Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Haematologica ; 91(1): 141-2, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16434386

RESUMO

We report an analysis of the value of a second high-dose melphalan autograft, performed at relapse, on a series of newly diagnosed myeloma patients entered into the high-dose program at our center. We conclude that relapse-free survival after the first autograft is a major prognostic factor in determining outcome.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Recidiva , Terapia de Salvação , Transplante Autólogo
2.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 47(11): 2335-8, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17107906

RESUMO

A retrospective case-matched study was conducted to compare the oral regimen CTD (cyclophosphamide - thalidomide - dexamethasone) and infusional CVAMP (cyclophosphamide - vincristine - doxorubicin - methylprednisolone) as induction therapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. The response rate after three cycles of treatment was statistically higher with CTD (n = 27) compared to CVAMP (n = 27) (89% vs. 56%, P = 0.016). Toxicity studies showed more neutropenia (grade 3/4) (4% vs. 60%, P = 0.0002) with CVAMP and more thrombotic episodes with CTD (11% vs. 4%). CTD may emerge as the superior induction regimen prior to PBSCT, in terms of high efficacy and better tolerability.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/cirurgia , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Transplante Autólogo , Vincristina/efeitos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapêutico
3.
Hematology ; 12(2): 113-5, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17454191

RESUMO

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether adequate stem cells (CD34+) could be harvested at presentation in myeloma patients such that high dose melphalan (HDM) with autologous stem cell rescue can be offered as primary therapy. The regimes either involved no prior cytoreductive chemotherapy (steroids only, n = 31) or a single course of VAD (n = 22). The median number of CD34 cells collected with steroids was 1.3 x 10(6) (0.2-5.6) compared to 4.6 x 10(6) (0.3-19.2) cells/kg with VAD (P < 0.0001). We conclude that it is possible to collect stem cells from myeloma patients at presentation with minimal prior therapy. Using this strategy, of a single prior course of chemotherapy followed by immediate harvest, it is feasible to offer early high-dose therapy in clinical situations where this is important.


Assuntos
Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/sangue , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Células Sanguíneas , Ciclofosfamida/farmacologia , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Filgrastim , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/farmacologia , Humanos , Lenograstim , Leucaférese , Masculino , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Metilprednisolona/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/cirurgia , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacologia , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Tempo , Vincristina/administração & dosagem
4.
Hematology ; 10(5): 361-4, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16203605

RESUMO

If standard infusional therapy (IC) has been used to treat myeloma at presentation, it is a matter of debate whether patients should receive the original induction therapy or a different drug combination in first relapse. Instinctively, most clinicians may switch treatment, particularly since the advent of new drugs for the treatment of myeloma. Hitherto, there has been no data on the efficacy of repeating standard IC in the salvage setting. We studied 62 myeloma patients whose initial treatment consisted of C-VAMP and a single high dose melphalan procedure and who were retreated with C-VAMP at the time of first relapse. Response to salvage C-VAMP was seen in 50% (95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.62) but we were unable to identify any predictors for response to salvage C-VAMP. Only patients resistant to salvage C-VAMP benefited from a second autograft. The survival of patients who responded to salvage C-VAMP was not prolonged by a second transplant. In conclusion, our data supports the use of C-VAMP for patients with myeloma in first relapse and suggest that only patients resistant to salvage C-VAMP should be offered a second autograft.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Terapia de Salvação , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Transplante Autólogo , Vincristina/administração & dosagem
5.
Br J Haematol ; 129(5): 607-14, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15916682

RESUMO

Induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM) is the standard treatment for fitter patients with myeloma. The place of bortezomib and the thalidomide analogues within this treatment paradigm is yet to be established. We sought to identify patients who may benefit from the introduction of novel agents during their initial management. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed on 383 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma eligible for HDM to determine whether the extent of response to induction therapy and HDM correlated with long-term survival. Early response [complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)] to induction therapy was predictive of overall survival (OS) [median OS, 7.47 years for responders (CR and PR) versus 4.89 years for non-responders; P = 0.035]. The attainment of CR at 3 months post-HDM correlated with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS, 7.4 years in CR group versus 5.3 years in non-CR group; P = 0.023). This data suggests that, at every stage of treatment, the aim should be to achieve CR. Patients with suboptimal responses could be offered alternative therapy. We propose a multiparametric risk-adapted model that includes response to induction chemotherapy and HDM, for identifying patients who may benefit from novel approaches to treatment.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Medula Óssea , Esquema de Medicação , Seguimentos , Humanos , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Indução de Remissão , Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA