Role of antiangiogenic agents in first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: "Anti-angiogenetic drugs plus chemotherapy" (anti-angio-chemo) and "immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy" (ICI-chemo) are superior to traditional chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in the absence of a direct comparison of ICI-chemo with anti-angio-chemo, the superior one between them has not been decided, and the benefit of adding anti-angiogenetic agents to ICI-chemo remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the role of antiangiogenic agents for advanced NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy. METHODS: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy versus therapeutic regimens involving ICIs or anti-angiogenetic drugs were included. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and rate of grade 3-4 toxicity assessment. R-4.3.1 was utilized to perform the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 54 studies with a sample size of 25,046 were finally enrolled. "Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" significantly improved the ORR compared with "Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy" (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-5.87). The trend also favored "Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" in PFS and OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39-1.31; HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.77-1.16, respectively). In addition, "Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy" and "Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy" significantly prolonged the PFS compared to "Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92; HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.97; respectively). Meanwhile, "Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy" and "Sintilimab + Chemotherapy" yielded more OS benefits than "Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.83; HR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.46-0.91; respectively). Scheme between "Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" and "Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy" made no significant difference (OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 0.56-2.42) concerning the rate of grade 3-4 toxicity. It seemed that ICI-chemo yielded more improvement in quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) than "Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy" in cost-effectiveness analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ICI-chemo is associated with potentially longer survival, better cost-effectiveness outcomes, and comparable safety profiles than anti-angio-chemo. Also, adding bevacizumab to ICI-chemo seemed to provide additional therapeutic benefits without adding treatment burden. Our findings would supplement the current standard of care and help the design of future clinical trials for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Pretreatment Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase and Metastases Numbers as Potential Determinants of Anti-PD-1 Therapy Outcome in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the determinant factors of anti-PD-1 therapy outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 64 patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC. The association of patients' characteristics, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) with survival benefit of anti-PD-1 therapy were analyzed using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Patients were divided based on the median value of CRP, NLR or LDH into different subgroups. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 11.4 months (range: 1-28 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.9 months (95% CI, .18-3.6) and 15 months (95% CI, 10.9-19.1) months, respectively. Pretreatment metastases numbers was significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.10-3.63; P = .024) and OS (HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.36-5.61; P = .005). Baseline LDH level was independent predictor of OS (HR = 7.01; 95% CI 3.09-15.88; P < .001). Patients with LDH level >435 U/L at the baseline had significantly shorter PFS and OS compared to patients with LDH level ≤435 U/L (median PFS: 1.7 vs 3.5 months, P = .040; median OS: 3.7 vs 18.5 months, P < .001). Patients with non-durable clinical benefit (NDB) had significantly higher LDH level at the baseline compared to patients who achieved durable clinical benefit (DCB) (P = .025). Post-treatment levels of CRP, LDH, and NLR were decreased compared to baseline in patients with DCB (P = .030, P = .088, and P = .066, respectively), whereas, there was a significant increase in post-treatment level of LDH compared with baseline in patients with NDB (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: LDH level at the baseline was an independent predictor of OS and pretreatment metastases numbers was a significant predictor of PFS and OS.

Hepatotoxicity associated with PD-1 blockade antibodies in cancer patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus.

The use of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies in treating malignancies is increasing; however, most registered clinical trials on anti-PD-1 antibodies exclude patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). This retrospective study aimed to assess hepatotoxicity in cancer patients infected with HBV undergoing anti-PD1 antibody therapy and identify the associated risk factors. A total of 301 cancer patients positive for hepatitis B core antibodies (HbcAb) (negative or positive hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]) who received PD-1 inhibitors were enrolled. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence rate of hepatotoxicity related to PD-1 inhibitor treatment, and risk factors associated with hepatic toxicity, respectively. Of the enrolled analyzed, 16.9% (n = 51) developed any grade and 4.7% (n = 14) developed grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity, respectively. Higher risk for any-grade hepatotoxicity development was associated with sero-positive HBsAg (OR = 6.30; P = 0.020), existence of liver involvement (OR = 2.10; P = 0.030), and detectable baseline HBV DNA levels (OR = 2.39; P = 0.012). Patients with prophylactic antiviral therapy decreased hazard for the incidence of grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.10; P = 0.016). Our results suggested chronic (HBsAg-positive)/resolved (HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive) HBV-infected cancer patients are at an increased risk of hepatotoxicity following PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Cancer patients should be tested for HBsAg/HBcAb prior to the commencement of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. For patients with chronic/resolved HBV infection, ALT/AST and HBV DNA should be closely monitored during the whole immunotherapy period.

Efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors in first-line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 + Chemo) have achieved substantial progress in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, evidence about programmed cell death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-1 + Chemo) in SCLC is relatively lacking. Whether PD-1 inhibitors differ from PD-L1 inhibitors in their clinical outcomes remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of PD-L1 + Chemo vs PD-1 + Chemo in ES-SCLC by searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and major oncology conferences. We examined overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: We included four randomized trials (IMpower133, CASPIAN, KEYNOTE-604, and EA5161) with a total of 1553 patients. Direct comparison showed that PD-L1 + Chemo (PFS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; OS: HR 0.75) and PD-1 + Chemo (PFS: HR 0.72; OS: HR 0.77) significantly prolonged survival time compared with chemotherapy alone. But PD-L1 + Chemo (relative risk [RR]: 1.07) and PD-1 + Chemo (RR: 1.13) were not superior to chemotherapy alone in terms of ORR. Indirect comparison showed no significant difference in clinical efficacy between PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo (OS: HR 0.99; PFS: HR 1.10; ORR: RR 0.95). We further stratified patients according to subgroups in terms of OS. In the subgroup of patients with brain metastasis, PD-L1 + Chemo tended to prolong OS (HR: 0.61, 0.28 to 1.32). There were no significant differences between PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo regarding safety analyses. However, PD-L1 + Chemo exhibited a better safety profile in reducing the risk of treatment discontinuation due to AEs (RR: 0.43, 0.19 to 0.95) and pneumonia (pneumonia of any grade, RR: 0.59, 0.24 to 1.42; pneumonia of grade ≥ 3, RR: 0.37, 0.10 to 1.39). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo provided a significant survival benefit relative to chemotherapy alone for ES-SCLC. The efficacy and safety of PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo were similar based on current evidence.

The perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and cancer patients: an observational study in China.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been widely accepted in western countries. However, limited attention has been given to PROs in China due to a lack of research on the agreement between doctors' and patients' reports of adverse events. This study aims to reveal the perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and cancer patients in China. METHODS: An observational study was administered at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). Totally, 200 adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy participated. Patient reports were collected by nurses via telephone. Doctor reports were collected by nurses based on their medical records. The agreement between doctors and patients was analyzed by Cohen's κ. RESULTS: Agreement between doctors and patients varied among different symptoms: 0.26 for nausea/vomiting, 0.49 for constipation, 0.63 for diarrhea, 0.65 for general pain, and 0.76 for rash. Doctors' underreporting rates were 70% for nausea/vomiting, 50% for diarrhea, 38% for rash, 33% for constipation, and 29% for general pain. CONCLUSIONS: The perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and patients exists in China, especially regarding subjective symptoms. Introduction of PROs in both clinical trials and routine clinical practice should be considered in China.

KEYNOTE-032: A Randomized Phase I Study of Pembrolizumab in Chinese Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: Results of the KEYNOTE-032 study showed that the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of pembrolizumab in Chinese patients were comparable with those observed in international studies, and antitumor activity was encouraging. These data support further evaluation of pembrolizumab to improve clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BACKGROUND: The KEYNOTE-032 study evaluated pembrolizumab pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prior treatment failure and/or ineligibility for standard therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or 200 mg every 3 weeks (up to 35 cycles). Safety and pharmacokinetics were primary endpoints; antitumor activity was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 42 of 44 randomized patients received pembrolizumab treatment (2 mg/kg, n = 14; 10 mg/kg, n = 13; 200 mg, n = 15). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 29 of 42 (69%) patients (grade 3-4, 4/42 [10%]); 5 (12%) had immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions. Pembrolizumab single dose half-life following 2 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 200 mg was 15.1, 15.8, and 12.3 days, respectively. Serum exposure at the doses studied (range, 2-10 mg/kg) was approximately linear; steady-state area under the curve0-21 days (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 730.9 (627.4-851.6), 2,819.2 (2,009.4-3,955.4), and 931.0 (724.4-1,196.6) µg•day/mL, respectively. After 7.9 (range, 0.7-13.1) months median follow-up overall, objective response rate was 14.3% (95% CI, 5.4%-28.5%); median progression-free survival was 2.1 (95% CI, 2.1-4.2) months, and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 6.6 months-not reached). CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab had manageable toxicity, linear serum exposure, and encouraging antitumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.

Intratumor heterogeneity comparison among different subtypes of non-small-cell lung cancer through multi-region tissue and matched ctDNA sequencing.

Understanding of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) among different non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtypes is necessary. Whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profile could represent these ITH is still an open question. We performed 181 multi-region tumor tissues sequencing and matched ctDNA sequencing from 32 operative NSCLC to compare ITH among different NSCLC subtypes, including EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), KRAS-mutant LUAD, EGFR&KRAS-wild-type LUAD, and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and examine potential value of ctDNA for ITH analysis. ITH is evaluated by ITH index (ITHi). If the somatic genetic alteration is shared by all the tissue regions, it is defined as trunk mutation. Otherwise, it is called branch mutation. The ITHi will be higher, if the tumor has less trunk mutations. We found EGFR-mutant LUAD showed significantly higher ITHi than KRAS-mutant LUAD/wild-type LUAD (P = 0.03) and numerically higher ITH than LUSC. For trunk mutations, driver mutations were identified at a higher proportion than passenger mutations (60% vs. 40%, P = 0.0023) in overall, especially in EGFR-mutant LUAD (86% vs. 14%, P = 0.0004), while it was opposite in KRAS-mutant LUAD (40% vs. 60%, P = 0.18). For branch mutations, the proportions of driver mutations and passenger mutations were similar for each NSCLC subtype. ctDNA analysis showed unsatisfactory detections of tumor-derived trunk and branch mutations (43% vs. 23%, P = 4.53e-6) among all NSCLC subtypes. In summary, EGFR-mutant LUAD has the highest ITH than other NSCLC subtypes, offering further understanding of tumorigenesis mechanisms among different NSCLC subtypes. Besides, ctDNA maybe not an appropriate method to reflect ITH.

Progression-free survival and one-year milestone survival as surrogates for overall survival in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The advent of immunotherapy leads to greater availability of effective subsequent treatments and extended survival in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), complicating the evaluation of overall survival (OS) in second-line NSCLC trials. Here, we aimed to assess the surrogacy of progression-free survival (PFS) and milestone survival for OS in second-line NSCLC trials investigating chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, respectively. We systemically searched for active-controlled, second-line NSCLC trials. The milestone time point was set at one-year based on pre-analysis. A two-stage meta-analytic validation model was adopted to assess associations between surrogate endpoint (SE) and OS and associations between treatment effects on SE and OS. Treatment effects on SE and OS were expressed as PFS hazard ratios (HRPFS ), 1 yr-milestone ratio (Ratio1y-SUR ) and HROS . Subgroup analyses stratified by treatment types and trial publication years evaluated the surrogacy in different clinical contexts. The study included 50 trials with 22,804 patients. One-year survival strongly correlated with OS (R2 [95% confidence interval]: one-year survival -median OS = 0.707 [0.704-0.708]; Ratio1y-SUR -HROS = 0.829 [0.828-0.831]). No correlation was established between PFS and OS (median PFS-median OS = 0.100 [0.098-0.101]; HRPFS -HROS = 0.064 [0.059-0.069]), except in immunotherapy subgroup (HRPFS -HROS = 0.835 [0.791-0.918]). In subgroup analyses, surrogacy of one-year survival persisted in different clinical contexts, and the disassociation between PFS and OS persisted in recent trials. One-year milestone survival showed strong surrogacy for OS in second-line NSCLC trials. Although no association was identified between PFS and OS, the strong HRPFS -HROS correlation in immunotherapy trials indicates the potential of PFS as a SE in NSCLC trials involving immunotherapies.

A Phase I/II Open-Label Study of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Advanced or Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Other Solid Tumors.

LESSONS LEARNED: Nivolumab treatment at doses of 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (Q2W), 240 mg Q2W, and 360 mg once every 3 weeks was well tolerated in the Chinese population, with no new safety signals identified.Comparison of intensive pharmacokinetic profiles of nivolumab at 3 mg/kg Q2W in Chinese versus global populations revealed no ethnic differences of nivolumab treatment.Nivolumab shows promising preliminary antitumor activity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BACKGROUND: This phase I/II study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death-1 monoclonal antibody) in Chinese patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and other solid tumors. METHODS: A dose evaluation phase (3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks [Q2W]) was followed by a cohort expansion phase (3 mg/kg Q2W or flat doses of 240 mg Q2W or 360 mg once every 3 weeks). RESULTS: In the dose evaluation phase, 8/8 patients completed one cycle with no dose-limiting toxicities. At data cutoff, 46/51 patients were evaluable for safety (all cohorts). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 35 (76%) patients and were primarily grade 1-2; one patient (3 mg/kg Q2W) discontinued because of study drug toxicity. Intensive PK profiles at 3 mg/kg, 240 mg, and 360 mg were well characterized at single and multiple doses of nivolumab. An objective response was determined in six (6/46) patients, four (4/32) of whom had NPC tumors. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab monotherapy at 3 mg/kg and flat doses of 240 mg and 360 mg were well tolerated in this Chinese patient population, with PK profiles at 3 mg/kg being similar to those of global patients. Preliminary efficacy results showed promising antitumor activity of nivolumab in advanced NPC.

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and response to osimertinib in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFRex20ins) mutations represent approximately 4-12% of EGFR mutations and are generally refractory to the 1st and 2nd generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Development of effective therapies for patients with EGFRex20ins mutant non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) represents a great unmet need. Preclinical models have shown that osimertinib is active in NSCLC harboring EGFRex20ins, while the antitumor activity of osimertinib remains to be evaluated in patients with EGFRex20ins mutations. METHODS: Tumor genotyping was performed in 2316 Chinese NSCLC cases with targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) covering the whole exons of EGFR gene. The frequency and genetic characteristics of EGFRexon20ins mutations were analyzed. Furthermore, six patients with specific EGFRexon20ins mutations and receiving osimertinib 80 mg once daily were retrospectively included to assess the antitumor activity and safety of monotherapy osimertinib. RESULTS: EGFRex20ins mutations were identified in 4.8% (53/1095) of EGFR mutant NSCLC and 2.3% (53/2316) of all NSCLC cases. The most frequently identified EGFRexon20ins is A767_V769dup (17/53,32.1%). We found that the genetic characteristics of EGFRex20ins mutations in Chinese patients with NSCLC were comparable to those reported in Caucasian patients. Four patients with osimertinib therapy achieved partial response and the rest stable disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval 5.0-12.9 months; range 4.9-14.6 months). The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (2/6), pruritis (2/6), stomatitis (1/6) and nausea (1/6). No grade 3 or more AEs were documented. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the genetic characteristics of EGFRex20ins mutations in Chinese patients with NSCLC were comparable to those reported in Caucasian patients. Furthermore, our study firstly demonstrated promising antitumor activity of osimertinib in certain EGFRex20ins mutant advanced NSCLC patients, indicating that osimertinib treatment for EGFRex20ins positive patients deserves further study.

Cause-specific death assessment of patients with stage I small-cell lung cancer: a competing risk analysis.

Aim: Stage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a potentially curable disease that needs timely and multidisciplinary management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the probability of cause-specific mortality for patients with stage I SCLC. Material & methods: We identified patients in the SEER database and constructed a proportional subdistribution hazard model to evaluate cancer-specific mortality. A nomogram was built based on Fine and Gray competing risk regression model. Results: A total of 864 stage I SCLC patients were identified. The 5-year cumulative incidence of SCLC-specific mortality was 56.2%, while that for other causes of death was 17.3%. The c-index for the prognostic prediction model was 0.66. Besides, the nomogram was well calibrated. Conclusion: Our nomogram might serve as a reference for clinicians when evaluating the prognosis of stage I SCLC.

Camrelizumab (SHR-1210) alone or in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results from two single-arm, phase 1 trials.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy regimens, preferentially gemcitabine plus cisplatin, are generally considered the first-line standard of care for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, no consensus has been reached regarding treatment following progression after first-line therapy. Camrelizumab (SHR-1210) is a humanised anti-programmed death-1 (anti PD-1) antibody. We present safety and preliminary antitumour activity of camrelizumab alone as second-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line therapy in this patient population. METHODS: We report the results from two single-arm, phase 1 trials. Both trials included patients aged 18-70 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed nasopharyngeal carcinoma and confirmed metastatic disease or locoreginal recurrence, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients who received at least one previous line of treatment were enrolled at five academic hospitals in China into the dose-escalation and expansion trial to receive camrelizumab monotherapy intravenously at escalating doses of 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg, and a bridging dose of 200 mg per dose once every 2 weeks (monotherapy trial). Treatment-naive patients were enrolled from a single centre in China to receive six cycles of camrelizumab 200 mg (day 1), gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (days 1 and 8), and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) every 3 weeks followed by camrelizumab 200 mg maintenance once every 3 weeks (combination trial). The primary endpoint of both trials was the safety and tolerability of the study treatment. Analyses were done per protocol. Both trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02721589 (camrelizumab monotherapy trial) and NCT03121716 (camrelizumab combination trial). Both trials are ongoing, but are no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS: In the camrelizumab monotherapy trial, between March 31, 2016, and Sept 20, 2017, 121 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 93 patients were enrolled across the dose-escalation and expansion cohorts and received at least one dose of camrelizumab (safety population). 15 (16%) of 93 patients had treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4, the most common of which were elevated conjugated bilirubin concentration (three [3%] of 93 patients), stomatitis, anaemia, and increased concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin, each of which occurred in two (2%) patients. Eight (9%) patients had a treatment-related serious adverse event. No dose-limiting toxic effects were observed during the dose-escalation phase. 31 (34%; 95% CI 24-44) of 91 evaluable patients on camrelizumab monotherapy had an overall response with a median follow-up of 9·9 months (IQR 8·1-11·7). In the camrelizumab combination trial, between April 18, 2017, and Aug 15, 2017, 24 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 23 patients were enrolled and treated (safety population). 20 (87%) of 23 patients had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events: neutropenia (13 [57%] of 23 patients), anaemia (11 [48%] patients), leucopenia (11 [48%] patients), thrombocytopenia (seven [30%] patients), oedema (two [9%] patients), hyponatraemia (two [9%] patients), hypochloraemia (one [4%] patients), and rash (one [4%] patient). Two patients had treatment-related serious adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred in these trials. 20 (91% [95% CI 72-97]) of 22 evaluable patients had an overall response with a median follow-up time of 10·2 months (IQR 9·7-10·8). INTERPRETATION: Camrelizumab is a well tolerated, potential treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The combination of camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin has a manageable toxicity profile and promising preliminary antitumour activity for this disease in treatment-naive patients. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further establish the role of immune checkpoint inhibition for nasopharyngeal carcinomas. FUNDING: Hengrui Medicine Co, Chinese National Natural Science Foundation project, Science and Technology Program of Guangdong, Pearl River Nova Program of Guangzhou.

Impact of prior cancer history on the overall survival of patients newly diagnosed with cancer: A pan-cancer analysis of the SEER database.

The population of cancer survivors with prior cancer is rapidly growing. Whether a prior cancer diagnosis interferes with outcome is unknown. We conducted a pan-cancer analysis to determine the impact of prior cancer history for patients newly diagnosed with cancer. We identified 20 types of primary solid tumors between 2004 and 2008 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were compared by χ2 test and t-test as appropriate. The propensity score-adjusted Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of prior cancer on overall survival (OS). Among 1,557,663 eligible patients, 261,474 (16.79%) had a history of prior cancer. More than 65% of prior cancers were diagnosed within 5 years. We classified 20 cancer sites into two groups (PCI and PCS) according to the different impacts of prior cancer on OS. PCI patients with a prior cancer history, which involved the colon and rectum, bone and soft tissues, melanoma, breast, cervix uteri, corpus and uterus, prostate, urinary bladder, kidney and renal pelvis, eye and orbits, thyroid, had inferior OS. The PCS patients (nasopharynx, esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, lung, ovary and brain) with a prior cancer history showed similar OS to that of patients without prior cancer. Our pan-cancer study presents the landscape for the survival impact of prior cancer across 20 cancer types. Compared to the patients without prior cancer, the PCI group had inferior OS, while the PCS group had similar OS. Further studies are still needed.

Olanzapine-Based Triple Regimens Versus Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist-Based Triple Regimens in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The current antiemetic prophylaxis for patients treated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) included the olanzapine-based triplet and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs)-based triplet. However, which one shows better antiemetic effect remained unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed 43 trials, involving 16,609 patients with HEC, which compared the following antiemetics at therapeutic dose range for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: olanzapine, aprepitant, casopitant, fosaprepitant, netupitant, and rolapitant. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients who achieved no nausea, complete response (CR), and drug-related adverse events. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Olanzapine-based triple regimens showed significantly better no-nausea rate in overall phase and delayed phase than aprepitant-based triplet (odds ratios 3.18, 3.00, respectively), casopitant-based triplet (3.78, 4.12, respectively), fosaprepitant-based triplet (3.08, 4.10, respectively), rolapitant-based triplet (3.45, 3.20, respectively), and conventional duplex regimens (4.66, 4.38, respectively). CRs of olanzapine-based triplet were roughly equal to different NK-1RAs-based triplet but better than the conventional duplet. Moreover, no significant drug-related adverse events were observed in olanzapine-based triple regimens when compared with NK-1RAs-based triple regimens and duplex regimens. Additionally, the costs of olanzapine-based regimens were obviously much lower than the NK-1RA-based regimens. CONCLUSION: Olanzapine-based triplet stood out in terms of nausea control and drug price but represented no significant difference of CRs in comparison with NK-1RAs-based triplet. Olanzapine-based triple regimens should be an optional antiemetic choice for patients with HEC, especially those suffering from delayed phase nausea. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: According to the results of this study, olanzapine-based triple antiemetic regimens were superior in both overall and delayed-phase nausea control when compared with various neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists-based triple regimens in patients with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Olanzapine-based triplet was outstanding in terms of nausea control and drug price. For cancer patients with HEC, especially those suffering from delayed-phase nausea, olanzapine-based triple regimens should be an optional antiemetic choice.

p300 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion via inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Histone acetyltransferase p300 is a crucial transcriptional coactivator and has been implicated as a poor prognostic factor in human cancers. However, little is known about the substantial functions and mechanisms of p300 in NSCLC proliferation and distant metastasis. METHODS: We constructed p300 down-regulated and up-regulated cell lines through RNAi and recombinant plasmid transfection. Cell Counting Kit-8 assays were used to test the cell proliferation and confirmed by colony formation assays. Wound healing assays and transwell chamber assays were used to test the migration and invasion ability. Based upon these results, we measured the epithelial markers and mesenchymal markers after regulating p300 expression to explore epithelial-mesenchymal transition as a potential mechanism of p300 promoting NSCLC metastasis. RESULTS: In NSCLC cells NCI-H1975 and NCI-H1993, down-regulation of p300 leads to inhibition of cell proliferation and colony formation. Cells with reduced p300 expression also demonstrate inhibited migration and invasion ability. Contrarily, up-regulation of p300 significantly enhanced the proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion ability of NCI-H460. Importantly, further investigation shows that decreased p300 expression is associated with reduced expression of mesenchymal markers and increased expression of epithelial markers, while up-regulated p300 expression correlated with decreased expression of epithelial markers and increased expression of mesenchymal markers. CONCLUSIONS: As a crucial tumor promoter, p300 promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in NSCLC cells. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition is a potential mechanism of p300 promoting NSCLC metastasis.

Optimal prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

AIM: We compare neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK-1RA)-based triple regimen and conventional duplex regimen for antiemetic efficacy for patients with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Patients & methods: Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were used to evaluate the complete response and no significant nausea. The results were separately analyzed for pure MEC regimens, carboplatin-based regimens and oxaliplatin-based regimens. RESULTS: Ten trials focused on MEC involving 2928 cancer patients using NK-1RA triple regimens or conventional duplex regimen were included. NK-1RA-based triple regimen showed significant better complete responses in overall (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05-1.24), acute (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.04) and delayed (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04-1.23) phase compared with duplex regimen in patients with MEC. Similar results were found for no significant nausea. Subgroup analyses showed that triple regimen showed superior antiemetic efficacy significantly in patients with carboplatin-based chemotherapy, instead of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: NK-1RA is recommended to use in carboplatin-based chemotherapy, not oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes are poor for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and no well established first-line chemotherapy is available for the disease. We compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were recruited from 22 hospitals in China. Key inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ function, and measurable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either gemcitabine (1 g/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1), or fluorouracil (4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1 given intravenously) once every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The randomisation was done centrally via an interactive phone response system using block randomisation with a size of six. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by the independent image committee in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one cycle of study drug. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01528618. FINDINGS: Between Feb 20, 2012, and Oct 30, 2015, 362 patients were randomly assigned to a group (181 to the gemcitabine [plus cisplatin] group and 181 to the fluorouracil [plus cisplatin] group). Median follow-up time for progression-free survival was 19·4 months (IQR 12·1-35·6). The median progression-free survival was 7·0 months (4·4-10·9) in the gemcitabine group and 5·6 months (3·0-7·0) in the fluorouracil group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55 [95% CI 0·44-0·68]; p<0·0001). A total of 180 patients in the gemcitabine group and 173 patients in the fluorouracil group were included in the safety analysis. Significantly different treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the gemcitabine and fluorouracil groups were leucopenia (52 [29%] vs 15 [9%]; <0·0001), neutropenia (41 [23%] vs 23 [13%]; p=0·0251), thrombocytopenia (24 [13%] vs three [2%]; p=0·0007), and mucosal inflammation (0 vs 25 [14%]; <0·0001). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in seven (4%) patients in the gemcitabine group and ten (6%) in the fluorouracil group. Six (3%) patients in the gemcitabine group and 14 (8%) patients in the fluorouracil group discontinued treatment because of drug-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. INTERPRETATION: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin prolongs progression-free survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The results establish gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the standard first-line treatment option for this population. FUNDING: Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Programme, Chinese National Natural Science Foundation project (grant numbers 81372502 and 81201917), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 program numbers 2012AA02A501 and 2012AA02A502), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (grant number S2013010016564).

KRAS mutation-induced upregulation of PD-L1 mediates immune escape in human lung adenocarcinoma.

It was reported that PD-L1 expression was correlated with genetic alterations. Whether PD-L1 was regulated by mutant Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the underlying molecular mechanism were largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the correlation between PD-L1 expression and KRAS mutation and the functional significance of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. We found that PD-L1 expression was associated with KRAS mutation both in the human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines and tissues. PD-L1 was up-regulated by KRAS mutation through p-ERK but not p-AKT signaling. We also found that KRAS-mediated up-regulation of PD-L1 induced the apoptosis of CD3-positive T cells which was reversed by anti-PD-1 antibody (Pembrolizumab) or ERK inhibitor. PD-1 blocker or ERK inhibitor could recover the anti-tumor immunity of T cells and decrease the survival rates of KRAS-mutant NSCLC cells in co-culture system in vitro. However, Pembrolizumab combined with ERK inhibitor did not show synergistic effect on killing tumor cells in co-culture system. Our study demonstrated that KRAS mutation could induce PD-L1 expression through p-ERK signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may be a promising therapeutic strategy for human KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma.