Web-Based Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Well-being: Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness can improve overall well-being by training individuals to focus on the present moment without judging their thoughts. However, it is unknown how much mindfulness practice and training are necessary to improve well-being. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether a standard 8-session web-based mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program, compared with a brief 3-session mindfulness intervention, improved overall participant well-being. In addition, we sought to explore whether the treatment effects differed based on the baseline characteristics of the participants (ie, moderators). METHODS: Participants were recruited from 17 patient-powered research networks, web-based communities of stakeholders interested in a common research area. Participants were randomized to either a standard 8-session MBCT or a brief 3-session mindfulness training intervention accessed on the web. The participants were followed for 12 weeks. The primary outcome of the study was well-being, as measured by the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index. We hypothesized that MBCT would be superior to a brief mindfulness training. RESULTS: We randomized 4411 participants, 3873 (87.80%) of whom were White and 3547 (80.41%) of female sex assigned at birth. The mean baseline World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index score was 50.3 (SD 20.7). The average self-reported well-being in each group increased over the intervention period (baseline to 8 weeks; model-based slope for the MBCT group: 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, and brief mindfulness group: 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.91) as well as the full study period (ie, intervention plus follow-up; baseline to 20 weeks; model-based slope for MBCT group: 0.41, 95% CI 0.34-0.48; and brief mindfulness group: 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.40). Changes in self-reported well-being were not significantly different between MBCT and brief mindfulness during the intervention period (model-based difference in slopes: -0.02, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.19; P=.80) or during the intervention period plus 12-week follow-up (-0.08, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.02; P=.10). During the intervention period, younger participants (P=.05) and participants who completed a higher percentage of intervention sessions (P=.005) experienced greater improvements in well-being across both interventions, with effects that were stronger for participants in the MBCT condition. Attrition was high (ie, 2142/4411, 48.56%), which is an important limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Standard MBCT improved well-being but was not superior to a brief mindfulness intervention. This finding suggests that shorter mindfulness programs could yield important benefits across the general population of individuals with various medical conditions. Younger people and participants who completed more intervention sessions reported greater improvements in well-being, an effect that was more pronounced for participants in the MBCT condition. This finding suggests that standard MBCT may be a better choice for younger people as well as treatment-adherent individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03844321; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03844321.

Serum Epitope Repertoire Analysis Enables Early Detection of Lyme Disease with Improved Sensitivity in an Expandable Multiplex Format.

Widely employed diagnostic antibody serology for Lyme disease, known as standard two-tier testing (STTT), exhibits insufficient sensitivity in early Lyme disease, yielding many thousands of false-negative test results each year. Given this problem, we applied serum antibody repertoire analysis (SERA), or next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based serology, to discover IgG and IgM antibody epitope motifs capable of detecting Lyme disease-specific antibodies with high sensitivity and specificity. Iterative motif discovery and bioinformatic analysis of epitope repertoires from subjects with Lyme disease (n = 264) and controls (n = 391) yielded a set of 28 epitope motifs representing 20 distinct IgG antibody epitopes and a set of 38 epitope motifs representing 21 distinct IgM epitopes, which performed equivalently in a large validation cohort of STTT-positive samples. In a second validation set from subjects with clinically defined early Lyme disease (n = 119) and controls (n = 257), the SERA Lyme IgG and IgM assay exhibited significantly improved sensitivity relative to STTT (77% versus 62%; Z-test; P = 0.013) and improved specificity (99% versus 97%). Early Lyme disease subjects exhibited significantly fewer reactive epitopes (Mann-Whitney U test; P < 0.0001) relative to subjects with Lyme arthritis. Thus, SERA Lyme IgG and M panels provided increased accuracy in early Lyme disease in a readily expandable multiplex assay format.

The Lyme Disease Biobank: Characterization of 550 Patient and Control Samples from the East Coast and Upper Midwest of the United States.

Lyme disease (LD) is an increasing public health problem. Current laboratory testing is insensitive in early infection, the stage at which appropriate treatment is most effective in preventing disease sequelae. The Lyme Disease Biobank (LDB) collects samples from individuals with symptoms consistent with early LD presenting with or without erythema migrans (EM) or an annular, expanding skin lesion and uninfected individuals from areas of endemicity. Samples were collected from 550 participants (298 cases and 252 controls) according to institutional review board-approved protocols and shipped to a centralized biorepository. Testing was performed to confirm the presence of tick-borne pathogens by real-time PCR, and a subset of samples was tested for Borrelia burgdorferi by culture. Serology was performed on all samples using the CDC's standard two-tiered testing algorithm (STTTA) for LD. LD diagnosis was supported by laboratory testing in 82 cases, including positive results by use of the STTTA, PCR, or culture or positive results by two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for cases presenting with EM lesion sizes of >5 cm. The remaining 216 cases had negative laboratory testing results. For the controls, 43 were positive by at least one of the tiers and 6 were positive by use of the STTTA. The results obtained with this collection highlight and reinforce the known limitations of serologic testing in early LD, with only 29% of individuals presenting with EM lesion sizes of >5 cm yielding a positive result using the STTTA. Aliquots of whole blood, serum, and urine from clinically characterized patients with and without LD are available to investigators in academia and industry for evaluation or development of novel diagnostic assays for LD, to continue to improve upon currently available methods.

A Multiplexed Serologic Test for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease for Point-of-Care Use.

Single multiplexed assays could replace the standard 2-tiered (STT) algorithm recommended for the laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease if they perform with a specificity and a sensitivity superior or equal to those of the STT algorithm. We used human serum rigorously characterized to be sera from patients with acute- and convalescent-phase early Lyme disease, Lyme arthritis, and posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome, as well as the necessary controls (n = 241 samples), to select the best of 12 Borrelia burgdorferi proteins to improve our microfluidic assay (mChip-Ld). We then evaluated its serodiagnostic performance in comparison to that of a first-tier enzyme immunoassay and the STT algorithm. We observed that more antigens became positive as Lyme disease progressed from early to late stages. We selected three antigens (3Ag) to include in the mChip-Ld: VlsE and a proprietary synthetic 33-mer peptide (PepVF) to capture sensitivity in all disease stages and OspC for early Lyme disease. With the specificity set at 95%, the sensitivity of the mChip-Ld with 3Ag ranged from 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56% to 94%) and 85% (95% CI, 74% to 96%) for two panels of serum from patients with early Lyme disease and was 100% (95% CI, 83% to 100%) for serum from patients with Lyme arthritis; the STT algorithm detected early Lyme disease in the same two panels of serum from patients with early Lyme disease with a sensitivity of 48.5% and 75% and Lyme arthritis in serum from patients with Lyme arthritis with a sensitivity of 100%, and the specificity was 97.5% to 100%. The mChip-Ld platform outperformed the STT algorithm according to sensitivity. These results open the door for the development of a single, rapid, multiplexed diagnostic test for point-of-care use that can be designed to identify the Lyme disease stage.

Phelan-McDermid syndrome data network: Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical notes and curated genetic reports.

The heterogeneity of patient phenotype data are an impediment to the research into the origins and progression of neuropsychiatric disorders. This difficulty is compounded in the case of rare disorders such as Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) by the paucity of patient clinical data. PMS is a rare syndromic genetic cause of autism and intellectual deficiency. In this paper, we describe the Phelan-McDermid Syndrome Data Network (PMS_DN), a platform that facilitates research into phenotype-genotype correlation and progression of PMS by: a) integrating knowledge of patient phenotypes extracted from Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) data and clinical notes-two heterogeneous, underutilized sources of knowledge about patient phenotypes-with curated genetic information from the same patient cohort and b) making this integrated knowledge, along with a suite of statistical tools, available free of charge to authorized investigators on a Web portal https://pmsdn.hms.harvard.edu. PMS_DN is a Patient Centric Outcomes Research Initiative (PCORI) where patients and their families are involved in all aspects of the management of patient data in driving research into PMS. To foster collaborative research, PMS_DN also makes patient aggregates from this knowledge available to authorized investigators using distributed research networks such as the PCORnet PopMedNet. PMS_DN is hosted on a scalable cloud based environment and complies with all patient data privacy regulations. As of October 31, 2016, PMS_DN integrates high-quality knowledge extracted from the clinical notes of 112 patients and curated genetic reports of 176 patients with preprocessed PRO data from 415 patients.

Host glycosylation of immunoglobulins impairs the immune response to acute Lyme disease.

BACKGROUND: Lyme disease is caused by the bacteria Borreliella burgdorferi sensu lato (Bb) transmitted to humans from the bite of an infected Ixodes tick. Current diagnostics for Lyme disease are insensitive at the early disease stage and they cannot differentiate between active infections and people with a recent history of antibiotic-treated Lyme disease. METHODS: Machine learning technology was utilized to improve the prediction of acute Lyme disease and identify sialic acid and galactose sugar structures (N-glycans) on immunoglobulins associated specifically at time points during acute Lyme disease time. A plate-based approach was developed to analyze sialylated N-glycans associated with anti-Bb immunoglobulins. This multiplexed approach quantitates the abundance of Bb-specific IgG and the associated sialic acid, yielding an accuracy of 90% in a powered study. FINDINGS: It was demonstrated that immunoglobulin sialic acid levels increase during acute Lyme disease and following antibiotic therapy and a 3-month convalescence, the sialic acid level returned to that found in healthy control subjects (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the abundance of sialic acid on Bb-specific IgG during acute Lyme disease impaired the host's ability to combat Lyme disease via lymphocytic receptor FcγRIIIa signaling. After enzymatically removing the sialic acid present on Bb-specific antibodies, the induction of cytotoxicity from acute Lyme disease patient antigen-specific IgG was significantly improved. INTERPRETATION: Taken together, Bb-specific immunoglobulins contain increased sialylation which impairs the host immune response during acute Lyme disease. Furthermore, this Bb-specific immunoglobulin sialyation found in acute Lyme disease begins to resolve following antibiotic therapy and convalescence. FUNDING: Funding for this study was provided by the Coulter-Drexel Translational Research Partnership Program as well as from a Faculty Development Award from the Drexel University College of Medicine Institute for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Disease and the Department of Microbiology and Immunology.

Late-stage borreliosis and substance abuse.

Background: Infectious diseases can contribute to substance abuse. Here, a fatal case of borreliosis and substance abuse is reported. This patient had a history of multiple tick bites and increasing multisystem symptoms, yet diagnosis and treatment were delayed. He experimented with multiple substances including phencyclidine (PCP), an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that opposes NMDA agonism caused by Borrelia infection. During PCP withdrawal, he committed one homicide, two assaults, and suicide. Methods: Brain tissue was obtained from autopsy and stained for microglial activation and quinolinic acid (QA). Immunoflouresence (IFA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to identify the presence of pathogens in autopsy tissue. Results: Autopsy tissue evaluation demonstrated Borrelia in the pancreas by IFA and heart by IFA and FISH. Activated microglia and QA were found in the brain, indicating neuroinflammation. It is postulated that PCP withdrawal may exacerbate symptoms produced by Borrelia-induced biochemical imbalances in the brain. This combination may have greatly increased his acute homicidal and suicidal risk. Patient databases also demonstrated the risk of homicide or suicide in patients diagnosed with borreliosis and confirmed multiple symptoms in these patients, including chronic pain, anxiety, and anhedonia. Conclusions: Late-stage borreliosis is associated with multiple symptoms that may contribute to an increased risk of substance abuse and addictive disorders. More effective diagnosis and treatment of borreliosis, and attention to substance abuse potential may help reduce associated morbidity and mortality in patients with borreliosis, particularly in endemic areas.

A Set of Diagnostic Tests for Detection of Active Babesia duncani Infection.

Human babesiosis is a rapidly emerging and potentially fatal tick-borne disease caused by intraerythrocytic apicomplexan parasites of the Babesia genus. Among the various species of Babesia that infect humans, B. duncani has been found to cause severe and life-threatening infections. Detection of active B. duncani infection is critical for accurate diagnosis and effective management of the disease. While molecular assays for the detection of B. duncani infection in blood are available, a reliable strategy to detect biomarkers of active infection has not yet been developed. Here, we report the development of the first B. duncani antigen capture assays that rely on the detection of two B. duncani -exported immunodominant antigens, BdV234 and BdV38. The assays were validated using blood samples from cultured parasites in human erythrocytes and B. duncani -infected laboratory mice at different parasitemia levels and following therapy. The assays display high specificity with no cross-reactivity with B. microti , B. divergens , Babesia MO1, or P. falciparum. The assay also demonstrates high sensitivity, detecting as low as 115 infected erythrocytes/µl of blood. Screening of 1,731 blood samples from diverse biorepositories, including previously identified Lyme and/or B. microti positive human samples and new specimens from field mice, showed no evidence of B. duncani infection in these samples. The assays could be useful in diverse diagnostic scenarios, including point-of-care testing for early B. duncani infection detection in patients, field tests for screening reservoir hosts, and high-throughput screening such as blood collected for transfusion. Short summary: We developed two ELISA-based assays, BdACA38 and BdACA234, for detecting B. duncani , a potentially fatal tick-borne parasite causing human babesiosis. The assays target two immunodominant antigens, BdV234 and BdV38, demonstrating high specificity (no cross-reactivity with other Babesia species or Plasmodium falciparum ) and sensitivity (detecting as low as 115 infected erythrocytes/µl). The assays were validated using in vitro-cultured parasites and infected mice. Screening diverse blood samples showed no evidence of B. duncani active infection among 1,731 human and field mice blood samples collected from the north-eastern, midwestern, and western US. These assays offer potential in diverse diagnostic scenarios, including early patient detection, reservoir animal screening, and transfusion-transmitted babesiosis prevention.

Single-tier point-of-care serodiagnosis of Lyme disease.

Point-of-care (POC) serological testing provides actionable information for several difficult to diagnose illnesses, empowering distributed health systems. Accessible and adaptable diagnostic platforms that can assay the repertoire of antibodies formed against pathogens are essential to drive early detection and improve patient outcomes. Here, we report a POC serologic test for Lyme disease (LD), leveraging synthetic peptides tuned to be highly specific to the LD antibody repertoire across patients and compatible with a paper-based platform for rapid, reliable, and cost-effective diagnosis. A subset of antigenic epitopes conserved across Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies and targeted by IgG and IgM antibodies, were selected based on their seroreactivity to develop a multiplexed panel for a single-step measurement of combined IgM and IgG antibodies from LD patient sera. Multiple peptide epitopes, when combined synergistically using a machine learning-based diagnostic model, yielded a high sensitivity without any loss in specificity. We blindly tested the platform with samples from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) LD repository and achieved a sensitivity and specificity matching the lab-based two-tier results with a single POC test, correctly discriminating cross-reactive look-alike diseases. This computational LD diagnostic test can potentially replace the cumbersome two-tier testing paradigm, improving diagnosis and enabling earlier effective treatment of LD patients while also facilitating immune monitoring and surveillance of the disease in the community.

How disease advocacy organizations participate in clinical research: a survey of genetic organizations.

PURPOSE: Disease advocacy organizations may assist in the conduct of research in a variety of ways. We sought to characterize how disease advocacy organizations participate in clinical research and perceive their contributions. METHODS: Postal and electronic surveys administered to leaders of disease advocacy organizations for genetic conditions identified through the Genetic Alliance's Disease InfoSearch. RESULTS: Of the 201 disease advocacy organizations approached, 124 (62%) responded. In the past 2 years, 91% of these organizations had assisted in participant recruitment, 75% collected data, 60% provided a researcher with financial support, and 56% assisted with study design. Forty-five percent of these organizations also supported a research registry or biobank. Few disease advocacy organization leaders (12%) reported regrets about research studies they had supported. Most (68%) felt their involvement in clinical research had increased the amount of research on their condition and that researchers should consult organizations like theirs in deciding how to recruit participants (58%) and in selecting research topics (56%). CONCLUSION: In addition to providing financial support, disease advocacy organizations participate directly in multiple aspects of research, ranging from study design and patient recruitment to data collection and analysis. Leaders of these organizations feel strongly that scientists and research sponsors should engage them as partners in the conduct of clinical research.

The Spectrum of Erythema Migrans in Early Lyme Disease: Can We Improve Its Recognition?

Background and objective Diagnosis of early Lyme disease (LD) often relies on clinical recognition of the skin lesion, erythema migrans (EM), a diagnostic sign of disease when laboratory testing is insensitive. Because EM can present in morphologically distinct forms, its recognition by clinicians can be challenging. This study aimed to characterize the clinical spectrum of lesions in patients presenting with suspected early LD in an ambulatory care setting to identify features that might help clinicians to be better prepared to recognize EM lesions. Methods Images of lesions from 69 participants suspected to have early LD were retrospectively evaluated by a dermatologist and a family practitioner with expertise in early LD. Reviewers made determinations on the diagnoses and morphological features of lesions. Agreement between reviewers and associations among lesion types and participant demographics, symptomology, and laboratory evidence of infection were examined using the kappa statistic and contingency tables, respectively. Results Challenges in diagnosing EM were evident in our study: initial concordance between reviewers was moderate [kappa statistic (95% CI): 0.45 (0.245 - 0.657)]. The final classification included 35 lesions (51%) that were agreed to be EM; 23 lesions (30%) were considered to be possible early EM or tick bite reactions, and 11 (16%) were thought not to be EM, but rather other diagnoses, including ringworm, allergic contact dermatitis, and mosquito bites. Only two lesions (6%) were observed with a classic bull's eye or ring-within-a-ring pattern. Most EM lesions were uniform (51%), pink (74%), oval lesions (63%), with well-demarcated borders (92%). Early EM or tick bite reactions were typically <5 cm in size (74%), red (52%), round lesions (61%), with a punctum present (100%). Lesions thought not to be EM also tended to be pink or red (64%), round (55%), or uniform (45%) lesions, but also had raised (25%) or irregular borders (33%), which were not commonly observed in the reviewer-classified EM or tick bite reaction lesions. Participants with lesions classified as EM reported that they had the lesions for more days (p = 0.043) and reported more symptoms (p = 0.017) than participants with other lesions. Only 14 (20%) participants overall had positive laboratory evidence for LD; these included 13 (37%) of the participants with EM-classified lesions. Conclusions EM commonly occurs in forms that are not the classic bull's eye. Patients often present with lesions that may represent the very early stage of EM or tick bite reactions, and most patients will test negative on currently available laboratory tests, challenging clinicians in making an LD diagnosis or treatment decisions. Additional studies to further characterize the morphological features of EM and how variation in skin lesions may be perceived among clinicians would be helpful for developing guidelines on improving clinician recognition of EM.

Capture Sequencing Enables Sensitive Detection of Tick-Borne Agents in Human Blood.

Assay sensitivity can be a limiting factor in the use of PCR as a tool for the detection of tick-borne pathogens in blood. We evaluated the performance of Tick-borne disease Capture Sequencing Assay (TBDCapSeq), a capture sequencing assay targeting tick-borne agents, to test 158 whole blood specimens obtained from the Lyme Disease Biobank. These included samples from 98 individuals with signs and symptoms of acute Lyme disease, 25 healthy individuals residing in Lyme disease endemic areas, and 35 samples collected from patients admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital or referred to the infectious disease clinic. Compared to PCR, TBDCapSeq had better sensitivity and could identify infections with a wider range of tick-borne agents. TBDCapSeq identified a higher rate of samples positive for Borrelia burgdorferi (8 vs. 1 by PCR) and Babesia microti (26 vs. 15 by PCR). TBDCapSeq also identified previously unknown infections with Borrelia miyamotoi, Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia species. Overall, TBDCapSeq identified a pathogen in 43 samples vs. 23 using PCR, with four co-infections detected versus zero by PCR. We conclude that capture sequencing enables superior detection of tick-borne agents relative to PCR.

Testing Raman spectroscopy as a diagnostic approach for Lyme disease patients.

Lyme disease (LD), the leading tick-borne disease in the Northern hemisphere, is caused by spirochetes of several genospecies of the Borreliella burgdorferi sensu lato complex. LD is a multi-systemic and highly debilitating illness that is notoriously challenging to diagnose. The main drawbacks of the two-tiered serology, the only approved diagnostic test in the United States, include poor sensitivity, background seropositivity, and cross-reactivity. Recently, Raman spectroscopy (RS) was examined for its LD diagnostic utility by our earlier proof-of-concept study. The previous investigation analyzed the blood from mice that were infected with 297 and B31 strains of Borreliella burgdorferi sensu stricto (s.s.). The selected strains represented two out of the three major clades of B. burgdorferi s.s. isolates found in the United States. The obtained results were encouraging and prompted us to further investigate the RS diagnostic capacity for LD in this study. The present investigation has analyzed blood of mice infected with European genospecies, Borreliella afzelii or Borreliella garinii, or B. burgdorferi N40, a strain of the third major class of B. burgdorferi s.s. in the United States. Moreover, 90 human serum samples that originated from LD-confirmed, LD-negative, and LD-probable human patients were also analyzed by RS. The overall results demonstrated that blood samples from Borreliella-infected mice were identified with 96% accuracy, 94% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. Furthermore, human blood samples were analyzed with 88% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 90% specificity. Together, the current data indicate that RS should be further explored as a potential diagnostic test for LD patients.

Recent Progress in Lyme Disease and Remaining Challenges.

Lyme disease (also known as Lyme borreliosis) is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States with an estimated 476,000 cases per year. While historically, the long-term impact of Lyme disease on patients has been controversial, mounting evidence supports the idea that a substantial number of patients experience persistent symptoms following treatment. The research community has largely lacked the necessary funding to properly advance the scientific and clinical understanding of the disease, or to develop and evaluate innovative approaches for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Given the many outstanding questions raised into the diagnosis, clinical presentation and treatment of Lyme disease, and the underlying molecular mechanisms that trigger persistent disease, there is an urgent need for more support. This review article summarizes progress over the past 5 years in our understanding of Lyme and tick-borne diseases in the United States and highlights remaining challenges.

Point-of-Care Serodiagnostic Test for Early-Stage Lyme Disease Using a Multiplexed Paper-Based Immunoassay and Machine Learning.

Caused by the tick-borne spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, Lyme disease (LD) is the most common vector-borne infectious disease in North America and Europe. Though timely diagnosis and treatment are effective in preventing disease progression, current tests are insensitive in early stage LD, with a sensitivity of <50%. Additionally, the serological testing currently recommended by the U.S. Center for Disease Control has high costs (>$400/test) and extended sample-to-answer timelines (>24 h). To address these challenges, we created a cost-effective and rapid point-of-care (POC) test for early-stage LD that assays for antibodies specific to seven Borrelia antigens and a synthetic peptide in a paper-based multiplexed vertical flow assay (xVFA). We trained a deep-learning-based diagnostic algorithm to select an optimal subset of antigen/peptide targets and then blindly tested our xVFA using human samples (N(+) = 42, N(-) = 54), achieving an area-under-the-curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.950, 90.5%, and 87.0%, respectively, outperforming previous LD POC tests. With batch-specific standardization and threshold tuning, the specificity of our blind-testing performance improved to 96.3%, with an AUC and sensitivity of 0.963 and 85.7%, respectively.

Psoriatic arthritis is a strong predictor of sleep interference in patients with psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine what clinical features of psoriasis predict sleep interference. METHODS: Data were obtained from 420 respondents to the 2005 National Psoriasis Foundation telephone and e-mail surveys. Logistic regression was used to determine whether disease severity, body mass index, age of onset, psoriatic arthritis, income, ethnicity, sex, current therapy, and quality-of-life measures predicted reported sleep interference within the last month. RESULTS: Psoriatic arthritis was the most significant predictor of sleep disturbance (odds ratio = 3.26). Itch, pain of lesions, and impact on emotional well-being were also significant predictors (odds ratio 1.26, 1.22, and 1.18, respectively). Body surface area covered with psoriasis, body mass index, and therapy were not significant predictors of sleep interference. LIMITATIONS: All data were self-reported and not physician-assessed. CONCLUSIONS: History of psoriatic arthritis, presence of itch and pain of psoriatic lesions, and impact of psoriasis on overall emotional well-being predict sleep interference.

Treatment of intertriginous psoriasis: from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: Involvement of areas of the skin fold is common in patients with psoriasis although the exact incidence is unknown. This report summarizes studies regarding the therapy of intertriginous psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options. Our aim was to arrive at a consensus on therapy for intertriginous or inverse psoriasis. METHODS: Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding psoriasis affecting the skin-fold areas and its therapy. LIMITATIONS: There are few evidence-based studies on the treatment of intertriginous psoriasis. RESULTS: The recommended short-term (2-4 weeks) therapy for inverse psoriasis is low- to mid-potency topical steroids. For long-term therapy, topical calcipotriene (calcipotriol) or one of the immunomodulating agents, pimecrolimus or tacrolimus, is favored. CONCLUSIONS: Low- to mid-potency topical steroids are recommended as first-line, short-term treatment. It is recommended that their use should either be of limited duration (less than 2-4 weeks) or that the lowest effective strength be used intermittently for long-term care to minimize the potential for risks. Calcipotriene (calcipotriol), pimecrolimus, and tacrolimus, while not as highly efficacious as topical steroids, are associated with fewer long-term risks and are therefore recommended for long-term therapy when feasible.

A series of critically challenging case scenarios in moderate to severe psoriasis: a Delphi consensus approach.

Clinical trials for systemic psoriasis therapy typically enroll healthy patients and exclude patients with cardiovascular disease, latent tuberculosis, liver disease, histories of malignancies, viral infections, children, and pregnant or breast-feeding women. Physicians often require guidance for optimum management of severe psoriasis in patients that have a combination of underlying disease states. To provide treatment recommendations for complex psoriasis scenarios, a consensus panel comprising 15 experts in psoriatic disease convened to review and discuss available evidence-based data and to arrive at a consensus for treatment options of difficult cases. An application of the Delphi Method was used to select case scenarios, provide medical treatment options, present the case study with existing medical evidence, and anonymously vote on treatment options. The top 10 treatment options were ranked and statistically analyzed to compare the differences between treatments. The final rankings and analysis provide guidance for practical, safe, and efficacious treatment options in a number of complex psoriasis scenarios.

Quality of life and treatment satisfaction among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and patients with psoriasis only : results of the 2005 Spring US National Psoriasis Foundation Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Five to forty percent of patients with cutaneous psoriasis develop an inflammatory, oligoarticular spondyloarthropathy known as psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To compare health-related quality of life (QOL) between cutaneous psoriatic patients with and without psoriatic arthritis. METHOD: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from the 2005 Spring US National Psoriasis Foundation Quality of Life Telephone/Internet Survey. 426 patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis were included in the 2005 survey. Among these respondents, the self-reported disease histories of 140 patients with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were compared with those of 278 patients with cutaneous psoriasis only. Both groups were compared with respect to demographics, skin disease severity, treatment history and satisfaction, and QOL using previously validated assessment scales. RESULTS: Compared with those with skin psoriasis only, respondents with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were slightly older, more likely to be female and members of the National Psoriasis Foundation, and more likely to report a younger age of disease onset. They were also more likely to be unemployed, to report their job was affected by their condition, and to report a higher mean estimate of lost annual wages. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, however, no significant differences between groups were detected in skin disease severity, overall QOL, and satisfaction with current treatment options. At the same time, individuals with skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were more likely to be taking systemic agents. They also reported higher mean scores for pain, while those with cutaneous psoriasis reported higher mean scores for self-consciousness only. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous reports that did not control for skin disease severity, this study demonstrates that patients with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis do not report significantly worse health-related QOL compared with patients with cutaneous psoriasis only. Nor do they report significantly greater dissatisfaction with current treatment options. These findings may reflect the intrinsic inadequacy of the QOL instruments used in this study for capturing the additional burden of joint disease. Alternatively, these findings may reflect the existence of a threshold of joint disease in patients with skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis below which joint symptoms are perceived as negligible relative to cutaneous disease.

Psoriasis treatment patterns: results of a cross-sectional survey of dermatologists.

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated community physician prescribing patterns for patients with psoriasis. METHODS: US dermatologists actively practicing general dermatology and treating 10 or more patients with psoriasis/mo were interviewed (n = 90) in April and June 2006 and they recruited 8 to 10 consecutive patients for record review (n = 895, mean age = 46 years, 51% men). Proportion of patients treated with systemic, biologic, or topical therapy as reported by the dermatologist and recorded in the records was assessed by psoriasis severity. RESULTS: Among patients with severe psoriasis (body surface area affected > 10%), 56% to 63% received systemic therapy (including biologics) or phototherapy and 37% to 44% received topical therapy only. Dermatologists reported prescribing biologics to 41% of patients with severe disease compared with patient records where 27% to 34% of body surface area = 11% to 40% and 36% of body surface area greater than 40% patients received biologics. LIMITATIONS: Because of the small sample, eligibility criteria, and voluntary interview, selection bias may have occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Some dermatologists are prescribing systemic therapy for the majority of their patients with severe psoriasis but a gap in treatment remains for about 40% who received topical therapy alone.