 1 year; (2) query of health-care system-wide integrated data warehouse (IDW) to ascertain last date of clinical contact within the system for all patients; (3) online obituary search, cross-referencing for unique patient identifiers to determine if mortality occurred in remaining unknown patients; and (4) phone calls to remaining unknown patients or patients' families. Between January 2012 and December 2016, 744 patients underwent TAVI. All 744 patients were eligible for 30-day follow-up and 546 were eligible for 1-year follow-up. At routine clinical follow-up of 22 of 744 (3%) patients at 30 days and 180 of 546 (33%) patients at 1 year had unknown survival status. The integrated data warehouse query confirmed status-alive for an additional 1 of 22 patients at 30 days (55%) and 91 of 180 patients at 1 year (51%). Obituaries were identified for 23 of 180 additional patients at 1 year (13%). Phone contact identified the remaining unknown patients at 30 days and 1 year, resulting in 100% known survival status for patients at 30 days (744 of 744) and at 1 year (546 of 546). In conclusion, using a comprehensive approach, we were able to determine survival status in 100% of patients who underwent TAVI.

Clinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with active surveillance by four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) ranges from 7% to 14%. The incidence of leaflet thrombosis when 4DCT is performed for clinical and echocardiographic indications is unknown. METHODS: All patients with prior TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) who underwent evaluation between October 2015 and January 2017 at our institution and had clinical or echocardiographic indications of leaflet thrombosis were evaluated by 4DCT. Indications for 4DCT by echocardiography included (1) interval increase in mean gradient of 10 mm Hg or more, (2) interval decrease in ejection fraction of 10% or more, (3) thrombus seen on transthoracic echocardiography, (4) persistent or increasing paravalvular leak, or (5) valve dehiscence or thickened leaflets seen on transthoracic echocardiography. Clinical indicators were (1) stroke, (2) transient ischemic attack, or (3) new or worsening heart failure. RESULTS: During the study period, 612 patients underwent TAVR, and 101 patients (55 TAVR; 46 SAVR) met the criteria for 4DCT imaging. Leaflet thrombosis was seen in 17 of 55 TAVR patients (30.9%) and 15 of 46 SAVR patients (32.6%). Follow-up imaging with 4DCT after treatment with anticoagulation showed improvement or resolution in thrombus burden and leaflet excursion in all TAVR patients and in two-thirds of SAVR patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with clinical or echocardiographic indications suggestive of leaflet thrombosis were found to have evidence of leaflet thrombosis using 4DCT. This allowed tailored anticoagulation therapy with resolution of the thrombus in most patients and avoiding unnecessary anticoagulation in the remaining two-thirds of patients.

Effects of heart failure and diabetes mellitus on long-term mortality after coronary revascularization (from the BARI Trial).

This study evaluated the effect of heart failure (HF) and ejection fraction (EF) at baseline on long-term cardiac mortality in patients undergoing coronary revascularization and investigated the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on mortality. We evaluated long-term outcomes of patients without HF, HF and a preserved EF, and HF and a decreased EF who underwent revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery after enrollment in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial. Ten years after initial revascularization, cumulative rates of freedom from cardiac death were 90% in patients without HF, 75% in patients with HF and a preserved EF, and 59% in patients with HF and a decreased EF (p <0.001, 3-way comparison). In diabetic patients with HF and a preserved EF, there was a significant increase in cardiac mortality compared with patients without HF (p <0.001); however, this relation was not seen in patients without DM. In conclusion, patients with HF and a preserved EF have increased mortality over 10 years compared with those without HF. Only in patients with DM did HF with preserved EF confer additional risk.

Usefulness of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in the Management of Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

We aim to evaluate the contemporary role and outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV), based on physician intent, for the management of severe aortic stenosis. This is a prospective, 2-center study of 100 consecutive high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent BAV. Before BAV, physicians assigned intent as (1) bridge to decision (BTD); (2) therapeutic bridge to planned therapy; or (3) palliation. Patients in the BTD arm underwent clinical assessment at 30 days to determine eligibility for definitive valve therapy. All patients were followed up to 1 year, with outcomes measured including procedural complications, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires scores, 30-day and 1-year mortality, and definitive valve therapy. Enrolled patients had a mean age of 80.6 (±9.6) years, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of 11.4% (±7.1%), and 91 (91.0%) patients had class III or IV New York Heart Association congestive heart failure. Intent in the 100 study patients was 76 BTD; 20 therapeutic bridge to planned therapy; and 4 palliation. Thirty-day mortality for all patients was 6 of 100 (6.0%), and 1-year mortality for all patients who received definitive valve therapy was 6 of 54 (11.1%). For patients surviving to 30 days, adjusted (by Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality) Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires scores were significantly improved from baseline for all patients and BTD patients. In conclusion, as a bridge to decision and treatment tool, BAV appears to have a valuable role in properly selecting and improving patients to undergo definitive valve replacement.